Anne Aly has for years been an Islamic supremacist foe of free discourse. In August 2014 I wrote here about her false claims that Islam doesn’t sanction beheading and grants equality of rights to women. Instead of responding on substance, which I understand that she could not really do since I had produced numerous Qur’an verses that rather directly showed her to be lying. So instead she claimed that she had received “hate mail” from Jihad Watch readers; six months later that claim had morphed into death threats. Predictably, that became the story, as dubious as her claims were, not her deceptions.
Now, if she gets her way in Australia, she could just have me arrested — not for the alleged hate mail or death threats, but for my initial post exposing her deceptions. This proposed law clearly would establish Muslims as a protected class, beyond all criticism, which would have the effect of allowing the jihad to advance unimpeded and unopposed.
“Australian MP Wants to Make It Illegal to Cause Religious Offence to Muslims,” by Kieran Corcoran, Heat Street, March 30, 2017 (thanks to JW):
An Australian MP has called for tougher speech laws so that it is illegal to offend Muslims because of their religion.
Anne Aly, Australia’s first female Muslim MP (pictured), said that race discrimination laws should be expanded to cover insults based on religion as well.
Restrictive speech laws Down Under have banned people from saying anything which could “offend or insult” people because of their race.
As Heat Street has previously reported, the Australian government is mounting a push to rewrite the legislation so that words must “harass or intimidate” before they become a matter for the courts.
Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull said the legislation in question – Section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act – has “lost its credibility” and needs to change.
However, Aly proposes doing the opposite – keeping the lower standard for the law, and adding “religion” to the current list of “race, colour or national or ethnic origin”.
Speaking to The Australian, she said: “I find it a little bit strange that someone can call you a ‘dirty Arab’ and that be covered under the bill, but if they called you a dirty Muslim you’re not covered.”…
I will cheerfully go to court to defend myself against my total opposition to Islam. I’ll be happy to parade Islam’s obnoxious beliefs and practices in the public arena. Ms Aly had better be careful, this may just be a bridge too far for Islam. It thrives on lies, deception and secrecy. Let’s drag it, kicking and screaming, into the light. I cannot get a Muslim (including Ms Aly) to respond to any of my questions about Islam. I’m apparently supposed to go to a Mosque open day to ask my questions. Sure, if I can get a police escort and personal bodyguard.
Like insest. the family doesnt want to talk about it, just shut U up.
They really are attempting to elevate themselves into a position of priviledge.
If laws like the ones she wants were already in place, there would have been no Reformation.
You would be surprised to know the number of academics who support her in this endeavour.
Can she tell us who called her a dirty Muslim?
Anne Aly …
She is what she is …
An Arab and an islam !!!
(and the definition of both is Vile Putrid Malevolent AND Deceitful … as well as being a Plague upon Civilisation)
Why is it we can discuss,debate on air all religions ,cults etc,but not islam ,they always talk about the misconceptions we have of them but will not do anything to clear them,we have every right to criticize and want answers but none are forth coming ,why did Mr. Turnbull’s violence against women and the Royal Commission into child abuse stop short at investigating islam and protecting it’s women and children ? child marriages ,FGM complaints made to police were never investigated according to those who made the complaints ,it all smells of corruption in high places