Any problem that is presented as a global crisis is a scam. The fabrication of global crises is a scam.
Science is an ongoing evolving activity, but it is being presented as static knowledge that is agreed (consensus); together with the cancellation and censorship of dissenting voices.
(paraphrased).
Whenever science is static you are dealing with a scam. And yet 99% of the people still are sleeping.
BREAKING: A member of the World Economic Forum has called for an 86% reduction in the World’s Population. These people are genocidal maniacs who need to be stopped.
A celebrated member of the globalist World Economic Forum (WEF) has called for a staggering 86 percent reduction in the population of humans, arguing that the goal can be achieved “peacefully.”
Dennis Meadows, one of the main authors of the Club of Rome’s 1972 pro-depopulation book “The Limits to Growth.”
Meadows is an honorary member of the Club of Rome and a member of the World Economic Forum.
Despite his book being published over 50 years ago, his ideology is still very anti-human.
Meadows argues that most of the world’s population must be wiped out so that the survivors can “have freedom” and a “high standard of living.”
More below the fold.
Feds Have No Data On How Regulations Reduce Emissions: Audit Finds
The federal government does not know if regulations to limit methane emissions are achieving their target…
During a 2017 interview, Meadows claims that genocide of 86% of the world’s population is “inevitable.”
However, he insists that a “benevolent” dictatorship could accomplish the mass de-population “peacefully.”
“We could [ ] have eight or nine billion, probably,” he says of the world’s growing population.
“If we have a very strong dictatorship which is smart … and [people have] a low standard of living,” Meadows says as he explains how the population reduction agenda could be triggered.
“But we want to have freedom and we want to have a high standard of living so we’re going to have a billion people.
“And we’re now at seven, so we have to get back down.
“I hope that this can be slow, relatively slow, and that it can be done in a way which is relatively equal, you know, so that people share the experience.”
WATCH:
It’s no coincidence that Meadows’ words echo the words in the 1995 report titled “United Nations Agenda 2030: Global Biodiversity Assessment.”
The report, first presented at the United Nations “climate change” conference COP1, states:
An ‘agricultural world’ in which most human beings are peasants, should be able to support 5 to 7 billion people …
In contrast, a reasonable estimate for an industrialised world society at the present North American material standard of living would be one billion.
What the advocates of this ideology seem to omit mentioning is that, according to Worldometer, the population of the world is currently over 8 billion.
In 1972, the Club of Rome’s “The Limits to Growth“ published the results of computer-simulated forecasts calculated by a team of statisticians recruited from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (“MIT”).
It was the culmination of a two-year study undertaken by the MIT team under the nominal heading of Jay Forrester and Dennis Meadows.
“The Limits to Growth” is arguably the most influential book about “sustainability.”
It became the blueprint of the new anti-humanist movement that birthed today’s Green New Deal agenda.
The book is not only Malthusian in principle, but a survey of its bibliography reveals that it is also backed by extensive citations from an array of Malthusian-eugenicists and affiliated institutions that have been dedicated to population control.
A 2012 article celebrating the book’s 40th anniversary stated: “It is worth revisiting Limits [to Growth] today because, more than any other book, it introduced the concept of anthropocentric [human caused] climate change to a mass audience.”
Another reason to revisit “The Limits to Growth” is to highlight the influence it had and still has on supranational organizations.
For decades, New Age guru Barbara Marx Hubbard – who called for one-fourth of the human population to be culled to usher in a New World Order – championed transhumanism and Malthusian sustainable development.
The ideology is the crux of WEF founder and Chairman Klaus Schwab’s “Great Reset” and “Fourth Industrial Revolution” agendas.
Hubbard’s Malthusian overpopulation theories were partly inspired by “The Limits to Growth.”
In fact, in Hubbard’s “Book of Co-Creation,” there are multiple passages that warn of Malthusian “limits to growth” that could lead to ecological catastrophes.
She also met personally with Club of Rome co-founder, Aurelio Peccei who prompted the World Economic Forum to adopt the Malthusian tenets of “The Limits to Growth” at the WEF’s Third Annual Meeting in 1973.
And now we have Meadows boldly declaring that he hopes that a dictatorship will slowly and “peacefully” cull 86% of the world’s population.
This theory hasn’t escaped other members of the World Economic Forum either.
WEF elites are frequently touring a world with a massively reduced population.
As Slay News has reported, Yuval Noah Harari, a top WEF member and senior advisor to Schwab, declared last year that “we just don’t need the vast majority of the population” in today’s world.
According to Harari, most of the general public have now become “redundant” and will be of little use to the global elite in the future.
Harari, who describes himself as a historian and futurist, argues that modern technologies like artificial intelligence “make it possible to replace the people.”
And more recently, Harari gloated in September that “climate change” will create a “technological Noah’s Ark” on Earth that will only be beneficial to “elites.”
READ MORE: WEF Advisor: ‘We Don’t Need Vast Majority of Population’
RE “Yuval Harari” and his MISDIRECTING “Cognitive Revolution” (Homo Deus) propaganda notions on homo sapiens that’s meant to normalize the sick scheme of transhumanism
Yuval Harari, Schwab’s WEF’s frontman psychopath [https://www.bitchute.com/video/Alhj4UwNWp2m], who is sold as an intellectual “genius” or “prophet” by this crazy world is the person who called you and me and all other commoners “useless people” [https://archive.ph/KlOKx] — while millions of those “useless people” have been buying and recommending his books like candy (to learn his “lessons”), serving him very usefully. It’s one proof that most people anywhere are stupid and crazy (while “thinking” they’re intelligent and non-crazy).
The WEF cabal of psychopaths, including Harari, has always promoted and invested into artificial intelligence or AI are now, starting in early 2023, suddenly supposedly have a change of heart makes it clear that their warnings about AI and having it regulated is just a manipulative tactic to misdirect and deceive the public, once again.
The manipulative “AI open letter” scheme is part of The Hegellian Dialectic in action: problem-reaction-solution.
This staged deceitful bogus letter campaign is meant to raise public fear/hype panic about an alleged big “PROBLEM” (they helped to create in the first place) so the public demands (REACTION) the governments regulate and control this technology =they provide the “SOLUTION’ FOR THEIR OWN INTERESTS AND AGENDAS… because… all governments are owned and controlled by the leading psychopaths in power …. http://www.CovidTruthBeKnown.com (or https://www.rolf-hefti.com/covid-19-coronavirus.html).
What a convenient self-serving trickery … of the ever foolish public.
“AI responds according to the “rules” created by the programmers who are in turn owned by the people who pay their salaries. This is precisely why Globalists want an AI controlled society- rules for serfs, exceptions for the aristocracy.” —Unknown
The SELECTIVE narrative Harari choses in his writings (STEERING and CONTROLLING what you should believe [https://www.bitchute.com/video/Alhj4UwNWp2m]) to describe and categorize homo sapiens’ “cognitive revolution” omits the key human elements (ie self-delusion, grandiosity, manipulation, deception, lunacy — all of which shine thru for any lucid reader of his ‘Sapiens’ book and other works of his biased propaganda (that serves to normalize transhumanism), and that he himself engages in and manifests!) that has led humans to be largely destructive and therefore not being wise (sapiens) at all.
Instead, manipulative Harari’s self-serving focus has been for many years on humans’ capacity to believe fictional stories and therefore can be controlled via narrative, fictional or not, as long as everyone believes the same story — the official story, the authorized narrative, such on 9/11 or on Covid, etc. This interplay of human capacity to trust and follow “official” narratives AND the major controllers of these authorized narratives, ie the psychopathic authorities in power, is coherently explained by the reality-based theory of “The 2 Married Pink Elephants In The Historical Room” (see CovidTruthBeKnown.com) that curates the human condition and the crazy world we always have lived in.
“Separate what you know from what you THINK you know.” — Unknown
Even just somewhat more coherent intellectuals as psychopathic Harari have also recognized Harari’s ethics-empty “extremely dangerous” propaganda (while still naively, self-foolingly and falsely believing Harari is “brilliant”) [https://archive.ph/zFwwH]. The production of such “persuasive” but extremely dangerous propaganda a la Harari is of course typical of psychopaths (see CovidTruthBeKnown.com).
“You don’t live in a free country. And no, it’s not because they make you pay taxes or that time they made you wear a mask or whatever. The real reason you don’t live in a free country is much, much bigger than that: you don’t live in a free country because the minds of your countrymen are imprisoned. Westerners think they’re free because they can say whatever they want and vote however they want, but WHAT THEY WANT is controlled by mass-scale psychological manipulation. Being able to speak and vote as you wish is meaningless if the powerful CONTROL WHAT IT IS THAT YOU WISH.” — Caitlin Johnstone, Independent Journalist
“The term ‘artificial intelligence’ would lose its glamour (and its enormous value to hand-waving snake oil salesmen) if it said “dumb routine calculation at massive speed and scale”. But that’s what it is — and here is the essential point: such an ability to calculate does not equal human intelligence. AI does not ‘understand’ anything.” —Alan Mitchell