Obama's 'Intimate Iftar Event'

I must have been missing something:

Hussein Obama:  “Muslims made sacrifices on 9/11” –

Pamela calls it treason.

I say who will rid us of this insolent putz?  Why do we allow a Marxist Muslim to rewrite history for us?

The First War and The Last War

Yes, indeed, Mr. President (always taking a free hand with history).

The first war the United States of Anerica had to fight was against the Muslims, not one but two wars, in fact — the first was the First Barbary War(1801–5), also known as the Barbary Coast War or the Tripolitan War. Most Americans are unaware of this salient fact, but that’s a fact. Truth does not change.

[It] was the first of two wars fought between the United States and the North African Berber Muslim states known collectively as the Barbary States. These included the quasi-independent Sultanates in the middle and western coastal regions of North Africa—what is now Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia, and Libya.

And of course, the second World War found us engaged against the Muslim world.

But now, 10 years after 9/11, our daily truth is being manufactured by a Muslim parvenu  and a complicit media.
To the surprise of neither his supporters nor his detractors, Imam Obama doesn’t have much to say on Easter, but he treats Ramadan like a national holiday. Wednesday evening he hosted  (a shady bunch of) Muslims at the White House for an “Iftar” dinner honoring the barbaric cult. His dinner speech ranged from trite to bizarre to alarming:

“Like so many faiths, Islam has always been part of our American family, and Muslim Americans have long contributed to the strength and character of our country, in all walks of life. This has been especially true over the past 10 years.”

Off hand I can’t remember any Muslim Americans making significant positive contributions to this country, but I can remember what happened 10 years ago. True enough, we’ve had Islam rubbed in our face by our liberal ruling class ever since.

Muzz in the house, fox guarding the chicken coop….

But they were there. ISNA has admitted ties to both Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood. “Obama’s Iftar guest list omits controversial attendees,” by Neil Munro in the Daily Caller, August 11 (thanks to Robert):

Did anyone mention Huma Abedin? If not, why not?

U.S Ignores Hillary Clinton’s Powerful Aide Huma Abedin at Its Own Risk

The White House’s published guest list for this year’s Ramadan Iftar dinner was much shorter than previous years’ roster. It excluded the names of several controversial advocates who have attended the event in the past, including some who The Daily Caller can confirm did attend on Wednesday night.“It was a squeaky clean list,” said Durriya Badani, director of the U.S.-Islamic World Forum, an annual event organized by the Brookings Institution’s Saban Center and the Qatari government. The guests on the published list are “not controversial at all,” said Badani, whose name is on the list the White House provided to reporters.

“It was a lot more low-key … It was a more intimate event this year,” said Haris Tarin, the Washington director of the Muslim Public Affairs Council, whose invitation was kept off the published list. “I have no idea why they didn’t publish [MPAC’s invite] … I’m going to learn about that a little bit more,” he told The Daily Caller.

Mohamed Magid also attended but did not appear on the White House’s publish list. Magid is imam of the All Dulles Area Muslim Society mosque in Northern Virginia and the current president of the Islamic Society of North America. Along with MPAC, Magid’s two organizations have drawn criticism from a loose network of online critics who claim they are sympathetic to Islamist groups….

The list also excluded a few controversial attendees, such as Tarin from MPAC and Mohamed Magid, who is the imam of the All Dulles Area Muslim Society mosque in Northern Virginia and the current president of the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA).

Critics of Tarin’s and Magid’s organizations — including the Investigative Project on Terrorism — use the Internet to publish court records, translate Arab-language media reports, and record information released by Muslim advocacy groups in the United States and overseas. For example, court records now available online show that the federal government designated ISNA an unindicted co-conspirator during the 2008 trial of Texas Muslims who smuggled money to the Hamas terror group….

It doesn’t end here:

WTF?… US Gives $100 Million to Hamas Controlled Gaza

Umm… Why is the Obama administration giving $100 million to Hamas?
The AP reported, via Orbus Max/GWP

7 thoughts on “Obama's 'Intimate Iftar Event'”

  1. Seriously, scrubbing the White House guest list? What is the liar-in-chief trying to hide?….spit…..

  2. Umm… Why is the Obama administration giving $100 million to Hamas?

    I don’t know what anyone else might call it but I call it Obama’s al Zakat on behalf of the US taxpayers.
    To the US taxpayers, however, it is al Jizya.

  3. ”Muslims made sacrifices on 9/11″

    Yeah—they ‘sacrificed’ the pilots who flew the planes into buildings.

    1. In a video after 9/11, OBL said the Muslims on the planes were ‘passengers’.

      Now the Muselputz Obama is using the same words to insult America.

  4. We throw money at the UN, a tons of countries. This is one of the real reasons we are broke. Do not anyone tell you other wise. They like to blame it on the so called entitlements. The truth is they have been syphoning your Social Security and other funds for many many years. The whole idea is redistribution of wealth. Obama didn’t start this. There is a long line beind him. He’s just speeding making us into a third world nation .

  5. Barack Hussein Obama has done everything in his power to further the cause of islamic supremacist conquest both at home and abroad, (see HERE and HERE) and at a recent iftar dinner filled with radical islamic supremacists who are intricately linked to the jihad, he extolled the virtues of islam, lied about its role in American history and bemoaned the great ‘sacrifice’ of muslims on September 11, 2001 – the day that muslims murdered us wholesale on our own soil for islam.

    Islam Is Not Part of Our Civilization –
    by Bill Warner at Political Islam

    Obama said at the latest White House Iftar dinner:
    Like so many faiths, Islam has always been part of our American family, and Muslim Americans have long contributed to the strength and character of our country, in all walks of life.
    These words have no basis in fact. Islam is not part of our civilization because its foundational principles are opposite to ours. Our civilization is built on the foundation of critical thought (how we think) and the Golden Rule (ethics). Islam is built on submission (authoritative thought) and ethical dualism.
    Let’s compare the principles, of these different thought systems, starting with authoritative thought and critical thought. Critical thought (also: analytic thought, scientific thought) is the necessary reasoning or intellectual basis for our culture of democracy. Critical thought is objective–no matter who does the work, they get the same results. It is fact-based, uses cause and effect, and is intellectual, not emotional. Critical thought’s tie into morals is that you don’t lie or cheat about data.
    Let’s look at some authoritative reasoning. Authoritative reasoning is based on expert opinion and asserts its truth by power. It is so, because the Establishment says it is so.

    The Meccan Koran, the early Koran, has one new idea—Mohammed is the prophet of Allah. (The ideas found in the Koran are derivative.) The proof of Mohammed’s prophecy is repetition of “Mohammed is the prophet” and what happens if you don’t accept that. The reasoning is circular—Mohammed is the prophet of Allah, because Allah says so. (Actually, the archangel of Allah says so.) How do we know what Allah says? Mohammed tells us what Allah says.
    The Koran of Medina (the later Koran) contains one new idea—if you don’t believe that Mohammed is the prophet of Allah, then you can be murdered in jihad. If you are not persuaded, then you can be eliminated. Now that is authoritative reasoning.

    More on authoritative reasoning can be found in the Sharia. The Sharia says that apostasy (leaving Islam) is a capital offense. And what entails apostasy?
    • To be sarcastic about Allah or any verse in the Koran
    • To deny the consensus of the Islamic scholars
    • To deny that Islam is to be the world’s only religion
    • To be sarcastic about Sharia
    And people say that Islam just needs to be reformed. Good luck on dealing with the authoritative rules of thought and reform. It is not that you are wrong, you are dead wrong. Want more examples of authoritative thought? Try Salman Rushdie, the author of the Satanic Verses, a novel. Islam’s reaction to the novel was a death fatwa. When the Mohammed cartoons were published, people died in riots.
    So far in America what happens if you differ with Establishment thought about Islam, you are called names, such as bigot or hater, and insulted as a punishment. However, the Establishment keeps flirting with the expanded versions of hate speech being criminalized. Hate speech is speech that the Establishment doesn’t like.
    Critical thought does not deal with punishment, just cause and effect along with Aristotelian logic. If you lose an argument under the rules of critical thought, you have had a learning experience, not a life threatening experience. Nor do insults and threats play a part in critical thought.
    Now to ethics, the Golden Rule is that we should treat ALL others as we would be treated. This is a unitary ethic, one rule for all peoples. Islam does not see it that way. Islam has one set of ethics for the Muslim and another set for the Kafir. The Hadith and the Koran are very clear that a Muslim is a brother to all other Muslims. A Muslim is a brother to any Muslim before he is the brother to any member of his Kafir blood family.
    Look at Mohammed’s ethics. Mohammed is the divine human prototype, the perfect man, as it says in 91 Koranic verses. How did Mohammed treat his neighbor? In Medina he gave neighboring tribes the chance to become become Muslims and to submit to Islam. If they did not, he attacked them. Submit or die–no Golden Rule.
    Mohammed repeatedly said that Muslims should lie to Kafirs if it would advance Islam—pure ethical dualism. Here we have the hadith:
    Bukhari 5,59,369 Mohammed asked, “Who will kill Ka’b, the enemy of Allah and Mohammed?”
    Bin Maslama rose and responded, “O Mohammed! Would it please you if I killed him?”
    Mohammed answered, “Yes.”
    Bin Maslama then said, “Give me permission to deceive him with lies so that my plot will succeed.”
    Mohammed replied, “You may speak falsely to him.”…
    Our Constitution’s Bill of Rights is an expansion on the Golden Rule. We eliminated slavery based on the Golden Rule. Do we live up to the Golden Rule on every occasion? No, but that does not diminish its guidance, because we can use the Golden Rule to criticize those that fail to meet it.

    To sum it all up: our civilization is based on the principles of the Golden Rule and critical thought. Islam is based on dualistic ethics and authoritative thought. There is no compromise between the opposites of the Golden Rule and dualistic ethics. There is no half-way between authoritative thought and critical thought. Islam’s principle of submission means that only active resistance can let us survive.
    We have a 1400 year history of the interaction between Islam and Kafir nations. The data matches the theory. Centuries after Islam enters the culture, the host culture is annihilated–see Turkey. There is no compatibility between Islam and us. Islam is not now, nor can it ever be, a part of our civilization. It is the final goal of Islam to annihilate all Kafir civilizations. Its first stage of–we are just like you, only different—should be seen for what it is. No amount of preaching by apologists can change Islam’s political doctrine and history.

    Islamic sharia is being crammed down our throats and those who resist it and try to force adherence to AMERICAN law in the United States are vilified, just as their counterparts in Europe are. Europe at this point is nearly lost, as a sleepy complicate populace begins to awaken, to their horror, they are learning that it will be nearly impossible to undo. We mustn’t let it happen here, we are the last bastion of freedom in the world and when our light becomes extinguished by islamic darkness, the whole world will be lost forever.
    Sharia and Western Compliance by Leslie Sacks at Family Security Matters

    Thanks to Zilla

Comments are closed.