On the occasion of its launch in 2004 from near Buffalo, New York, the Muslim television channel “Bridges TV” won the enthusiastic support of Secretary of State Colin Powell’s media assistant,Â Stuart Holliday: “I laud your expression of interest in promoting understanding and tolerance.” And so it went; Bridges TV also met with euphoricÂ media coverage, uncritical academic reaction, and blessings from sports giants like Muhammad Ali and Hakeem Olajuwan.
Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â * Â ‘Misunderstood’ Islamist Aasiya Hassan
On the political level, its raison d’Ãªtre was based on theÂ canard that Muslims in the United States sufferÂ from bias and are victimized. That an idea took formal expression in 2000, when theÂ SenateÂ passed a resolution inveighing against the “discrimination” and “backlash” suffered by the American Muslim community, an insulting falsehood then and now.
On the ideological level, Bridges TV was a fraud, pretending to be moderate when it was just another member of the “Wahhabi lobby.” Endorsed by some of the worst Islamist functionaries in the country (Nihad Awad, Ibrahim Hooper, Iqbal Yunus, Louay Safi), it was an extremist wolf disguised in moderate sheep’s clothing.
From the start, however, Bridges TV amounted to a lie.
On the financial level, Bridges TV marketed itself to investors on the basis of an imaginary population ofÂ 7–7.4Â million U.S. Muslims, or 2-3 times the actual total, making the stationÂ commercially unviableÂ from day one.
Finally, on the familial level, Bridges TV pretended to be based on what criticÂ Zuhdi JasserÂ calls the “public marital partnership” of the station’s first couple; Muzzammil (“Mo”) Hassan proudly related how his wife Aasiya Z. Hassan spurred him toÂ create Bridges TV. He was the hard-charging founder responsible for finances and marketing; she expressed her devotion to Islamic ideals and culture as the station’s program director.
In fact, reports Aasiya’sÂ divorce attorney, the couple had “physical confrontations off and on” during their entire eight-year marriage and these recently escalated to Muzzammil issuing death threats.Â Salma Zubair, who says she is Aasiya’s sister, writes that Aasiya “lived her 8 years of married life with fear.”
Aasiya began divorce proceedings on the grounds of “cruel and inhuman treatment” and won an “Order of Protection” on Feb. 6 to force Muzzammil out of their shared house, enraging him; according to the localÂ police chief, Muzzammil “came back to the residence and was pounding on doors and broke one window.”
|Muzzammil Hassan standing outside the Bridges TV studio.|
On Feb. 12, the couple encountered each other at the television studio. At 6:20 p.m., Muzzammil went to the police and directed them where to find his wife’s corpse. Officers found her body at the station in a hallway, decapitated and with multiple stab wounds. Detectives charged Muzzammil with murder and are looking for knife used to kill her.Â
A reliable source informs me â€“ and this is breaking news â€“ that the police found Muzzammil repeatedly told his wife that she had no right, under Islamic law, to divorce him. They also quote him stating that Aasiya, because beheaded, cannot reach paradise.
Muzzammil’s defense lawyer says his client willÂ plead not guilty, presumably by reason of insanity.
A great battle looms ahead on how to interpret this crime, whether asdomestic violence or honor killing.Â Supna ZaidiÂ of Islamist Watch defines the latter as “the murder of a girl or woman who has allegedly committed an act that has shamed and embarrassed her family.” Deeply alien to Westerners, this motive hasÂ paramount importanceÂ in traditional Muslim life.
In aÂ Middle East QuarterlyÂ article, “Are Honor Killings Simply Domestic Violence?” feminist theorist Phyllis Chesler delineates eight differences between these two concepts, including the identities of perpetrator and victim, the circumstances of the murder, the degree of gratuitous violence, the killer’s state of mind, and family responses.
Did Aasiya die in a crime of passion or to reinstate a family’s reputation? Was the violence generic or specifically Muslim? TheIslamic Society of North AmericaÂ opts for domestic violence while theÂ National Organization for Women‘s New York State chapter sees an honor killing.
The crime at Bridges TV fits neither model exactly, suggesting we need more information to determine its exact nature. But as theforces of political correctnessÂ inevitably bear down to exclude an Islamic dimension to the murder, the motive of family reputationmustÂ be kept alive. Enough with the pleasant deceits â€“ time has come to utter hard truths about Bridges TV.