Year: 2016

What is the difference between a radical feminist and an Islamist?

Andrew Bolt

New-age feminism gives cover to creeping Islamism sharia:

London’s first ever Muslim Mayor is set to ban images of ‘unrealistic’ scantily clad women from ads on public transport, which could see the city adopt some of the most censorious policies in the Western world.

Sadiq Khan argued for the move by appropriating the language of feminism, claiming that alluring images of beautiful women could make them “ashamed of their bodies”.

Ironically, the policy is likely to please both the misogynistic Islamist and prudish, third wave feminist, whose ends appear increasingly similar.

The announcement comes five years after suspected Islamists began painting over images of bikini clad women in Tower Hamlets in East London, and last year after feminists began similarly defacing images of women in bikinis on London transport.
bikini 

Reader Paul says:

I bet this wasn’t in his election platform.

And around Europe the burka is descending:

Images of women are banned in public across large parts of the Muslim world, and the phenomenon is now spreading in the Western world.

Germany’s ‘progressive’ Justice Minister, Heiko Maas, recently promised to ban ads which “reduce women or men to sexual objects” in an attempt to create a “modern gender image” following the mass sex attacks on New Year’s Eve in Cologne, committed by mostly Muslim migrants.

The London Mayor echoed these sentiments. He said in a statement: “As the father of two teenage girls, I am extremely concerned about this kind of advertising which can demean people, particularly women, and make them ashamed of their bodies. It is high time it came to an end.”

Right. Its all about “protecting women”.  When Erdogan promoted the hijab in Turkey, it was all about the “rights of religious women to wear hijab”. Now, 10 years later, the non religious women have lost their right not to wear the hideous shrouds.

Why is this man still preaching here?

Andrew Bolt

The Turnbull Government has now cancelled the visa of an Iranian Muslim cleric who says gays should be killed.

But it still allows Feizel Chothia, a Muslim cleric from South Africa, to live and preach in Perth.

From Chothia’s book Sex and Sexuality in Islam:

Islam prescribes capital punishment for Homosexuals. While such punishment may seem cruel, they have been instituted to maintain the purity of society and to keep it clean of perverted elements…

It is one of the major sins Islam. The Holy Qur’an says:

“And We sent Lut as a Messenger: Remember that he said to his people, “Have you become so shameless that you commit such indecent acts as no one committed before you in the world? You gratify your lust with men instead of women: indeed you are a people who are transgressors of all limits.” (7: 80, 81)

Here and at other places the Holy Qur’an declares that sodomy is a heinous sin that warrants the wrath of Allah…

European nations in the modern world … are doing their utmost to propagate and have succeeded, to a large extent, in giving this filthy act legal sanction…

As if this wasn’t bad enough, many homosexuals (and some heterosexuals) enjoy hurting or being hurt by their partners, through tying each other up, whipping or hitting each other!

Who let him in? How many other imams think gays deserve execution? And is Islam compatible with a society like ours?

DHS ordered me to scrub records of Muslims with terror ties

Why Orlando Mass Murder Was Predictable

by Peter McLoughlin (June 2016) For decades, the Left (including the Leftist media) have been working to protect Islamo-Nazism from criticism. This has meant that the percentage of Muslims in Western countries has doubled and doubled again. And because the Left and the media protect the Islamo-Nazis …Read More…

.

Paris attack: Cop-killer broadcast murder live on Facebook, saying he was answering Isil’s call for lone wolf attacks during Ramadan

From the Telegraph A suspected Islamist who stabbed to death a police commander and his wife in France claimed he was following Isil’s call for lone wolf attacks during Ramadan, in a video posted online after the killing. Larossi Abballa, a 25-year-old known to French security services, pledged …Read More…

.

FBI Called Off Investigation Of Orlando Shooter Because They Thought His Coworkers were Racists

Me thinks America needs a different FBI.

Oh heads will roll at the FBI. Heads will roll. There is video at the Daily Caller: The FBI reportedly cancelled its 2013 investigation into Orlando terrorist Omar Mateen after only 10 months because they viewed the terroristic threats he made as a reaction to “being marginalized because of his Muslim …Read More…

.

ACLU lawyers blame ‘Christian right,’ GOP for Orlando terrorist attack

From the Washington Examiner: Christian conservatives are responsible for the mass shooting at a gay bar in Orlando because they “created this anti-queer climate,” according to American Civil Liberties Union attorneys. “You know what is gross — your thoughts and prayers and Islamophobia after …Read More…

Confucius:

If language is not correct, then what is said is not what is meant; if what is said is not what is meant, then what must be done remains undone; if this remains undone, morals and art will deteriorate; if justice goes astray, the people will stand about in helpless confusion. Hence there must be no arbitrariness in what is said. This matters above everything.

Two days before Orlando jihad massacre, DHS told officials not to use words “jihad” and “Sharia” to avoid offending Muslims

The Obama administration is deeply committed to the proposition that it would be wrong and harmful to identify the jihad threat for what it is. In reality, its politically correct willful ignorance is hamstringing proper analysis of the problem, and endangering Americans.

“DHS report before Orlando massacre: Don’t offend Muslims while combating extremism,” by Douglas Ernst, Washington Times, June 14, 2016:

A report by the Homeland Security Advisory Council released days before the Islamic terror attack in Orlando, Florida, stressed the importance of combating extremism by avoiding terms that might offend Muslims.

A HSAC subcommittee first created by DHS Secretary Jeh Johnson in 2015 published its report on June 9.

Some instructions found in the report include:

Officials should not use the word “jihad.”
Officials should not use the word “sharia.”
Officials should not use the word “takfir,” which is done when one Muslim accuses another of apostasy.
Officials are instructed to “reject religiously-charged terminology and problematic positioning by using plain meaning American English.”

“We must speak with honor and respect about all communities within the United States,” the Daily Caller reported Tuesday. “We should give dignity to the many histories and diversities within our nation and advocate for a consistent whole of government approach that utilizes agreed terms and words. Tone and word choice matter.”…

Continue reading Hussein Obama Forbids Words Like “jihad” and “Sharia”

The usual lies and obfuscations by the coreligionists of Omar Mateen that characterise this creed: no one knew him, no one knows anything and lets worry about “islamophobia” and that imaginary ‘backlash’ that never comes:

The Orlando massacre is not “homegrown extremism.”

WTF is “homegrown” supposed to mean, anyhow?

If a Mohammedan is born in the West, if he holds a western passport, does that make him a civilised man? I don’t think so. A soldier of allah is by nature the enemy of infidel society. Therefore, every Mohammedan is a walking time bomb.

Continue reading ISLAMIC TERRORISM IS NOT DOMESTIC TERRORISM

Is this Goldman-Sachs rep even dumber than KRudd, G-Lard and Shorty?

Turnbull: whites “invaded” this land. This “always will be Aboriginal land”

Andrew Bolt

I have warned conservatives about what Malcolm Turnbull would be like once elected.

You don’t actually need to wait that long after today’s presser:

JOURNALIST:

Do you agree that the colonisation of Australia can fairly be described as an invasion?

PRIME MINISTER:

Well I think it can be fairly described as that and I’ve got no doubt – and obviously our first Australians, Aboriginal Australians describe it as an invasion. 

And never may people with no Aboriginal ancestors feel an equal right to call this home:

So this was and is and always will be Aboriginal land.

And so the racial division of this country proceeds, encouraged by the party many would have expected to resist.

Obama: Debate on radical Islam is political distraction

MILO YIANNOPOULOS:

 How many more innocent gays need to die before we admit that America, and the world, has an Islam problem?

I don’t mean a “radical Islam” problem or an “extremist Islam problem.” Violence is not the extreme in Islam any more: it’s the norm. The public’s patience for comments like the one below, from the dimwitted lesbian Sally Kohn, are wearing thin. As for mine, it’s long since run out.

EVERY religion has sub-groups of intolerant extremism. You can’t tell me the problem is religion. The problem is intolerant extremism!—Sally Kohn

A lot of people laughed at Donald Trump when he suggested a temporary ban on Muslims entering the country. No doubt they thought he was further harming his chances in the general election.

No one is laughing now. What’s more, I expect many are quietly wondering if the “temporary” ban might have to be permanent. Western capitalist democracy gave women and gays equal footing in society; Islam has arrived to roll the clock back.

The Left Chose Islam Over Gays. Now 100 People Are Dead Or Maimed In Orlando. Obama’s response to the tragedy today was similarly limp-wristed. He made no mention of Islam or Muslims, instead condemning “hate and terror” and taking a brazen swipe at gun rights activists by noting “how easy it is to let people get their hands on a weapon.”
-He didn’t even address the uniquely homophobic character of the attack. What a good liberal!
-Plus, a parade of I-told-you-sos from Milo.” 

In other news:

Continue reading The Left Chose Islam Over Gays. Now 100 People Are Dead Or Maimed In Orlando

Islamic cleric Farrokh Sekaleshfar leaves Australia after anti-gay comment controversy

A visiting Islamic cleric has defended his comments supporting the death penalty for homosexuals in certain cases before flying out of the country this evening.

Sheik Farrokh Sekaleshfar, who was visiting Sydney, made the anti-homosexual comments at the University of Michigan three years ago and they have been reportedly linked to the recent massacre in Orlando — a claim he strenuously denies.

Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull had earlier ordered an urgent review of the Sheikh’s visa saying Australia had a “zero tolerance for people who come to Australia to preach hatred”.

The Sheik said his comments were made in an academic setting, and he regretted they were filmed and published online.

He said he advocated the death penalty for homosexuals who have sex in public, in a country that abides by Islamic law.

PHOTO: The Sheik reportedly described death as an appropriate sentence for homosexuality. (Supplied: YouTube)

“When does this question of death theoretically arise? It arises in particular scenario and it’s such a small probability that I’ve never even heard of such a scenario arising, where in such a country, with such a mandate, where the rule of law is Islam, there where homosexual couples … commit anal copulation in public — no-one does that,” the Sheikh said.

In an interview with the Lateline, he expressed his sympathies to the families of those who died in the Orlando shooting and denied his comments could be seen as justification for the massacre.

“No speech, especially when you’re not inciting any hatred and it was given three years ago, that would never lead to such a massacre,” the Sheikh said.

Three years ago the message was no different. He was inciting the same hatred.

“That animal, they are connecting me to him [Omar Mateen]. Not at all. He was an ISIS sympathiser, a follower of Baghdadi, these people are criminals.”

So is Sheik Farrokh Sekaleshfar. They’re cut from the same cloth.

He also said he would respect any action taken by the Australian Government.

“But if the Government were to make that decision and the people want that, then I respect it, but I don’t see any reason for fear even though I do understand why people may panic.

“But I just want to give that assurance that it’s not a theme, my themes don’t revolve around this area.”

His themes revolve exactly around these areas.

Related:

Pull my other leg:

• Muslims fearing retaliation after gay nightclub shooting

• Hundreds gather at Brisbane vigil to honour Orlando shooting victims

Continue reading Australia sends Islamic savage Farrokh Sekaleshfar on his way