Hedjabbery, Headchoppery, Feminist Ideals and Sharia

Islamic State Actually Has More Support In Britain Than In Arab Nations

…and then there are the criminally minded Australian city boys who have deluded themselves into believing they are devout Islamists who have no place in the West. 

“We will chop off the heads of the Americans, chop off the heads of the French, chop off the heads of whoever you may bring.”

The British government says 50 people a week — 2600 a year — are sent for “deradicalisation.” What can that program in “deradicalisation” possibly do?

UK: Police are being “stretched” by an “exceptionally high” number of inquiries into Islamist-related extremism, Scotland Yard has said.

14063030211961_700Four (Musel-)men, who have appeared in court accused of planning a terror attack between July 8 and October 7 this year, allegedly plotted to kill police officers or soldiers on the streets of London. Tarik Hassane, 21, Suhaib Majeed, 20, Nyall Hamlett, 24, and Momen Motasim, 21, have all been charged with intending to commit acts of terrorism.

Amid fresh ISIL gains, officials in Anbar province have urged the Iraqi government to request foreign ground troops.

With sharia against… sharia?

Britain may use a mediaeval law dating to 1351 to charge citizens with treason if they go to fight with ISIL in Iraq and Syria, Foreign Secretary Philip Hammond said.

The last person to be hanged for treason in Britain was William Joyce, a propagandist for Nazi Germany nicknamed Lord Haw Haw who broadcast to Britain during World War Two and who was executed in 1946.

david-cameron-mainstream-britain-muslim-life.jpgw700Prime Minister David Cameron has warned that ISIL, whose fighters have seized large areas of Syria and Iraq, pose a grave threat to Britain while police and intelligence officers say they have seen a rise in potentially deadly plots.

Britain: Muslim Rape Gangs Run Wild by 

 Authorities cower in fear of being called “racist,” while key files go missing.

General acceptance for hijabbery grows downunder:

Ignorance and stupidity causing hijab “solidarity”

513324-45563cf2-500e-11e4-b4a7-73f674a378cc“With the passage of time there will be more acceptance of religion Islam and more acceptance of diversity,” Professor Hassan said.–Muslim women say the ‘ban the burqa’ debate is inspiring …   Inspiring? Wherever Islam rules, “diversity” goes out the door….

“Islam turned out to be the religion that appealed to my feminist ideals”

chained-muslim-womenNo matter how many journalists heads are hacked off by devout jihadists, the enemedia never tires of shilling, promoting and advancing Islam. The ceaseless proselyting (dawah) by these breathless would-be victims is astonishing. Is there any more offensive, anti-woman garment than the burka? Is there any more offensive, anti-woman system of governance than the sharia? [Pamela Geller]READ MORE

One thought on “Hedjabbery, Headchoppery, Feminist Ideals and Sharia”

  1. As you know, the head-covering isn’t specifically a “religious” right of muslims, it’s more of a practical one, because Muhammad asserted it’s the males’ sharia “law”-mandated “holy right and duty” to RAPE ALL uncovered women, “because” it’s then the women’s fault for “provoking” the men.

    (To Muhammad’s mind, all men were uncontrollable animals, at the mercy of their hormones, as he was)!

    I’m pretty sure AUSTRALIAN LAW has SPECIFIC provisions which refute the “Rape is the woman’s fault!” bit.

    The Hijab is not a religious uniform, nor a fashion trend – it’s a prison uniform!

    It’s also an insult to both sexes; from Qur’an Sura 33:59, it is a slanderous statement that implies the muslim men (and all men, just like Muhammad) are so at the mercy of their hormones, that they must molest and rape any and all women they can see; so it’s always the women’s own fault for not covering up. It also says the muslim men have a duty to molest and rape all the infidel women for not covering up!

    “O Prophet! Tell your wives and daughters and the believing women to draw their cloaks over their bodies. That will be better so that they will be known so as not to be molested. And Allâh is Most Forgiving, Most Merciful.” (Qur’ân 33:59)

    So, exactly HOW will they “be known” in the freedom sack?! Certainly not as in: “Oh, I know her! Hi, Mary!” but “known” as muslimas – as members of the gang! And why is this important? “so as not to be molested!”

    Which again implies that muslims DID and always WILL “molest” (i.e: rape,) all the NON-muslim (“infidel”) women! That it’s the infidel women’s faults, because they don’t cover up, that the muslim men “must” molest (rape) them!

    Moe also said women are created by allah as domesticated animals, created for men’s pleasure, and like fields to be tilled at will by men.


    Before Moe, covering up was optional; any fool could ignore it if they wanted to. The tafsir ahadith isnads (supplemental, explanatory material apending the Qur’an) explain that the Sura in question (33:59) arose because Moe’s wives were seen by moonlight as they went potty outside his tent one night. But, quite unlike any other self-respecting warlord, who would have had the peeping tom executed for spying on his wives, Moe agreed with the man and blamed his victims, (his own wives) perhaps because the peeper was a rich or influential member of an allied tribe.

Comments are closed.