Turkish wannabe caliph wants to integrate Europe in the new Ottoman Empire

“Incomplete Project”

Someone to rule over us: (thanks to Mullah)

Erdogan: EU without Turkey an incomplete project


“Turkey’s becoming a full member to the EU will pave way to a new integration between the EU and Islamic world” said Erdogan, adding “Five permanent members have a great accountability and responsibility before history”.

World Bulletin/News Desk

Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan said at a conference themed “Turkey-EU relations” in Warsaw, Poland that an EU without Turkey will remain as an incomplete political project.

Erdogan said Europe is a union that rejects religious, sectarian and ethnic origin differences and Turkey’s being a Muslim country is never a hindrance to become an EU member and leaving such a country outside is against the union’s own self and reason to unite and be present.

Without religion Europe is sufficiently weakened to be conquered.

“Turkey’s becoming a full member to the EU will pave way to a new integration between the EU and Islamic world and erase the question marks from minds,” Erdogan added.

Translation: “Submit and we will not harm you”

Erdogan went on to underline dropping support from people for EU and said “Broken promises and double standards unfortunately diminish Turkish public’s trust in the EU and support for the EU process when the first steps were taken for negotiations was 70-75 percent but now it dropped down to 30-35 percent.”

Recep Tayyip Erdogan continued as follows: “Despite all hindrances and negativities put in front of us we carry on this process with patience. We make reforms, not only for adaptation to the acquis but also for our country, nation and future. Our works on democratization and human rights are, indeed, a result of our citizens’ expectations on those issues.”

Erdogan emphasized that Turkey has already unified with the EU politically, economically and physically as a necessity of history and geography.


“Humanity will never reach peace with current UNSC”

(“Humanity” means Muslims only; unbelievers are the ‘vilest of creatures’, only if the non-muslims submit to mohammedan rule they can enjoy muselmanic protection and some kind of peace….)

By pretending to be peaceful, Muslims are working towards  the establishment of a universal caliphate with everyone submitting to Allah. And with millions of clueless and naive Westerners falling over themselves to ingratiate themselves to their Muslim overlords, their job is getting easier all the time.


Erdogan also said that humanity will never reach peace with the current UNSC structure in Warsaw.

“Five permanent members have a great accountability and responsibility before history; problem in Syria can be solved at the moment that five members make a decision,” Erdogan added when he spoke about the ongoing civil war in Syria, also underlining the necessity for NATO to give support to world peace.

Europe has no dog in that fight in Syria. We should be rooting for both sides….

Following the conference, PM Erdogan and Mrs. Erdogan joined the dinner given in their honor by Polish PM Donald Task and Mrs. Tusk at the prime ministry.

Erdogan was accompanied during the dinner by some ministers, officials and businesspeople.


2 thoughts on “Turkish wannabe caliph wants to integrate Europe in the new Ottoman Empire”

  1. Turkey is looking around for new allies – and that is not good news for America.

    Although Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan has long been essential to President Barack Obama’s strategy in the eastern Mediterranean and the Middle East, and although he boasts the second largest army in the American-led NATO, he is currently exploring new alliances with some of America’s main commercial and political competitors and long-established enemies.

    By reaching out to countries like China and Iran, Erdogan is expressing his disappointment at America’s perceived withdrawal from the region, according to some foreign policy analysts. He has snubbed advances from America’s arms manufacturers, hosted top officials from Tehran and deepened a rift with Israel, its former ally. Others believe he is returning to his former policy, long considered a failure, of seeking ties with everybody in the neighborhood and beyond.

    But recent dramatic shifts in policy may also be part of Erdogan’s search for a new political role, steering Turkey away from its century-long secularism and turning it towards a new model in which Islam trumps democracy and Turkey moves from being not simply one more member of the NATO alliance but a major world power in its own right with ties around the globe.

    Erdogan was quick to develop a special relationship with Obama, who saw the policies of his Islamist Justice and Development Party (AKP) as a model for how Islam and democracy can exist side by side. But Erdogan was unhappy about Obama’s reluctance to intervene in Syria’s civil war and some of his latest diplomatic moves have raised eyebrows in Washington.

    “Relations remain good,” said Steven Cook of the Council of Foreign Relations, a longtime Turkey watcher. But, he adds, a nagging question now arises in American foreign policy circles: “What is it that Turkey provides?”

    As Ankara seeks new alliances, Erdogan’s opponents, both inside and outside the country, point to his “neo-Ottomanism.” Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu, a former academic who is the main architect of the AKP’s foreign policy shifts, often invokes the memory of the old Ottoman Empire, complete with dropping the names of the empire’s major outposts. “Without going to war, we will again tie Sarajevo to Damascus, Benghazi to Erzurum and to Batumi,” he promised recently.

    There are many signs of Turkey’s departure from the century-old traditions established by the founder of modern Turkey, Mustafa Kemal Ataturk – who turned the country into an outward facing, secular, Western-friendly state in the aftermath of the Ottoman defeat in World War I. Erdogan is so hostile to Ataturk, he can’t even bring himself to utter the words Istanbul Ataturk Airport. This week, in another sign he is shifting Turkey in a new direction, he clashed with students in Istanbul who were afraid he’d outlaw mixed-sex apartment-sharing, which is seen by some in his entourage as sinful and un-Islamic.

    Meanwhile, Davutoglu’s early idea of where the future of Turkey lies with the promise of “zero problems with all our neighbors” has not materialized. Such a foreign policy looked good on paper and it was welcomed by the Western press, noted Razi Canikligil, a veteran New York-based reporter for Turkey’s Hurriyet newspaper. But now, “All I see in the American and European media is criticism of Erdogan’s foreign policy,” said Canikligil.

    “Zero problems” have turned into lots of problems:

    ● Erdogan remains intent on unseating Syria’s President Bashar Assad, who was one of his early allies.

    ● He continues to strongly support Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood, ousted from power in last summer’s military coup, which has pitted Turkey against the current Egyptian ruler, General Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

    ● Turkey is viewed with suspicion by the Palestinian Authority because of its strong backing of their mortal rival Hamas.

    ● Relations with Saudi Arabia have also cooled off, partly because Turkey, which has a Sunni majority, has started repairing ties with Shiite powers, including not only Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki but, most troubling to America, the mullahs who rule Iran.

    “Some circles may want to represent us as two rival neighbors. Some may desire it,” Davutoglu declared during a much-ballyhooed joint press conference in Istanbul with Iran’s foreign minister, Javad Zarif, on November 1. “On the contrary, Turkey and Iran are not rivals but friends,” he said.

    In the West, the thawing of relations between Iran and Turkey after a long period of chilliness is seen as part of a troubling trend. It came after Ankara stunned Washington and other NATO allies by signing a $3.4 billion deal with a Chinese company to build a missile defense system.

    Preferring China Precision Machinery Import and Export Corp. to U.S. manufacturers Raytheon and Lockheed Martin certainly caught Washington’s attention, not least because the Chinese-made system is incompatible with the NATO air defenses imminently due to be deployed in Turkey. To add insult to injury, the Chinese manufacturer is already on the American sanctions list for violating long-standing embargoes against Iran and North Korea. “We are seriously concerned about what this means for Allied missile air defense,” the American ambassador in Turkey, Francis Ricciardone, said last month.

    Turkey has long aimed to establish itself as an independent arms supplier, at times running afoul of the strict restrictions that accompany American arms sales to foreign countries. As far back as the 1960s, President Lyndon Johnson told Turkey it could not use NATO arms in its war in Cyprus, noted Soner Cagaptay of the Washington Institute for Near East Policy. Turkey has therefore tried to get arms from non-Western manufacturers for a long time, he said.

    But, he added, the timing of Ankara’s decision to do such a prominent deal with the Chinese company has to do with its irritation over America’s inaction in Syria.

    “This is a result of Turkey feeling lonely,” said Cagaptay. “Ankara is exposed to the fallout of the Syrian War and it has not been able to get American firepower to oust Assad.” And so, he concludes, as Erdogan realizes he may have to learn to live with Assad remaining in power, he’s turning to Iran to help sort things out in Syria.

    This decision may have further soured the long-deteriorating relationship between Erdogan and Israel. Last month Washington Post columnist David Ignatius reported that Ankara’s intelligence officials have disclosed to their Tehran counterparts the identities of Israeli-recruited agents working in Iran, after the spies met with their Israeli controllers on Turkish soil.

    “This is a despicable act,” said Danny Yatom, the former chief of Mossad, Israel’s foreign intelligence agency. Stressing that he only knows about the incident from press accounts, Yatom added that if were true, Turkey could only have learned about the agents from the Israelis. Allied intelligence agencies customarily inform each other about contacts conducted on each other’s soil, he told me, adding that in his many years in the intelligence business he can’t remember such a blatant betrayal “by a so-called friendly apparatus.”

    Turkey denied Ignatius’s report, but Davutoglu stressed in his Istanbul press conference with Zarif that “the Turkish government has never cooperated with Israel against any Muslim country – and it never will.” Yatom, who predicts the reported incident will come to haunt Turkey, as in the future allies will fear sharing intelligence with it, said Israel has only a few ways of getting back at Turkey. “We won’t do the same to them,” he told me, but added that Israel must “call on countries to reassess intelligence sharing and urge the Americans and NATO to cool relations with Turkey as result of this.”

    In light of his ever-shifting policies, much of the early promise Westerners saw in Erdogan has fizzled. In Turkey, too, his violent clampdown on the Gezi Park demonstrators last summer – complaining about restrictions on the freedom of speech and civil rights abuses – disappointed many former supporters. He may have jeopardized his plan to strengthen the powers of the country’s presidency and run for that office when his term-limited premiership ends in 2015.

    Erdogan may be down, at least for now, but “I’d never count him out,” said Cook. “He’s too good a politician.”

    By Benny Avni

  2. Remember how incomplete Europe was during the era when the turks, during their ongoing european military campaign, reached Vienna only (and twice so)? That era extended from roughly 1450 to 1900.

    In earnest: It is more than a pity that Turkey is still allowed to play its age-old game, which is splitting Europe’s nations for some dubious, transitory, shifting alliance of purpose with this incompatible mohammedan ‘partner’ – like Germany/Turkey against Britain during WW1, or NATO Turkey against Soviet Union/Russia after WW2.

Comments are closed.