UN HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL STUNNED: ARAB DIPLOMAT CHALLENGES HISTORICAL NARRATIVE ON ISRAEL.
GENEVA — In a dramatic address delivered before the United Nations Human Rights Council, Jasem Aljuraid—an Arab political refugee speaking on behalf of UN Watch—challenged the assembly’s position on the Middle East, questioning popular claims regarding indigenous rights and historical colonization.
Directly addressing the Council, Aljuraid urged diplomats to re-examine regional history:
“A Jewish kingdom ruled in Judea for a thousand years. We, the Arabs, took this land. Who Arabized Egyptians, Phoenicians, Persians, and Amazighs? It was us, the Arabs. So why does the Council enshrine a lie by keeping a permanent agenda item on Palestine, while ignoring the indigenous heart of Israel returning home?”
He went on to criticize the Council’s permanent Agenda Item 7—a mandate dedicated specifically to scrutinizing Israel—arguing that the nation’s current military actions are counter-terrorism measures that protect the wider region.
Concluding his remarks, Aljuraid defended Israel’s operational role in the region:
“Today, Israel is a fighter for peaceful nations, freeing Gaza from Hamas, and saving Iranians from the Islamic Republic. What Israel is doing to the IRGC is a gift to humanity.”
Tunisia developed one of the world’s most severe jihadist recruitment problems after the 2011 Arab Spring revolution in the country. Thousands of Tunisians traveled to Syria, Iraq and Libya to join jihadist groups, with UN-linked estimates putting the number Tunisian Jihadis fighting abroad as high as 6,000 at one point.
The explosion of Islamism occurred as Qatar became one of post-revolution Tunisia’s most influential foreign partners, pouring substantial money into the country and developing close relations with the Islamist Ennahda movement. Qatar says its Friendship Fund alone provided a $97 million development grant, alongside other investments and financial assistance.
Ennahda has deep ideological roots in the Muslim Brotherhood tradition. Its precursor movement was heavily influenced by Egyptian Brotherhood literature and developed ties with the Egyptian Brotherhood, while the founder Rached Ghannouchi has acknowledged being influenced by Muslim Brotherhood ideologues, including the movement’s founder Hassan al-Banna.
[T]he terrifying fact [is] that Europe’s erasure as a civilization is underway.
Economically, Europe is in ghastly shape.
For nearly five decades, the European Union’s economic growth and productivity rates have lagged behind those of the United States.
European Union countries have established welfare states that have steadily expanded since 1980 and stifle economic growth.
The European Union has also proliferated stifling regulations that place a heavy encumbrance on businesses. Restrictions on gas and electricity production, combined with a drive for a rapid and extremely costly transition to “renewable energy”, have resulted in natural gas prices in Europe that are now three to five times higher than in the US, and electricity prices that are 2 to 4 times higher than in the US. To survive, many European companies have relocated production outside Europe.
International investment is turning away from Europe. Nine of the world’s top ten tech companies are American; the tenth is Taiwanese.
Although heatwaves have been affecting Europe for more than two decades, the continent remains resistant to air conditioning, viewing it as an expensive luxury (AC consumes costly electricity)…. In 2003, a heatwave in Europe killed more than 20,000 people. Almost nothing was done to prevent a recurrence, so in 2026, another heatwave has already claimed 25,000 lives.
Pessimism about the future — fueled by the questionable narrative berating “man-made global warming” and the hyped-up fear that the planet may become uninhabitable — is on the rise in Europe.
Most new immigrants in Europe come from the Muslim world and appear to have no interest whatever in assimilating or becoming more westernized. Many are emphatically discouraged from doing either by the leaders of their communities, for instance, by “honor killings….” There appears to be a growing demand among immigrants, in fact, to make Europe more like the Third World countries they abandoned.
The proportion of Muslims in the United Kingdom, France, Belgium, the Netherlands, and Sweden has been increasing decade after decade – with consequences that anyone even slightly versed in history could have expected. Warnings have gone unheeded.
Political parties defending Western civilization and values — while asserting their opposition to the Islamization of Europe and “civilizational erasure” — are gaining electoral momentum. Meanwhile, political leaders across major European nations and at the helm of the EU appear determined to prevent those parties from governing.
The “offense” of those political parties disfavored by Europe’s “elites” consists of defending the values of the West, fighting the Islamization of Europe, and opposing the erasure of European civilization. These political parties are consequently subjected to exclusionary maneuvers and are relentlessly harassed by rival political leaders who not only seem to disagree but are also dragging the continent into a free fall and a possible cultural death. Continue reading The Rape of Europe P2
The hide & the hubris of these savages is off the charts.
Gamel Kheir didn’t tell the whole story. The third ‘choice’ is death.
“If you return the call to prayer back to us, we leave you alone. If you don’t return the call to prayer, you have two choices: you either fight, or pay a tax for protection.”
.
Context:
.
Kuffars, or non-Muslims, have three choices: to accept Islam, to pay the jizya tax for protection, or to face conflict. This reflects historical practices regarding non-Muslims living in Islamic states.
.
1. Accept Islam
Non-Muslims can choose to convert to Islam, thereby becoming part of the Muslim community.
2. Pay the Jizya Tax
Kuffars can opt to pay the jizya tax, which is a form of protection tax. This allows them to live under Islamic rule while maintaining their religious identity.
3. Face Conflict
If neither of the above options is accepted, non-Muslims may face military conflict. (To be clear, those who reject submission will have their heads seperated from their bodies….)
.
Sydney’s Lakemba Mosque is trying to gain council approval to play the Islamic call to prayer from loudspeakers. Lebanese Muslim Association spokesturd Gamel Kheir says the practice is inclusive, because Islamic authorities always historically gave non-Muslims the choice to pay a special tax for protection. “If you return the call to prayer back to us, we leave you alone. If you don’t return the call to prayer, you have two choices: you either fight, or pay a tax for protection.”
Sydney’s Lakemba Mosque is trying to gain council approval to play the Islamic call to prayer from loudspeakers.
Lebanese Muslim Association spokesman Gamel Kheir says the practice is inclusive, because Islamic authorities always historically gave non-Muslims the choice to pay… pic.twitter.com/48bz4oWyCt
A Kurdish migrant in Germany was asked if he would fight for the country in case of war.
He laughed in the interviewer’s face.
His answer: “Never. I came here to marry a German woman, get German citizenship, and make German money. That’s it. I have no connection to Germany.”
He… pic.twitter.com/5OAlKIKS7t
Verena Brunschweiger is an anti-white white activist in Germany who says “my lineage ends with me,” and urges the entire white population of Germany to stop having children: “‘My bloodline ends with me’ – German feminist activist calls for White people to stop having children and accept refugees,” Remix News, June 29, 2026
Whoever is behind this deserves the rope:
A working plan is being discussed to facilitate the departure of Palestinian families from Gaza and their reunification with relatives in Europe, according to reports from well-sourced security channels.
Greece, Germany, France, Belgium, the Netherlands, Spain, Italy, and, of…
El-Sayed has denied that the Jewish state has a right to exist.
He has repeatedly accused Israel of committing “genocide.” El-Sayed’s birth mother, Fatten Elkomy, worked for the Islamic American Relief Agency, also known as the IARA. The U.S. Treasury Department in 2004 designated the network as an organization supporting terrorism, including support for Osama bin Laden and Hamas.
Treasury documents also stated that as early as 2003, the organization was “responsible for moving funds to the Palestinian territories for use in terrorist activities, notably serving as a conduit to Hamas in one Western European country.”
El-Sayed has accepted campaign donations from the Hamas-linked Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), a group that was an unindicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land Foundation trial. Federal prosecutors have long alleged historical and structural links between CAIR and the Muslim Brotherhood.
El-Sayed has campaigned with the fanatical antisemite and supporter of Islamic terrorism Hasan Piker, who famously said that “America deserved 9/11.” Asked about Piker’s remark, El-Sayed did not call it “unacceptable” and “outrageous.” No, he simply called it “dumb.”
And he has continued to campaign with Hasan Piiker .
No wonder, then, that many Democrats in Michigan — especially but not exclusively Jews — are determined to prevent a victory by Abdul el-Sayed.
Rep. Josh Gottheimer (D-NJ) said that Hasan Piker is “calling for violence against Jews, American Jews who support the U.S.-Israeli relationship, literally calling for them to be attacked, which is a Nazi-like formula” and Democratic U.S. Senate nominee Abdul El-Sayed isn’t clearly denouncing Piker and is leaving the door open to continuing to campaign with him.
Hasan Piker is nothing more than a grifter and a hater.
Always believe the ‘educated’ nutroots who live in denial:
“….the conflict in southern Thailand is becoming increasingly colored by religion, there is scant evidence to suggest links either to any radical Islamic ideology that exhibits links to pan-Islamism or to broader global jihadi terrorism and violence…” NBR is considered ‘mainstream’…
Jihad Watch is not mainstream, but accurate & reliable.
12 May 2026 The “separatist violence” in Thailand is an Islamic jihad with the goal of separating the Muslim areas in the southern part of the country from Buddhist Thailand and uniting them to Muslim Malaysia.
Al-Qaeda call for jihad against former Thai PM Thaksin Shinawatra
Last weekend, suspected insurgents in Thailand launched more than 70 to 75 coordinated bomb and arson attacks.
Recent reports:
Over the weekend of August 22–23, 2026 (mainly Saturday evening into Sunday), suspected insurgents carried out a large wave of coordinated arson, bomb, and related attacks across Thailand’s southern border provinces (the “deep south”).
reuters.com
Authorities and media reported the following key details:Scale: Early figures from the military’s Internal Security Operations Command cited around 50–51 incidents (mostly arson and incendiary attacks). Later tallies rose to more than 70 locations, with some reports specifying at least 78 incidents across four provinces: roughly 40 in Narathiwat, 21 in Yala, 15 in Pattani, and a couple in Songkhla. Other counts mentioned about 68 sites.
reuters.com
Targets and methods: Government and local administrative buildings/offices, shops (including a 7-Eleven), vehicles, utility/telecommunication poles and towers, railway tracks (prompting temporary suspensions), tires (to disrupt roads), CCTV cameras, and some infrastructure. Methods included arson, small bombs/improvised explosives, tire fires, and scattered obstacles. Some attacks involved armed groups.
bbc.co.uk
Casualties and response: At least three people were injured (reports commonly note two women and one man injured in a roadside bombing in Narathiwat; all in stable condition). No deaths were widely reported from this wave. A temporary overnight curfew was imposed in Narathiwat (later lifted). Security was heightened, with increased surveillance and patrols.
aljazeera.com
Context: These occurred amid the long-running insurgency in the predominantly Muslim Malay southern provinces (Narathiwat, Yala, Pattani, and parts of Songkhla), which has killed more than 7,000 people since intensifying around 2004. No group immediately claimed responsibility. Officials linked it to possible retaliation for recent security crackdowns (including after a deadly July attack on soldiers), efforts related to stalled/restarting peace talks (often involving the main separatist group BRN and Malaysian facilitation), or other factors. Authorities had received some advance intelligence warnings of possible attacks on government sites, shops, and infrastructure.
reuters.com
The violence is part of a decades-long low-level conflict seeking greater autonomy or independence. Peace efforts have repeatedly stalled. Reports as of August 24–25 noted heightened security measures continuing, with some additional isolated incidents afterward.
Southern Thailand insurgency
Ongoing conflict
The Southern Thailand insurgency is an ongoing conflict centered in southern Thailand. It originated in 1948 as a separatist insurgency in the historical Malay Patani Region, made up of the three southernmost provinces of Thailand and parts of a fourth, but has become more complex and increasingly violent since the early 2000s from drug cartels, oil smuggling networks, and sometimes pirate raids. The former Sultanate of Pattani, which included the southern Thai provinces of Pattani, Yala, Narathiwat—also known as the three Southern Border Provinces—as well as neighbouring parts of Songkhla Province, and the northeastern part of Malaysia, was conquered by the Kingdom of Siam in 1785 and, except for Kelantan, has been governed by Thailand ever since…. (Wiki)
‘They Are Against the Principles of the Country They Live In
The Islamization of Europe
by Robert Williams
“Europe should wake up. If they remain silent it will be destroyed from within.
It is almost already destroyed. If Europe does not wake up and prosecute these people… these people are not only Hamas.
These people are against freedom, against democracy, against secularism, they are against the basic principles of the country they live in.” – A Gazan living in Belgium, Channel 12 News, July 2026.
After the report was issued, Belgian federal MP Sam van Rooy… requested a city council emergency session, but could not find enough votes to get one.
No meeting was held; no other party found it necessary.
This indifference to the security of the local Christian and Jewish communities, the city and country at large, is particularly jarring after documentation exposed that Hamas was planning an October 7-style mass attack against Jewish and Israeli targets in Europe, scheduled to coincide with the second anniversary of the October 7, 2023 atrocities.
Perhaps one might argue that the Belgian government, which has shown itself to be extremely anti-Israel, does not care that Hamas raises funds in the country: the victims are “only” Israelis and Jews. So far.
“Germany and other European countries are now increasingly being viewed as operational areas for possible attacks.” —German Federal Prosecutor General Jens Rommel, Jerusalem Post, June 16, 2026
In 2024, Belgium received half of all Palestinian asylum applications submitted in the entire EU. In that year alone, 3,281 Palestinians were granted formal refugee status by Belgium.
“This is not a Jewish problem, but a European problem.” – Ralph Pais, vice-chair of the Jewish Information and Documentation Center, Antwerp, Belgium, September 11, 2025.
Shabana Mahmood has said she had no choice but to include killers, rapists and child sex offenders in the early release scheme because prisons faced running out of space.
The Prime Minister defended the proposal, arguing that people in more affluent areas would have to ‘do their share’ in housing asylum seekers, as the number of small boat migrants arriving in the UK under his premiership topped 3,000.
.
Islam is the second-largest religion in the United Kingdom, with nearly four million Muslims, or 6.0% of the total population, as of the 2021-2022 Census. The majority of British Muslims are Sunni, and the largest concentration is in London, where Muslims make up about 15% of the population.
Two weeks ago we covered one chapter Ahmed wrote in a Hizb pamphlet – published in 2002, and republished in 2017 (Ahmed was not involved in the republication) – where she attacked ‘western education’ as a ‘threat’ to Muslims, condemned democracy and integration, and criticised British schools for teaching pupils that child marriage is wrong.
However, the same pamphlet includes a second, even more radical chapter, co-written by Ahmed and another senior Hizb activist, Nazreen Nawaz, head of its women’s section.
This describes Hizb’s plan to create a fully Islamic education system as part of the Islamic dictatorship, the Khilafah, which is its core goal. As the chapter puts it: ‘nothing will be contained within the curriculum that contradicts with Islam, such as the teaching of the ideas of freedom, nationalism, democracy or evolution in a positive light’.
‘Nor can there be any schools established on any other religion, sect or race… Even the non-Muslims need to be educated under the educational curriculum of Islam… by pushing them to think about the correct belief in life.’
Trinity Assistant Professor of Education, Dr David Limond, was one of 179 signatories of “A statement in support of Nathan Cofnas’s Right to Academic Freedom of Expression”. Other signatories included Australian philosopher Peter Singer, Canadian psychologist Steven Pinker, and American philosopher Jeff McMahan.
The statement refers to another statement by members of Ghent University, in Belgium, calling on the university to rescind Cofnas’s appointment as a postdoctoral researcher. It cites part of a statement that claims his views “violate the university’s code of ethics and are morally beneath contempt”.
