The OIC Forces the 'Cairo Declaration of Yuman Rites' on Unsuspecting EUro Dhimmies & the U.S.

Abolishing the Universal Declaration of Human Rights to replace it with sharia.

Replacing the U.S. Constitution  & the Bill of Rights With Sharia. America now has a White House that is fully shariah-compliant.

Diabolical. Is the West simply too dumb or ignorant to even notice?  This is bloody scary stuff. And comrade Hillary is not the only one peddling OIC doctrine and preparing us for the caliphate.

Whitewash in the White House  (GoV)

The OIC White House
 The Organization of Islamic Cooperation is six years into a ten-year jihad against what it calls “Islamophobia”. It has set up an Islamophobia Observatory  (with a war-chest of over $ 100 million dollars) to keep an eye on those who oppose Islam, and issues both quarterly and annual reports on the progress of its work.Back in June the foreign ministers of OIC member states met for a three-day session in Kazakhstan and hammered out a series of resolutions which were published as“Resolutions on Legal Affairs Adopted by the 38th Session of the Council of Foreign Ministers (Session of Peace, Cooperation and Development) Astana, Republic of Kazakhstan) 28-30 June 2011” [pdf]. As you can imagine, this document is a dreadful load of deadly-dull bureaucratic boilerplate, and very handy bedtime reading for insomniacs.However, the first resolution — Resolution No.1/38-LEG on the follow-up and coordination of work on human rights — is worth a look, particularly items 7 through 10, pages 4-5 (my italics):

7. Expresses its deep concern over the frequent and erroneous association of Islam with violations of human rights and the misuse of the print and audio-visual media in propagating such misconceptions which lead to the reinforcement of prejudice and discrimination against Muslims and calls onthe Member States to undertake information activities to counter these activities;
8. Notes with grave concern the increasing trend of Islamophobic measures in the Western countries, stresses the responsibility of those States to ensure full respect to Islam and all divine religions and the inapplicability of using freedom of expression or press as a pretext to defame religions, and calls forrefrain from imposing restrictions, in any form whatsoever, on the cultural and religious rights and freedoms of people.
9. Denounces media campaigns and fabrications made by some quarters in non-Member States regarding the mistreatment of non-Muslim minorities and communities in the OIC Member States under the slogan of religious freedoms and so on.
10. Expresses the need to pursue, as a matter of priority, a common policy aimed at preventing defamation of Islam perpetrated under the pretext and justification of the freedom of expression in particular through media and Internet.

There are a few things to notice in these items:

  • The OIC would have us take as a given that any association of Islam with human rights violations is “erroneous”. That is, there cannot be any truth to such allegations, and Muslims never violate anyone’s human rights due to the tenets of their religion. Any allegations of the mistreatment of non-Muslim minorities in Muslim countries are prima facie “fabrications”.This is actually quite true, from the perspective of Islamic law. The treatment of non-believers, apostates, women, gays, adulterers, etc. is meted out according to the shariah, and is quite compatible with the Cairo Declaration of Human Rights in Islam, which is what the OIC means when it refers to “human rights”.
  • The “misuse of the print and audio-visual media in propagating such misconceptions” refers to operations like this one, and especially to the much larger blogs and media outlets that oppose Islamization.Our activities are improper, and must be shut down.
  • “The responsibility of those States to ensure full respect to Islam” is a reference to UNHRC Resolution 16/18, which aims to combat the defamation of Islam.The addendum of “and all divine religions” is a smokescreen, since Islamic law does not recognize any other divine religions. There is only one.
  • The right to free expression does not extend to the defamation of Islam, which UN member states are obliged to prevent.

All of this is straightforward, and what we expect from the OIC. What has changed in the last year or so is the willingness of the United States to accept the OIC’s requirements on the “defamation of religions” and attempt to implement them through the UN, doing an end run around the First Amendment.

So how is the Obama administration doing? What kind of report card will it get from the OIC? Based on the document below, Barack Hussein Obama is a candidate for the honor roll.

A document entitled “Empowering Local Partners to Prevent Violent Extremism in the United States” [pdf] was released earlier this month by the White House. Once again, this is pretty dull reading — the usual useless claptrap that we’ve come to expect from the federal government over the last ten years about how it plans to fight “terrorism”. It was bad enough under George W. Bush, but it has gotten worse under the Light-Bringer.

Before I quote anything from this confection, let’s analyze some of the word usage in it.

4 thoughts on “The OIC Forces the 'Cairo Declaration of Yuman Rites' on Unsuspecting EUro Dhimmies & the U.S.”

  1. I would like to ask OIC and the UN the following question: All Muslims pray 5 times a day and in each prayer the must curse all Christians and Jews. This is part of what they say in Arabic: “May Allah ake all their children become orphans; may Allah make all theri women become widows;may Allah destroy them” and many more evil violent exhortations to Muslims. In addition, the Koran has passages like” kill the Jew wherever you may find him” and Kill the infidel” WILL THE UN AND OIC REMOVE THESE PASSAGES FROM THE KORAN and WILL THEY change the 5 times daily prayers? I think not. SO we will not submit and obey this directive until they do.

  2. The Breivik Portfolio, Part Two: The Chechen Connection

    From the Gates of Vienna

    As I mentioned in my first post in this series, Anders Behring Breivik reportedly received training at secret a paramilitary camp in Belarus:

    Breivik ‘Underwent Paramilitary Training in Belarus’

    Norway’s twin terror suspect Anders Behring Breivik trained at a secret paramilitary field camp in Belarus earlier this year, a Belarusian opposition politician said on Thursday, citing security sources. “Breivik visited Belarus several times. This spring, as part of his preparations for his twin attacks, he visited Minsk, where he underwent training at a secret paramilitary field camp,” Mikhail Reshetnikov, the head of the opposition Belarusian Party of Patriots, told the online newspaper.

    He cited sources within Belarus’s “security organs.”

    Earlier this month “Niccolo Machiavelli” dug into Mr. Breivik’s Belarus activities in greater detail for a post at Big Peace. The killer’s eastern activities reveal cloak-and-dagger underworld connections that lead through Belarus into Russia, Chechnya, and beyond.

    A Polish site reports that the paramilitary camp — which Mr. Breivik may have visited three times — was organized by a retired KGB colonel named Valery Lunev. The Real Russia Blog has more:

    Norwegian Terrorist Anders Breivik Trained in Belarus Militant Camps
    Yuri Mamchur

    While U.S. news feature information that Breivik purchased ammo from a U.S. supplier, Eastern European feeds are full of details of Breivik’s multiple trips to Belarus, changes in his behavior and wealth, and the training he underwent in Belarusian militant camps. In fact, Belarus’ tight government regime and active intelligence have served a great purpose this time around. Even though Breivik didn’t do anything suspicious at the time, Belarusian KGB kept precise records on Breivik, who was called “Viking” in the intelligence reports.

    First time, Anders Breivik visited Minsk on March 4, 2005. He flew Vienna-Minsk-Vienna roundtrip, departing from Belarus on March 11, 2005. At the border, Breivik told customs officials that he came to visit the Vikings’ graves. Centuries ago, Vikings went through the region multiple times, and there are indeed multiple ancient graves visited by the Vikings’ ancestors. Thus, the first visit didn’t trigger any suspicion. It is still unknown whether Breivik visited the graves, but he did investigate Belarus’ governance, political structure, and the results of the Chernobyl nuclear disaster. The tour guides, who chaperoned Breivik in 2005, remember that he was afraid of poisoning with radioactive food products – a normal, they say, tourist behavior for a Western tourist. Now, that the stuff hit the fan, Belarusian KGB looked closer into what Breivik was really doing in their country.

    It appears that the Norwegian terrorist underwent the militant-terrorist training under the guidance of 51-year-old Valery Lunev, a former colonel of Belarusian special forces, who now lives in Netherlands but regularly visits Belarus. According to Mikhail Reshetnikov, the Head of the Party of Belarus Patriots who is familiar with the intelligence records, “Breivik visited Belarus three times. Last Spring, while actively preparing for the terrorist attacks, he entered Poland with his own passport, and then travelled to Minsk under a passport of another European country. He recently got a Belarusian girlfriend and obtained access to significant amounts of money.”…

    The fact that Mr. Breivik was monitored by Belarusian intelligence and associated with a retired KGB colonel means that he was well-known to the shadowy international spy networks long before the events of July 22, 2011. If the Belarusian security services are even minimally competent — which, since they inherited the KGB apparatus, seems likely — then we may assume that Mr. Breivik’s Belarusian “girlfriend” was in fact an agent of the state, tasked with monitoring his movements and activities when he was east of Talinn. Such would have been the practice of the KGB, which supplied “girlfriends” for as many Western businessmen and diplomats as possible.

    But Anders Breivik’s connections in the former Soviet Union extended much farther afield than Minsk. Big Peace tracks the links between Mr. Breivik and an organization called the “Slavic Union”, as briefly mentioned by a Chechen website:
    Russian authorities in Oslo… previously warned the Norwegian state security police PST that Vyacheslav Datsik and his followers from the Slavic Union were preparing a terrorist attack (it now seems that the Russians did it on purpose to divert police attention from Breivik — KC).

    So who is Vyacheslav Datsik? The Chechen propaganda mill is not the only source of information about him. According to Norway’s TV2, as translated by a Norwegian English-language news service:
    Broadcaster TV2 has reported that it has emerged that Breivik had met Russian neo-Nazi Vjatjeslav Datsik in Oslo, who was previously rejected when he attempted to apply for asylum in Norway after running away from a Russian psychiatric institute. Datsik was jailed in Norway and eventually deported for various offences. Breivik has reportedly had close links with Datsik’s organization, Slavic Union, who were found to possess knives, guns and firebombs when police raided an Oslo tattoo enterprise operated by the group. Breivik is believed to have bought much of his equipment from Russia.

    The story becomes even more peculiar as we dig into a report from last year that Datsik claimed to have been sent to Norway by the Russian secret service to kill a Chechen separatist leader:

    Vjateslav Datsik, a Russian neo-Nazi arrested in Oslo after fleeing a psychiatric ward in St Petersburg, was sentenced to eight months in prison on Thursday for violating weapons laws. He was heavily armed when he tried to seek asylum in Norway earlier this year.

    Datsik, age 29, had declared himself guilty on all counts. He has earlier claimed that he wants to stay in Norway as long as possible, and equated the prison where he’s being held to “a luxury hotel.”

    Also known as “Red Tarzan,” Datsik has said he rowed over the Baltic Sea after running away from a Russian psychiatric hospital where he claimed to have been tortured. He also has told reporters and the court that he had been sent to Norway by federal agents in Russia who wanted him to kill Chechyan separatist leader Akhmed Zakajev. [emphasis added]

    “Wait a minute, Baron!” you say. “This Datsik fellow sounds like a common or garden lunatic. Maybe the Russians had him in the nuthouse for a good reason.”

    And maybe they did. But the Russian and Chechen connections don’t end there, and all the threads seem to intertwine with Islamic radicals and terrorists. Once again, a report from a Chechen source:

    Akhmed Zakayev [the target of the alleged assassination attempt], right after the World Chechen Congress in Warsaw 2010, had to visit Norway. Since then, Russian agent was aiming on Akhmed Zakayev. According to ChechenCenter’s received sources, Russian agent named Viacheslav Valerievich Datsik, was sent to Norway to assassinate Mr. Zakayev three months ago.

    Datsik received a gun from Russian FSB and was told to eliminate Chechen leader, the most diplomatic politician in Europe. With such information Datsik informed the Highest Court of Norway and also added that his friends forced him to give up to the local police and explain the situation.

    As it is known for some authorities, Viacheslav Datsik is under arrest now and going through variety of court processes. The Highest Court of Norway is planning to jail Datsik for eight months. Datsik seems to be satisfied to spend eight months in prison and wants to get rid of Russian KGB. Datsik says that KGB (FSB) anonymously urged him of something bad.

    Viacheslav Valerievich Datsik is a former kickboxer and winner of many martial championships including “ultimate fight”…

    So, if we believe these stories, Mr. Datsik was sent to Norway by the FSB to kill a Chechen separatist. But he then changed his mind and turned himself in to the Norwegian authorities.

    If this were where the trail ended, then we could wrap things up, and readers would depart disappointed. But there’s more.

    Let’s take a closer look at the reported associations of Valery Lunev, the former KGB colonel under whose guidance Anders Breivik is said to have received paramilitary training in Belarus. Among other things, we read that Col. Lunev converted to Islam when he married a relative of the late Dzhokhar Dudayev, a former general in the Soviet Air Force and the first President of the Chechen Republic of Ichkeria.

    He also has connections with the Gulf Emirates. He is an officer in a private intelligence company, Far West LLC, which is based in Dubai, according to a translated Russian report. The brother of one of his colleagues in Russian intelligence was reportedly assassinated in Dubai.

    The intrigue gets even thicker. The largest shareholder in Far West is Prince Turki al-Faisal, the former head of Saudi Military intelligence, and a former ambassador to both Great Britain and the United States. Other prominent shareholders include a general from Ukrainian military intelligence and a former subsidiary of the U.S. company Halliburton. Ruslan Saidov, a retired major on the Soviet General staff and a Muslim Chechen, holds a 25% share.

    According to the Russian report, Both Saidov and Lunev are associated with the Grey Wolves, the underground Turkish radical nationalist group which has connections with Chechen separatists.

    The same report lists what it says are some of Far West’s customers:

    The largest Chinese state oil company;
    A consortium of families from Saudi Arabia, Lebanon, and Pakistan;
    Iranian high-tech export firms with connections to the speaker of the Iranian parliament; and
    A group of Ukrainian coal mine magnates in alliance with German manufacturers of nuclear power equipment.

    All of this is a murky stew, as intelligence matters usually are, especially where Russia is involved. It’s hard to see the underlying patterns.

    But let’s recap a bit of what we’ve learned (assuming, of course, that any of this material is true, which we don’t really know):

    Anders Behring Breivik allegedly engaged in paramilitary training under the auspices of a former KGB officer who is a convert to Islam and has connections to Chechen separatists.
    Mr. Breivik is also said to have been in contact with a Russian connected with the Slavic Union, who was sent to Norway to assassinate a Chechen separatist leader.
    Tracking these associations back, we find a private intelligence firm in the Persian Gulf which seems willing to do business with a wide variety of clients.

    No coherent overall plan can be discerned from such a mishmash.

    Pro-Chechen or anti-Chechen? Is there an Islamic connection? Who knows?

    But one thing is for certain: given the cast of characters and the organizations involved, it strains credulity to think that Western intelligence services had never heard of Anders Behring Breivik before July 22, 2011.

    To put it more strongly: It is inconceivable that the PST and the CIA had never run across the Oslo murderer’s name before he committed his crimes.

    Given that American, British, and Norwegian intelligence services were active during the period when Mr. Breivik was hanging out with all those spooks and assassins, one of the agencies is certain to have run across him. If none of them did, they must be very incompetent indeed.

    Big Peace wraps up the loose ends:

    Investigators are also looking to Breivik’s finances (over $700,000 earned through his investments), possibly in Bermuda or other Caribbean tax havens, but those investigations seem to be in early stages.


    With a Russian assassin (with whom Breivik reportedly met) allegedly in Oslo to kill a Chechen leader, and a large CIA presence also in Oslo attending demonstrations, photographing potential terrorists and cooperating with at least some branches of Norwegian law enforcement, surely it is worth investigating whether some hint of Breivik’s planning for the attack hadn’t been detected by one or the other of these intelligence services.

    No matter what the intelligence services might have known back then, they are busily denying any such knowledge now.

    For those whose credulity has been sufficiently strained by all this, the main remaining question is: Why?

    The Breivik Portfolio, Part Three: The OIC Connection

    From the Gates of Vienna

    Note: This post is of necessity long and involved, because the Organization of Islamic Cooperation does not pursue its goals in a straightforward fashion. If the OIC made all its moves in broad daylight where everyone could see what was happening, this article would not only be much shorter, it would be unnecessary.

    Unraveling the knots of the OIC’s intentions requires lengthy exposition, much explaining, and laborious interpretation. The reader may be halfway or two-thirds of the way through this post before he realizes what I’m trying to do.

    Bear with me: this really is going somewhere. The result will be worth your time.

    In the aftermath of the Oslo massacre, the common theme in the mainstream media on both sides of the Atlantic was that “anti-Islam” websites like this one were at least partially responsible for the slaughter carried out by Anders Behring Breivik. According to the media’s logic, we “created a climate of hate” that helped legitimize the actions of the killer.

    As our several of our recent posts have demonstrated, however, the opposite was in fact the case — any opposition to Islam in the West has been relentlessly delegitimized and demonized in public discourse for at least the last decade. The absolute ban on any meaningful discussion of the issues at stake prevented any normal political action, leaving the field open for a psychopathic mass-murderer to do it his way. Many ordinary people have long been silenced, since opposing Islam is often a career-killer, but why would a psychopath worry about such trivial matters?

    The public standards regulating the discussion of Islam all across the West are remarkably uniform. Whether enforced formally or informally, they require the suppression of free speech in draconian ways that are not applied to speech about any other religion or group. How did this come about?

    All of these rules about what may and may not be said about Islam — where did they come from?

    Longtime readers already know the answer to that question: the discussion of Islam in the public forums of the West is regulated by the tenets of shariah, as described in the Koran and the Sunna of the Prophet and codified in the four principal schools of Islamic law. This application of shariah in the West accords with the repeated demands of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) as promulgated through resolutions at the United Nations. The behavior of the media, the academy, and Western political leaders closely follows the strictures against the “defamation of religions” as laid down by the OIC.

    The first post in this series examined the American influences on Anders Behring Breivik. Part Two looked at the killer’s training and connections in Belarus, Russia, and Chechnya.

    In this third installment we’ll highlight a different sort of influence:

    What created the environment in which a Norwegian mass murderer could be “weaponized” so effectively against the European Counterjihad?
    Why are our governments and our media complying with the demands of the OIC?
    How did Western Europe and the United States become such willing and diligent enforcers of shariah law?

    * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

    To understand the astonishing degree to which the Organization of Islamic Cooperation has subverted the institutions of the West, it is necessary to investigate in some detail the historical and legal basis for the OIC’s demands.

    Back during the Danish Mohammed cartoon crisis in 2006, Professor Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu, the Secretary General of the OIC, said this [pdf]:

    The angry reaction in the Muslim world… is mainly due to the premeditated and deliberate attack on the revered person of the prophet, whose holy position, message and teachings were maliciously and calculatingly sacrilege by the so called defenders of freedom.

    To Prof. Ihsanoglu, the rights and freedoms we enjoy in the West are illegitimate and deserving of scorn. He and the OIC recognize a different standard, one that sets well-defined limits on freedom of speech as required by Islam. As I pointed out last week, the OIC foreign ministers recently passed a resolution [pdf] that included these clauses (italics added):

    7. Expresses its deep concern over the frequent and erroneous association of Islam with violations of human rights and the misuse of the print and audio-visual media in propagating such misconceptions which lead to the reinforcement of prejudice and discrimination against Muslims and calls on the Member States to undertake information activities to counter these activities;
    8. Notes with grave concern the increasing trend of Islamophobic measures in the Western countries, stresses the responsibility of those States to ensure full respect to Islam and all divine religions and the inapplicability of using freedom of expression or press as a pretext to defame religions, and calls for refrain from imposing restrictions, in any form whatsoever, on the cultural and religious rights and freedoms of people.
    10. Expresses the need to pursue, as a matter of priority, a common policy aimed at preventing defamation of Islam perpetrated under the pretext and justification of the freedom of expression in particular through media and Internet.

    As is often the case with Islam, common English phrases such as “human rights” and “defamation of religion” mean something different to the Muslims of the OIC than they do to non-Muslims.

    The founding document of the Organization of the Islamic Conference (now the Organization of Islamic Cooperation) is its Charter [pdf], which states in Article 15:

    The Independent Permanent Commission on Human Rights shall promote the civil, political, social and economic rights enshrined in the organisation’s covenants and declarations and in universally agreed human rights instruments, in conformity with Islamic values. [emphasis added]

    So what “universally agreed human rights instruments” are referenced here? Is the OIC referring the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which was passed by the United Nations soon after its founding?

    Not at all. The OIC considers the UDHR inadequate and un-Islamic. To codify the human rights of Muslims, the OIC created the Cairo Declaration on Human Rights in Islam, commonly known as the “Cairo Declaration”. It is a formal legal instrument put together by the OIC on behalf of OIC member states in 1990, and was formally served to the United Nations in 1993.

    Article 22 of the Cairo Declaration states:
    Read more »

  3. “Great” arab inventions. Obama’s Cairo speech

    Muhammad, founder of Islam and author of Koran, was mentally sick psychopath and pedophile, he had married a 6-year old girl and raped her when she was 9. Muhammad could not read and write. While in seizure, he uttered disjointed phrases, which his followers represented as Allah divine afflatus. This is the history of Islam that muslims and “honest and free” western media would not like you to know. These facts show that islam is not a religion, but a cult.
    Read: “History of Middle Ages” Professor Nikolay A. Osokin, Textbook (in Russian), Publishing house: Imperial University Printing Office, Kazan, 1888, 771 pp.; Publisher: ACT, Harvest, Moscow, 2008, 672 pp. (reprint)
    In his Cairo speech, Obama accredited to arabs all fundamental inventions human race made over centuries. None of the Obama mentioned is true, as every person graduated from credible high school knows. However, it does not mean that arabs, great nation with centuries of history, has no inventions critical for human life. They have and here they are:
    1. Ethnic Cleansing – invented centuries ago, implemented over 2000 years ago in Israel when they occupied Israel and disseminated Jews around the world; from 1948 through 1953 arab countries expelled a million Jews and stole their properties; in 1974, Turkish armed forces invaded Cyprus, captured 36 percent of its territory, partitioned the island, implemented a policy of “ethnic cleansing” and sent close to 200,000 Greek Cypriots southward as refugees who lost their property, desecrated churches and cemeteries, and in 1983 declared the northern Turkish Republic of Cyprus; in 1999, Kosovo Liberation Army stormed homes of the last 15 Jews in Kosovo’s capital, who had to clear out, with just the clothes on their backs; recently, Jews in Yemen were under attack and have been relocated to Britain.
    2. Genocide – invented by Turks and implemented in 1915–1917 in Armenia: over 1.5 mln. Armenians, including children, died.
    3. Holocaust – invented by Haj Amin al Husseini, the Mufti of Jerusalem, in 1920s in Palestine (occupied territory of the State of Israel); implemented in Palestine in 1920s-30s; in 1941, Haj Amin al Husseini brought the Holocaust idea to Hitler and helped him to implement Holocaust in Europe 1941-45; he organized in Europe two islamofascist brigades that operated under SS control, had their own concentration camp, and killed tens of thousand of Europeans, including Jews.
    Islam is based on three fundamental principles:
    1. Stealing
    2. Killing, and
    3. Lying
    Koran says:
    “Slay them wherever you find them. Fight against them till idolatry is no more and God’s religion reigns supreme” (Sura 2:190),
    “Seek out your enemies relentlessly” (Sura 4:103),
    “Make war on them till idolatry shall cease and God’s religion shall reign supreme” (Sura 8:36),
    “When the sacred months are over slay the unbelievers wherever you find them. Arrest them, beseige them and lie in ambush everywhere for them” (Sura 9:5),
    “Believers, make war on the infidels who dwell around you” (Sura 9:121),
    “When you meet the unbelievers on the battlefield strike off their heads” (Sura 47:3),
    “Prophet, make war on the unbelievers and the hypocrites and deal sternly with them. Hell shall be their home, evil their fate” (Sura 66:7).
    Koran is Islamic Mein Kamf. Islam is fascist cult and must be eliminated from the earth.

    1. “implemented over 2000 years ago in Israel when they occupied Israel and disseminated Jews around the world;”

      This is incorrect, Mark. The Romans did that.

      Islam came into existence six to seven-hundred years later and has been terrorizing the world ever since.

Comments are closed.