No birth certificate? No Obamacare!

Attorney files motion to link eligibility, health-care lawsuits

By Chelsea Schilling
© 2010 WorldNetDaily

A California lawyer who has led several of the high-profile legal challenges to Barack Obama’s eligibility to be president has filed a motion to intervene in a case by 13 attorneys general contesting the constitutionality of the Democrats’ massive health-care plan.

Attorney Orly Taitz – now a candidate for secretary of state in California – is seeking to link her case and the case against the health-care law, Florida et al vs. United States Department of Health and Human Services.

In legal documents filed April 6 in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida, Taitz requests an oral argument on the motion to take place April 14 at 9 a.m.

As WND recently reported, Taitz argues, “H.R. 3590 was signed into law by Mr. Barack Hussein Obama, who … never proved his legitimacy to the presidency. Therefore the act is invalid, as it was not signed by one legally entitled to sign it.”

Plaintiffs for the case include attorneys general representing the following states: Florida, South Carolina, Nebraska, Texas, Utah, Louisiana, Alabama, Michigan, Colorado, Pennsylvania, Washington, Idaho and South Carolina. Virginia has filed an independent suit in a separate action. The complaint lists Secretary of Health and Human Services Kathleen Sebelius, Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner and Secretary of Labor Hilda Solis as defendants.

The plaintiffs are asking the court to:

A. Declare the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act to be in violation of Article I of and the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States;

B. Declare defendants to have violated the plaintiffs’ rights as sovereigns and protectors of the freedom, health, and welfare of their citizens and residents, as aforesaid;

C. Enjoin defendants and any other agency or employee acting on behalf of the United States from enforcing the act against the plaintiffs, their citizens and residents, and any of their agencies or officials or employees, and to take such actions as are necessary and proper to remedy their violations deriving from any such actual or attempted enforcement

“Movant unlike the Attorneys General is a medical provider directly affected by the Act suing Quo Warranto,” Taitz’ motion states. “Accordingly, there can be no genuine dispute that Dr. Taitz claims a valid interest in the subject matter of the instant action – i.e. whether the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act violates the Commerce Clause.”

It continues, “It is likewise irrefutable that Dr. Taitz is presently ‘so situated’ that a disposition of the instant declaratory judgment action will significantly, if not completely, impair her legal interests.”

Taitz’ complaint notes that she is a California-licensed doctor of dental surgery and claims the health-care law “imposes an unreasonable infringement upon her gainful employment in dental surgery as overburdening interstate commerce in clear violation of the Commerce Clause.”

“However,” it states, “unlike the attorneys general, Dr. Taitz raises a more fundamental issue, the underlying legitimacy of Barack Obama to sign the act.”

World Net Daily has more

3 thoughts on “No birth certificate? No Obamacare!”

  1. Does this mean the Obamanation cant get ObamaCare as a COLB is NOT a Birth Certificate. Oh wait the Government does not need ObamaCare they are EXEMPT and dont have to pay they just keep their GOLDEN FREE Health Care as before.
    ObamaCare is just for LITTLE people like you and me.

  2. I am glad that some states have woken up to the fact that their ‘president’ is an imposter and inelligible to pass wind, leave alone any law in the country. I am sure this legal process will see the shit hit the fan as the wheels of the cog begin to fall in place quicker than I anticipated.
    I hope the Americans will be able to see their way back to reality, soon, especially the Jews.

  3. Who is this motherfucker?

    Obama’s Lies, Fraud: Can Special Counsel Patrick Fitzgerald Open an Investigation?

    Worldnetdaily carried a headline earlier this week regarding Barack Hussein Obama, aka Barry Soetoro, aka Barry Obama, aka Barack Dunham, aka Barry Dunham using a social security number issued in the state of Connecticut.

    NEW YORK — “Two private investigators working independently are asking why President Obama is using a Social Security number set aside for applicants in Connecticut while there is no record he ever had a mailing address in the state.

    “In addition, the records indicate the number was issued between 1977 and 1979, yet Obama’s earliest employment reportedly was in 1975 at a Baskin-Robbins ice-cream shop in Oahu, Hawaii.

    “WND has copies of affidavits filed separately in a presidential eligibility lawsuit in the U.S. District Court of the District of Columbia by Ohio licensed private investigator Susan Daniels and Colorado private investigator John N. Sampson.

    “The investigators believe Obama needs to explain why he is using a Social Security number reserved for Connecticut applicants that was issued at a date later than he is known to have held employment.”

    This issue has been around for quite some time; I wrote a column about it November, 5, 2009:…

Comments are closed.