Newsweek: Steaming Piles of Taqiyya, by the Truckload


Newsweek, of dubious fame ever since the invented Koran-rage incident in Gitmo, once again shills for Islamo-fascism: In cahoots with the Washington Pest (misspelling intended) they are telling their readers all the things that Islam is not. The list of taqiyya-spin doctors includes the egregious Georgetown professor John Esposito, the despicable Peanut Khadr, Queen Rania of Jordan, Tony BLiar (gotta keep that money coming, boy) and the illustrious Karim Agha Khan, ‘spiritual leader’ of the Muslim sect of Ishmaelites. Rest assured that none of these propagandists finds anything wrong with Islam itself, that it is all our fault and the fault of those mysterious ‘misunderstanders of Islam who’ve hijacked a peaceful faith’ by chopping of heads, blowing up themselves and others while screaming ‘Allahu Akhbar’ and on occasion fly jets into tall buildings.

Ah, and don’t waste too much time posting your rebuttal and your anger on those sites, because they won’t publish it. But if you intend to put a bit of lipstick on a pig you have a chance to find your Islam-friendly essay published: Go for it!


Iran: The hijab liberates women


Thanks to Robert Spencer’s Jihad Watch we already have one thorough rebuttal right here:

WaPo touts two Hizballah supporters’ definitions of jihad

“The Many Meanings of Jihad to 2 Prominent Muslims” in today’s Washington Post is part of their ongoing “On Faith” whitewash series, in which prominent Muslims retail pleasing platitudes about Islam and ignore the real issues. This segment is no exception: the paper’s introductory paragraph to the statements by Ali Gomaa and Ayatollah Fadlallah even acknowledges that Fadlallah is “known for his support of the armed Shiite movement Hezbollah” (not, you’ll notice, the “terrorist group Hezbollah”), although it doesn’t mention Ali Gomaa’s support for the same terrorist group.

Jihad is ‘inner struggle’


The swine who did this got 20 years, but will be pardoned within 8 to 10, wanna bet? 

Because the Koran sez ‘ Killing infidels is a small matter to us…’ 

8.55, 9.5, 95.5, 9.111 Infidels are worst beasts and lowest creatures and must be killed … Tabari IX:69 “Killing disbelievers is a small matter to us.” … 

Ali Gomaa’s bit is entitled “Jihad Is Not Just Armed Struggle.” The frequency with which Islamic apologists trot out this particular theme always surprises me. This is supposed to be reassuring to the potential and actual targets of armed jihad? I fail to see how the fact that jihad has multiple meanings, including interior spiritual struggle, somehow renders less lethal the AK’s and bombs with which other jihadists wage jihad.

After sketching out jihad’s pacific meanings, Gomaa says:

…In addition to these meanings, the term jihad refers to the defense of a nation or a just cause. These characteristics that amount to “in the way of God” are summed up in the Koran, “Fight in the way of God against those who wage war against you, but do not commit aggression — for, verily, God does not love aggressors.” (2:190) . . .

Bullshit by the truckload, read it all…


Islam Liberates Women




But“Jihad Is Not Just Armed Struggle”sounds good. At least Gomaa admits that jihad is, in fact, ‘Armed Struggle’- as opposed to the ‘inner struggle’ bulldust that makes you wanna puke. Try a laxative if you have a case of ‘inner struggle’ coming on, it might just work…


6 thoughts on “Newsweek: Steaming Piles of Taqiyya, by the Truckload”

  1. “Sheikh” Gomaa put out the lie that there is no compulsion in religion in Islam on the “Muslims Speak Out” love-in, but promptly called “mistranslation”, misunderstanding etc when his fellow throwbacks noticed.

    “Islam Online” is repeating the same lie – “Islam, West Share Common Ground: Muslims”, and tries to paint Georg Gaenswein as an “extremist” and blames Pope B16 “for the increasing anti-Muslim sentiments in the West”.

    “The Qur’an says ‘there is no compulsion in religion'” says Sheikh Hussein Halawa in Dublin.

    Despite what the Koran supposedly says, its deluded adherents roll on with their plan to establish a global Caliphate under Sharia law, and move closer to their doom when they seek to destroy the “Zionist entity”, and God (the real one, not the Allah-fake) destroys them.

  2. A turd with a sugar coating is still stinky. In fact, it will attract even more flies. So it goes with Islamania.

  3. I recommend the following website:

    …for an interview of Dr. Wafa Sultan regarding the perverted nonsense of Islamspeak!

    Dr. Sultan’s analysis of Islamic dualism is totally brilliant and devastating! Islam’s dualistic thought, where “A” can equal “non-A”, is complete gibberish and con-artistry taken to the ultimate degree in the service of male chauvinism. We might call this non-sensical way of thinking “Islamspeak” following George Orwell’s “Newspeak” in “1984”.

    In “Islamspeak”, “honor” means “dishonor”, “concubine” (women of the right hand) means “raping captive women”, “wife” means “human farm-animal-slave”. No one can read the Hadiths (which depict a callous desert godfather murdering his competitors and having them killed) and think of Mohammed as anything but a pirate who used religion to justify his political ambition to be king of Arabia and then of the world. Somehow Moslems quickly learn to immediately turn off the critical/analytical switch in their brain as soon as any topic involving Islam is mentioned. Their very minds are entirely “submitted” to non-sense…and “Islamspeak” is a form of language which paralyzes the ability to think analytically and where “no other thought is possible.”

    Dr. Sultan has called a spade a spade. There is no way in which beating, raping, enslaving women is “honoring” to them. Thus, “A” cannot equal “non-A”. Thus “Islamspeak” is contradictory non-sense.

    The most offensive thing about Mohammed to the modern mind is his pedophilia. Why do feminists not denounce this night and day? Is this retreat because of cowardice?

    Women professionals (like Wafa Sultan) with a keen understanding of Islamic dualism and the obvious hatred of women in Mohammed’s rantings must take up the torch, expose Mohammed’s fraud and liberate the women of the Islamic world. Their voices alone can do it.

    The whole politico-cultural system of Islam is a pack of chauvinistic perversions and must be intellectually attacked and intellectually destroyed.

    Dr. Sultan has led the way. Where are the courageous women who will follow?

Comments are closed.