“Your Speech Is Violence”

Censorship is out of control.

“Your Speech Is Violence”: How The Mob Is Using A New Mantra To Justify Campus Violence

Authored by Jonathan Turley,

Below is my column in The Hill on the increasing justification of violence by the left on our campuses by declaring speech itself “violence.” It is part of the license of our age of rage for many who want to silence opposing viewpoints. There is, however, a way to end this anti-free speech movement sweeping through higher education.

teaser image

It is part of the license of our age of rage for many who want to silence opposing viewpoints…

Here is the column:

“Silence is violence.”

When those words became a popular mantra years ago on college campuses, I wrote that the anti-free speech movement was moving toward compelled speech while declaring dissenting views to be harmful.

Today, it isn’t just silence that is considered violence on college campuses. It is also speech, as both faculty and students are actively shutting down opposing views on subjects ranging from abortion to climate change to transgender issues.

Recently, many people were shocked by a videotape of Hunter College professor Shellyne Rodríguez trashing a pro-life student display in New York. Most were focused on her profanity and vandalism, but there were familiar phrases that appeared in her diatribe to the clearly shocked students.

Before trashing the table, she told the students, “You’re not educating s–t […] This is f–king propaganda. What are you going to do, like, anti-trans next? This is bulls–t. This is violent. You’re triggering my students.”

The videotape revealed one other thing. At Hunter College, and at other colleges, it seems that trashing a pro-life student display and abusing pro-life students is not considered a firing offense. Hunter College refused to fire Rodríguez. Continue reading “Your Speech Is Violence”

Tranny Watch: its all about the children!

Of course it is. They are coming for your children. For the grooming. The forces of hell are unleashed. 

Low test scores in reading, writing and math, but they’ll know all about how to tuck their penises, bind their chest, puberty blockers, anal sex and blow jobs. They’ll be encouraged to undergo radical surgeries, but not taught that Science proves that there are only 2 genders and that God made them beautiful and perfect, just the way they are!

The Marxist agenda behind the rainbow

By Doug Hagmann – CFP

If you think Friday’s Supreme Court decision was about equality or equal rights for the three percent of the American population (at the expense of the 97 percent), you couldn’t be more wrong. If you think that Friday’s decision has no impact on you because you don’t care what people do in the privacy of their bedrooms, you couldn’t be more wrong. If you think the homosexual agenda is about tolerance, diversity or other slick marketing buzzwords, you are not only wrong, but sorely misinformed, misguided or you are purposely facilitating a lie.

America has a huge problem right now. Multiple problems, in fact, but like the victims of a train wreck, we must do triage so we can apply treatment in order of importance. The blunt force trauma inflicted upon America by five rogue members of our judiciary, redefining marriage as a result of a highly potent cabal of activists intent on America’s destruction, certainly moves this problem up the list of importance.

Continue reading The Marxist agenda behind the rainbow

Tranny Watch: Moustachioed Tranny Greets Kids @ Disneyland

They’re rubbing it in because they can. If we boycott them and apply the “go woke, go broke” principle consistently, we might be able to nip it in the bud.

LGBTQI+ Advocates Cheer as Federal Judge Overturns Tennessee’s Ban on Drag Shows in Front of Kids

Nolte: Backlash Grows Over Male Transvestite Greeting Children at Disneyland

ABOstralia: Give us a VOICE to expropriate you

Speaking up against a bad idea is not racist
The Voice is an idea
The Voice is about Marxism
Ideas have consequences
Bad ideas have victims
Marxism has 100+ million victims
Speaking up against a bad idea is being a responsible citizen
“I’m Aboriginal and have campaigned for Aboriginal rights all my life. I oppose the Voice. Am I racist? Jacinta Nampijinpa Price opposes the Voice. She’s Warlpiri, advocates for Aboriginal women and children suffering violence and abuse and once jointly presented at the National Press Club with Marcia Langton, a leading Yes campaigner. Does Langton usually share a stage with racists? Recently, Jacinta and I brought a 20-strong delegation of Aboriginal opponents of the Voice to Canberra (whom Albanese shunned and most media ignored). Are they all racist too? Of course not. It’s not racist to oppose special rights that will upend our democratic system”.
Warren Mundine

The push to end life, of both animals and humans, in the name of “climate activism” is fundamentally evil

For those who speak German: this video is extraordinarily informative. This lady connects the dots behind the climate racket:

This has to stop. Killing cows doesn’t make the weather nicer. The whole concept is idiotic.

“Net Zero” means collective suicide

You have probably heard of “Net Zero,” the unrealistically ambitious target of having no net greenhouse gas emissions by some point in the relatively near future (2030, maybe 2050 at the latest). A report filed in 2019 by the prestigious government-funded UK organization of engineers and scientists, UK FIRES, thinks Net Zero is not enough and is pushing for an insanely aggressive program called “Absolute Zero,” absolutely zero emissions by 2050. What does it entail?

.Among other things, no flights, no container shipping, no red meat consumption, no cement, no new steel production, and no fossil fuel use for any reason, even plastics, by 2050. How do they expect this to be possible? Draconian governmental action combined with drastic semi-voluntary reductions in individual quality of life for all citizens. In this episode of the New Discourses Podcast, host James Lindsay reads the Executive Summary of the UK FIRES “Absolute Zero” report (pdf, hosted by Cambridge University, by the way) to expose the unworkable, catastrophic insanity of their zero-emissions program in the UK and beyond, warning that it sets the stage for a Western Holodomor.


Subscribe to the New Discourses Podcast on SoundCloud, Apple Podcasts, Google Podcasts, Spotify, Stitcher, YouTube, or by RSS.

Additional episodes of the New Discourses Podcast are available here.

Follow James Lindsay: https://linktr.ee/conceptualjames

Migration Invasion

It will not stop until we stop it.

Biden Regime Opens Border to 1 Million+ Illegals Per Year

President Creepy Joe Biden’s border deputies are doubling the inflow of illegals through the “CPB One” pathway, regardless of a multi-state lawsuit against the likely illegal process.

The monthly inflow will rise to 38,750 each month, allowing 465,000 illegal migrants to be registered and released each to take U.S. housing, jobs, and government aid.

Other channels created by Biden’s pro-migration border chief, Alejandro Mayorkas, bring the planned inflow to almost one million illegals.

In many speeches, Mayorkas says he is building a mass migration system to deliver workers to wealthy employers and investors and “equity” to poor foreigners. The nation’s border laws are subordinate to elite opinion about “the values of our country” Mayorkas claims.

Migration — and especially, labor migration — is unpopular among swing voters. A 54 percent majority of Americans say Biden is allowing a southern border invasion, according to an August 2022 poll commissioned by the left-of-center National Public Radio (NPR). The 54 percent “Invasion” majority included 76 percent of Republicans, 46 percent of independents, and even 40 percent of Democrats.

UK: Deep State Employees Threaten to Strike over Migrant Deportation Plans

Nine Boat Migrants Drown in Shipwreck off Greece as People Smugglers Kill Again

Migrant Victory Parades for Turkey’s Erdogan in Germany Spark Diversity Fears for Progressives

UK & Big Tech Conspired to Censor Lockdown Critics

Despicable.

Exposed: UK Conspired with Big Tech to Censor Lockdown Critics

Govt-Media Secret Meets

online hatred

The UK government worked with social media and A.I. firms to spy on and censor critics of coronavirus lockdowns, a report has claimed.

The UK government worked with social media and A.I. firms to surveil and censor critics of coronavirus lockdowns, a report has claimed.

Officials within the UK government reportedly worked clandestinely with social media companies, such as Google, Facebook, and Twitter as well as A.I. firms to monitor critics of the lockdown regime, as well as to identify and ultimately censor speech criticising the draconian government policy.

Published by The Telegraph, the claims bear many similarities to the so-called “Twitter files”, which revealed how U.S. authorities worked hand-in-glove with social media firms to censor criticism of government COVID-19 policy.

According to the newspaper’s report, the UK government employed the so-called Counter-Disinformation Unit (CDU) — a Whitehall team originally set up to counter alleged disinfo during the 2019 European elections — to monitor social media posts challenging government lockdown policy with the aim of censoring the content.

To achieve this aim, the organisation reportedly worked closely with social media corporations as well as firms specialising in the use of Artificial Intelligence, the latter of which used the advanced technology to scour the net for messaging critical of government narratives on COVID-19.

One private firm that took part in this “state surveillance” operation was Yorkshire-based Logically, with the firm flagging numerous posts made by, according to The Telegraph, “respected scientists questioning lockdown or arguing against the mass vaccination of children against Covid-19”.

Zuck Loves Biden

Facebook Prevents RFK Jr. from Launching Instagram Campaign Account

Zuckerbugger is firmly in creepy Joe’s pocket. Diversity doesn’t mean providing a platform for other views. Got it.

FILE- In this April 10, 2018, file photo, Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg testifies before a joint hearing of the Commerce and Judiciary Committees on Capitol Hill in Washington. Last spring, as false claims about vaccine safety threatened to undermine the world's response to COVID-19, researchers at Facebook wrote that they …

Facebook-owned Instagram is preventing Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who is competing with President Joe Biden in the Democrat primary, from setting up an official campaign account, according to the candidate.

Progressive censorship is headed down the same path as the ‘Rushdie bounty hunters’

YouTube Stops Censoring Content Alleging 2020 Election Misconduct

teaser image

Cites “unintended effect of curtailing political speech”

In an interesting plot twist as we wade deeper into the 2024 election cycle, YouTube on Friday announced it will stop deleting content arguing that “widespread fraud, errors or glitches” affected the 2020 or other past presidential elections. 

“In the current environment, we find that while removing this content does curb some misinformation, it could also have the unintended effect of curtailing political speech without meaningfully reducing the risk of violence or other real-world harm,” the platform said in a blog post.  

The policy change elicited howls from the left, including an Orwell-flavored protest from an advocacy group called “Free Press.” The group’s Nora Benavidez told AFP that YouTube’s “dangerous decision to immediately stop removing content… which continues to sow hate and disinformation that threatens our democracy must be reversed immediately.”   

In its announcement, YouTube said it had removed “tens of thousands” of election-related videos but that, effective immediately, the 2020 election is fair game for anyone who wants to take a shot at it. The company’s policing of election discussions began in December 2020, after the safe harbor date for state vote certifications had passed.

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Banned By Major Social Media Site, Campaign Pages Blocked

teaser image

“Can anyone guess why that’s happening?”

A message from Steve Kirsch:

I’m blocking people who spread what I will call “real misinformation” or who resort to diversionary tactics when asked a simple question. While it was fun engaging with them, they would always change the topic when I asked them a question they couldn’t answer and they don’t understand simple statistics, e.g., a 0:48 odds ratio being criticized as needing more samples. This is time wasting for me. If you find a legit error, I’m more than happy to admit I’m wrong and fix it. Gorski is time wasting but he has a decent h-index and is a master at deceptive content, so I keep him around because it’s always a fun challenge for me to see the techniques he uses to twist the science to make it look like he’s smart. Unfortunately, he doesn’t directly answer my questions when I point out the flaws, so he may get on my block list soon as well.

Continue reading Progressive censorship is headed down the same path as the ‘Rushdie bounty hunters’