The Immigration Tsunami, Part 2

* They are not immigrants. They are not asylum seekers or refugees. They are invaders.

Marx: “Race and not class will be the defining issue that destroys the west.”

* Enoch Powell’s said it 40 years ago:  “Those whom the Gods wish to destroy they first make mad.”

* Must read: Abolish the White race!                                   

Harvard Hates The White Race
By Paul Craig Roberts 


by Baron Bodissey/Gates of Vienna        

I wrote last month about the growing immigration crisis in Southern Europe. In the weeks since that post the emergency hasn’t abated; if anything, it has increased. Every day brings a fresh batch of news stories about illegal immigrants landing in Lampedusa, or overwhelming holding facilities in Malta, or being drowned at sea. Despite the acknowledged problem of illegal migrants, Spain is actually inviting farm laborers into the country — this during a recession, and with unemployment reaching new levels.  


The material below is compiled from various articles which will appear in tonight’s news feed. It’s important to remember that this is just one day’s selection. News stories like them appear almost every day, although most of them won’t be found in the European MSM.


The EU has actually recognized that it has an illegal immigration problem, and is attempting to cope with it. The latest effort involves a European Coast Guard, which is intended to replace a previous effort which was acknowledged a failure:

The creation of a European Coastguard is one of the hypotheses the EU must take into consideration to deal with the illegal immigration emergency in the Mediterranean. The Prime Minister of Greece, Kostas Karamanlis, said this during a joint press conference with the Premier of Malta, Lawrence Gonzi, during his 2-day State visit to the island. “Frontex must be reinforced, not abandoned” said Karamanlis, in response to a question in which he was asked to comment the recent statements of mission leader Illka Laitinen, who in an interview admitted that the joint patrols have “failed”. Karamanlis underlined the importance of more cooperation between the EU member States in dealing with the immigration emergency, inviting European partners to start a discussion on the possibility to create a European Coastguard.

If the EU has designated the current situation an “emergency”, can you imagine how bad it must be?

Part of the problem is that all this immigration from Africa is actually planned; it’s just that the immigrants are jumping the queue a little bit. According to The Daily Express:
– – -  – – – – –

More than 50 million African workers are to be invited to Europe in a far-reaching secretive migration deal, the Daily Express can reveal today.

A controversial taxpayer-funded “job centre” opened in Mali this week is just the first step towards promoting “free movement of people in Africa and the EU”.

Brussels economists claim Britain and other EU states will “need” 56 million immigrant workers between them by 2050 to make up for the “demographic decline” due to falling birth rates and rising death rates across Europe.

The report, by the EU statistical agency Eurostat, warns that vast numbers of migrants could be needed to meet the shortfall in two years if Europe is to have a hope of funding the pension and health needs of its growing elderly population.

It states: “Countries with low fertility rates could require a significant number of immigrants over the coming dec ades if they want to maintain the existing number of people of working age.

“Having sufficient people of working age is vital for the economy and fortax revenue.” [emphasis added]

This is the crux of the matter: tax revenue. Despite all the statistical evidence indicating that immigrants absorb more tax revenues than they generate, the elites that run the system persist in the belief that the influx is economically necessary.

Their larger goal is the preservation of the system over which they preside. Those who have children surely want their offspring to partake of the same privileges that they enjoy, and perhaps someday set their hands to the same levers of power. In order to do that, the lumpen proletariat must remain a part of the system, and it matters not a whit if they are “brown” and Muslim, just so long as the power and perks continue to accrue to those at the top of the heap.

Ms Castex said: “It is urgent that member states have a calm approach to immigration. To say ‘yes’, we need immigration … it is not a new development, we must accept it.”



It is pre-ordained. We do not have a choice. What has been decided is what will come to be. No voice crying in the wilderness will deflect us from the plan.

So: we (that is, native Europeans) have agreed to replace ourselves gradually with Muslim immigrants from Africa.

The news article above terms the plan “secretive” rather than “secret”, because it’s not a secret. It may not be blazoned on the front pages of the continent’s newspapers, or printed up on handbills and pasted on lampposts, but it’s not a secret. The plans are part of the public record, buried in cubic miles of the bureaucratic bumf that has emerged from all the planning sessions in Strasbourg or Brussels.

It’s EuroMed, a.k.a. the Mediterranean Union, a.k.a. the Barcelona Agreement of 1995, a.k.a. Eurabia. And if you’re a European, it’s coming to your city, town, or village, no matter how far you are from Lampedusa, or Valletta, or Gibraltar.

The impoverished indigenes of Africa have caught wind of what lies ahead, and they’re not waiting for an official invitation: they’re coming to Europe now:

51 illegal Moroccan immigrants arrived yesterday in Barcelona on an Italian passenger ship and tried to enter into Spanish territory with false documents and were arrested when they got off the ship by national police officers.

And they’re willing to take some risks getting to the promised land:

Searches are taking place along the coastline of Spain on the lookout for around 50 migrants of Moroccan origin, who (according to a survivor) were involved in a shipwreck. The survivor was found on a beach 40 kilometres north of Rabat, near to the body of a man — presumably one of the victims of the wreck. According to Moroccan security sources cited by EFE news agency, the survivor is a young man — originally from Sale (Rabat). According to his testimony, the boat had fifty people on board when it set sail from the Moroccan coast at around 11.30pm on Tuesday night.

Those numbers were in the dozens; how about hundreds?

A large boat with 260 immigrants on board was aided 40 miles south of Lampedusa by Police patrol boats. The boat, 15 meters long was pointed out by the Sirio patrol boat that had previously collected another 143 non EU citizens on three other boats. With the arrival of the last 400 migrants on the island the situation remains critical in the centre where this morning about 1500 people were hosted in a structure that has a capacity for 700 people.

Or even tens of thousands:

A total 30,000 illegal immigrants have entered Italy so far this year, the country’s Interior Minister, Roberto Maroni told the Parliament on Thursday, adding that migration has risen “exponentially”.

The Government has allocated seven million euros for the construction of new reception centres for illegal immigrants and over 109 million euros to run these centres, said Maroni (photo).

On top of these sums, the Government has earmarked 747,000 euros to handle the arrival of illegal immigrants at Italy’s borders, he said.


Migration to Italy has risen “exponentially” from 500,000 people in 1987 to almost 3.5 million this year, Maroni noted.

He was speaking the same day that Italy’s central statistics agency ISTAT released data showing a record 3,432,651 foreigners were resident in Italy on 1 January this year, an increase of 16.8 percent over 2007.

So many immigrants are flooding into Malta that their rate of arrival exceeds the local birth rate:

The impact of immigrant arrivals on the island-state of Malta is so high that for the first time it has surpassed the birth rate. The statistics which were supplied by the Immigration Commission show that in Malta there are 40 immigrants for every square kilometre, an average that surprisingly surpasses the population density per square kilometre in Finland.

And remember: this sort of thing is happening every day, day after day, all along the Mediterranean littoral of Southern Europe.

Nothing approaching this has ever happened in peacetime during all of recorded history. No civilization has peacefully allowed itself to be supplanted by migrants.

So there’s no way foretell exactly how all of this will shake out. Still, I feel confident in making a single prediction:

This will not end well.

Al Jazeera Febr. 11, 2007: A 2-day secret meeting in Malta between nine EU countries and

12 member states at Foreign Minister level, including  Spain, Italy, Ireland, Egypt, Jordan and Saudi Arabia. Michael Frendo, Malta’s foreign minister, said the meeting would cover inter-cultural dialogue, global warming, energy security, immigration and economic development. The Middle east crisis is expected to be discussed. “Bringing together these two worlds in Malta is in itself a political message in favour of the politics of moderation and against extremism and division,” Frendo said.

 Europe lost the war against Islamic Jihad by denying it (Bat Ye´or).
“European leaders claim that Islam is an important part of Europe’s civilization. This assertion is necessary to the Euro-Arab symbiosis of the Mediterranean project that – according to Eurabian belief – guarantees peace. They think peace is a matter of continual European concessions on its culture and identities, and of its own disintegration” (Bat Ye´or) 
It is the resolution of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict that will give the Barcelona Process a central role in the region ( Bat Ye´or , and also  Nadia Mushtaq Abbasi ( Research Fellow at the Institute of Strategic Studies, Islamabad) 

Forces behind the planned Euromediterranean Empire

 According to Bat Ye´or (Eurabia 2005) the European-Arab Dialogue was a consequence of French aspirations to lead the formation of a new super-power counterweight to the USA. It was reinforced by the oil crisis after the Yom Kippur War in 1973, where the EEC countries submitted to Islam in  December of 1973 in Copenhagen. Since then all meetings between Europe and the OIC, ISESCO, and the Arab League  have, according to bat Ye´or, been a cringing submission to the Arabs, who have dictated censorship of our mediaand teaching of Islamic culture and ideology at the universities of Europe (Eurabia 2005)

Cause of the development of the “Euromediterranean Partnership”

Some think the thirst for oil is the major motivation for European submission to Islam. This does not seem likely to me for several reasons 
The efforts of the West to develop alternative energy sources were little intensified for 30 years after the 1973 oil crisis. Rather dismantling of nuclear power plants were intensified, which does not imply fear of the Arabs.
2. Probably, the oilprinces are at least as dependent on the oil money as we are on the oil: No money for the hungry Arab masses will soon mean starvation, revolutions and ousting of the ruling Arab dynasties.
3. If our submission was due to fear, we would have done as little as possible to avoid an embargo. In stead European leaders – not the Arabs – according to Bat Ye´or took the initiative in the European Arab Dialogue (EAD) to unnecessarily offer the Arabs all of Europe. They brought the horror into our own sitting rooms, in other words the  immigrataion connected with Euromediterranean  “partnership” under various bad excuses -especially about decreasing birth rates, which they are responsible for by permitting free abortion.
4.The issue of relations between the European Community and Mediterranean Countries is much older than from 1973, arose at the beginning of the 1960s when France underlined the need to reinforce trade interdependency, resulting from decades of colonial relations, between some European countries and the countries of the Mediterranean. Bat Ye´or agrees to this (Eurabia 2005).
5. Andreas von Retyi (Bilderberg, Kopp Verlag, Rottenburg 2006) has another explanation for the oil crisis in 1973: The  impact of theBilderberg group, which at its Saltsjöbaden meeting in 1973 – before the Yom Kippur War – wanted a quadrupling of oil prices and utilized the Yom Kippur War for this purpose by means of a double-tongued Henry Kissinger in shuttle diplomacy– while Saudi Oil Minister, Yamani, did his utmost to prevent the crisis.

What is behind the Euromediterranean Partnership?

 This does not mean that the Arabs do not push to spread their Islamic ideology. For they certainly do. But it means they are being invited to do so by our politicians and media who are corrupted by the greatest concentration of capital and media possession the world has ever experinced – emanating from the New World Order´ s leaders, who also financed the Russian and Nazi subversions.Therefore, our media have for 12 years been silent like oysters about the Euromediterranean Project – and for 34 years about the EAD. These processes are therefore practically unknown to the Europeans.

Europe’s Mediterranean policy has its legal basis in the Treaty of Rome . Article 131of the Treaty of Rome states that ‘the Member States agree to associate with the Community the non-European countries and territories which have special relations with Belgium, Denmark, France, Italy, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom.’

The man who did the spadework for the Euromediterranean Project was former EU Commission President Jacques Delors, who is an honorary member of David Rockefeller´s Club of Rome.
The European Commission, presided by Jacques Delors, launched in 1990 the “Renewed Mediterranean Policy”.
“The objective of learning to live together was outlined by the World Commissionon Education for the 21st Century chaired by the former President of the European Commission Jacques Delors.

“Formal education systems are to be geared towards …. daily practice of tolerance by giving way to others’ points of view.”
Thanks to the personal engagement of former Commission President Jacques Delorsand his successors, informal consultations have been taking place between EU officials and the various churches, religions and schools of thought in Europe since the 1980s”,i.e. “we are not different. Just let´s talk – and you will love to take the Burka, too! 
 For the sake of your well-being.” 

 The Barcelona Declaration
Create a  Region of shared security and prosperity through
1. Political and security measures
2. Financial and economic measures with massive investments through
   MEDA and the European Investment Bank as well as a Common market from 2010.
3. Cultural and social measures

Photo from the United Arab Emirates.
Since the Muslim umma aspires to world hegemony – why do we pave the way for it? The oil states abound in our money paid them for oil. Why do we not let them pay for th
eir poor brothers in Muhammad?

According to the report from the 9. Euromediterranean Foreign Minister Conference, Nov. 2007 Mauritania and Albania have now  also joined the Euromediterranean Society, which furthermore comprises: Algeria, Morocco, Tunesia, Egypt, The Palestinian Authority, Jordan, Syria, Lebanon, Turkey and Israel.
3 weeks after 9/11, 2001, the Euromediterranean Foreign Ministers met in Brussels and made the following statement: “The Ministers rejected as both dangerous and unfounded any equating of terrorism with the Arab and Muslim world. In this connection the importance of the Barcelona Process was emphasized by everybody…. to promote dialogue between equal civilizations  (Report from 5.-6. 10. 2001 in Brussels). This has been the EU attitude ever since.

Naples 2003: On Dec. 2-3 the EU promised the “partner countries” the 4 fundamental freedoms of the EU: Free mobility for capital, services, goods and people within the Euromediterranean area in return for  “economic and democratic progress” - as confirmed by the Danish Prime Minister Fogh Rasmussen.  This is stated in a report issued on Nov 28, 2003, i.e. 4-5 days before this scandalous Foreign Minister Conference!! ! And this VI. Euromediterranean Foreign Minister Conference decided to launch 

The  Anna Lindh Foundation, an institution to create a Euromediterranean area without “us” and “them” by brainwashing our youth to multiculturalism. Knowing that Islam cannot be moved an inch  the EU sees only one way to achieve this: To remove the last remnants of our culture, religion and nationality effectively and introduce the sharia as proposed by the Arhbishop of Canterbury – long practised in English courtrooms and in Denmark (only Halal-butchered poultry is sold) .

To help it are the Danish Center for Cultural Development, the various EM-Youth organizations, the media, and here , and here, and here and here and here and here as well as the UNESCO Cultural Convention.

Besides, the Alliance of Civilzations (AC) was founded by the Spanish Prime Minister Zapatero, Turkish Prime Minister Erdogan and UN Secretary General Kofi Annan  to promote this programme. It is planned to fuse with the EU Neighbourhood Policy in 2009.  It seems to be flirting with global New Age religion. On Jan. 15, 2008,  Benita Ferrero Waldner, EU Commissioner for External relations, met with AC and said: “We support Alliance of Civilization´s activities exploring innovative uses of mass media to promote cross-cultural understanding – but these will achieve their objective only when there is effective freedom of expression and information. A main objective of theEuropean Year of Intercultural Dialogue (2008) is mobilization of civil society.How else can we build bridges between communities and people?” Never mind us ordinary contrary ignorants!
However, the development of the Euromediterranean Partnership was not satisfactory. For while the EU considered the voluntary Barcelona Declaration to be judicially binding the Muslims did not. They took what they could use – and forgot the obligations! So in 2004 a new EU-initiative was introduced to secure immigration and trade:

The European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP)

 “The EU offers our neighbours a privileged relationship, building upon a mutual commitment to common values (democracy and human rights, rule of law, good governance, market economy principles and sustainable development). The ENP goes beyond existing relationships to offer a deeper political relationship and economic integration. The level of ambition of the relationship will depend on the extent to which these values are effectively shared. The ENP remains distinct from the process of enlargement although it does not prejudge, for European neighbours, how their relationship with the EU may develop in future

The central element of the European Neighbourhood Policy is the bilateral ENP Action Plans agreed between the EU and each partner. These set out an agenda of political and economic reforms with short and medium-term priorities. Implementation of the ENP Action Plans is underway.
The European Neighbourhood Policy applies to the EU’s immediate neighbours by land or sea – 
Algeria, Armenia,Azerbaijan, Belarus, Egypt, Georgia, Israel, Jordan, Lebanon, Libya, Moldova, Morocco, the Palestinian Authority, Syria, Tunisia andUkraine. Although Russia is also a neighbour of the EU, our relations are instead developed through a Strategic Partnership

To those adjacent countries left out of the enlargement process, the EU offers a stake in its internal market and further integration and liberalisation to promote four freedoms of movement: persons, good, capital and services. In return, it expects these countries to make progress in political and economic reforms.

In its “General Report 2007 the EU Commission informs  that 4.08 billion Euros were set aside for the ENP 2007-2010. In 2007 800 million Euros were given to the Palestinean areas. And that on 11.04.2007 the Black Sea Synergy was launched: A regional initiative for the countries around the Black Sea. In a communication from  Dec.5,  2007, the EU advocated “a strong ENP to improve trade and mobility“. Furthermore, “the European Union and its Mediterranean partners continued negotiations to enhance their trade relations with a view to creating a Euro-Mediterranean freetrade area to come into effect by 2010” with liberalization of services and a coherent agricultural and fishery policy. On March 15, 2007, the EU Parliament criticised the EU for doing too little with a view to the Free Trade Area by 2010. Morocco is praised for making progress

Where  will this enlargement end?
First 10 Euromediterranean partners, then 13 of them , then 16 ENP countries which may in due time join the EU – although most of them are outside Europe. And now the Black Sea Synergy! In the work of Nadia Mushtaq Abassi even the Persian Gulf is mentioned as an EU target!!

In my next post I shall enter on the EU and Globalism in its wider sense.. 

2 thoughts on “The Immigration Tsunami, Part 2”

  1. Border control is something the whole West seems to have a problem with. All you need is will and the problem can be solved. Unfortunately, will has been strangled by PC and its bastard children-multiCULTuralism and “diversity”.

  2. True “Islamophobia=BS”.
    I’ve spent many days at the Mexico/Arizona border working with clean-up folks and minutemen and finding Middle East artifacts dropped by “crossers.” Al and his Qaedas could walk-over our southern border with smallpox, ebola; you name it. None of us believe that wall will ever get built.

Comments are closed.