America’s Moment Of Truth by Pat Condell

Polish Patriots Invite the French and Other Europeans to Their Independence Day Rally

by Baron Bodissey

Every year on November 11 the Poles celebrate their independence day with a huge march and rally on the streets of Warsaw. This year they are inviting patriots from other European countries to join them to celebrate the free and independent nation-states of Europe.

The following video specifically invites the French to Polish Independence Day. Many thanks to Ava Lon for the translation, and to Vlad Tepes for the subtitling:

Transcript:

Continue reading →

Nothing in the French constitution says French citizens have to feed Mohammedan welfare seekers or provide them with halal food.  The French have every right to reject the Mohammedan hordes that their irresponsible gov’t dumps on the countryside:

‘There’s no halal meat’ Migrants brand France “racist” and say they want to come to Britain

MIGRANTS recently evicted from the Calais Jungle have branded France racist and says they will do anything to come to Britain.

Continue reading Afghan welfare seekers complain: no halal meat, French care more for cows than for migrants

Town in the heart of Europe where ONLY Arabic can be spoken and Arabs can live

“The owners do not want to mix with local population”–Local Estate Agent

PROTESTS are taking place in a town in Bosnia-Herzegovina because only Arabs are allowed and most of the houses contain the third or fourth wives of wealthy sheikhs.

Continue reading Bosnia-Herzegovina: Arab Muslims Only!

Waleed Aly writes for the New York Times to shit-can Australia

Australia’s Poisonous Wahhabi Aly

.
Australia doesn’t execute people Muslims for not being like us.  Islam does.  As a paid Islamist PR you’d reckon Waleed Aly might open up a bit about that central tenet of the system he pushes.

We couldn’t give a rat’s about other people’s religion as long as they don’t want to hurt us.

And we don’t decide who’s in or kept out of our country on race, gender, sexual orientation or how they say their prayers.

In our democracy what goes on here is what we the people of Australia want to go on here.    Not Muhammad.   Not Buddha.  And certainly not the views of Sunni Islam’s head office, Saudi Arabia spouted through slick PRs like Waleed Aly.

We don’t like it when people get killed because of something we did.

We are revolted when it’s children who have no say in getting on board leaky boats only to drown at sea while en route to claim a prize for mum and dad.

We’re more Hippocrates than Muhammad.  First do no harm.  We want to know a bit about who’s coming here and their intentions.  We don’t want them dead on arrival.  And self-selection or queue-jumping isn’t on.

Residency or citizenship in Australia is a glittering prize.  Many want it.   Let it rip and ruthless people smugglers will quickly fill the leaky boats again.  That’s what happenned last time Wahabbi Aly’s preferred system was running.  And thousands drowned.

Australians could see that our system was killing people.  Mohameddan fatalist culture might cop that sweet as the will of a vengeful creator.   But just like we do in most things – or overdo at work – it’s Safety First here and decent Australians won’t be a party to industrial scale killing.

I won’t cop two-faced criticism of our caring culture from a paid promoter of its opposite.   The least worst option is the stable one we have now.

Former Prime Minister Tony Abbott’s strong border protection and denial of the prize of residency to those who try to buck our system by arriving illegally by boat is working.   Lives are being saved.

We can’t offer refuge to everyone on earth from those who’d attack or persecute them.   But we can manage Australia and remove further unacceptable temptations and risks to life from our system.

Michael P. Smith is an Australian with a website and unfunded opinions.

Here’s the pretend proud Australian Waleed Aly using the pages of the New York Times to attack Australia and most of our population:

Read it and weep!

The Opinion Pages | OP-ED CONTRIBUTOR

Australia’s Poisonous Refugee Policy

By WALEED ALY OCT. 26, 2016

MELBOURNE, Australia — Governments tend to dislike being called torturers. That’s why the George W. Bush administration went through such legal contortions to exclude waterboarding from the definition of torture. That this relied on a definition too idiosyncratic for anyone outside the Republican Party hardly mattered because it allowed President Bush to say, “the United States does not torture,” with a straight face.

Continue reading Australia’s Poisonous Wahhabi Aly

Ever since 9/11, mosques and “Islamic centers” have been conducting campaigns of determined “outreach” to non-Muslims. The point of this “outreach” is to present Islam as the least threatening of faiths, one which has been too often misunderstood and its adherents unfairly maligned, and those adherents are only too glad to clear up misconceptions about their faith. One such gathering was held on September 16 at the Islamic Center of Boston in Wayland, Massachusetts, billed as “Meet Your Muslim Neighbors.”

The first “misconception” that the Muslim hosts thought needed to be cleared up had to do with how long Muslims have been in America. “People think that Muslims have just come here to this country,” said Shaheen Akhtar, who is an “interfaith liaison” and runs an “interfaith book club” at the Center. She told her audience that Jefferson and John Adams had both owned copies of the Qur’an. Her implication was clear: these men took a sympathetic interest in Islam. She even described Jefferson as “advocating for the rights of the practitioners of the faith.” This implies special pleading on his part for Islam. What Jefferson actually did was “advocate” for the principle of religious freedom in general, and famously quoted a line from John Locke’s 1698 A Letter Concerning Religious Toleration: “neither Pagan nor Mahamedan [Muslim] nor Jew ought to be excluded from the civil rights of the Commonwealth because of his religion.”

However, there were those whom Locke expressly excluded from toleration, and applying his own criteria, Muslims might well have been among them.

At the website of Apologetics Press:

Dr. Dave Miller has noted that in a section of A Letter Concerning Toleration dealing with those whom a civil magistrate “cannot” tolerate, Locke lists the following (page numbers refer to the 1796 edition of Locke’s Letter):Those whose religious opinions are contrary to “those moral rules which are necessary to the preservation of civil society” (1796, p. 53);

1. The religion that “teaches expressly and openly, that men are not obliged to keep their promise” (p. 54);
2. “[T]hose that will not own and teach the duty of tolerating all men in matters of mere religion…and that they only ask leave to be tolerated by the magistrate so long, until they find themselves strong enough to [seize the government]” (p. 55);
3. All those who see themselves as having allegiance to another civil authority (p. 56). Specifically, Locke gives the example of the Muslim who lives among Christians and would have difficulty submitting to the government of a “Christian nation” when he comes from a Muslim country where the civil magistrate was also the religious authority. Locke notes that such a person would have grave difficulty serving as a soldier in his adopted nation (cf. the 2009 Fort Hood shooting spree by a Muslim soldier who shouted, “Allahu Akbar” as he opened fire, killing 13 and wounding 32; see Stewart, 2010).
4. “[T]hose are not at all to be tolerated who deny the being of a God” (p. 56).

#1-#4 would all seem to disqualify Islam from such toleration.

But what did those visitors to the Islamic Center know about Jefferson’s reliance on Locke, and Locke’s criteria, that would have excluded Islam from “toleration”? And what did they know about, what could they reasonably conclude, from the Qur’ans owned by Jefferson and Adams?

Continue reading Hugh Fitzgerald: “Meet Your Muslim Neighbors”

Frankly, It is a disaster if a people don’t have the resolve to beat a a muselmanic savage to death on the spot when he desecrates their holy sites on their wedding day.

Mohammedan Migrant screaming ‘Allahu Akbar’ bursts into a wedding in a German church and tears down decorations

• Marcel Lohbeck, 35, and bride Friederike married in Duisburg, Germany
• They were celebrating their wedding with 90 guests at a church
• A 23-year-old Syrian man appeared at the back of the church 
• Groom claims he ‘fondled the statue of Mary’ and destroyed flowers 

“After a medical examination, the 23-year-old Syrian man was taken to a psychiatric hospital.”

Because clearly a Muslim screaming “Allahu akbar” and disrupting a Christian religious service must be insane, right? There couldn’t possibly be any other motive. Jihad? Islamic supremacism? Hatred and contempt for the unbelievers whom the Qur’an designates “the most vile of created beings” (98:6)? Don’t be silly, you greasy Islamophobe! This is just another instance of the global outbreak of mental illness.

“The officer said: ‘We tried to calm the obviously traumatised Syrian man.’” The poor dear! Good thing they were there to comfort him!

A newlywed couple have claimed their big day was ruined when a man burst inside the church shouting ‘Allahu Akbar’ and then started tearing down wedding decorations.

Groom Marcel Lohbeck, 35, and bride Friederike were celebrating their wedding with 90 guests in the Karmel Church in Duisburg, a city in western Germany.

Lochbeck said: ‘At the beginning of the ceremony, a man with a thick jumper and a hat on came into the church and sat in the back row.

‘Shortly afterwards, he stood up and wandered around the candles. He laughed in a disturbing manner and then fondled the statue of Mary.

‘He had been speaking in Arabic and partly English. He then started destroying the flowers and kept shouting “Allahu Akbar”.’

Police officer Ludger A., 57, the uncle of the groom, reportedly tried to intervene along with the church sexton.

The officer said: ‘We tried to calm the obviously traumatised Syrian man.’

After the man again refused to leave the church, there was a fight in which the police officer got slight injuries to his face.

Yet he managed to restrain the man until his colleagues from the Duisburg police could arrive.

After a medical examination, the 23-year-old Syrian man was taken to a psychiatric hospital.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3874108/Does-object-marriage-Migrant-screaming-Allahu-Akbar-burts-wedding-German-church-tears-decorations.html#ixzz4ODuQ1cGx
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Editor of Austria’s Largest Paper Charged with ‘Hate Speech’ over Migrant Article

by CHRIS TOMLINSON

Syrian Mother: Islamic State Baked Christians, ‘Kneaded’ Children in Bakery Machines

by FRANCES MARTEL