Mohamed El-Mouelhy’s halal racket heading for Supreme Court of New South Wales

Halal certifier Mohamed El-Mouelhy sues anti-halal campaigner Kirralie Smith for defamation

Please contribute to the  Q Society of Australia’s legal defence fund so that we can continue to speak the truth about halal certification in Australia.

A defamation case between a halal certifier and an anti-halal campaigner in the New South Wales Supreme Court is being closely watched by some of the country’s highest profile conservative politicians.

Key points:
  • Kirralie Smith believes money collected through halal certification could be directed into promoting terrorism
  • Halal Certification Authority president is suing Ms Smith for defamation over online videos
  • Coalition MP George Christensen will speak at a fundraiser to pay for Ms Smith’s court costs

On one side is Kirralie Smith, a leading figure in anti-Islam party Australian Liberty Alliance, and founder of the Halal Choices website.

“My primary concern, and why I started Halal Choices seven years ago, was because most halal certified foods are not clearly labelled, so the consumer is paying the fees without their consent,” she told 7.30.

She is concerned that money collected through the certification of halal food could be directed into organisations which promote terrorism.

On the other side is Mohamed El-Mouelhy, president of the Halal Certification Authority.

“Halal certification is an industry and it is bringing in a few billion dollars. Last year I think it was about $13 billion. It is a requirement by all Muslim countries,” he told 7.30.

He said that what he did with his money was of no concern to anyone else.

“What I do with my money is my business,” Mr El-Mouelhy said.

“Everybody supports their own faith, so why is supporting my own faith wrong but supporting other faiths is right?”

‘I have every right to sue’

Mr El-Mouelhy is suing Ms Smith for defamation over a number of online videos she presented for the Q Society, another anti-Islam group affiliated with the Australian Liberty Alliance.

“When you make false exaggerations I have every right to sue and sue everybody that has supported her and paid for her video,” he said.

But for Ms Smith and her supporters it is a matter of free speech, and she is now counter-suing Mr El-Mouelhy.

“There have been ongoing social media posts that are defamatory to us, and we see that is the best way to bring these issues to the public,” she said.

“He says he can back up his claims that I’m a racist and a bigot, and we’ll see whether he can.

“But I’m pretty confident I’m not a racist or a bigot. I’m simply criticising an ideology, I’m not criticising a people, group or an individual.”

Defamation lawyer Jeremy Zimet said the online space was quickly emerging as a new frontier for defamation cases.

“It’s important for observers to realise that there are consequences for posting publications online, whether it’s on social media or review sites,” he said.

.

Ms Smith’s opinions and political aspirations have caught the eye of conservative figures within Australian politics, including Coalition MP George Christensen, who will speak at a fundraiser to pay for Ms Smith’s court costs.

“I’m backing Kirralie Smith because she is raising legitimate concerns that many members of the public share around halal certification, what the money behind halal certification actually goes to,” Mr Christensen said.

“If she is ever inclined to join the LNP and the National Party then maybe there is a future for Kirralie in Canberra.”

The court case begins this month.

RELATED STORY: 

Mad mullahs of Iran threaten to hit Tel Aviv if Trump doesn’t submit

Iran hit back at Donald Trump’s comments saying the country was being put on notice over its ‘destabilising activity’ after it test-fired a ballistic missile. Iran seeks to annihilate Israel, it says so openly, it seeks to conquer the Middle East, it threatens Europe, it threatens the West, it threatens the world.

Iran boasts it only needs ‘seven minutes to hit Tel Aviv’ with a ballistic missile just days after Donald Trump put the country ‘on notice’ and opposed its nuclear deal
A senior leader to Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, Iran's most powerful figure, said America's threats were useless and that Iran did not need permission to defend itself

A senior leader to Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, Iran’s most powerful figure, said America’s threats were useless and that Iran did not need permission to defend itself

  • Trump said he was putting Iran ‘on a notice’ over its ‘destabilising activity’
  • A senior adviser to the Iranian supreme leader said the country would not yield
  • ‘Not the first time that an inexperienced person has threatened Iran’, official said
  • Iranian officials warned US any mistake would result in ballistic missile action 

Iran has boasted it only needs seven minutes to hit a US airbase in Tel Aviv with a ballistic missile just days after Donald Trump put the country on notice over its missile testing.

.
Mojtaba Zonour, a former advisor to the Iranian Supreme Leader’s Representative at the Islamic Revolution Guards Corps (IRGC), threatened the President by saying any mistake made by the US would result in action.

.
‘The US army’s fifth fleet has occupied a part of Bahrain, and the enemy’s farthest military base is in the Indian Ocean but these points are all within the range of Iran’s missile systems and they will be razed to the ground if the enemy makes a mistake,’ he said.
‘And only seven minutes is needed for the Iranian missile to hit Tel Aviv.’

Sharia And The Constitution

Short and to the point:

The United States Constitution including the Bill of Rights is based firmly on the bedrock premise that all people are equal under the law. And thus should receive equal treatment under the law. This is the basis of all judicial process in the United States.

Numerous Muslim Imams have declared repeatedly that Islamic law (Sharia) is totally compatible with United States Constitutional Law. First of all Sharia does not treat all people as equals. Sharia has a hierarchy of people and how they should be treated differently. First, Muslim men are considered by Allah to be superior to all other people. Second come Muslim women and small children who are considered to be inferior to Muslim men. And last and very inferior to both Muslim men and women are the infidels, unbelievers who in the United States are mainly Jews and Christians.

How can any legal system (Sharia) that promotes superiority be considered compatible with the United States Constitution? In strict Sharia Islamic countries a Muslim can murder a Jew or a Christian and it is not considered a crime. In fact the Koran encourages and sanctions such a barbaric act. A Muslim man can rape any infidel woman with impunity and it is not considered a crime. Are rape and murder compatible with the Bill of Rights? I think not!

Radical Islam is a violent ideology masquerading as a religion. There are no other religions on the face of the earth with such hateful violent tendencies. Radical Islam is more like Nazism planning a second and even greater Holocaust for Jews and Christians. Only the United States Constitution is protecting us from such an unthinkable fate.

First published in the Jonesboro Sun.

CBS News: the Statue of Liberty was intended to be a Muslim woman

Once upon a time CBS was meant to be a real news outlet.

‘Statue of Liberty was intended to be a Muslim woman’. Yes, nothing says “liberty” quite like Muslim women.

The Statue of Liberty is everywhere these days; for example, the most recent cover of Germany’s Der Spiegel shows Donald Trump holding a bloody knife in one hand and Lady Liberty’s disembodied head in the other.

Plenty of people are invoking “Liberty Enlightening the World” in the wake of President Donald Trump’s executive order on immigration and refugees while citing the 1883 Emma Lazarus poem “The New Colossus” as if it were one of the founding documents. Wouldn’t it be ironic, then, if researchers were to find that the famous statue were actually a Muslim woman?

CBS News certainly gave that impression Saturday with a short video segment it tweeted out, but which falls somewhere between “fake news” and “old news.”

More of that nonsense here.

Paris Denial

Islam denial industry in action every time a terrorist attack happens. The parents would have you believe it’s a cover up, no matter what.

Sandra Solomon on the Louvre Attacker: “He Was Doing the Right Thing According to Shariah Law”

Thanks to the Gates of Vienna

Sandra Solomon is an apostate from Islam who grew up in Saudi Arabia and now lives in Canada. Last night Vlad Tepes interviewed Ms. Solomon about the basis under the shariah for the destruction of works of art. According to Islamic Law — derived from the sayings of Mohammed — any work of art that represents animals or human beings is a form of idolatry, and is therefore haram, or forbidden. In Arabic such practices are referred to as shirk, or polytheism — the placing of entities alongside Allah as objects of worship. You and I, who patronize such art, are known as mushrikun, or polytheists.

Ms. Solomon also makes a point of reminding Muslims that if they have a painting, drawing, or photo in their houses — even a picture of their children — they are guilty of shirk, and according to Mohammed will go to hell for it:

Mohamed Al-Ghiety on the Louvre Mujahid: “Be Careful. It’s the Muslim Brotherhood.”

Thanks to the Gates of Vienna

The following clip is from a program on Egyptian television hosted by Mohamed Al-Ghiety, who is obviously not a pious or doctrinaire Muslim (it’s not clear to me whether he is considered an apostate). He discusses the recent incident involving Abdallah al-Hamamy, the Egyptian mujahid who allegedly attacked soldiers with a machete a few days ago near the Louvre. Mr. al-Hamamy’s father has been in the news in the past two days after talking to media reporters.

In this segment Mr. Al-Ghiety explains why the elder al-Hamamy can say with absolute honesty that his son could not possibly be guilty of such an attack, that he is in fact a good boy.

Many thanks to Sandra Solomon for the translation, and to Vlad Tepes for the subtitling:

Transcript:

Continue reading Paris Denial

Toronto Muslim speaker: “We must celebrate our way of life…until their way of life dissipates under our feet”

Robert Spencer:

Canada’s Zero Tolerance for Barbaric Cultural Practices Act forbids child marriage, polygamy, and forced marriage. It is being widely derided now as “anti-Muslim,” probably by the same people who last week were telling us that such practices had nothing whatsoever to do with Islam. It has even been blamed for the Harper government’s defeat. It will probably soon be a relic of history, and immigrants can stream into Canada and practice child marriage, forced marriage, and polygamy to their heart’s content. Here again we see that to the Left, all cultures must be defended and preserved except Western Judeo-Christian ones.

Meanwhile, this Syed Hussan is openly preaching sedition. But that is apparently just fine these days as long as you’re on the Left.

Note his open Sharia supremacism and call for the conquest of Canada: “We must celebrate our way of life, what they called barbaric cultural practices on our streets and in our homes until their way of life dissipates under our feet.”

“Toronto Protest: ‘Celebrate our barbaric cultural practices’, become ‘enemies’ of liberalism,” by Jonathan D. Halevi, CIJ News, February 6, 2017:

Thousands gathered on Saturday, February 4, 2017 in front of the American Consulate in Toronto to protest the policy of US President Donald Trump. The demonstration was organized by Black Lives Matter – Toronto (BLM TO) – the self proclaimed “coalition of Black Torontonians resisting anti-Black racism, state-sponsored violence and police brutality” – that has launched a nation-wide campaign entitled “National Days of Action Against Islamophobia & Deportations.”

One of the speakers at the rally was Syed Hussan, who represented the organization No One Is Illegal-Toronto and is affiliated with Toronto Community Mobilization Network and Migrant Workers Alliance for Change.

Continue reading Toronto Muslim speaker: “We must celebrate our way of life…until their way of life dissipates under our feet”

This stuff is hard on the brain

MPs Wear Islamic Veils in Parliament to Promote ‘World Hijab Day’

Coming soon – World FGM day, World gang-rape day, and a beheading the infidels festival. Its just “normalisation” you know.

parliamentby LIAM DEACON  

A number of MPs donned hijabs in Westminster Hall to celebrate World Hijab Day (WHD), which normalises Islamic veiling and promotes “modest” dress.

The group, led by the SNP’s Tasmina Ahmed-Sheikh, included SNP MPs Anne McLaughlin and Patrick Grady, as well as Labour’s former shadow equalities minister Dawn Butler and MP Naseem Shah.

Organisers of WHD ask for donations on February 1st each year and encourage women of different faiths to wear a hijab in “solidarity” with Muslims under the slogan: “I stand for her right to COVER!”

Not funny.  Please note that it takes no courage to ‘stand for her right to cover’. But worldwide many women who wanted to have the right NOT TO COVER  have been severely beaten and murdered. (SY)

More mind-numbing stupidity:

Theresa May tells Syrian migrant he can’t leave UK – because he’s a suspected TERRORIST 

THERESA MAY has banned a Syrian migrant from leaving Britain because he is suspected of being a terrorist.

Yes, you read that right. Theresa May suspected this man of being a jihad terrorist, and so she wanted to keep him IN Britain.

Continue reading This stuff is hard on the brain

Austria: Mohammedans march in large numbers for the burqa

“Hijab is a personal experience”…

For those who still don’t get it: the world belongs to allah and his meshugga profit. Muslims have the right to force disbelievers to submit to Islam. Those who resist must be killed. They are willing to kill and die to make their belief-system dominant in the world. What are you willing to do for what you believe?

Muslim Indonesia Fears Infidels Wake Up & Stop the Islamic Expansion Project

Modern, Moderate Indonesia Opposes Any Infidel Self-Defence Against Jihad, Attacks Trump Immigration Policies

As reported by Adam Harvey, Indonesia correspondent for Australia’s reliably-Islamophile ABC.

“Donald Trump’s Immigration Order Sparks Fear in Muslim-Majority Indonesia’.

Yeah, they’re afraid that the carelessly open door through which Muslim colonists have been able to pour into the Lands of the Infidels and establish their colonies and forward operating bases might just possibly be about to start shutting. – CM

‘US President Donald Trump’s immigration policies are going down badly in the world’s biggest Muslim-majority nation.

So?  The USA can survive without Muslim Indonesia, and the sooner the USA figures that out, and stops the flow of Indonesian Muslims into the USA, along with the flow of any other kind of Muslims, the better. – CM

‘One top analyst has told the ABC the policy will help extremists (bzzzzt! buzz-phrase bingo!  “resisting jihad causes jihad”, I see, and all that… nonsense.  The policy will stop some jihadis from getting in; it will begin, just a little, to cut the ummah, inside the gates, back down to size.  What’s needed, of course, but has to be gradually worked up to, in the present state of affairs, because of so many Useful Idiots who refuse to see the necessity, is a total and permanent ban on the entry into any Infidel country, of any person from any OIC country, other than – very carefully vetted – a bona fide member of the persecuted and abused indigenous non-Muslim minorities, such as Copts from Egypt or Yazidis and Christians from Syria.  If NO Muslims had been admitted inside the gates of the USA from, oh, about 1900 onward to the present day, then many, many many Americans would be alive, who now are dead… dead at the hands of allahu-akbaring Muslims, dead on September 11 2001, dead in San Bernardino, dead at Fort Hood, dead at the “Pulse” nightclub in Orlando…and then there are the many, many people who, though not killed, were maimed for life by the Muslim attack on the Boston Marathon – CM) and undoes years of good work by previous US presidents to avoid a “clash of civilisations“.

No, it’s a very small step toward bringing an end to years of grovelling appeasement of the Ummah and dhimmi-like or vassal-like payment of extorted jizya or tribute. – CM

‘A US federal judge in Seattle has granted a nationwide temporary restraining order effectively blocking the executive order, but the Trump administration is expected to immediately appeal the decision.

Continue reading Muslim Indonesia Fears Infidels Wake Up & Stop the Islamic Expansion Project