Can’t wait to meet E.T.
These very same YALE wakademics do not know what is a woman, go figure.
Warmists from the Guardian call Sky News Australia a ‘central source for climate misinformation’
Queenslands energy grid is on the brink of collapse as are our hospitals while crime is at record rates. And Labor spends $4 million a week on an empty quarantine facility.
If your vote was based on ₵Ⱡł₥₳₮Ɇ ₵Ⱨ₳₦₲Ɇ then your going to get it… A change in your household climate that is. Forget heaters in winter and air cons in summer.
Criminal insanity
‘Both #Covid19 and #climatechange created government policies that have served to greatly widen economic inequalities within and among nations with fat profits for Big Pharma and rent-seeking renewable industries.’
In addition to hypocrisy, models-data mismatch and fear-porn, a fourth common theme in Covid and climate change policies is the invocation of The Science. For the appeal to scientific authority to work better, scientific consensus is very helpful. Yet, driven by intellectual curiosity, questioning existing knowledge is the essence of the scientific enterprise. For the claim to scientific consensus to be accepted, therefore, supporting evidence must be exaggerated, contrary evidence discredited, sceptical voices stilled and dissenters ridiculed and marginalised.
Climate systems are complex owing to non-linear equations and dynamic linkages among multiple sub-systems like the atmosphere, land surface, oceans, glaciers, permafrost, solar variability, volcanic eruptions, cycles of planetary orbital variations, etc. The fabled 97 per cent scientific consensus was in relation to the simple and trivial proposition that ‘the earth is warming due to human activity’. That doesn’t tell us how dominant human activity is as a cause of global warming relative to natural variability over long time cycles; the rise in temperature that will mark a point of no return for the stability of the earth’s environment; and ‘tipping points’ that will push the ecosystem into a self-exacerbating cycle of rapid collapse. Gradually The Science was captured by climate activists who acted as gatekeepers to restrict entry to climate science departments to the faithful and used peer review to reject contrarian articles. By this means the claim of ‘consensus’ became self-validating.
This has proven harder with Covid, not least because the policy interventions defied settled science. We now know that Anthony Fauci and Francis Collins, from their perches atop the infectious diseases research funding agencies, orchestrated the takedown of the Great Barrington Declaration and smeared its three credentialled authors from Harvard, Oxford and Stanford universities as ‘fringe’ epidemiologists. Yet, as of last week, the Declaration had been signed by 930,000 people worldwide, including 63,000 medical practitioners and public health scientists. In addition, there is now a flood of articles being published that show the lack of demonstrable public health outcomes from lockdowns against measurable collateral health, mental health, educational, social and economic damage; and the inefficacy of other measures like masks and vaccines alongside possible long-term harms from them as well. This has produced a palpable lessening of confidence in the authority of scientific experts across the board.
********
Australia’s “brain-dead approach to energy” has caused our current energy catastrophe, says Sky News host Chris Smith.
“Yes, the world is suffering from power sanctions imposed on Russian gas, but most of Europe has nuclear reactors to fall back on,” he said.
“Not little ole Australia – we’ve been too frightened to even make power from our vast uranium deposits legal. There’s a law against it.
“And of course, we signed away the rights to our gas on the east coast, to multinationals lock, stock and barrel.
“What an international laughing stock Australia has become over energy.”
These very same YALE wakademics do not know what is a woman, go figure.
‘Both #Covid19 and #climatechange created government policies that have served to greatly widen economic inequalities within and among nations with fat profits for Big Pharma and rent-seeking renewable industries.’
In addition to hypocrisy, models-data mismatch and fear-porn, a fourth common theme in Covid and climate change policies is the invocation of The Science. For the appeal to scientific authority to work better, scientific consensus is very helpful. Yet, driven by intellectual curiosity, questioning existing knowledge is the essence of the scientific enterprise. For the claim to scientific consensus to be accepted, therefore, supporting evidence must be exaggerated, contrary evidence discredited, sceptical voices stilled and dissenters ridiculed and marginalised.
Climate systems are complex owing to non-linear equations and dynamic linkages among multiple sub-systems like the atmosphere, land surface, oceans, glaciers, permafrost, solar variability, volcanic eruptions, cycles of planetary orbital variations, etc. The fabled 97 per cent scientific consensus was in relation to the simple and trivial proposition that ‘the earth is warming due to human activity’. That doesn’t tell us how dominant human activity is as a cause of global warming relative to natural variability over long time cycles; the rise in temperature that will mark a point of no return for the stability of the earth’s environment; and ‘tipping points’ that will push the ecosystem into a self-exacerbating cycle of rapid collapse. Gradually The Science was captured by climate activists who acted as gatekeepers to restrict entry to climate science departments to the faithful and used peer review to reject contrarian articles. By this means the claim of ‘consensus’ became self-validating.
This has proven harder with Covid, not least because the policy interventions defied settled science. We now know that Anthony Fauci and Francis Collins, from their perches atop the infectious diseases research funding agencies, orchestrated the takedown of the Great Barrington Declaration and smeared its three credentialled authors from Harvard, Oxford and Stanford universities as ‘fringe’ epidemiologists. Yet, as of last week, the Declaration had been signed by 930,000 people worldwide, including 63,000 medical practitioners and public health scientists. In addition, there is now a flood of articles being published that show the lack of demonstrable public health outcomes from lockdowns against measurable collateral health, mental health, educational, social and economic damage; and the inefficacy of other measures like masks and vaccines alongside possible long-term harms from them as well. This has produced a palpable lessening of confidence in the authority of scientific experts across the board.
********
Australia’s “brain-dead approach to energy” has caused our current energy catastrophe, says Sky News host Chris Smith.
“Yes, the world is suffering from power sanctions imposed on Russian gas, but most of Europe has nuclear reactors to fall back on,” he said.
“Not little ole Australia – we’ve been too frightened to even make power from our vast uranium deposits legal. There’s a law against it.
“And of course, we signed away the rights to our gas on the east coast, to multinationals lock, stock and barrel.
“What an international laughing stock Australia has become over energy.”