"Marxist Hunter" Anders Behring Breivik

Thanks to WZ & JW

Anders Behring Breivik (32) Prior to the attacks, published a long manifesto and a video on the Internet, where he describes the attacks he was about to perform.

Both the video and the document is apparently published online on Friday 22 July – the day the attacks occurred.

“Marxist Hunter”

It this more than twelve minutes long video Behring Brevik compares himself with Knights, and announces a year-long war against Marxism and Islamism.

Today, the Knights Templars, an order within the Masonic movement  of which Anders Behring Breivik was a member,  announced that he will now be excluded from the Masonic Order.  (There’s more, here)

Needless to mention that our enemies smell blood, hoping for a feeding frenzy. I say don’t fall for the blame game, don’t go on the defensive, we have nothing to apologize for!

Anything including the kitchen sink:

Inevitable… Far Left Links “Right-Wing” Oslo Killer to Palin and Tea Party

Heads I Win – Tails You Lose

When crazed Bush-hatingleftist Jared Loughner went on a shooting spree in Arizona the left blamed Sarah Palin. When a crazed “right-wing” killer goes on a shooting spree in Oslo the the left blames Sarah Palin.

You just knew this was coming: Oslo mass murderer Anders Behring Breivik was known to be a fan of Winston Churchill so the media is having a heyday.

In their article on the massacre Reuters used the terms “right-wing” or “far-right” 25 times.

NORWAY SHOOTER – Right-wing Christian or Left-wing Media DRECK? 

And the far left is already linking the killer to Sarah Palin and tea party. (GWP)

Back to Reality:

First of all, here is Fjordman who was viciously smeared and attacked by the puffy Lizard from LGF. The deranged turncoat and libelblogger somehow reminds me of pedophile Scott Ritter, who was blackmailed into doctoring his reports and is now in jail. Fjordman of course has nothing to apologize for, and neither do we.

Fjordman Speaks Out

The blame game

Robert Spencer:

Norway’s Aftenposten is blaming me, Bat Ye’or and Fjordman for Breivik’s mass murders — as if killing a lot of children aids the defense against the global jihad and Islamic supremacism, or has anything remotely to do with anything we have ever advocated.

For that matter, no one has explained or can explain how this guy’s supposed anti-jihad views have anything to do with his murdering children.

Scenario #1:

1. Islamic preachers and texts preach violence and hate.
2. Islamic jihadists kill people.
3. Media and Islamic spokesmen say that only Islamophobes think #1 is even happening, or if it is, that it has anything to do with #2.

Scenario #2:

1. Freedom fighters preach free speech, freedom of conscience and equality of rights for all people, against Sharia and Islamic supremacism that denies those rights, advocating only legal means of protest and dissent.
2. Some nutcase who allegedly expressed allegiance with the freedom fighters kills people, none of whom are preaching Sharia or Islamic supremacism.
3. Media assumes that #1 caused #2 and blames freedom fighters.

SIOA and SIOE declare our sympathy for the victims and relatives of the victims of the heinous mass murders in Norway. We denounce the attacker and reiterate our dedication to the defense of free societies and opposition to all vigilantism and violence. Attempts to link us to these murders on the basis of alleged postings by the murderer mentioning us are absurd and offensive. Our work is and always has been wholly focused upon defending humane values and freedoms. There is no way that any sane person could possibly conclude that committing mass murder of children would advance the principles for which we stand. And if he was not sane, then any imputation of responsibility to us falters on that basis. Islamic jihadists and supremacists routinely invoke Islamic texts and teachings to justify violence, and thus those teachings are and should be rightly held up to scrutiny; by contrast, our record of support for human rights and the dignity of all human beings is consistent and unbroken. This murderer should be punished to the full extent of the law; any attempts to tar freedom fighters with his actions is deplorable.

“SIOE Group barred suspected Norway killer from forum,” from Reuters, July 23 (thanks to Pamela Geller):

(Reuters) – A fringe [sic] European anti-Islamist lobby group said on Saturday the man suspected of Norway’s gun and bomb massacre had tried to join their Facebook group on the Internet but had been rejected over his apparent neo-Nazi links.Anders Gravers, founder of Stop Islamisation of Europe (SIOE), said Anders Behring Breivik had made the application around 18 months ago.

Breivik said in an Internet posting in December 2009 (here) he had had discussions with SIOE, but Gravers said his organisation had no record of this.

“He has never been in contact with us and he has never given us any advice,” Gravers told Reuters.

But he said it was possible Breivik had attended one of its demonstrations.

He said an SIOE member in the Faroe Islands had checked Breivik’s Facebook “friends” on the social media site when he tried to join and discovered one who used a picture of Danish neo-Nazi leader Jonni Hansen as his profile picture.

“He advised us not to allow this guy to join or be able to post on the Facebook wall (message page),” said SIOE co-founder Stephen Gash.

SOIE, which says it has 30,000 followers on Facebook, was founded by Gravers and Gash in 2007 with the aim of “preventing Islam becoming a dominant political force in Europe.”

Gash said the organisation is unpolitical and opposes both Islam and Nazism…. (More)

15 thoughts on “"Marxist Hunter" Anders Behring Breivik”

  1. Stop the apologies!

    Why It Wasn’t Unreasonable to Suspect Muslim Terrorism in Norway
    By Aaron Goldstein on 7.22.11 @ 11:55PM

    “Not all Muslims are terrorists but nearly all terrorists are Muslim.”

    In light of the fact that the man responsible for two heinous acts of terrorism which have thus far resulted in the deaths of 87 people is a native born, non-Muslim Norwegian, John Tabin asks if large segments of the media (including bloggers like him and me) were wrong to speculate that this was an act of Islamic radicals.
    For his part, Tabin plans to answer that question in depth at a later date. So allow me to give my thoughts. I would like to make the case that it was not at all unreasonable to speculate that Muslims were involved in this attack.
    First, it was only a year ago that Norwegian authorities thwarted an al Qaeda plot to attack Norway.
    Second, today’s attacks were nearly simultaneous. An al Qaeda calling card.
    Third, it was only last week that that Norwegian authorities indicted Mullah Krekar, founder of the Ansar al-Islam, for threats against Norwegian politicians.
    Fourth, a Muslim organization called Ansar al-Jihad al-Alami claimed responsibility for the attack. This is the most notable point of all. I mean what kind of people brag about murdering innocent civilians they did not kill?
    Finally, consider all the acts of terrorism which have occurred since September 11, 2001 – Bali, Madrid, London, Mumbai, Fort Hood not to mention all those suicide bombings in Israel. All of those attacks were carried out by Muslim entities. Frankly, it would have been irresponsible to discount the possibility of yet another Muslim terrorist attack.
    So is Anders Behring Breivik a diabolically clever lone wolf or did he have help from others? While those questions must be answered, like Timothy McVeigh, Breivik is the exception that proves the rule. But unlike McVeigh, Breivik will not be executed for deliberate and wanton mass murder.
    The long and short of it is that when the next terrorist attack is carried out whether it be next week, next month or next year, the people and the organizations at the top of my suspect list will be Muslim.

    As the adage goes, “Not all Muslims are terrorists but nearly all terrorists are Muslim.”


    The tragedy in Oslo, Norway has led us to into some not-usually-traveled territory: Norwegian politics. And as we try to get a better understanding of the political climate in the grieving country, here is some of what we are learning.

    The day before Anders Behring Breivik opened fire on youths at a Labor Party camp, organizers welcomed the country’s foreign minister. Now, the foreign minister’s message from that day has been revealed: it was an anti-Israel speech in which he came out in strong support of a Palestinian state. That message was something being supported by the camp’s attendees, who were part of the ruling Labor Party’s socialist youth movement called AUF.

    According to a translated report for Norwegian news station TV2, Norwegian Foreign Minister Jonas Gahr Store visited the camp on the island of Utoya on Thursday, the day before Breivik opened fire on campers killing over 80 of them.

    “Together with the Norwegian Broadcasting Corporation correspondent Sidsel Wold and Norwegian People’s Aid Kirsten Belck-Olsen, discussed the Foreign Minister of the deadlock between Israel and the Palestinian Authority,” the Google translation of the article says.

    It continues:

    As foreign minister arrived Utøya he was met with a demand from the AUF that Norway must recognize a Palestinian state.
    – The Palestinians must have their own state, the occupation must end, the wall must be demolished and it must happen now, said the Foreign Minister to cheers from the audience.
    Earlier this week, when Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas visited Norway, the Minister said to TV 2 news channel that Norway stands ready to recognize a Palestinian state . This he repeated during the debate on Utøya.


  2. I’m totally with you on this Sheik. It had all the marks of being an Islamist hit at the beginning and even I thought it was. I’m really starting to smell a ‘fit up’ somewhere.

    Well the war on Conservatives, whether it be Christian or just plain conservative people by nature has been going on for some time now. Looks like the ‘Left(wits)’ have now just scored a direct hit on us.

    The left/communists with their evil brethren will have a nice propaganda tool to use now. Looks like they’re upping the ante.

  3. 17,457 islamic terrorist attacks since 9/11…..still wondering why everyone immediately thinks anything that resembles a terrorist attack is by muslims first?

  4. Too many things don’t add up here.

    Let’s go back a bit. Wikileakes released documents showing that obama met with the MB while he was campaigning and that they planned together for the disruption of islamic countries, starting with Eygpt. with “moderate” dictators. Leakes showed there was a plan to introduce this as a “democracy” movement that would spread and eventually destablize Europe. (No, I didn’t save links, but it’s easily found. I went to Dogpile, the searched “obama met with muslim brotherhood during campaign.”)

    Next, we have a situation in Europe where Eurocentric political parties and defense leagues are gaining converts every day and interfering with these plans for Europe. Battles have taken place in the streets between them and the “anti-fa” (for anti”facist”) kids. The elites have been trying to crack down on the Euro groups, and the media regularly refers to them as racist. But people are waking up.

    If you were a marxist/globalist/islamist, how could you put a stop to the traditional values leagues/political parties in Europe, while at the same time, hurting American conservatives, Christians, anti-jihad websites, the EDL, NDL, Tea Party, and Sarah Palin (whew!) — while getting EVERY “anti-racist,” “anti-fa” kid on your side a deadly weapon to use against the right for decades to come.

    Why, arrange for a very Nordic-looking young man with a documented history to go on a rampage in Norway! (They do have a very islam0friendly foreign minister). Set up a FB page for him, pu some comments on anti-jihad pages for a history, take all these staged photos and write him a manifesto!

    How? Who knows? Could be a convert with a clever disguise; could be somebody brainwashed, like Patty Hearst was. We’re talking conspiracy — anything could happen.

    Just sayin’. (And if you want more, in addition, they could stop any movements against mosques in Western countries while appeaing muslims and making it much more difficult to develop intel in those areas. Ground Zero Mosque? Why, of course, and we’ll build one on the site of the Oslo explosions, too!)

    Think it couldn’t happen? Look how, AFTER BEING ATTACKED, just to show they weren’t mad, in 10 years, America elected a muslim brotherhood-connected guy named Hussein Obama, a guy whose cousin advocates for sharia in Kenya. And think of all the new US footholds by islam, now that we all want to assure them we know they are an ROP. There’s even a crescent-shaped Flight 93 memorial planned that will point to mecca! (for “healing.”)

    Already, the left has up sites about “Hate speech, the Tea Party, Glen Beck, and Norway” (check it out). It’s as if, if they were trying to destroy Christianity and Western civ. really quickly,. withoout waiting for demographics and taking a chance on losing to the anti-jihadists, what better way could they have chosen? It’s like a screenplay or a novel — almost as good as “The Manchurian Candidate.”

    Like OK City and the book “The Third Terrorist,” it might not be what it at first seems. Cover-ups HAVE happened.

    Just sayin’. Something is fishy, and we’re not talkin’ lute.

  5. Agree Jen – many things do not add up. An open warning for the left wing idiots – you use the tragedy in Norway for your own selfish needs and you will by held to account.

  6. Jen

    “Leakes showed there was a plan to introduce this as a “democracy” movement that would spread and eventually destablize Europe.”

    How very interesting.

    This was new to me, but is actually, what I at one point came to suspect, since everything was so coordinated, or, well, orchestrated. I think, as far as we know now, the above paragraph makes sense.

    I think what you’re saying, Jen, makes a lot of sense. Most people are in the now and yesterday of what happened in Oslo and Utøya, as well as wherever in the world they may be geographically at the moment. But there is a tomorrow, and everything looks different in tomorrow’s spotlight on today’s events. So if we’re able stretch beyond today and look back, we might see other things than what is apparant today.

    We know there are evil people out there, and they may at the same time, on the other end of that scale, be some of the most charismatic, thus gathering loads of people around them. Sitting in high positions, being carismatic and gathering crowds doesn’t necessary mean you’re a good person with good intentions.

  7. Is it an interesting point in itself, that the Minister of Foreign Affairs takes time to go to the youth camp? In my opinion, yes.

    Looking back, we know there were 80 individuals of foreign background there, out of a total of 700.

    An important subject on the agenda was “aid Palestine/boycot Israel”

  8. ” There’s even a crescent-shaped Flight 93 memorial planned that will point to mecca! (for “healing.”)”

    Just pointing out.

    – What can we do to make the left see what’s going on?

  9. Nidarosdomen Cathedral
    29 July 1030

    Destroying Christianity more quickly. Today, Foreign Minister Støre was to speak about “dialogue” at Stiklestad, where the battle to Christianize Norway took place 29 July 1030.

    Forces, fronted by the bishop, and the former Oslo bishop, are working on a plan to make this site a multicultural center for dialogue and reconciliation. Plans have been going on for up to three-four years, and people are very much against this idea.

    Støre at Stiklestad today

    People who disagree with the idea of multicultural center at Stiklestad, are present pointing out that they are discontent they didn’t get to have a say, and also emphazising that Støre is on a political mission here today.

  10. The EU crises, as well as the US crises now – all part of the plan?

    Germany demands that the countries heavily indebted let go of some sovereignty to EU.

    – Stoltenberg keeps talking about The Millennium Goals
    – Hitler talked about The Third Reich
    – Muhammed’s goal was the Califathe

    Do we see any links here? A pattern?


Comments are closed.