Uncategorised – Page 1441

The Islamic hatred of “kafirs” is insatiable

Turkish Deputy PM: “Independence means being able to stand up to kafirs (infidels) by calling them kafirs”

Independence? Is Turkey’s independence in question?

Anyway, Kurtulmus’ statement is striking. He discusses this hatred for Infidels in the context of the “four fundamental elements on which the new Turkey has been established,” and says: “We know Allah is one and we do not bow down or kneel down to anyone, other than before Allah. That is why as Turkey now advances in this path, some people are getting uptight.”

Turkey is still ostensibly a secular state. Kurtulmus’ declaration is an essentially direct repudiation of Kemalist secularism.

“Turkish Deputy PM: Independence Means Being Allowed to Persecute Infidels,” by Robert Jones, PJ Media, December 12, 2016:

Numan Kurtulmus, the deputy prime minister of Turkey, recently announced the following at a public meeting:

Independence means being able to stand up to kafirs (infidels) by calling them kafirs.

Kurtulmus was clarifying the Turkish government’s understanding of “independence” at a local meeting of the ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP). He discussed “the four fundamental elements on which the new Turkey has been established,” then explained the ideology behind the AKP’s stance:

In our dictionary, kafir is not the non-Muslim. In our dictionary, kafir is the despot, the oppressor, the one who persecutes people, and the imperialist. I am talking about our economic and political independence on these lands. We know Allah is one and we do not bow down or kneel down to anyone, other than before Allah. That is why as Turkey now advances in this path, some people are getting uptight.

However, according to Islamic scriptures, “kafir” is indeed the term used to define “non-Muslim,” and this term is used universally by Muslim societies to refer to non-Muslims, or “unbelievers.”

But there is even more to “kafir” than that. Dr. Bill Warner, the author of several books and articles on political Islam, explains just how dire the “kafir” label is within Islam:

The language of Islam is dualistic. As an example, there is never any reference to humanity as a unified whole. Instead there is a division into believer and kafir (unbeliever). Humanity is not seen as one body, but is divided into whether the person believes Mohammed is the prophet of Allah or not.

The Koran says that the “kafir” must be: hated (40:30); mocked (83:34); punished (25:77); beheaded (47:4); confused (6:25); plotted against (86:15); terrorized (8:12); annihilated (6:45); killed (4:91); crucified (5:33); and warred against (9:29).

Continue reading The Islamic hatred of “kafirs” is insatiable

“Adelaide Man” charged with four counts of advocating terrorism

Something tells me this is no “Adelaide man” at all. I’d say the chance that he’s a Muselman is 100%. What say you?

A South Australian man who police allege posted videos to social media encouraging people in overseas conflict zones to commit terrorist acts has been charged with advocating terrorism.

The Flinders Park man, 50, was arrested at a facility in Northfield today and was charged with four counts of advocating terrorism.

Police said he was arrested as a result of information received via the National Security Hotline.

There are no current or impending threats to the Australian community as a result of these activities, police have said.

The man is scheduled to appear before the Adelaide Magistrates Court at a later date.

The M.O. of Gillian Triggs’ ‘human rights’ circus is just like Islamic terrorism

Bill Leak has compared the Australian Human Rights Commission to “Islamist terrorists” as he calls for the repeal of contentious race-hate laws, hitting out at the agency for “persecuting” him over a provocative cartoon.

Note how the lame stream media appeals to your sense of ‘fairness’ by calling censorship of free speech “contentious race-hate laws”. Free speech is not about race hate, it is our birthright as as citizens of a free country. It is also a suggestion that Australians cannot be trusted to speak freely because they’re all “racist”. To put Bill Leak’s prosecution in exclamation marks adds insult to injury. Triggs’ frivolous discrimination lawsuits are destroying peoples lives and careers. Triggs, the whole HRC circus and 18C need to be scrapped. Australia doesn’t need a speech police.

In his submission to the parliamentary inquiry on freedom of speech, The Australian’s editorial cartoonist says the commission’s complaint-handling process was not only “punishing” but acted as a warning “to anyone else still naive enough to believe they lived in a free society”.

All three complaints lodged under section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act against Leak’s cartoon — depicting an Aboriginal police officer handing over a “wayward” boy to his father, who has forgotten his son’s name — have been dropped by the AHRC after two months of investigations.

“While less murderous than the tactics deployed by Islamist terrorists, the actions taken by the AHRC were no less authoritarian and they sprang from the same impulse: to use whatever means they have at their disposal to silence those with whom they disagree,” Leak says.

“Section 18C … was just the ticket. It provided them with the blunt and brutal weapon they were looking for.”

Using his case as an example of why the law should be repealed, Leak said his cartoon was not an attempt to “malign indigenous people on the basis of their race” but to “shine the spotlight on the truth of family dysfunction in indigenous communities”.

“It should never have even been possible for someone like me to be subjected to such illiberal persecution in Australia and if we, as Australians, are to continue to take pride in proclaiming ourselves to be citizens of a free country, I believe we will have to take steps to ensure it never happens to anyone else, ever again,” he says.

Commission president Gillian Triggs has said she must inquire into and attempt to conciliate all written complaints under 18C and the majority of matters are resolved within four months.

But Leak said the commission’s investigative procedures were “opaque” and “unsatisfactory”.

The Institute of Public Affairs welcomed the discontinuing of the third complaint against Leak but called it a “hollow win for free speech”. “A complaint doesn’t have to be successful for people to feel threatened,” director of policy Simon Breheny said.

HRC ‘like Islamist terrorists’

Click on image to enlarge

Integration? Will never happen…

As they grow more numerous, they grow more honest in their ambitions. As Merkel said in another clip on this channel, It is the Germans who have to integrate with them.

Muslim activist group JUMA, in Germany states plainly that integration is not going to happen.

Muslim teens attack traditional Christmas parade in Austria

A group of young Muslim teens physically attacked parade goers during the annual Krampus parade during a procession near Salzburg on Tuesday night. BY PAMELA GELLER

Muslims appeal to dumb females to don a hijab, to submit to acting stupid and to look happy doing it:

How’s this for a lying taqiyya snake:

look how sincere and how sweet she looks, and yet she’s spreading nothing but poison and lies:

NYC: Muslima who claimed she was harassed by Trump supporters arrested for filing false report

This was yet another fake anti-Muslim hate crime that garnered international headlines without a murmur of skepticism from the establishment propaganda media. Pamela Geller took apart Yasmin Seweid’s flimsy story here — pointing out most notably that the alleged “Islamophobic harassment” took place in a crowded subway car, and yet in an age in which everyone has a phone and random incidents are captured on video all the time, there was no video of this incident, and indeed, no proof at all.

JIHADWATCH.ORG|BY ROBERT SPENCER

Continue reading Integration? Will never happen…

Erdogan’s Private Youth Army

It looks like Erdogan wants to fight an all-out war inside Turkey against any and every enemy he may be facing.

Initially, the youth branches will be formed in 1,500 mosques. But under the plan, 20,000 mosques will have youth branches by 2021, and finally 45,000 mosques will have them. Observers fear the youth branches may turn into Erdogan’s “mosque militia,” like the Nazi Party’s Hitler Youth organization in Germany.

In a remarkable display of paranoia, Yigit Bulut (left), a top advisor to Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan (right), recently accused foreign chefs on cooking programs shown on Turkish TV stations of being foreign spies. .

Erdogan’s Private Youth Army

GATESTONEINSTITUTE.ORG|BY BURAK BEKDIL

Critics, including opposition lawmakers, are inquiring about Sadat’s activities, suspecting its real mission may be to train official or unofficial paramilitary forces to fight Erdogan’s multitude of wars inside and outside Turkey.
Initially, the youth branches will be formed in 1,500 mosques. But under the plan, 20,000 mosques will have youth branches by 2021, and finally 45,000 mosques will have them. Observers fear the youth branches may turn into Erdogan’s “mosque militia,” like the Nazi Party’s Hitler Youth organization in Germany.
Erdogan probably fears Shia expansionism more than Kurdish adventurism, but most likely in his thinking, Kurdish adventurism is part of Shia expansionism.

Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan has good reasons to be living in constant fear. Only a few months ago, on July 15, hundreds of military officers, including several in his own security detail, attempted to topple him in a coup d’état. But the way he thinks he can best fight and win a future attempt at his governance — and life — exposes Turkey to the risk of civil war.

Continue Reading Article

Continue reading Erdogan’s Private Youth Army

Soros Think Tank Claims Russia Could Engineer Migrant Sex Attacks to Boost Right-Wing Parties

“Lets blame Russia for everything” is the latest trend, manufactured by spooky dude. No surprises here.

Soros pays the left to import Third World rapists, murderers, and child molesters into Western Civilization and then blames the Russians when they actually rape and murder?

Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain, just focus on Trump and blame the Ruskies.

New Year's Eve Sex Attacks

The Associated Press

by VIRGINIA HALE/Breitbart

An “expert” from the George Soros-funded and founded European Council on Foreign Relations (ECFR) claims intelligence agencies in Russia and Syria could set migrant sex mobs on German women in order to swing the country’s federal election.

Bild, Germany’s largest tabloid, carries the claim in a piece which asserts that Russia intends to “sabotage the outcome” of the Bundestag election next year by causing a “radical reshaping of public opinion”.

The ECFR’s Gustav Gressel said Moscow’s interference could go beyond spreading “disinformation”, and suggested it’s possible that Moscow could mobilise secret agents linked to the Russian mafia, Bashar al-Assad, and even long-deposed Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein to sexually assault German women.

“A section of the refugees from Iraq and Syria, if only a very small section, had connections with Assad or Saddam Hussein’s secret services”, he said.

According to Gressel, these people could be specifically targeted by intelligence agents or organised crime and directed to cause disturbances in Germany.

“What would happen, for example, if a similar event to [the mass sex attacks on New Year’s Eve] in Cologne were repeated at a summer festival before the election? How would Merkel stand then? What would be the consequence for the Bundestag election? Of course, this is an extreme example, but it is within the range of possibility,” he said.

The article, co-written by Julian Röpcke — a journalist whose unflinching support of al-Qaeda and the most extremist “rebels” in Syria earned him the nickname #JihadiJulian, a popular hashtag campaign on Twitter — claims Moscow interfered with the U.S. election by publishing internal Democratic National Convention documents through Wikileaks.

The ECFR is a Soros-funded, pan-European think tank of which the arch-globalist billionaire was a founding Council member. The organisation’s website featured a piece by the Hungarian hedge fund manager as early as February 2009 marking Russia as “hostile” and a “threat” to “open society values”, in which he instructed Europe to “neutralise” the nation.

The European Union has strongly signalled its intent to take action against “fake news” in recent weeks.

Despite the fact that information dealing with migrants attacking their European hosts has also been suggested to be “fake news” the media in parts of Europe routinely self-censors what they report, with journalists directed to avoid “stirring up prejudice” in their work.

Apostasy is high treason, punishable by death

MEMRI TV (thanks to Vlad Tepes)

Sheikh of Al-Azhar Ahmad Al-Tayyeb: In Islam, Unrepentant Apostates Should Be Killed; Homosexuality Is a Disease

Ahmad Al-Tayyeb, the Sheikh of Al-Azhar, discussed the laws pertaining to apostasy, and said that if it constitutes a “danger to society,” it carries a death sentence. In a daily show aired on several Egyptian TV channels and posted on the official YouTube channel of Al-Azhar, Sheikh Al-Tayyeb said: “The four schools of law all concur that apostasy is a crime, that an apostate should be asked to repent, and that if he does not, he should be killed.” He further said that “the concepts of human rights are full of ticking time-bombs” and that in Muslim society, sexual liberty and homosexuality are diseases. “No Muslim society could ever consider sexual liberty, homosexuality, and so on to be a personal right.” The video was posted on the official Al-Azhar Youtube channel on June 16.

EGYPTIAN PROFESSOR RAGHEB EL-SERGANY: EUROPE OWES ITS SCIENCE, MORAL VALUES, AND HYGIENE TO THE MUSLIMS

You gotta hand it to these dumb shiites, they call themselves ‘professor’ and claim they invented the wheel and right after that the bidet. How else would we know that Muslims invented hygiene?

Egyptian researcher Ragheb El-Sergany said that Europe became acquainted with science and with moral values only through the Muslims. According to El-Sergany, a professor in the Faculty of Medicine of Cairo University, it was the Muslims who brought the notion of cleanliness to Europe, where people used to wash themselves only twice a year, he said, adding that the bidet is evidence of this. The interview with El-Segany was broadcast on Hamas’s Al-Aqsa TV on November 24.

France: gov’t decision to bring in imams to quell religious tensions led to a “more hardline version of Islam”

How dense are these people? Fighting fire with gasoline?

FRANCE’S NO GO ZONES: Women fight back after being BANNED from streets by Muslim men

FRENCH women have launched a fightback to reclaim areas of the country turned into no go zones by Muslim men as a shocking report lays bare the state of social segregation caused by mass migration.

A women’s rights campaign group is organising marches and protests in a bid to retake streets in predominantly Islamic neighbourhoods which they say have become entirely male dominated.

.La Brigade des Mères, which is aiming to restore gender equality in France’s troubled ‘banlieues’, says women in many communities are now too scared to go out because gangs of young men rule the streets.And a shocking undercover report, compiled by the TV channel France 2, shows how women are not welcome in bars and cafes in Muslim majority areas, with many men openly hostile to their presence in public at all.

The French suburb of Sevran and Marion Le Pen

Some areas of France have become no go zone for women, according to a report

A bar in the French suburb of Sevran

A report by France 2 highlighted the impact of Muslim migration on communities

Continue reading France: gov’t decision to bring in imams to quell religious tensions led to a “more hardline version of Islam”

Wilders support rises after court tries to shut him down

No surprise. Geert Wilders’ support soars after court action to punish him for saying he wanted fewer Moroccans in The Netherlands.

Andrew Bolt

These are issues that must be left to voters, not judges:

The party of populist anti-Islam Dutch MP Geert Wilders has risen strongly in the polls since the lawmaker was tried and convicted of discrimination, according to a survey published Sunday.

If legislative elections due next March were held this week, Wilders’ Freedom Party (PVV) would pick up 36 out of 150 seats in the lower house of parliament, making it the biggest single political group, it found.

Before the trial began on October 31, the PVV was credited with 27 seats.

During the trial, but before his conviction on Friday, its estimated share rose to 34 seats. It currently has 12 lawmakers.

The new poll data … found that Prime Minister Mark Rutte’s Liberals would place second with 23 seats, against 40 today, and his junior coalition partners, the Labour Party (PvdA), would gain 10 seats, compared with 35 today.

Wilders was found guilty of discrimination against Moroccans but acquitted of hate speech over remarks he made at an election rally in March 2014.

He had asked supporters whether they wanted “fewer or more Moroccans in your city and in the Netherlands.” When the crowd shouted back “Fewer! Fewer!” a smiling Wilders answered: “We’re going to organise that.”

It is against the law to promise fewer Muslim immigrants but perfectly legal to bring in more.

What Was Behind the Trial of Geert Wilders?

by George Igler/Gatestone Institute

If Europeans are ever to stand a chance of unravelling the coils of laws constricting their throats, preventing their ability to speak out against the demographic redrawing of their countries or any other potential danger they may note, it may prove helpful understanding how this slow strangulation took shape.

Although the gross unfairness of Geert Wilders’s prosecution is clear when compared with other Dutch politicians who have articulated far worse, there is also compelling evidence that much that is preached from the Koran in mosques daily would clearly fall under such a definition of hate speech — also remaining curiously outside the attention of public prosecutors.
Are not elected Member of Parliament even more responsible to for the safety of the public than are other citizens? If elected officials are criminalized for speaking out, at what point do such restrictions start posing a national security problem?
How are ordinary, decent, native Europeans ever likely socially and politically to articulate how they never consented to being part of a “grand experiment,” without incurring the stain of bigotry accompanying this reasonable assertion, from friends and co-workers alike?
Would it not be a remarkable irony if, instead of burying Wilders, as the conviction seemed intended to do, it propelled him instead to victory?

Continue reading Wilders support rises after court tries to shut him down

Repeal 18C or say farewell to free speech: IPA

President of the Australian Human Rights Commission Gillian Triggs. Picture: Kym Smith

The Australian/ DENNIS SHANAHAN

Political Editor, Canberra

Sections of the Racial Discrimination Act which allow race-hate court claims based on insults and offence are so damaging to freedom of speech they must be repealed, and not just amended, according to the most comprehensive submission to the parliamentary committee investigating the laws.

The above must be the most tortured sentence ever. 18C is not about “race hate”, it kills free speech. No gov’t and no judiciary should be trusted with protecting you or me from being insulted or offended.

Yesterday, as the Human Rights Commission hardened its defence of section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act and suggested merely “clarifying” the terms of “insult and offend”, the parliamentary committee was also told the law violates the right of free speech, is secretive, punishes defendants through process and may be unconstitutional.

In a 58-page submission to the legal and constitutional parliamentary committee tasked with considering changes to improve the controversial section 18C and the procedures of the Human Rights Commission, the Institute of Public Affairs argues the laws deny freedom of speech, erode democracy, undermine attempts to combat racism and have a “chilling effect” on debate about serious social issues.

• HEDLEY THOMAS: Inquiry needs to look at farce

“Only by removing the law from the statute books entirely can parliament restore Australians’ right to freedom of speech, improve our liberal democracy, and eliminate the sundry abuses that it has caused,” the submissions from the conservative think tank says.

The committee is examining possible changes to section 18C and the procedures of the Human Rights Commission after a judge threw out a racial hatred case brought against three university students from Queensland University of Technology being sued for $250,000 in damages by indigenous QUT staffer Cindy Prior for Facebook comments.

The IPA said section 18C “does not protect any other natural right that might reasonably be said to countermand the right to freedom of speech. There is no right not to be offended. Nor does individual dignity demand this kind of restriction on free expression”.

The submission said 18C was also bad for democracy and limited the range of ideas people could express by its “chilling effect” on debate.

“Moreover, freedom of speech strengthens social cohesion by exposing bad ideas and malevolent actors, rather than allowing them to fester in silence,” the submission said. “The third limb of the case for repeal is that in practice the law has proved unworkable and unfair. The law does nothing to prevent the kinds of racism that people are most likely to encounter, overlaps with other laws to the point of redundancy, and is so poorly drafted that significant uncertainty about its key terms persists.

“Indeed, the law may well be an unconstitutional exercise of the external affairs power or an unconstitutional burden on Australians’ implied right to freedom of political communication.”

It said proposals to amend the act and substitute “vilify” for “insult” or “offend” or simply remove insult and offend and leave “humiliate” would be inadequate.

During the committee hearing yesterday Gillian Triggs backed away from her earlier suggestions that replacing or removing “insult and offend” could be a solution. The commission believed it would be “a retrograde step to amend it” because it would put the law “right back to square one”.

Continue reading Repeal 18C or say farewell to free speech: IPA