Repeat after me: It’s got nothing to do with Islam

Brigitte Bardot, France’s iconic blonde bombshell and “sex kitten” who reigned supreme from 1952 – 1973, has been on trial five times for insulting Muslims and “inciting racial hatred.”

“I am fed up with being under the thumb of this population which is destroying us, destroying our country.”–Brigitte Bardot


In todays sick western nations; speaking the truth is called “hate speech”, being patriot is called “bigotry”, being proud of your heritage is called “racism”, denouncing evil is called “hate mongering”, sounding any alarm of danger is instantly crashed by the tyrannical machine of political correctness . There is no consolation for this dying western civilisation. And that what happened to Brigitte Bardot


The socialist rabble that runs France can’t argue with her, since she is obviously right, so they arrest her. (Moonbattery)


 Repeat after me: It’s got nothing to do with Islam

Tim Blair

Obama was at it again last week, telling a summit on violent extremism that Islamic terrorists who kill in the name of Islam have nothing at all to do with Islam.

Lots of nothing to do with islam (and the associated allah ackbars) at The Daily Telegraph thanks to Mullah, pbuh

Curry Princess Watch

UK ‘losing radicalisation war’- ‘radicalisation happens in bedrooms’

warsi 1

Baroness Warsi, who resigned last summer over the Government’s “morally indefensible” policy on Gaza, warned it is becoming more apparent that people are being radicalised in their bedrooms rather than in places of worship. …

More on the former minister with her Gaza and other muslim baggage at The Herald thanks to Mullah, pbuh

UK: Muslim former Cabinet member gave official posts to Islamic supremacists

Britain can’t seem to kill itself fast enough to suit British authorities. “Islamic ‘radicals’ at the heart of Whitehall,” by Andrew Gilligan, the Telegraph, February 22, 2015: Entryism, the favourite tactic of the 1980s’ Militant Tendency, is when a political party or institution is infiltrated by groups with a radically different agenda. (JW)

Entryism, the favourite tactic of the 1980s’ Militant Tendency, is when a political party or institution is infiltrated by groups with a radically different agenda. Since Militant’s Trotskyites were expelled from the Labour Party, the word has rather fallen out of fashion.

But now, according to one Muslim leader, Islamic radicals are practising entryism of their own — into the heart of Whitehall – courtesy of a woman who was until recently a government minister.

Baroness Warsi, the first Muslim woman to sit in Cabinet, handed official posts to people linked to Islamist groups, including a man involved in an “unpleasant and bullying” campaign to win planning permission for the controversial London “megamosque” proposed by a fundamentalist Islamic sect.

He sits – alongside other radicals or former radicals and their allies – on a “cross-Government working group on anti-Muslim hatred” set up by Lady Warsi and Nick Clegg, the Deputy Prime Minister.

Some members of the group are using their seats at the table to urge that Whitehall work with Islamist and extremist-linked bodies, including one described by the Prime Minister as a “political front for the Muslim Brotherhood”. Some are also pressing to lift bans on foreign hate preachers from entering Britain, including Zakir Naik, who has stated that “every Muslim should be a terrorist”.

Fiyaz Mughal, a former member of the working group, told The Telegraph that he had resigned in protest at its activities. “I was deeply concerned about the kinds of groups some of the members had connections with, and some of the groups they were recommending be brought into government,” he said. “It seemed to me to be a form of entryism, by people with no track record in delivering projects.” Mr Mughal is head of Tell Mama, the national organisation for monitoring anti-Muslim attacks.

If Fiyaz Mughal, a discredited liar, thinks the situation was bad, it must have been very, very bad. But why is Telegraph reporter Andrew Gilligan, who broke the story about Mughal’s distorting evidence of “hate crimes” against Muslims, going to him for comment now? Did his superiors order him to make nice with Mughal? Or did he decide that while Mughal is dishonest, he isn’t as bad as Islamic jihadists? Whatever is going on here, treating someone like Fiyaz Mughal as if he were a valid authority is just another sign of the deep trouble Britain is in today.

3 thoughts on “Repeat after me: It’s got nothing to do with Islam”

  1. The left just hates it when you dish up the truth!
    Why worry about all the perverted Islamist parasites when you have a screaming left to do their bidding.

  2. The Western Political narrative never changes, despite the unequivocal assertion of the terrorists themselves who make it clear they are motivated by the teachings and examples of their prophet and his promise of virgins.
    The record of history is broken.
    How else can we explain that after a repetition of 25,000 times one would not question the validity of this Treasonous Seditious narrative by our own politicians?

    • Immediately after the attack, the president or the prime minister of the country in which the attack has taken place goes on TV and declares that this attack had nothing to do with Islam.

    • Right after that the chief of police announces that he has taken all the measures to protect islams from any imaginary backlash and nonexistent reprisal.

    • In the evening of the same day the mainstream media interviews an imam or a islam spokesperson who emphasizes that Islam does not condone violence.

    • We are then told that extremists exist in all religions and reminded that some thirty years ago a few Christians killed a few abortionist murderers of unborn babies.

    • Then the pundits are called to pontificate that the root cause of Islamic terrorism is not in what the terrorist themselves say, and nothing to do with the Quran (that in hundreds of verses calls on the believers to kill the unbelievers), but in the injustice done to islams in other parts of the world, such as in Abu Ghraib prison and particularly in Palestine where half a century ago Israelis defeated the Arab invaders who had vowed to drown them in the sea.

    • A few days after that the police and the politicians of the victim country hold meetings with the leaders of the islam community where they conclude that more money should be given to the “moderate islams” to persuade the “radicals” to not take their religion seriously.

    • The experts also conclude that emblems like Christmas and Christmas trees hurt the religious sentiment of islams and they should be removed from public institutions, shopping malls and schools, while at the same time islams should be given some concessions, like not requiring them to wash their hands before performing operation on patients, designating a room and Islamic toilets for them in public institutions, and allow them to apply for driving license without requiring them to show their face.

    • Also, in the spirit of integration and community cohesion, everyone should be forced to eat halal meat, which involves extra cruelty to the animals, without their knowledge, whether they want it or not.

    While politicians in western countries and the mainstream media are stuck in the above narrative, the truth is not hidden from the islams.

    Author: Ali Sina
    Ali Sina is the author of Understanding Muhammad and Muslims.

    ‘Incarcerate’ all Treasonous/Seditious Politicians !!!
    ‘Expel’ all islam from everywhere !!!

Comments are closed.