Why Muslim Lone Wolves May Now Target Based on Race
Moon battery
Moonbats have a remarkable knack for getting everyone to view life through their identity politics lens — even those who don’t normally think in those terms, like Muslim terrorists. Al Qaeda offers a solution to the problem posed by liberal authorities twisting the Orlando terror atrocity into a hate crime against sacred homosexuals and/or Hispanics rather than a mighty blow against America on behalf of Allah:
Lone wolf jihadists should target white Americans so no one mistakes their terror attacks for hate crimes unrelated to the cause of radical Islam, Al Qaeda writes in the latest edition of its online magazine.
Too late. Allah (Muhammad) divided the world in believer and unbeliever 1400 years ago. The Mohammedans understand that. Why don’t we?
Yes, you heard right. They’re countering violent extremism by not mentioning the cause of violent extremism at all. From Judicial Watch:
Four years after the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) purged anti-terrorism training material determined to be offensive to Muslims, its umbrella agency, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), may eliminate divisive Islamic terms like “jihad” and “sharia” in government programs targeting radicalization among youth.
It’s political correctness run amok and the Obama administration has played a central role in promoting it by caving in to the demands of various Muslim rights groups. In this latest case a Homeland Security Advisory Council is recommending that, to avoid “us versus them” when discussing extremism, certain “religiously-charged” terminology must be avoided. This includes using “American Muslim” rather than “Muslim American” and rejecting religious, legal and cultural terms like jihad, sharia, takfir and umma. Jihad is the holy war that propels Islamic terrorism. Sharia is the authoritarian doctrine that inspires Islamists—including the world’s most violent groups such as Al Qaeda—and their jihadism. Takfir and umma are Arabic terms that mean apostasy and Muslim community.
We are running on taxis because the sharia-compliant London transit authority refused to run them on buses, even though they are running an Allah is Greater ad campaign:
Geller, who co-founded the American Freedom Defense Initiative in an effort battle radical Islam in the United States, announced the ad campaign last week on the group’s website.“Despite the overwhelming push-back and danger, we continue to fight on fiercely,” she wrote. “The war is in the homeland, and it’s only just begun.”
And the fight is not cheap, Geller explained.
“London buses refused our ads, despite running Islamic prayers on their bus-sides. So we are putting our ads on 100 London taxis …. they go up this week, but it’s bloody expensive,” Geller wrote.
AfterEzra Levant’s investigation into reports that migrant children in Nova Scotia were bullying other students, TheRebel.media set up a tip line — tips@therebel.media — for parents whose children were also being bullied.
Now a parent in New Brunswick says there are migrant “children” at her child’s school as old as 22. These adult males “with full beards” are “hitting on the 14-15 year old girls.”
TheRebel.media filed an Access to Information request to get to the bottom of this — and over 2000 documents came in, with more on the way
Emails between teachers reveal what’s going on in their classrooms.
What they talk about will shock you:
Bullying, anti-semitism, sexual harassment, jokes about homemade bombs — and refugee girls telling teachers they live in fear of their brothers and fathers.
The same hatred as from Nazis is coming from Islamists and their politically correct allies. We do not even have a vague idea of how much Western culture we have surrendered to Islam.
Democracies are, or at least should be, custodians of a perishable treasury: freedom of expression. This is the biggest difference between Paris and Havana, London and Riyadh, Berlin and Tehran, Rome and Beirut. Freedom of expression is what gives us the best of the Western culture.
It is self-defeating to quibble about the beauty of cartoons, poems or paintings. In the West, we have paid a high price for the freedom to do so. We should all therefore protest when a German judge bans “offensive” verses of a poem, when a French publisher fires an “Islamophobic” editor or when a music festival bans a politically incorrect band.
It all occurred in the same week. A German judge banned a comedian, Jan Böhmermann, from repeating “obscene” verses of his famous poem about Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan. A Danish theater apparently cancelled “The Satanic Verses” from its season, due to fear of “reprisals.” Two French music festivals dropped Eagles of Death Metal — the U.S. band that was performing at the Bataclan theater in Paris when the attack by ISIS terrorists (89 people murdered), took place there — because of “Islamophobic” comments by Jesse Hughes, its lead singer. Hughes suggested that Muslims be subjected to greater scrutiny, saying “It’s okay to be discerning when it comes to Muslims in this day and age,” later adding:
“They know there’s a whole group of white kids out there who are stupid and blind. You have these affluent white kids who have grown up in a liberal curriculum from the time they were in kindergarten, inundated with these lofty notions that are just hot air.”
As Brendan O’Neill wrote, “Western liberals are doing their dirty work for them; they’re silencing the people Isis judged to be blasphemous; they’re completing Isis’s act of terror.”
A few weeks earlier, France’s most important publishing house, Gallimard, fired its most famous editor, Richard Millet, who had penned an essay in which he wrote:
“the decline of literature and the deep changes wrought in France and Europe by continuous and extensive immigration from outside Europe, with its intimidating elements of militant Salafism and of the political correctness at the heart of global capitalism; that is to say, the risk of the destruction of the Europe and its cultural humanism, or Christian humanism, in the name of ‘humanism’ in its ‘multicultural’ version.”
Kenneth Baker just published a new book, On the Burning of Books: How Flames Fail to Destroy the Written Word. It is a compendium of so called “bibliocaust,” the burning of books from Caliph Omar to Hitler, and includes the fatwa on Salman Rushdie. When Nazis incinerated books in Berlin they declared that from the ashes of these novels would “arise the phoenix of a new spirit.” The same hatred is coming from Islamists and their politically correct allies. We do not even have a vague idea of how much Western culture we have surrendered to Islam.
Theo Van Gogh’s movie, “Submission,” for which he was murdered, disappeared from many film festivals. Charlie Hebdo‘s drawings of the Islamic prophet Mohammed are concealed from the public sphere: after the massacre, very few media reprinted these cartoons. Raif Badawi’s blog posts, which cost him 1,000 lashes and ten years in prison in Saudi Arabia, have been deleted by the Saudi authorities and now circulate like forbidden Samizdat literature was in the Soviet Union.
After the massacre of Charlie Hebdo‘s staff, very few media reprinted their Mohammed cartoons. Pictured above, Stéphane Charbonnier, the editor and publisher of Charlie Hebdo, who was murdered on January 7, 2015 along with many of his colleagues, is shown in front of the magazine’s former offices, just after they were firebombed in November 2011.
Even the journaille from the Herald Sun keeps smearing patriots with the “racist” label. To suggest that the Antifa thugs are no more to blame for the riots than those who stand for freedom and democracy is despicable.
IT’S bad enough that the centre of Melbourne is regularly turned into a war zone but now extremist protesters have added flag burning to their repertoire.
If you listen to the irrational idiocy of the masked thugs who are variously, and charitably, described as “anti-fascists” or “anti-racists” the Australian flag is a celebration of racism and only racists would object to its desecration.
The other argument put forward by protesters and their miserable band of apologists is that the flag is just a piece of cloth and destroying it shouldn’t upset anybody.
Anti racism and fascism protesters burn the Australian flag as they march against the True Blue Crew at Parliament House in Melbourne, Sunday, June 26, 2016. (AAP Image/Tracey Nearmy) NO ARCHIVING
You can’t have it both ways; either the flag is a powerful symbol that represents a country and its people or it’s a nondescript piece of material.
But it would be too much to expect sensible, consistent arguments from fringe-dwelling simpletons who feel they are entitled to cause mayhem in city and suburban streets to push their bizarre agendas.
We should stop referring to the groups taking part in these violent protests as anti-racist or anti-fascist; their agenda has little to do with either and most migrants would be just as disgusted by their antics as any other Australian.
The protesters should be called what they are and not what they claim to be; after all we don’t refer to Nazis as the master race or call terrorists freedom fighters.
A woman tries to hold up a burning Australian flag during Sunday’s rallies. Picture: Stuart McEvoy
On Sunday a group of extremist Left demonstrators, most of them hiding their faces, burnt Australian flags with one man filmed yelling “Allah Akbar”.
It’s all a massive joke to these socialists, anarchists and assorted losers whose actions in recent months have cost the community a fortune both in police resources and loss of trade as well as damage to Melbourne’s reputation.
Some of Sutherland’s fellow losers think a petition might help:
Thursday’s referendum saw 17.4 million (51.9 per cent) votes cast to leave the EU, compared with 16.1 million (48.1 per cent) for remaining part of the bloc, with a turnout of 72.2 per cent, according to the Electoral Commission.
In response, more than 2.6 million people have signed an online petition calling for the Government to implement a rule that ‘if the Remain or Leave vote is less than 60 per cent based on a turnout less than 75 per cent, there should be another referendum’.
These people are ridiculous. Meanwhile, Remain supporter Oliver Imhof has now joined the Leave camp:
Above all other ideological affiliations, I am a democrat. And as a democrat I have to accept a defeat. I have to accept being oppressed by a majority of an older generation that seems intent on depriving us of our future.
Masked members of a splinter anti-fascism group have set Australian flags on fire and scuffled with police and media in the latest Melbourne rally between rival protest groups. However, police managed to keep the opposing groups separate at the protests today.
About two dozen people dressed in black and wearing masks still managed to interrupt an anti-Islam rally, setting flags alight and scuffling with news photographers.
That would be the “moderates” who are always “shocked” when one of their own goes jihad. Obviously, not one cent went to the victims. For them, the killer is a “martyr”.
According to several recent reports, the Muslim community has made a donation in excess of $87,000 to the family of Orlando nightclub shooter Omar Mateen.
It’s currently unknown how the funds will be distributed, however it’s been said that the majority of the $87,000 will be allocated to Omar Mateen’s widow Noor Salman and father Seddique Mateen. Sources indicate that the remaining funds will be distributed among Omar’s siblings. Prior to distributing the donation, the Mateen family is expected to provide Omar with a ‘proper Islamic funeral’.
The whereabouts of Omar Mateen’s widow Noor Salman are currently unknown and cause for controversy as rumors of her potential grand jury indictment in connection to her husband’s June 12th shooting spree circulate throughout social media and on-line news publications. It’s clear to authorities that Omar Mateen’s father Seddique Mateen, knows where Noor Salman is and has maintained contact with her since her disappearance on June 15th 2016.
Many are surprised by the donation made on behalf of the Muslim community as Muslim community leaders have largely spoken out against the actions of Omar Mateen since the mass-shooting occurred during the early hours of June 12, 2016.
To weaken the US military machine is top priority for the Obama regime. Occupying and distracting soldiers minds with homo-promo and tranny chicanery is disgraceful, Islamo-prop and the removal of all things Christian is like defecating on the honour of the Christian majority, and the absurd rules of engagement, like “courageous restraint” in the face of the enemy puts unbearable pressure on America’s fighting men. America is in deep shiite.
President Barack Obama is forcing the Pentagon to repeal its ban on transgender service members, meaning U.S. soldiers will soon be serving under the command of cross-dressing soldiers.
The policy change is another example of how progressives bypass Congress and the voters by using the military to promote and advance social changes nationwide. Since 2009, for example, the military has been used to aid illegal immigrants and to help change the definition of marriage so that it can include single-sex couples — regardless of the far-left policies’ impact on combat readiness and recruitment.
The repeal of the long-standing exclusion of cross-dressing transgender soldiers is coming “within weeks” or at least by the end of July, according to The Washington Post.