Which means the Irish gov’t is heavily infiltrated by Klaus Schwab’s “great reset” apparatchiks to box his nefarious Agenda 30 through.
The Beef Carbon Reduction scheme has begun in Northern Ireland.
Farmers in Northern Ireland can now get PAID by the government if they slaughter cows at an earlier age.
The Beef Carbon Reduction scheme is encouraging farmers to reduce the slaughter age of cattle in order to reduce the climate emissions.
In other words, slaughter the cows at a younger age when they have less meat, which will likely make the price of beef go even higher. All in the name of climate change of course.
Under the scheme, farmers will be paid £75 for each eligible animal that is slaughtered.
”This innovative approach signals a shift in how we deliver support to decarbonise and protect our environment, thereby contributing to meeting the targets set by the Climate Change Act” said Agriculture Minister Andrew Muir.
Again and again we are seeing cows being pointed out as a big climate culprit. Why is that? Because I do not believe that climate change is the real reason.
Bill Gates is backing a company that is developing an ANTI-FART vaccine injection for cows to make them fart less. This is madness.
You literally cannot make this up. How is this real? Turns out that there is now a company called ArkeaBio that is making a vaccine for cows and the goal is to stop the cows from farting and burping. In other words, an anti-fart vaccine for cows. And you will never be able to guess who has been backing this project…
And cows are also being fed a TOXIC chemical to reduce their climate emissions.
With all this meddling, don’t you think we risk doing more harm than good?
We all saw what happened with the experimental mRNA injections.
Under the Sustainable Farming Scheme in Wales, it has been reported that a whopping 122.000 livestock could have to be slaughtered to meet climate goals.
They could SLAUGHTER 122 000 livestock to meet climate goals?
First of all, guess who was recently announced as the “fourth most influential” person spreading “pro-meat misinformation” on the internet? Apparently I was – Being in good company with people like Donald Trump Jr. and Thomas Massie in a report published by The Bureau of Investigative Journalism.
You see, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the UN has published a roadmap on how to achieve their climate goals.
One of the targets they have includes reducing methane emissions from livestock by 25% by the year 2030.
Again we see the year 2030, because this all goes back to the UN Agenda 2030.
So in order to meet the Sustainable Development Goals outlined in Agenda 2030, we need to reduce methane emissions from livestock by 25%.
Guess who has been donating massive amounts of money to it? You can read my article about that here:
Bill Gates push for DIGITAL ID with $1.27 billion donation to Agenda 2030 ”Global Goals”
Independent Ireland TDs reject EU Migration Pact; call for referendum. Independent Ireland TDs have announced their intention to vote against the proposed EU Migration Pact when it comes before Dáil Éireann.
Michael Collins TD has called for a referendum on the pact to “let the people of Ireland decide if this is in our best interests”. Deputy Michael Fitzmaurice has raised concerns stating: “This pact will significantly reduce Ireland’s control over immigration issues and cede further power to Brussels.
“Ireland has a special legal right to opt out of the EU migration and asylum pact under Protocol 21 of the Treaty of Lisbon. This gives an opt-in or opt-out choice on individual proposals in the areas of freedom, security, and justice. Deputy Richard O’Donoghue said: “If this government is so confident that this pact is for the benefit of the people of Ireland, they should call a referendum and allow the people to decide.” After careful consideration of the potential impacts on Ireland’s sovereignty, financial stability, and social infrastructure, the party announced the decision detailing six key areas in which the pact may negatively impact the people of Ireland.
Sovereignty and control
The Lisbon Treaty allows Ireland to opt out of such measures, a safeguard that the people of Ireland voted to protect. Opting into this pact would mean adhering to EU-wide regulations that could significantly reduce Ireland’s control over its immigration policies. This pact includes a number of legal instruments, voted on individually in the European Parliament, that are now bundled together for a single vote. Independent Ireland does not believe that ceding further powers to Brussels around the area of migration will be beneficial to the nation: “What sovereignty we have over our own borders will essentially and effectively be ceded to the European Union if we adopt this pact.
There is no rational outcome whereby doing this will benefit the Irish state or asylum seekers.” Particularly when the current government has so badly handled a crisis that has been unfolding over the past 24 months, we fear that the old trope of ‘we’re sorry but this is a European directive’ may be used by this and future governments to effectively wash their hands of responsibility for any future immigration crises we may face. Financial burden The solidarity mechanism within the pact could impose substantial financial obligations on Ireland. Member states must either relocate asylum seekers or make financial contributions, potentially straining national budgets during a time when Ireland is already facing significant economic challenges. Capacity and infrastructure Ireland may struggle to scale up its infrastructure and resources to meet the new regulations. We are already struggling with a decades-long health and housing crisis that will continue to be exacerbated by another massive increase in asylum seekers. We must work to resolve the issues we face currently using our own laws and, if necessary, introduce emergency legislation to deal with the current crisis in immigration. Social integration and cohesion Rapid increases in asylum seekers and migrants have impacted social cohesion and integration efforts. Ireland needs adequate support systems in place to help genuine asylum seekers fleeing from war. However, many currently availing of our lax asylum law implementation and enforcement are coming from safe countries and are deemed as economic migrants travelling here illegally. Helping new arrivals to integrate successfully will be incredibly difficult to manage under the accelerated timelines mandated by the pact and will add further pressure on a society struggling to cope with current numbers.
Flexibility in crisis situations
The pact includes provisions for crisis management but Independent Ireland argues that Ireland would benefit more from retaining the flexibility to respond to migration pressures on its own terms. Binding regulations from Brussels may not always suit Ireland’s specific context and needs. Example of Denmark Denmark has successfully managed its immigration issues without opting into this pact, maintaining greater control over national policies while addressing migration challenges effectively.
This model demonstrates that it is possible to manage immigration successfully without ceding more power to Brussels. Conclusion Independent Ireland’s TDs believe that we should maintain its opt-out from the EU Migration Pact to ensure greater control over its immigration policies, avoid financial burdens, and ensure that its infrastructure and social systems are adequately prepared.
The Independent TDs urge the government to consider the long-term implications of this decision and to respect the assurances given to the Irish people during the Lisbon Treaty referenda: “Anything positive in this pact can be achieved by way of ad hoc consents and measures without having to cede any more control to the EU.”
