Hamas’ Sexual Terror Unveiled

Recurring patterns of rape, sexual torture, mutilation, and abuse of captives is part of jihad & goes back to the days of Muhammad.

‘Silenced No More’: Report Details Sexual Violence Was ‘Deliberate, Systematic’ in Hamas’

‘Silenced No More’: Report Details Sexual Violence Was ‘Deliberate, Systematic’ in Hamas’ Oct. 7 Massacre

A major new report from a two-year investigation documenting Hamas’s October 7 atrocities concluded that sexual violence during the terror group’s massacre and subsequent hostage captivity was “deliberate,” “systematic,” and “integral” to the attack, detailing what researchers described as recurring patterns of rape, sexual torture, mutilation, and abuse carried out across massacre sites, abduction routes, and throughout the prolonged captivity of hostages in Gaza.

The 300-page report — titled Silenced No More: Sexual Terror Unveiled — was released Tuesday by the Civil Commission on October 7th Crimes by Hamas Against Women and Children following a two-year investigation into the atrocities committed during Hamas’s October 7, 2023, invasion of southern Israel, the deadliest massacre of Jews since the Holocaust, in which roughly 1,200 people were murdered and more than 250 taken hostage into Gaza.

Nolte: NYT Admits ‘No Evidence’ Israel Trained Dogs to Rape Prisoners, Prints Outlandish Hamas

NYT Admits ‘No Evidence’ Israel Trained Dogs to Rape Prisoners, Prints Outlandish Hamas Lies Anyway

The far-left New York Times published a column accusing Israel of training dogs to rape Palestinian prisoners.

The New York Times published this even after admitting, “There is no evidence that Israeli leaders order rapes.”

Oh.

No evidence?

Really?

So much for editorial standards.

Oddly enough, there’s a ton of evidence around this new report about the sexual barbarism committed by Hamas on October  7, but the New York Times was not only not interested in reporting on that, the New York Times is also obviously (and without evidence) publishing Hamas dog-rape lies as “news” to blunt the effect of the damning October 7 report.

Well, who needs editorial standards when you are a newspaper that can no longer survive on advertising, which makes you totally reliant on a base of far-left, Jew-hating subscribers that must be appeased, even if it is with blood libels that you admit you have “no evidence” for.

So, how does the Times justify publishing something so obscene?

Easy.

First, the Times publishes it in an opinion column. Then — and this is really something — the Times relies on the word of people, well, like this: