Islam denial industry in action every time a terrorist attack happens. The parents would have you believe it’s a cover up, no matter what.
Sandra Solomon on the Louvre Attacker: “He Was Doing the Right Thing According to Shariah Law”
Sandra Solomon is an apostate from Islam who grew up in Saudi Arabia and now lives in Canada. Last night Vlad Tepes interviewed Ms. Solomon about the basis under the shariah for the destruction of works of art. According to Islamic Law — derived from the sayings of Mohammed — any work of art that represents animals or human beings is a form of idolatry, and is therefore haram, or forbidden. In Arabic such practices are referred to as shirk, or polytheism — the placing of entities alongside Allah as objects of worship. You and I, who patronize such art, are known as mushrikun, or polytheists.
Ms. Solomon also makes a point of reminding Muslims that if they have a painting, drawing, or photo in their houses — even a picture of their children — they are guilty of shirk, and according to Mohammed will go to hell for it:
Mohamed Al-Ghiety on the Louvre Mujahid: “Be Careful. It’s the Muslim Brotherhood.”
Thanks to the Gates of Vienna
The following clip is from a program on Egyptian television hosted by Mohamed Al-Ghiety, who is obviously not a pious or doctrinaire Muslim (it’s not clear to me whether he is considered an apostate). He discusses the recent incident involving Abdallah al-Hamamy, the Egyptian mujahid who allegedly attacked soldiers with a machete a few days ago near the Louvre. Mr. al-Hamamy’s father has been in the news in the past two days after talking to media reporters.
In this segment Mr. Al-Ghiety explains why the elder al-Hamamy can say with absolute honesty that his son could not possibly be guilty of such an attack, that he is in fact a good boy.
Many thanks to Sandra Solomon for the translation, and to Vlad Tepes for the subtitling:
|00:00||Today, one of the (French) MPs|
|00:04||His name is François Mollaz, he wrote…|
|00:07||from reports from previous attacks,|
|00:12||based on his word, on the previous attacks|
|00:16||he is a suspect in four previous attacks. Now I need to know how he was a suspect. He was staying…|
|00:20||In the UAE (Emirates), working. They condemned …|
|00:28||say he was a conscript from Al Mansura, with the Islamic State (ISIS).|
|00:32||I did another episode last week, and I had|
|00:36||the lawyer Khalid Al Bri and a guy who came back from the Islamic State…|
|00:40||in Libya. And they said “in the Dakahlia|
|00:44||Delta (area of Egypt) ISIS is trying to conscript the attacker, by amazing temptations…|
|00:48||Some of them travel and some of them are sleeper cells who have been arrested…|
|00:52||and are still under investigation. So, the Dakahlia and the Western area (of Egypt)|
|00:56||is an area where they recruit people for the Islamic State…|
|01:00||The question is, was Abdullah al-Hamamy, who committed the Louvre attack, a soldier for ISIS?|
|01:04||They sent him to|
|01:08||the Emirates, to Paris to commit a terror attack for the Islamic State.|
|01:12||Some say yes.|
|01:16||We have information that this guy, he visited Turkey many times for|
|01:20||As a tourist, and he stayed there|
|01:24||a week and he received orders from leaders…|
|01:28||from a Muslim Brotherhood member (Ikhwan), an Egyptian doctor who lives in Turkey.|
|01:32||Information (on Abdullah el-H.): worked with terrorist cell, including Egyptians, Tunisians, Syrians…|
|01:36||As a cover story, he worked for a company in Dubai.|
|01:40||And the one who helped him get the cover story job is a Muslim Brotherhood member.|
|01:45||I’m telling the Emirates… Be careful. Be careful. It’s the Muslim Brotherhood,|
|01:48||and you are the first people who discovered a huge infiltration in education from the Muslim Brotherhood.|
|01:52||And many people have been charged and convicted and sentenced to many years in jail.|
|01:56||The businesses in the Emirates have a lot of Muslim Brotherhood control, and they hire people…|
|02:00||from the Islamic State.|
|02:04||It’s strange that Abdullah al-Hamamy’s father, a retired police lieutenant…|
|02:08||and his brother…|
|02:13||who is still a police officer,|
|02:17||and they told me that his brother is in important secret intelligence…|
|02:21||Allah! The father, the retired police Lieutenant,|
|02:25||we recorded with his father. (is the video ready Mr. Fikri?)|
|02:33||I need the video…|
|02:37||The father, I felt he had been hit on the head.|
|02:41||And you will see the video right now.|
|02:45||And he cannot believe it and is in denial.|
|02:49||And this denial|
|02:53||when a crisis happens to anyone…|
|02:57||the first reaction is to deny to deny. “I cannot believe it.”|
|03:01||I feel the father is reacting like this. Because when his son,|
|03:05||who is still living with him and got married a year ago,|
|03:09||and he had kids. —And then all of a sudden my son is a terrorist!?|
|03:14||All of a sudden he commits a terror attack, and then all of a sudden the whole world…|
|03:17||media, the national security and the global intelligence apparatus|
|03:21||…and they are investigating me and the family.|
|03:25||This is the situation with the father right now.|
|03:29||But I want to tell (the father): when you study any guy|
|03:36||who is a member of any terrorist group, you will find…|
|03:40||you will find everything is very tidy.|
|03:44||He (the father) said his son wore jeans, had a modern look of facial hair,|
|03:48||…and our house is modern. And his room doesn’t have…|
|03:52||Allah! (expression of surprise) You have your son, he is eating and drinking with you, and|
|03:55||you don’t know anything about him? —And that’s what happened.|
|04:00||What happened with many people. They were surprised that their kids have been recruited|
|04:04||to be a member of a terrorist group.|
|04:08||A part of the Muslim Brotherhood code is that you’re not supposed to tell your family you’re a member.|
|04:12||Unless your family is a Brotherhood family.|
|04:16||This is a part of the Charter of ten or twenty rules that Hassan al-Banna, (founder) made for the Ikhwan.|
|04:20||So how about if he was in an even more secret terrorist group like the Islamic State?|
|04:29||I am talking to the father now, didn’t you read his tweets? Didn’t you see his page?|
|04:33||He is calling everyone a Kafir! (infidel) and this is in his private social media accounts!|
|04:41||Give me his picture?|
|04:45||Where is the video?|
One thought on “Paris Denial”
There are so many calls to deceit, and ways to deceive, as prescribed by their texts. Here’s a small sample:
Taqiyya (Shia) or Muda’rat (Sunni): tactical deceit for the purposes of spreading Islam.
Kitman: deceit by omission.
Tawriya: deceit by ambiguity.
Taysir: deceit through facilitation (not having to observe all the tenets of Sharia).
Darura: deceit through necessity (to engage in something “Haram” or forbidden).
Muruna: the temporary suspension of Sharia in order that Muslim immigrants appear “moderate.” So
through the principle of Hijra (Muslim Immigration), the early Muslims are a “red herring” or a Trojan Horse. The Kafir or Kuffar community gets the false sense that the early immigrants are not a threat, at least until the Muslim community has gained strength.
Taqiyya Deception (taqqiya): Dissimulation (Concealment of the truth about a situation) is sanctified hypocrisy. It is considered a part of Islamic strategy to lie and deceive unbelievers by any means.
Thus, exercising turkey is very pious behavior. Veiling the truth: Adjustment, deception up to the open lie. –
“Taqqiya is attached, if it is helpful to the well-being of the religion -Islam” (Khomeini).
(To lie and cheat for the good of Islam against an Infidel is considered as a sacred duty).
Kitman also spelled as Kithman is close to Taqqiya (see above) but rather than outright dissimulation, it consists in telling only a part of the truth, with “mental reservation” justifying the omission of the rest. One example may suffice.
When a Moslem maintains that “jihad” really means “a spiritual struggle” and fails to add that this definition is a recent one in Islam (Little more than a century old), he misleads by holding back, and is practicing “Kitman.” Another example would be the insistence of a Moslem apologist that, “of course”, there is freedom of conscience in Islam and then quoting that Qur’anic verse:
”There shall be no compulsion in religion.” But the impression given will be false, for there has been no mention of the Moslem doctrine of abrogation, (To abolish, do away with, or annul, especially by authority) or naskh.
There are 109 verses straight from the Quran dictating hate, murder, and terror against all people who will not submit or convert to Islam.
By Moslem Standards: “Success” is measured by what they have done to affect your “status” with them.
(A.) Whether they have converted you, by any and all means, (B.) Subjected you to a Dhimmi-Slave status and you have paid the 30% Jizyah Tax, of which you will receive absolutely no benefit as a Non-Moslem (C.) Cut off your hand and foot on opposite sides, (the same as if you were caught as a thief) (D.) or enslaved as an actual slave or (E.) Killed you!
All muslims are liars. Their creed informs them their god wants them to lie all the time, to everyone* – to their own families and friends (“to keep the peace”) and of course to their infidel enemies (“to keep the peace until you are in a position of strength and able to successfully attack them again”). Obviously, since islam is only an extortion racket CRIME syndicate, they have to lie to them selves, too, in order to pretend it’s a “religion” in any way; i.e: “God told us to commit these crimes!”
Comments are closed.