Oxford Debate 2026: ‘is the west right to be suspicious of Islam?’

That such a question is being debated 25 years after 9/11 just goes to show how institutions of higher learning have been corrupted & perverted by libturds & Mohammedans.

Fear and Loathing at the Oxford Union

The President of the Oxford Union is a “Palestinian” Muslim, Aisha Khan Aziz, who six weeks ago, presided over a debate on the resolution that “This house believes we should be suspicious of Islam.”

Tommy Robinson was arguing for its adoption.

Aisha Khan Aziz warned him that there was a Muslim mob outside the Union,, and that without the extensive security presence, provided by the Oxford Union, that mob would tear Robinson apart.

He would, she said, “be quite literally cooked.” Along with Tommy Robinson, the anti-Islam campaigner Laurence Fox was arguing for the proposal to be adopted. He made his point in an unusual way, as we shall see. More on the Oxford Union audience whose fear showed that despite their protestations they were indeed “suspicious of Islam” can be found here: “Muslim Oxford Union President Tells Islam Critics That Without Security, They’d Be ‘Cooked’ by Mob,” Twitchy, August 1, 2026:

About six weeks ago, the Oxford Union held a debate on the question, “This house believes we should be suspicious of Islam.” The Oxford Union tried to suppress the video, but now it’s come out. In this clip, the president of the Oxford Union, a Palestinian Muslim named Aisha Khan Aziz, tells bad boy Tommy Robinson that there were rioters outside, and without the security generously provided by the Oxford Union, he would be “quite literally cooked.”

In other words, despite her claim that the West was more violent, Aziz Khan herself recognized the potential for violence of the Muslims waiting outside the Union, who she warned were ready to to tear Tommy Robinson apart. And that is why, knowing what the discussion would be about, and how Muslims would respond, she no doubt asked for a greater security presence.

The Oxford Union tried to prevent it, but a video of this debate was posted online. And the comments made on the video were illuminating:

Here’s an absolutely brilliant gambit by Laurence Fox, who says he will not be intimidated and threatens to display an image of Mohammed. Watch how quickly Aziz springs to the podium to argue that the use of props is banned.

This is three and a half minutes, but watch until the end.

“… uncomfortable… they’re scared.”…

The audience at the Oxford Union was scared silly that Laurence Fox announced that he was about to show a drawing of Muhammad.

Everyone in the audience was tense with fear; the very people claiming Islam is a religion of peace showed in their alarm — with calls for Fox to be prevented from displaying the promised drawing — their real view of Islam.

They were terrified that if Fox were to pull out of the envelope the promised drawing of Muhammad, even their presence at this reveal could put them all in danger of attack by Muslim fanatics. The palpable fear in the room demonstrated perfectly what members of the Oxford Union actually believe — as opposed to what they say they believe — that Islam is indeed a violent religion.

Fox posted his full speech if you’d like to hear more:

Point taken, Mr. Fox. The palpable terror in the room, prompted by the mere suggestion that you would be displaying a drawing of Muhammad, showed what those defenders of Islam in the Oxford Union really think. They will insist that Islam is nonviolent, even as they tremble in fear of what those Muslims could do to them for merely being present when a drawing of Muhammad is shown.