Alarming ‘Russiagate’ News – It’s Much Worse Than We Ever Knew
Concerns have resurfaced over alleged misconduct by intelligence and law enforcement figures during their extended efforts against President Donald Trump, with senior oversight officials indicating that criminal activity may have played a role in what some have characterized as a coordinated conspiracy.
Devin Nunes, formerly leading the House Intelligence Committee and now CEO of Truth Social, suggested that several security officials may have overstepped legal and ethical lines during the years-long pursuit of claims now widely discredited. The suggestion has included recommendations for revoking clearances and removing individuals from sensitive roles who may have been involved in these efforts.
More below the fold.
Evidence Reveals Biden White House Orchestrated Lawfare Against Trump to Rig 2024 Election
‘Breaking the Law’ Exclusive… Book Drops Tomorrow
’Scandal of the Century’
Alex Marlow’s new book, “Breaking the Law: Exposing the Weaponization of America’s Legal System Against Donald Trump,” reveals a vast conspiracy to use lawfare to rig the 2024 race by engaging in an unprecedented level of coordination across branches of government, Democrat power structures, and the White House itself.
Trump: Biden-Harris Staffers Pushed Banks to ‘Destroy Trump,’ Debank Conservatives
Trump Won the Trade War Before the First Shot Was Fired
It’s worth noting that several criminal referrals were issued by the House Intelligence Committee at the time, all initiated under Nunes’s leadership. The possibility of those referrals resulting in prosecution may hinge on factors such as applicable statutes of limitations or whether those timelines can be extended under broader conspiracy-related considerations. Nunes indicated that the final decisions now rest with FBI Director Kash Patel and Attorney General Pam Bondi.
The current focus has reportedly shifted toward enforcing accountability within the intelligence structure, especially for those who may still retain access to classified material despite involvement in questionable operations linked to the now-debunked Russia narrative. Figures previously engaged in misleading assessments, it has been suggested, remain embedded within federal agencies, raising further alarms among oversight boards.
Recently declassified documentation, released by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, has pointed to deeper concerns surrounding the origins of the Russia investigation. Former intelligence analysts have warned that these revelations represent yet another blow to the already damaged credibility of the intelligence community.
According to the documents, senior Obama-era officials may have orchestrated a deliberate effort to shape a false narrative around Russian interference following the 2016 election. Allegations have surfaced that these assessments were constructed to delegitimize the Trump administration before it could formally take office.
Those implicated in the matter include former President Barack Obama, as well as senior intelligence figures such as James Clapper, John Brennan, and James Comey. Following the emergence of these claims, it was reported that Clapper had retained legal counsel, a move viewed by some as signaling the gravity of the allegations.
Former senior CIA analyst Fred Fleitz voiced his concerns about the Obama administration’s seeming politicization of information, pointing out that partisan manipulation seemed to be becoming more intense once Trump took office. Some believe that the involvement of individuals like as John Brennan and former Representative Adam Schiff has contributed to the systemic breakdown of institutional confidence.
The criminal referral filed by Gabbard, which contains documents about the purported intelligence fabrication and the larger plot to overthrow President Trump’s administration, has been acknowledged by the Department of Justice.
The referral was accompanied by a statement emphasizing that those who may have participated in such efforts, regardless of position or political affiliation, must be held accountable through legal channels. It has been underscored that the constitutional integrity of the republic remains at stake, and that consequences should follow if wrongdoing is confirmed.