Censorship: Harris threatens to “Go After” Social Media Companies

The cabal is everywhere and it hates free speech. Now they’re all ganging up on Elon Musk and X, just like on Telegram, which is not -yet- under their control. If we don’t fight this, the whole world will become a dark and ugly place.

Imagine having creeps like this in positions of authority!

Elon Musk faces possible summons before UK parliament over role of 𝕏 This comes as UK officials voice concerns about 𝕏’s handling of national security threats and Musk’s provocative political statements.

This is a good time to remind everyone that Harris intends to go after Social Media companies and Free Speech.

At a time where millions of Americans are concerned about free speech, where does Kamala Harris stand?? She thinks it’s justified to censor speech over their political definitions of “hate” and “misinformation”

HARRIS: “We will go after Social Media companies”

Here’s what Lefturds really want:

Jason Clare MP
Social media and their toxic algorithms are like pokies for kids. To keep our children safe, we’ll legislate a minimum age for social media.
.

Lefturds claim they want to “keep children safe”, and then they groom them with filth like this:

The Labor/Teals/Green alliance are corrupting kids

Why else would the PM shortlist a book aimed at 8+ year old kids where they are shown how to perform sex acts for the Prime Minister’s literary awards?

That’s grooming and the sexualisation of children Labor/Teals/Greens needs to stay out of our bedrooms, stay away from of our kids, homes and schools and hopefully soon completely get out of our lives.

Kamala Harris has expressed concerns about how social media companies handle certain types of speech, particularly what she might call “hate speech” or “misinformation.” Here’s what this means in simpler terms: What is Hate Speech and Misinformation? Hate Speech: This is language that attacks or demeans a group based on attributes like race, religion, ethnic origin, sexual orientation, disability, or gender. Misinformation: This refers to false or misleading information that is spread, regardless of whether there’s an intent to deceive. Kamala Harris’s Stance: Kamala Harris has suggested that social media companies should be held responsible for the content on their platforms. She believes that these companies should not allow hate speech or misinformation to spread freely without some form of regulation or oversight. Why Does This Matter?

Free Speech: Many Americans value the right to free speech, which means you can say what you want without the government stopping you, with some exceptions like yelling “fire” in a crowded theater if there’s no fire. Concerns About Censorship: When Harris talks about going after social media companies for what they allow on their platforms, some people worry this could lead to censorship. They fear that defining what counts as “hate” or “misinformation” might be too subjective and could be used to silence legitimate opinions or debates. The Debate: For Regulation: Some people agree with Harris because they think hate speech can lead to real-world violence and misinformation can mislead people, affecting elections or public health (like during the vaccine debates). Against Regulation:

Others argue that once you start regulating speech, it’s a slippery slope. Who decides what’s hateful or misinformation? They worry it could be used to suppress opposition or unpopular opinions.

What Does “Go After” Mean? When Harris says, “We will go after Social Media companies,” it implies she wants there to be consequences or new rules for these companies if they don’t manage hate speech or misinformation according to certain standards.

This could mean fines, laws, or other regulatory measures. The Balance: The big challenge is balancing free speech with the need to protect people from harm. While everyone agrees that some limits are necessary (like not allowing threats), where to draw the line is hotly debated.

So, Kamala Harris’s position is about making social media companies more responsible for what’s said on their platforms, aiming to reduce harm but sparking a debate on freedom of speech versus censorship. This topic gets tricky because while protecting people from hate and lies is good, making sure everyone can still share their thoughts freely is also very important in a democracy.