Harry the Taliban
Click below to listen:
Sheik yer’mami wrote ‘Harry the Taliban‘ as a sort of ‘good riddance’ to misguided young westerners who are attracted to militant Islam…
David Hicks comes to mind as well as the ‘American Taliban’ John Walker Lind, who was captured fighting with the Taliban when American forces captured him in Afghanistan…
David Hicks
John Walker Lindh
Another ‘American Taliban’ hiding somewhere in Pakistan is Adam Gadahn sends his regards:
The strange transformation of Adam Gadahn
Surprisingly, quite a few confused young westerners like ‘Harry’, baby boomers, children of the flower power generation, kids who grew up with all that sex & drugs & rock’n roll are only too willing to trade the freedom of the west for a total regulation of everything life has to offer: A cult, a guru, a leader, a totalitarian system, a cause. Bizarre? Weird? Maybe.
There are always some in every generation who want to change the world, though few are willing to take up weapons and go against their own culture and country-men.
The Jihad is a global movement, the ‘ummah’ gives a sense of belonging, the believer enters another universe where ‘to kill and to be killed in the way of Allah’ replaces all humanitarian priniciples….
Adam Gadahn is a close associate of Al Zawahiri & Bin Laden who seems to be running the Al Quaeda propaganda department. Recently he posted internet videos with fiery speeches ‘inviting’ people like Robert Spencer from Jihad Watch, Daniel Pipes and George Bush to Islam and to ‘leave their evil ways’- otherwise they would be….But please: Google it! find out for yourself!
Salaam aleikum!
My name is Mamduh Habib, I am completely innocent! I was picked up in Pakistan and held in Gitmo where they fed me with halal burgers and pissed on my Koran!
I was tortured with loud pop music when all I wanted was to find a good Islamic school for my children….
Words for the song
Harry was a punk
He smelled just like a skunk
Harry was a Hippie
In need of treatment for his peepee
Harry smoked hashish
And he followed Rajneneesh…
But Harry never took a shower
In all his years of flower power
Harry found religion
Just like a homing pigeon
Harry was a Jesus freak
At the time when that was chic
Scientology was was cool
They made money of this fool
But he never took a shower in all the years
With flower power
They brainwashed Harry well and good
And then he joined the brotherhood
He went straight to Afghanistan
And there he joined the Taliban
He joined the Jihad with Osama
And there he fought in Allah’s way
But he still didn’t take no shower
In all those years with Muzzie power…
They bombed the shit out of the Taliban
And occupied Afghanistan
They captured Harry and his gun
That was the end of Harry’s fun
Harry’s parents may be rich
But now he is the prison bitch
*
But he never takes a shower
He never takes a showeeeeeeeeerrrrrrr…………
Stumble it!
Digg It 
Technorati 
Print This Post
Email this articlePlease note: Comments are open and unmoderated, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Winds of Jihad. Obscene, abusive, silly, or annoying remarks may be deleted, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their views by Winds of Jihad.
December 19th, 2006 at 2:25 pm
this is so true… love your work sheik yer mami!
December 20th, 2006 at 2:01 am
thanks for that michael
December 23rd, 2006 at 6:33 am
I love your brilliant music sheiky baby
wish it was played on all the radio stations in australia its so cool, but alas we have no freedom of speech the mussies are already dominating our p.m. now
I got a mosque near me and it sure shits the hell out of me how they let em all in, and nopw we are getting pissed on by hi8m, and all in name of allah the baballah in sha allah lolololol
allah the baboob, mumu the shiite hoon
muhamad the pedophile
loved little girls once in a while lol
anyway fight islam and allah till they all piss off back from where ther hell they all came from dont want nos cummy mussie in australia matie
January 1st, 2007 at 10:29 pm
Great lyrics, will u b posting anything about the fact that the US sold anthrax and E Coli to Saddam Hussain ?
Or what about the killing of 500,000 children in Iraq thru 12 years denial of medicine ? Just a few more than the 3,000 killed on 9/11
Is the above what made the west ‘civilized’ ?
January 2nd, 2007 at 1:46 am
‘Bremer’-
Perhaps you could post some evidence for the absurd claims you’re making?
And don’t forget to mention that 9/11 ‘was all done by BUSH’ and the CIA and the Mossad, and yes, there’s Tim McVeigh, abortion clinic bombers and the KKK…etc…
Did I forget anything?
January 2nd, 2007 at 9:37 am
The evidence you ask for is found in a Senate report entitled, ‘United States Chemical and Biological Warfare-related Dual-use exports to Iraq and their possible impact on the Health Consequences of the Persian Gulf War’
The report concludes, ‘The United States provided the Government of Iraq with ‘dual use’ licensed materials which assisted in the development of Iraqi chemical, biological and missile-systems programs, including chemical warfare agent production facility plant and technical drawings, chemical warfare filling equipment’.
Not quite so ‘absurd’ when the US Senate itself admits the truth in its own report.
As for the half million dead Iraqi children, I was referring to the fact that the five permanent members of the UN security council (UK, US, France, Russia & China) had all voted for 12 years to impose sanctions on Iraq which meant that Iraqis were denied medicine for that period.
In August 1999, UNICEF revealed that the death rate among Iraqi children under 5 had more than doubled during sanctions, from 56 deaths per 1,000 live births to 131 deaths per 1,000 live births. They claim that there is no other reason for the sharp increase in the rate of infant mortality in Iraq.
If the half million dead children had been American or British, we would not hear the end of it. But the fact that these figures represent victims of countries such as UK & US means that such things are swept under the carpet.
Will anyone now admit the existence of state terrorism, or is the killing of an estimated half million children an act of ‘freedom, civilization and democracy’ ?
January 2nd, 2007 at 9:51 am
Why don’t you post a copy of that ‘report?’
The Iraqi’s were never denied medicine. The oil for food program was a corrupt scam which was totally exploited by Saddam and various UN officials like Coffi Annan. Why do you blame the west if an Arab dictator robs and cheats and deprives his people?
Besides: The West has no obligation to supply planet Islamiyah with anything.
January 2nd, 2007 at 10:15 am
The oil for food programme only existed in the first place because of the damage that was done to Iraq’s civilian population by the ‘civilized’ west.
And yes, medicine was denied: diptheria vaccines, for example, were denied to Iraqi children on the basis of the claim that Saddam could extract a substance from the vaccine to be used in weapons. Even though, my previous post showed that the US has admitted supplying weapons to Saddam.
Besides: The Arab world has no obligation to supply the west with cheap oil (but the fact that Saudi Arabia does supply cheap oil means that the US administration will not condemn the brutal regime in Saudi Arabia - even though most of the 9/11 hijackers came from Saudi)
January 2nd, 2007 at 10:28 am
http://www.iraqwatch.org/perspectives/Sussexreport.htm
There is a list near the bottom of the linked page showing what chemicals were sent to Iraq from the US - both E coli & anthrax are listed.
At the bottom of the page you’ll see a link to the actual report
Happy reading
January 2nd, 2007 at 10:41 am
Bremer,
1. If you don’t post any evidence I’m not going to answer your posts. Is that clear?
2. Saudi Arabia supplies the world with oil at market prices, not cheaper.
3. If the West cuts supply to the ‘Arab world’ that will be the end of that ‘Arab
world’- not of the West.
Western know-how found, financed, explored, drills and refines the oil. Western know-how and technology ships it and distributes it.
The Arabs squander the money we pay them for it and plough most of it into the global jihad, mosques & madrassahs, weapons for the mujaheddin…
But you know all that, since you are a good soldier of Allah…
January 2nd, 2007 at 5:59 pm
Have I ever described myself as a soldier of Allah ? I don’t remember that.
And as for evidence, you obviously haven’t seen the link in my previous post. It’s you that fails to provide the evidence. Didn’t you see e coli & anthrax listed in the shipments to Iraq from the US in the above link ? Uncomfortable reading, eh ?
The only reason why you’re threatening to stop the debate is because you cannot handle the fact that I’ve provided evidence against the US that comes straight out of the US- and it’s not from Michael Moore, but from a Senate report. And what of your evidence ? Can you back up the claim that ‘most of it (the money you pay the Arabs) goes into global jihad ? Do you have a reference where I can establish this claim as fact ?
I would like to sincerely thank you for one thing, though: the fact that you’ve got the bottle for a debate and didn’t just delete my comments (which I suspected might have been the case).
Thank you
January 2nd, 2007 at 11:22 pm
Bremer, I don’t know how old you are but your inablility to reason, your infantile attempt to construct some kind of logical context and your confusion with some puff-pieces on the net, which you believe can be presented as some kind of ‘evidence’ doesn’t make ‘uncomfortable reading’- it is not worth my time!
You asking me for evidence that the Arabs plough most or their money back into the global jihad? LOL! Look around! Who builds most of the mosques in the world today and which one is NOT Saudi-financed? Which jihad-movement is not supported by wealthy Arabs?
Would they exist in the first place if it wasn’t for petro-dollars?
January 3rd, 2007 at 10:47 pm
To ask someone to ‘look around’ at who builds the mosques is hardly evidence. Just because Saudis pay for a load of mosques to be built is not the same thing as funding terror. Or state terror.
And how can you refer to my evidence as puff-pieces (whatever that means) ? Even the invoices for the E coli & anthrax the US sent to Iraq was referenced on the link I provided. How’s this for puff-pieces, read the first paragraph at the following link. It might just sheik yer braini !!!
http://www.answers.com/topic/riegle-report
What does it feel like to be humiliated on your own blog ? I can tell that your blog was meant to be some kind of infantile/funny attack on Islam, but it must be hard to deal with someone who provides damning evidence from a Senate report when you can only feebly respond by asking me to ‘look around’ at who is building the mosques.
I’m beginning to think that this blog was put together by a teenager with too much time on their hands.
January 4th, 2007 at 12:02 am
Bremer sez:
“To ask someone to ‘look around’ at who builds the mosques is hardly evidence. Just because Saudis pay for a load of mosques to be built is not the same thing as funding terror. Or state terror.”
First you deny, then you admit, which one is it? . It is a well known fact that most of the mosques in the west are financed by the Saudi’s. In the US 90 % of mosques are controlled by those who follow the Wahabi doctrine. They have the money, they call the shots.
Funding Terror? Terror comes straight from your ‘profit’ Mohammed who said “Terror made me victorious” and “strike terror in the hearts of the infidels”- it is a clear command directly from the Koran. So is world domination, like ‘fight them (the unbelievers) until all religion belongs to Allah’… So again, what is your argument?
I could post you endless hate-speeches and video clips directly from your own Imams, Muftis and Mullahs, so you you wanna tell me that they are all misunderstanders of your ‘peaceful religion’ and you know better then they do?
And this document you posted: What are you trying to say? That the US should have not traded with Saddam Hussains regime when Saddam was not seen as a threat? If that’s what the regime ordered then they might have got what they paid for. What’s the issue? The US is also selling weapons to Yemen and Saudi Arabia, does that make them allies? Hardly!
Go ahead and ‘humiliate’ me! You make me laugh! Your whole argumentation is infantile, it is mere distraction and it all sounds like “The Koran is the word of G-d because it sez so- in the Koran…’
January 4th, 2007 at 11:39 pm
In all honesty, I would be happy to deal with the interpretations of koranic verses to the best of my ability if you would provide me with a reference to which chapter & verse you are quoting. This is just another example of a non-muslim taking verses at random which I’ve already demonstrated as being stupid - remember the ‘beating’ you could give muslim women with a miswaak (twig). You obviously don’t learn very well, do you have some form of learning disability or something ?
I enjoyed your suggestion that I might think of myself as being more knowledgeable than the radical scholars, etc. And this comes from someone who rejects a Senate report because he seems to think he knows better than a senator !!! Yeah right, Im sure experienced journalists and academics have such a hard time deciding which sources to quote: “shall I reference a senate report or shall I visit Sheik yer Mami’s blog” ??? LOL, what a tough decision!
And it gets even WORSE: the claim that Saudi Arabia & Yemen are hardly allies of the US just because they bought weapons off the US!!! Does the US make a habit of selling weapons to its enemies then ? Everyone with the slightest knowledge of international relations is aware of the fact that the US & Saudi are allies - its the reason why the US will not take action against Saudi for 9/11 because the US was always afraid of Saddam across the border taking control of the Saudi oil fields. Therefore, Saudi Arabia’s dictatorial royal family has remained in control of the country, thus ensuring cheap oil to the US (just compare petrol prices between the US & UK?).
Finally, I’m a bit concerned that my claim this blog was put together by a teenager with too much spare time was not even challenged. Oh dear…..
January 5th, 2007 at 11:35 am
Bremer,
You are dancing around the questions like a whirling Dervish.
Look at yourself and the nonsense you’re peddling! A child can see through you!
Was the Ayatollah Khomeini a misunderstander of Islam or did he know his stuff?
Yes or No?
Ayatollah Khomeini, Circa 1942: RoPMA
From the book Anti-American Terrorism and the Middle East (a collection of source documents and statements from key militant Islamic figures), the late unlamented Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini (subject of a recent gushing photographic tribute at the BBC) answers the question, “Is Islam a religion of peace?” (Hat tip: Brazilian Neocon.)
Islam is Not a Religion of Pacifists
Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, 1942
Islam’s jihad is a struggle against idolatry, sexual deviation, plunder, repression, and cruelty. The war waged by [non-Islamic] conquerors, however, aims at promoting lust and animal pleasures. They care not if whole countries are wiped out and many families left homeless. But those who study jihad will understand why Islam wants to conquer the whole world. All the countries conquered by Islam or to be conquered in the future will be marked for everlasting salvation. For they shall live under [God’s law]. …
Those who know nothing of Islam pretend that Islam counsels against war. Those [who say this] are witless. Islam says: Kill all the unbelievers just as they would kill you all! Does that mean that Muslim should sit back until they are devoured by [the unbelievers]? Islam says: Kill the [the non-Muslims], put them to the sword and scatter [their armies]. Does this mean sitting back until [non-Muslims] overcome us? Islam says: Kill in the service of Allah those who may want to kill you! Does this mean that we should surrender [to the enemy]? Islam says: Whatever good there is exists thanks to the sword and in the shadow of the sword! People cannot be made obedient except with the sword! The sword is the key to paradise, which can be opened only for holy warriors!
There are hundreds of other [Koranic] psalms and hadiths [sayings of the prophet] urging Muslims to value war and to fight. Does all that mean that Islam is a religion that prevents men from waging war? I spit upon those foolish souls who make such a claim.
Well.
Any more questions?
January 5th, 2007 at 3:32 pm
Just one question - why should I answer your questions when you make no attempt to answer mine, Or provide the evidence you promise: remember the one where you promised to provide me with thousands of examples - I haven’t seen one. You then expect me to defend koranic verses but evade any explanation about Senator Riegle’s report. If you (or anyone else for that matter) want to learn more about koranic verses that offend you, then you should read a reputable tafseer - scholarly commentary on the koran. That’s all I would be quoting from anyway - but you still haven’t got the message.
I’ll carry on reading the blog in the hope that you make some attempt to answer the questions I have put to you, and provide the evidence you claim to have. Until then, I don’t see any point in contributing to this ‘debate’ because you obviously think that we should do this by different rules.
Anyone with at least half a brain can see that I have easily beaten you because you’re just desperately repeating yourself: “let’s get Bremer to justify more dodgy sounding verses & quotes from firebrand clerics while I do nothing to answer the points he makes”.
January 7th, 2007 at 8:24 am
Bremer,
If you have nothing to say don’t say it here.
You couldn’t even ‘beat me’ with a wet noodle if you were intelligent, which you are not.
Your ‘out-of-context’ rubbish doesn’t fly, not here and not anywhere else. If you wanna convince anyone of a ‘peaceful or moderate’ Islam try your luck on the Islamic websites.
Coming here beating around the issues and making absurd claims simply exposes you as a Muhammedan zombie. But I’ll give you another chance: Why don’t you post the 164 jihad verses from the Koran with some ‘reputable tafseer?’
I am holding my breath already!
January 8th, 2007 at 2:07 pm
Is Mr Bremer working for CAIR? Seems so.
January 8th, 2007 at 2:09 pm
Sheikyermami, keep up the fighting spirit.
January 8th, 2007 at 7:01 pm
Harry the Taliban…
Here’s some more anti-Jihad music, a parody of Johnny Walker-Lindh and his ilk….
January 9th, 2007 at 1:35 am
O0ps, it was meant as an email. I’m more tired than I thought…
January 9th, 2007 at 1:38 pm
Filthy disgusting pigs.
January 9th, 2007 at 2:14 pm
Gee .. I seem to be as twisted as Bremer .. it’s the heroin in Talibanland.
January 10th, 2007 at 1:30 am
Paul,
I am not going to yell and scream at you. I sincerely want to know what you are trying to say. I read about half of the article about the ecoli and anthrax and noticed that these shipments were sent to Iraq in 1980. Why were they sent then? Were we at war with them then? Also, weren’t we helping them out in their war against Iran?
Cindy
January 10th, 2007 at 2:14 pm
This, from the Piers Akerman blog, sez it all: The fake tantrums and the crocodile tears of the loony left and and self-styled ‘human rights activists’ are put to shame by the Australian government who sent delegations to Gitmo no less than 17 times. For a guy who left and betrayed his country and his people, became a Muhammedan by the name of Mohammed Daoud, who went to Afghanistan with the intend to kill Australians and Americans and ended up as an enemy combatant, I spit on the fools who lent their support to this traitor! Hicks deserves a choice between a rope and a bullet, no more, no less..!
By Piers Akerman
Saturday, January 06, 2007 at 09:16pm
GET braced for an avalanche of propaganda over the next few days as the ABC and some other media outlets whip themselves into a frenzy to mark self-professed al-Qaeda warrior David Hicks’s fifth year in incarceration.
In the course of this orgiastic exercise, some facts will become blurred and others distorted beyond recognition.
Among the worst offenders will be the usual publicity-seeking lawyers from civil rights lobby groups, who appear determined to use Hicks’s plight as a vehicle for their own aggrandisement.
As the Free-Hicks lobby’s demands reach a crescendo to mark Thursday’s anniversary, it would pay cooler heads to remember the following facts when they hear some of the jackasses braying about the need to release him without trial.
First, contrary to what is often claimed, Hicks has been charged with offences. Three to be precise, including attempted murder, aiding the enemy and conspiracy against the US.
Those charges were laid under the initial framework of the anti-terrorist laws enacted by Executive Authority. That authority was challenged and overturned by the US Supreme Court last year and the charges were voided. New ones will be laid under the new Act approved by Congress.
That there has been a delay in bringing Hicks to trial is also not unusual but unavoidable. Appeals lengthen the process as the pleas are heard - the squeals that would fill the airwaves, if such appeals were not treated seriously, would be even louder than the calls for Hicks’s release.
But remember that notorious Sydney gang rapist Bilal Skaf also successfully appealed against a rape conviction after it was learnt that two jurors, who had found him guilty, had visited the site of one of his crimes to better inform themselves of the terrain.
When that conviction was quashed, Skaf remained in prison on other convictions until a new trial was held. Does anyone recall a civil rights lawyer protesting that Skaf wasn’t released despite delay in commencing his new trial? No.
Nor is it a fact that Hicks has been forgotten or ignored by the Government. At last count, he had been visited in Cuba on 17 occasions by consular staff.
A famous former NSW premier and accomplished barrister once remarked that “anyone can go to jail if they get the right lawyer’’, and it seems that Hicks’s team passed up the opportunity to have their client dealt with speedily by a plea bargain when he was first charged. The deal was rejected.
That Hicks in Guantanamo will be charged under the new Act passed with congressional authority rather than the executive authority which was successfully appealed, does not bode well for a future challenge should Hicks’s lawyer, Major Michael Mori, decide to appeal, as he has indicated he might.
The US Supreme Court is much less likely to reject laws voted through Congress than those issued from the Executive Office. A further appeal against the legality of the military commission set to try him could easily add another two years to the process.
Hicks’s supporters have also, rather stupidly and noisily, lambasted the appointment of his lawyer by the US military, and the fact that the military will appoint his judges and prosecutors.
In truth, this differs not at all or is not, in any way, more sinister than what occurs in Australian criminal courts when a defendant is provided with a court-appointed lawyer to appear against a public prosecutor before a judge, with the Australian government appointing and paying the judge, the defence and the prosecution.
Without getting into his tactics, is anyone really suggesting that Major Mori has not been tireless in his endeavours to have his client released?
The new Act under which Hicks will be charged also incorporates such fundamental safeguards as the presumption of innocence, a right to be present throughout the trial, a right to cross-examine prosecution witnesses, a ban on evidence obtained by torture, access to all the evidence the prosecution intends to adduce at trial, the provision of military defence counsel and the ability to retain civilian defence counsel, the option to remain silent or testify at trial, standard of proof beyond reasonable doubt, double- jeopardy protections, and an appeals process right up to the US Supreme Court.
It has also been agreed that he will not be subjected to the death penalty and, if convicted, his sentence can be served in an Australian jail.
It is clear that it will be alleged that Hicks was a combatant who armed himself with a Kalashnikov after 9/11, and fought against Coalition forces, and indeed wrote about his commitment to kill Christians and Jews.
He did not propose to offer them a trial.
While no one could argue that he has not been held for a long period, it can be argued and demonstrated that he and his legal team have contributed to prolonging that experience.
What’s clear is that neither the Australian nor the US government is responsible for the plight Hicks finds himself in now.
His supporters should demand that al-Qaeda warn recruits of the possibility of lengthy legal processes after capture when inducting future new trainees.
February 5th, 2007 at 12:13 pm
[...] A while ago I wrote ‘Harry the Taliban’ for guys like Hicks, Adam Gadahn, John Walker Lind & Jihad Jack. The song is here: http://sheikyermami.com/2006/12/19/harry-the-taliban/ [...]
February 10th, 2007 at 8:56 am
Bremer can get all the E.Coli he needs from his toothbrush.
February 10th, 2007 at 8:58 am
Bremer probably has some on his nose from Hil Lah Lah.
March 27th, 2007 at 10:09 am
[...] Sheik Yer’mami’s Winds of Jihad. Single-handedly holding the fort in Cairns, the Sheik is reknowned for thought-provoking hits such as “Harry the Taliban” and “Muslim Woman”. The Sheik makes me think particularly hard about protecting my online anonimity. [...]
June 3rd, 2007 at 11:16 pm
Adam Gadahn works with a Beverly Hills psychologist named Dr. Carole Lieberman. Dr. Carole Lieberman is a Muslim posing as a Jew. She is part Lebanese. Her and Adam Gadahn plotted the 9-11 attacks and are plotting with Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to wipe out Israel and the United States.
http://adamgadahn.livejournal.com/
July 7th, 2007 at 12:19 pm
Jesus Christ ! You are a legend Sheikh yer Mami. I agree 100 % with everything you promulgate. By the way your songs are a work of genius. Kudos to you- our hero ! Make more such anti mussie songs…I won’t to buy it on CD>
Best regards,
From your fanclub in India ( Mumbai)
P.S India is one of the nations heavily affected by Islamic menance. We’re sick of the Mussie Scum and are thinking of way to get rid of ‘em. Sadly Political Correctness and Marxist BS is also our biggest enemy here. We are with you in prayers and best wishes !
August 9th, 2007 at 12:39 pm
[...] Harry the Taliban Digg It Del.icio.us Technorati Print This Post Email this [...]
August 9th, 2007 at 2:42 pm
All I read from the moslem apologist, is blah blah blah. I see what islam is everyday, no one has to explain what they are. The evidence points to murdering cretins.
October 9th, 2007 at 11:04 pm
you fucking piece of thrash! where the fuck do you get off eh? bastard!!!