Miller is presidential material. Clear thinking must take priority over leftist machinations:
There’s a comforting idea behind a lot of immigration policy: that crossing a border is basically a reset button. New country, new rules, new identity, the slate wipes clean.
It doesn’t work that way, and pretending it does isn’t compassion, it’s wishful thinking. People bring their whole selves with them, their trust in institutions, their attitudes toward law and violence, their expectations about how society should work.
Sometimes that changes over a generation of real integration. Sometimes, at large enough numbers with no real assimilation, it doesn’t change much at all, and the same patterns just take root somewhere new.
That’s why assimilation can’t be optional. Welcoming people in without asking anything of them in return isn’t generosity, it’s abdication. A country has every right to say: you’re welcome here, and in exchange, you learn the language, you respect the laws, you adopt the basic values that hold this place together.
Mr Both Douk Deng (pictured, right) broke into Britain illegally & was given housing.
He was caught trying to break into a primary school, armed with a hammer, a hatchet, a knife, and a can of petrol.
He doesn’t speak English & left a wife & child in Sudan.
According to her logic, happy whites make blacks unhappy, so whites should give money to blacks as compensation. What is your response? pic.twitter.com/iqAFieMKjq
Pauline Hanson “racially discriminated against a Muslim senator” in a 2022 tweet by telling her to return to Pakistan, a court has ruled, upholding an earlier decision.
The One Nation party leader had appealed a 2024 ruling that found she had breached the Racial Discrimination Act when she responded to a post by Senator Mehreen Faruqi with an “angry personal attack” that was described as “anti-Muslim”.
Hanson had argued in the Federal Court that political communication should be protected, but Justice Melissa Perry dismissed her appeal on Monday.
“Today’s win is for every single person who has been made to feel that their belonging in this country is conditional,” Faruqi said outside court.
“This case was always about holding to account racism and holding to account those who perpetrate racism,” she added. “Hate speech is not free speech.”
On the day Queen Elizabeth II died in September 2022, Faruqi offered condolences to those mourning the Queen in a social media post. However, she added: “I cannot mourn the leader of a racist empire built on stolen lives, land and wealth of colonised people.”
Hanson responded with a post that Judge Angus Stewart described in 2024 as “a variant of the slogan, ‘go back to where you came from’”.
The phrase was “a racist trope with a long history” and “implicitly” targeted Muslims, he said.
He ordered Hanson to delete the tweet and pay Faruqi’s legal costs.
Faruqi, the deputy leader of the Greens, took Hanson to court after the tweet was posted, arguing that it breached the Racial Discrimination Act.
She argued that the post was reasonably likely to offend, insult, humiliate or intimidate another person or group and was made because of her race, colour, or national or ethnic origin.
Hanson has previously advocated for a “Muslim ban” on immigration and earlier this year attracted criticism for an interview in which she suggested there were no “good” Muslims.
Does that mean she was illegal in Italy but still managed to come to Australia?
Now she bitches that illegals don’t get the red carpet treatment in Australia either?
.
A Muslim woman in America is very angry because the maintenance staff at her workplace keep throwing away all the empty plastic bottles that she hides in the bathroom.
“Muslims use those bottles to fill it up and clean our ass after going to the bathroom.” Any advice for her? pic.twitter.com/v86IZwlq0G
Australians have never held a direct referendum or national vote specifically authorising the UN (or any supranational body) to override Australia’s Constitution, Parliament, or democratic self-government.
Australia joined the UN as a founding member in 1945 under the Chifley government, with broad bipartisan support at the time for post-WWII international cooperation — but that was parliamentary action, not a popular vote.
Muslims all over Europe are freaking out after Sweden made a historic and courageous decision:
Sweden will no longer use the term “Islamophobia,” coined by the Muslim Brotherhood, because it is a politically manipulated concept aimed at silencing criticism of Islam. Swedish Foreign Minister Maria Malmer Stenergard announced that her government will push the European Union and the United Nations to stop using this fraudulent term.
Australia:
I draw attention to the fact that the Albanese government HAS enshrined in LAW, the Digital ID system, that clearly We The Australian People DID NOT WANT. (people worldwide dont want it)
.
* I draw attention to the fact that is seems it was done “silently”.
.
* A DEEP DEEP CONCERN IS, every PRIVACY has now potentially been removed from EVERY AUSTRALIAN. Everything we buy. Everywhere we go, everything we say, ALL MONITORED.
.
The DIGITAL ID SYSTEM IS NOW LAW IN AUSTRALIA. LAW!
Australia was fortunate amid the horrifying events of December 14, 2025, when two Islamic jihadis opened fire on a Hanukkah celebration at Sydney’s Bondi Beach, murdering fifteen people and injuring forty others.
For by then, Australia’s Special Envoy to Combat Islamophobia, Aftab Malik, had been on the job for over a year, and so was able to act swiftly and decisively to ensure that there was no really serious fallout from the attack, such as Australians beginning to get the idea that Islam wasn’t quite as wonderful as the far, far-left government of Anthony Albanese would have them believe.
More recently, Malik has recently been trying to ensure that no one Down Under ever again expresses a negative view of Islam. He hasn’t been successful so far, but just as sure as death and taxes, he will keep trying.
Australians are being deceived by a ruthless, criminal gov’t that is complicit in advancing the global jihad by all & any means. Reimporting jihadists who have denounced their Australian citizenship is a disgrace. It is an insult to every red-blooded Australian. Treason on this level must never be forgotten. Justice must be served.
If you are a Muslim and you call your son Tariq. You really should not be surprised if he grows up to join Jihad.
“Tariq ibn Ziyad is widely celebrated as one of the most successful and impactful Muslim military commanders in history. He launched the 711 CE conquest of the Iberian Peninsula (modern-day Spain and Portugal)” that resulted in a 700year occupation ….
Australians have made it abundantly clear: we do not want former ISIS fighters or their spouses returning to our country.
When ISIS fighter Tareq Kamleh was reportedly discovered alive almost a decade after he was declared dead, Federal Environment Minister Murray Watt said:
“We won’t be providing assistance, just as we haven’t provided assistance to others to come back.”
And “we’ve made clear for some time now that we won’t be providing any assistance as a government to anyone who’s made the absolutely awful decision to join a foreign terrorist organisation.”
When Australia’s Special Envoy to Combat Antisemitism Jillian Segal recommended adopting the IHRA definition of antisemitism in July 2025, the backlash arrived within days. The Jewish Council of Australia argued that Segal’s plan entrenches a selective approach to racism that serves political agendas. UN Special Rapporteur Ben Saul and Greens Senator David Shoebridge said the definition’s broad framing conflates legitimate criticism of Israeli government policy with antisemitism itself.
Amnesty International warned that the plan risks weaponizing criticism of Israel to silence protest. We’ve discussed how meritless these arguments are – the IHRA definition explicitly allows criticism of Israel that is similar to criticism of any other country – but that doesn’t stop the IHRA foes from making up their arguments.
Even if the IHRA definition is vague in parts – and it is – it is at least a definition that can be argued about. It provides a basis for discussion.
But how can one discuss Islamophobia without defining it?
Weasel words from the Labor government as they push affordable housing further out of reach for everyday Aussies through unprecedented levels of mass migration. Albo’s approach to the affordable housing crisis is like pouring water into a bucket full of holes.
The journaille is the lowest form of life on the planet:
Pauline Hanson has snapped at a journalist after he suggested her immigration stance was a “version of a White Australia policy” in a heated interview during a ticketed lunch event.https://t.co/IFIemWwir9
Nothing “Islamophobia Envoy Aftab Malik” recommends will improve community safety.
“Extra cultural training” adds insult to injury.
It is for dumbing down people who need to learn about the vile ideology of islam that must be confronted & fought, not coddled and mollified.
We don’t need “extra cultural training” for this. We need them gone!
Anthony Albanese is set to blow millions of taxpayers’ dollars on “establishing an Islamophobia Education Taskforce” and “supporting Muslim communities through new multicultural grants.”
— Craig Kelly:🇦🇺Foundation for Economic Education (@craigkellyAFEE) July 21, 2026
Italy’s Prime Minister deported an imam after he defended the marriage of nine-year-old girls on national television.
Reform UK’s London mayoral candidate Laila Cunningham says Britain should take an equally tough approach, arguing that anyone who advocates child marriage is a… pic.twitter.com/VY4pbBnaXC
After two Islamic terrorists murdered 15 Jews in Bondi celebrating Chanukah, this decrepit gov’t went to any length to protect Islam, to deep six a Royal Commission rather than allow establishing a connection between Jew-hatred & Islamic terrorism. To employ an Islamic “envoy” is an insult on every Australian taxpayer. But here we are, suffering insult after injury:
Aftab Malik, a United Nations Alliance of Civilisations “Global Expert” on Muslim affairs, has been named as the government’s Islamophobia envoy.
Australia’s “Islamophobia” top dog, Aftab Malik, recommended that the government discount religion as a motivating factor in terrorist acts. This was clearly an attempt to prevent the Australian government from discovering or shedding any light upon the role of Islam in the motivations of jihad terrorists. Anyone who dared to note that jihad violence was being committed in accord with Islamic texts and teachings would have been dismissed as “Islamophobic.” Surprisingly, Albanese rejected this recommendation, but Aftab Malik will no doubt keep pushing.
“Anthony Albanese releases government’s response to Islamophobia report,” by Lexie Jeuniewic, David Lipson and Keane Bourke, ABC.net.au, July 17, 2026:
Al Bozo goes to any length to suck up to the Mohammedans. “Islamic envoy” Aftab Malik is an Islamo-propagandist who demands Islamic blasphemy laws to muzzle us. And he is doing it on the taxpayer dollar. Disgraceful.
Islamic envoy, Aftab Malik has advised Anthony Albanese to roll-out blasphemy laws in Australia, to protect Muslims pic.twitter.com/urZDflPrwC
The Albanese government’s long-awaited response to its special envoy’s report on Islamophobia has rejected calls for an overhaul of counter-terror laws, focusing instead on a new education task force and expanded community liaison teams for police. Continue reading Albanese declares “‘Islamophobia’ has no place in Australia”
But to many Australians, it looks less like fairness and more like a massive tax grab dressed up as compassion.
While wrapping himself in the language of helping young Australians, he is reaching deeper into their pockets to fund a bigger government and his vision for Australia’s future.
There is something disturbingly unfair about building your own wealth under one set of rules, then changing those rules once you’ve made it to the top.
That is the contradiction confronting Anthony Albanese.
The Prime Minister built his own financial future in an Australia that rewarded aspiration.
