UK: “anti-religious comments” verboten!

Here we see again how Britain’s ‘hate-speech’ laws are being used to criminalise all resistance to Islamic jihad:

…two men in Bristol were arrested and released on bail for making alleged “anti-religious” comments on Twitter.

Scaramouche wonders:

“anti-religious” comments? Doesn’t Richard Dawkins, for one, do that all the time? I don’t see the coppers slapping the cuffs on him.

6 thoughts on “UK: “anti-religious comments” verboten!”

  1. Ah, but Richard Dawkins has a name, whereas the “two men in Bristol” seem anonymous. I am also unable to find any record of what they actually said/tweeted. Perhaps because it was so innocuous that there is more power in ignorance?
    If we don’t know what they said, we will all be too afraid to say anything?

  2. Be very careful folks – the left wing dolts in Whitehall are trying to silence your voices. Cameron and cohorts will hav to stand in front of the British people and explain their rather question decisions, and then accept judgement and consequent punishment.

  3. How is anyone to know what is verboten and what is not? the USSR had the same dilemma.
    I guess it depends who you are and who’s prosecuting.
    The islamist lobby should have no say in what we say, yet our Governments are making sure they do.

  4. It should never be forbidden to criticize any superstition, idea, religion, ideology, concept and or whatever, period. But, it seems at times that the majority of people on the Earth have some genetic predisposition to defending and kissing the arse of Islam, while those they are defending are involved in full time slaughter and depravity. It seems we have a death wish brought on by decades of the politics of self hate being crammed down our throats.
    Islam is poison.

  5. i.e: “It should be illegal to accuse these criminals (moslems) of their crimes, if doing so might offend them by hurting their feelings with the often painful truth, and so “make” them commit even more crimes! We must, in stead, all learn to become better victims. Whee!

    PS: Threatening non-members of their crime gang of holy mobsters with death is their protected religious speech, not a death-threat hate-crime!”

    Funny how these racist liberal/atheists hate “all” (the Judeo-Christian) religion’s,’ yet have a lot of warm fuzzy tolerance feelings for any of the swarthy people’s superstitions.

    Here’s MY take on ALL religions: Let’s compare Philosophy, Science, and Religion:

    Philosophy is speculation, presented AS speculation.
    Science is tested speculation, presented AS tested speculation.
    Religion is speculation, presented AS FACT.

    So, only religion is a lie … and lying is the most basic form of theft (it’s the theft of th Truth) and all thefts are crimes. Religion is a crime.

    That having been said, at best, all ‘real’ religions only offer advice based on observations of human psychology and metaphysical opinion, while at WORST, all ‘real’ religions only say:

    “Obey our silly rules, or GOD (/’the gods/) will get you!”

    …But ONLY islam says:

    “Obey our silly rules, or WE will get you (‘for god’)!”

    So islam is only EXTORTION, and extortion is always a crime.

    When liberals try to make it “illegal” to report crimes, and in stead insist on enabling those crimes by being willing accomplices and accessories to those crimes, they have become criminal negligents and traitors to rationality and civilization them selves, and so must be removed.

Comments are closed.