Joe Biden worked to systematically cleanse White men from the federal judiciary. 86% of his judicial nominees were women or BIPOC.
Democrats are anti-White.
If only someone would have raised the alarm.


Sparkle Motion In DC
With leftwing judges continuing to stymie President Trump’s attempts to do what he was elected to do, The Federalist Society noted something interesting about the makeup of the DC district courts: a third of the judges there are foreign born, including the latest, a Caribbean immigrant named Sparkle Sooknanan.
Of course, as Josiah Lippincott points out, this didn’t happen by accident. It was the result of a deliberate Biden Administration policy to appoint nearly all women and nonwhite judges.
The Democrats being anti-white is one reason for this policy, as Lippincott writes. Another reason is that the Democrats know how someone named Sparkle Sooknanan is going to rule on every issue ahead of time. In contrast, Republicans can appoint an ostensibly conservative white man named John Roberts and never be sure if he will rule in their favor on an issue.
This Has Become An Existential Issue
As Charles Haywood writes below, this judicial rebellion against Trump has become an existential issue for America. Haywood, as an attorney who clerked for a federal appeals court judge, broke down what’s at stake in the X post below. Before we get to Haywood’s post, a brief market note.

…there’s no such thing as coincidence in DC…
Tren de Aragua migrants must be allowed to appeal their deportations ordered under the 1798 Alien Enemies Act, Judge James Boasberg ruled Monday.
The ruling is likely to be appealed — in part, because President Donald Trump’s deputies say the judiciary has no role when the President invokes the 1798 act to deport aliens amid an invasion or a “predatory incursion” of the United States.
“This is unconstitutional,” responded Stephen Miller, the President’s deputy chief of staff.

Continue reading Trump v the militant Judiciary