“But a good muslim stopped the bad muslim” is not a convincing argument.
They want you to tolerate grooming gangs, skyrocketing crime, antisocial behaviour, ethnic replacement and occasional terrorism because there are good immigrants too.
This doesn’t bring back the dead Jews murdered because the borders opened up to the entire world and allowed the terrorist’s father to immigrate and reproduce. Notice how countries like Poland don’t have to deal with terrorism in the first place.
They never mass imported this situation, and therefore don’t have to navigate this mess. And you know what the result is? Their children and loved ones are alive because their government didn’t place them in the firing line of terrorists to begin with.
There was no good muslim there to stop a bad muslim because he wasn’t there either, and because of this, Polish citizens are alive and safe.
My point is: The West should NOT be the ideological and literal battleground between extremist and moderate islam. Sydney, Australia shouldn’t be where they face each other while civilian Australian Jews are caught in between.
Why is this so damn hard for so many leftists and muslims to understand? Nobody is disputing Ahmad el-Ahmad is a hero and a great man. We’re saying this entire scenario was imported for no good reason, and if it wasn’t imported, 10 year old Matilda and dozens of other Jews would be alive today.
Let the muslim world sort itself out in islamic lands, not in the West. Until they do, let them remain in their own countries.
