Menstruating Females to the Back

“We as Muslims reject the idea of freedom of speech, and even the idea of freedom.”-Hamza Andreas Tzortzis

University College London adopts sharia law for public debate, separating women from men

Pamela Geller:

Madness. Visiting atheist professor Lawrence Krauss walked out on a debate at UCL (University College London) after seeing Sharia segregation of audience members. Segregation was enforced along Sharia gender lines by university’s OWN security staff. Sick. The university, founded on secular principles, hurls itself back centuries and becomes a hotbed of Islamic jihad.

Archbishop Cranmer:

Why do ‘human rights’ fly out of the window where Islam is concerned? Why does liberal democracy take a back seat in the toleration of sharia law? Why do universities and public institutions bend over backwards to avoid the charge of ‘Islamophobia’?

University College London is one of our great seats of learning and foremost among UK centres of research. Founded in 1826, UCL was the first university in England to be established on an entirely secular basis: students were admitted irrespective of their religion, and gender equality was a foundational statute.

So it is all the more surprising that a public debate was held on 9th March at which the audience was segregated by gender (ie women in the cheap seats at the back). It was hosted by the Islamic Education and Research Academy (iERA), and the topic was: ‘Islam or Atheism: Which Makes More Sense?’. It pitched atheist Professor Lawrence Krauss against Hamza Andreas Tzortzis (described variously as ‘a lecturer on Islam’ or an ‘Islamist extremist’). He agitates for a global caliphate and isn’t particularly disposed to Jews, gays, adulterous women or democracy. He has publicly denounced liberty:

“We as Muslims reject the idea of freedom of speech, and even the idea of freedom. We see under the Khilafa (caliphate), when people used to engage in a positive way, this idea of freedom was redundant, it was unnecessary, because the society understood under the education system of the Khilafa state, and under the political framework of Islam, that people must engage with each other in a positive and productive way to produce results, as the Qur’an says, to get to know one another.”

Many other iERA spokesmen take the view that the US conspired in the 1993 al-Qaeda attack on the World Trade Center; that ‘every Muslim should be a terrorist’; that homosexuals should be hanged and women who commit adultery should be stoned.

So, it is rather surprising that Hamza Andreas Tzortzis was invited to speak at UCL at all, let alone that they indulged his medieval mosque attitudes in separating the women from the men.

Apparently, Professor Krauss had objected to any such sharia segregation prior to the meeting. When he arrived and witnessed UCL security guards forcing people to change seats, he walked out, as seen in the video above. One of the attendees Dana Sondergaard wrote on her Facebook page:

Tonight I attended a debate a UCL on Islam and Atheism. After having been told the event would NOT be gender segregated, we arrived and were told that women were to sit in the back of the auditorium, while men and couples could file into the front. After watching 3 people be kicked out of the auditorium for not following this seating plan, Dr. Krauss bravely defended his beliefs of gender equality and informed event staff that he would not participate unless they removed the segregated seating. Needless to say, the staff got their shit together pretty quickly and the event (thankfully) continued. Props to Dr. Krauss for standing up for his beliefs, especially in such a biased environment!

This is not Saudi Arabia, though one begins to understand the concerns of those who talk of ‘Londonistan’. It is utterly shameful that UCL security staff helped to enforce this segregation, which must be contrary to the University’s own diversity and equality policies. To justify their actions, the security guards invoked the ‘terrorism’ clause: the three were ejected from their seats because they were deemed to constitute a ‘threat’.

The only threat they posed was to the sensitivities of Hamza Andreas Tzortzis.

Why do ‘human rights’ fly out of the window where Islam is concerned? Why does liberal democracy take a back seat in the toleration of sharia law? Why do universities and public institutions bend over backwards to avoid the charge of ‘Islamophobia’?

The seating arrangements were made known well before this debate took place, so why was it left to just three men to sit with the women in protest? Where were the hordes of equality-loving LGBTers? Where were the ardent and principled feminists? Why were they not demanding seats at the front, with the men?

Any mention of this by the BBC? None at all. What outcry would have greeted a debate at which the audience was segregated black and white or gay and straight. But male and female is okay, because it is the will of Mohammed (pbuh).

His Grace is reminded that UCL has form on this – see here and here.

4 thoughts on “Menstruating Females to the Back”

  1. The three stoogers that were following the sharia rules are no different than the stoogers at the head of our governments. Both use the fear that unwillingness to submit to the sharia rules is a form of threat that warrants our subjugation….

    This is no laughing matter…we are deep in devil’s territory here….

  2. I am sure there would be many Progressive Wimmins Libbers eager to please / show UN /Islam just how Progressive they are by obeying Sharia’s male female segregation LAWS … after all their enemy’s enemy is their friend.

  3. Hi,

    Talmudic Judaism-Romanism-Mohammedanism, are 3 Jihadic Cults that have their roots in Babylonian Zoroastrianism.

    Satan is a Zoroastrian myth!

    The essence of evil is the heart & mind of mind (Jeremiah 17:9-10; James 1:12-20.

    These 3 Cults are the cause of world unrest for thousands of years.

    The vast majority of people get it wrong, whether atheists, agnostics, liberal, conservative etc. Greed & selfishness are the root cause of the havoc in the world, WITHOUT any OUTSIDE INTERFERENCE or INPUT!

    Let us lay the blame, where it needs to be laid – SELFISH MAN.

  4. Correction!

    That should have read:

    The essence of evil is the heart & mind of man (Jeremiah 17:9-10; James 1:12-20.

Comments are closed.