Professor Afshin Ellian has warned that bleats of “multiculturalism” are a one-way street as Muslims in Europe oppress historic minorities in their own lands and have no intention of showing “tolerance”. (Breitbart)
Annemee Siersma/Flickr
The Iranian-born professor of law argues that while Muslim migrants are quick to claim their customs under “multiculturalism”, they have no intention of reciprocating.
Writing in Elsevier magazine, Dr. Ellian says Muslims rapidly learn the rules of multiculturalism and push for their place in society but have no intention of adopting any sort of progressive ideals.
This story was broken by a very dear friend of mine who saw exactly the same thing in the UK 10 years ago at his daughters school in London. He now resides in New Brunswick, where he relives the same problems 10 years later with his kids, who go to school there.
Justin Trudeau and the Liberal Government have brought in 25,000 Syrian refugees and many more to come.
Writing about this just angers me inside, Faith Goldy from therebel.media has done some investigating with the help of therebel staff since last fall on this.
Most refugees that came to Canada couldn’t speak English and needed classes, so most of these refugees are getting educated on English, some of those refugees are full bearded grown men and are sexually harassing children in NB schools, children as young as 11 years old are being harassed.
Al Jazeera gains unprecedented access to ISIL’s central leadership and explores the threat it poses to the Taliban.
Filmmakers: Najibullah Quraishi and Jamie Doran
Raising its black flag over the rugged mountainous regions of Afghanistan, the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) has emerged as a new threat to the war-ravaged country as it battles the Taliban for supremacy.
The Taliban are worried about the influx of foreign fighters who are believed to make up as many as half of ISIL’s fighters [Al Jazeera]
Employing violence and brutality to impose its will , Wilayat Khorasan, (the ancient name ISIL has chosen for the region made up of Afghanistan, Pakistan and parts of neighbouring countries), has emerged in seven different areas and vowed to step up operations, where the veteran fighters – the Taliban – once held sway.
Fighting to reconstitute the historical Khorasan into the so-called “caliphate” of Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, the group says it has grand plans for the region, starting with uprooting the Taliban and the government of President Ashraf Ghani.
Causing friction with the regional and overall leadership of the Taliban, armed battles have increased over the past few months with dozens of Taliban fighters killed in clashes, most notably in the Taliban stronghold of Nangarhar province.
If our current ideals don’t allow us to exclude people who vow, “With your democratic laws, we will colonize you,” then those ideals are only for schlemiels
It can be a good thing to be idealistic. But you’d better make sure you have the right ideals. As to this, the modern West is quickly becoming something non-Western — precisely because our ideals are now far less than ideal.
It has often been noted that some among us use our freedoms to destroy our freedoms. George Soros, a real-life James Bond villain, comes to mind; other leftist entities such as the ACLU and Southern Poverty Law Center also qualify, as they sue Americans into shedding Americanism.
Another example is a group they aid and abet: Muslim conquerors bent on winning the West for Dar al-Islam. And since this is not just an American phenomenon but a Western one, it has recently been addressed by a French academic — in strikingly blunt language.
Jean-Louis Harouel, professor emeritus of the History of Law at the University of Paris, recently criticized a French court’s decision to strike down a burkini (Islamic swimsuit) ban that had been instituted by dozens of the nation’s municipalities. Here are some of his words, as translated by Jihad Watch’s Hugh Fitzgerald:
[T]he Conseil d’Etat [the court] failed to take into account the fact that France is now engaged in a clash of civilizations, that just in the past year has cost it hundreds of deaths on its own territory, and which made it necessary to maintain the State of Emergency. “Islamism” is now making war on France, and there is no real boundary-line between Islam and Islamism.
The Conseil d’Etat failed to take into account the shock felt by the French people on seeing burkinis deliberately appearing on the beaches so soon after terrible massacres had been committed in France by Muslims acting in the name of their god. So soon after the carnage on the promenade in Nice and the slitting of the throat of a priest while he was fulfilling his priestly duties, such an increase in the flaunting of Muslim identity is truly indecent.
The Conseil d’Etat failed to take into account the fact that at present a silent conquest of Western Europe is underway. This conquest finds its source in the Qur’an where one can read that Allah has promised to give to the Muslims as the spoils of war the lands of the Infidels. That’s how sheikh Yousef Al-Qaradawi, one of the leaders of the UOIE (Union of Muslim Organizations in Europe), the French branch of which is the UOIF (Union of Muslim Organizations in France) put it: “With your democratic laws, we will colonize you. With our Koranic laws, we will dominate you.”
The Conseil d’Etat refused to see that the conquest of our beaches by these burkinis is only one stage in the taking over of France by the forces of political Islam. The Conseil d’Etat refused to see that those wearers of the burkini – like all those who wear variations on the Muslim veil — are the foot-soldiers, whether deeply convinced or merely docile, of a civilizational jihadism which is now trying to conquer our country by stealth.
To speak simply, the “rule of law” too often means condemning the peoples of Europe to helplessness when confronted by the mass immigration that is submerging them, and the aggressive Islam that is in the process of conquering their countries. To be able to react, it will be necessary to give the “rule of law” a bit of a shove, as it is currently being imposed on Europeans in this positively suicidal fashion by the secular religion of human rights.
Hungary’s WAR ON MIGRATION: Now Orban unleashes 3,000 extra cops to defend border
THOUSANDS of new police are to storm Hungary’s borders in a bid to crack down on the escalating number of illegal immigrants attempting to land in the country.
Hungary is taking a tough stance against the migrant crisis
Some 3,000 officers will patrol the barbed-wire fence erected last year between alongside Croatia and Serbia.
The move comes after Hungary’s Prime Minister, Viktor Orban, vowed for a major terror clampdown by saying there is a “demonstrable” link between immigration and terrorism.
Hungary is planning a new and even “more massive” fence to prevent refugees from crossing its border on their way to western Europe.
The Prime Minister, Viktor Orban, said the construction would stop any surge in asylum seekers if the EU-Turkey deal reducing boat crossings over the Aegean Sea collapses.
“Technical planning is under way to erect a more massive defence system next to the existing line of defence, which was built quickly [last year],” he said.
The existing razor-wire construction runs the entire length of Hungary’s borders with Serbia and Croatia, where hundreds of thousands of migrants have crossed during the refugee crisis.
Churches should have a ‘bouncer’ on the door throughout services to improve security, new counter terrorism advice suggests, as an expert has warned small parish churches are more at risk of attack that larger places of worship. The draft 12-page guidance drawn up by an adviser …Read More…From the Telegraph
Much of the UK’s Christian clergy, as well as its government, can stand up and take a bow for this one. It was they who implemented and applauded immigration policies that make it easy for Islamic State jihadis to get into Britain. It was they who stigmatized opposition to mass Muslim migration as racism, bigotry and Islamophobia. Now they are living in the Britain they made.“Vicars are told not to wear dog collars in public as experts fear ISIS will target British church in next attack,” by Alexander Ward, Daily Mail, August 31, 2016:
Vicars have been told not to wear dog collars in public over fears that Islamic State will target a British church in its next attack.
One man of the cloth said he has been advised not to wear his dog collar out and about amid fears he could be singled out in a terror attack.
Wait a minute, that’s not all:
Christians have no right to wear cross at work, says Government
Christians do not have a right to wear a cross or crucifix openly at work, the Government is to argue in a landmark court case
The Government has refused to say that Christians have a right to display the symbol of their faith at workPhoto: PA
The court in Nice concluded on Thursday the Riviera city’s decree is illegal because there were no proven risks of disruption to public order.
PARIS – A French court has overturned a ban on “burkinis” in Nice, the last of a series of similar decisions regarding local bans of the full-body swimwear adopted by some Muslim women.
In the French republic, state schools were built to fight the grip of the Catholic church on the whole of French society. The thinking was that Darwin is better at explaining the origin of the human race than the Bible. To build a country of free citizens: knowledge first; belief only if you insist, and even then, only by yourself.
“If the hijab or burkini had anything to do with modesty or piety, the Islamic fundamentalists would have sought private beaches, not insisted on forcing themselves on the public. … If the hijab becomes an accepted public phenomenon, a modern society cannot teach its future generations that a woman’s dress is not an excuse for rape”. — Hala Arafa, writing in The Hill.
A French Muslim society that often seems to feel as if it still belongs to its country of origin, appears to have decided that the game of secularism and “living together” should be over. With veils, burkinis and guns, various Islamists groups seem to be trying to embed the same message: We remain Muslims first and have decided to pay no attention to the culture of countries in which we are living.
For many today, French secularism is an anti-human rights ideology, a kind of moral deformity close to racism.
How can a free country, they ask, even think of doing such a thing as trying to ban a veil or a burkini — the full body covering for women to wear on the beach? How, they ask, can the French Republic call itself free and remain free when many of its citizens would like to rob Muslim women, peacefully obeying their own religion, of the freedom to choose their own clothes?
The current radicalization in France is not like that of the recent migration of Muslims to other European countries. Muslims have been coming to France in large numbers since the French left Algeria in 1962. The French never made any distinction between the French of “Gaul” and the French of North Africa. The current radicalization is not of those who came then, but of the younger generation — of French Muslims. They were born in France, speak French, were schooled in France — but they are not at ease with the values of France.
Islamic fundamentalism in France has been imported from the outside — by avenues such as Al Jazeera and Muslim wars in the Middle East. Now, therefore, these young French Muslim citizens have a real wish for secession from the rest of the population — like the wish of the Confederate states for secession from the United States, before and during the U.S. Civil War. These young French Muslims apparently do not want to live in the same country anymore. They seem to want a separate country, or a different country.
For more than 25 years, the French Republic, right and left, has been trying to disentangle the country from the “Muslim textile problem” (hijab, niqab, burka, burkini and so on). When the problem began back in 1989, the head of Creil College expelled three Muslim girls for wearing the Muslim veil, the hijab. A strong debate followed: pro-veil vs. anti-veil. Same arguments: as usual, tolerance, freedom of choice, and freedom of religion were on one side, secularism and respect for rules on the other side.
Rules? What rules?
Central to the history of France, is that, in the republic, state schools were built to fight the grip of the Catholic church on the whole of French society. At the end of 19th century, until the First World War, republican teachers worked hard to build schools separated from the Pope and the church. The thinking was that Darwin is better at explaining the origin of the human race than the Bible’s crediting God with creating the world in seven days. To build a country of free citizens: knowledge first; belief only if you insist, and even then, only by yourself.
The Islamic veil at school, or the burkini at the beach, seems an attempt to “re-religiousize” France and break the French consensus for secularism. For a hundred years, the consensus has been accepted by everyone — Catholics, Jews, Protestants — except for Muslims.
Four policemen in Nice, France, are pictured forcing a woman to remove part of her clothes because her outfit violated the city’s “burkini ban,” on August 23. They also fined her for the violation. (Image source: NBC News video screenshot)
The consensus can be summarized like this: Religious beliefs cannot belong to the public sphere without risking tyranny or civil war. If French citizens want to live in peace democratically, all disturbing subjects — especially faith in a country of multiple faiths — must remain strictly private.
For almost 30 years now, Muslims organizations in France have been telling everyone they do not accept this old private-public rule. Even at public schools, there are constant attempts to remodel the curriculum to align with religious faith.
“There is no such religion as Christianity … In reality, Jesus Christ was a Muslim coming from Jewish tradition … The name of the religion revealed to Christ was Islam …” — Abdurrahman Dilipak, columnist, Yeni Akit.
In Turkey, not even the smallest village of a few hundred inhabitants has a non-Muslim mayor.
Against this embarrassing background, Turkey is accusing Europe of being racist. That would be like North Korea accusing Europe of being a rogue state.
It’s not a bad joke; it’s a very bad joke. Turkey, where all variants of ethnic and religious xenophobia are a national pastime, is accusing the West of being racist.
Speaking after a spat with Austria and Sweden over news reports and tweets from those countries that accused Turkey of allowing sex with children under the age of 15, Turkish Foreign Minister Mevlut Cavusoglu claimed that the behavior of European countries reflected the “racism, anti-Islamic and anti-Turkish (trend) in Europe.”
He is talking about the same Europe where the inhabitants of one of its biggest cities, London, recently elected a Muslim as its mayor. In Turkey, not even the smallest village of a few hundred inhabitants has a non-Muslim mayor.
Turkish Foreign Minister Mevlut Cavusoglu (left) blasted European countries for “racism, anti-Islamic and anti-Turkish (trend),” partly in response to a tweet by Swedish Foreign Minister Margot Wallstrom (right) that read: “Turkish decision to allow sex with children under 15 must be reversed. Children need more protection, not less, against violence, sex abuse.”
In “racist” Austria, the police immediately arrested two suspects in connection with an attempt to set fire to a Turkish cultural center in the northern Austrian town of Wels — and at a time of rising tensions with Turkey. By contrast, Turkish law enforcement officials arrested five former gendarmerie intelligence officers just recently — nine years after the murder of Turkish-Armenian journalist Hrant Dink. These officers would probably never have been implicated if the two Islamist allies, President Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP) and Fethullah Gulen, his staunchest political ally when Dink was assassinated, had not turned into each other’s worst nemesis in power-sharing fight in 2013.
Yeni Akit is an Islamist newspaper and one of Erdogan’s media darlings, a kind of Turkish Pravda in its fanatical support of the president. Its editors always find a seat in the elite group of journalists who accompany the president in his private jet traveling to foreign capitals.
The Burkini is a a visible symbol of Islamisation.
Video thanks to Vlad Tepes
And here an interview between Marine LePen and CNN ‘s “secular Muslima Hala Gorani, who regularly throws hissy fits whenever someone criticises Islam:
In France the debate about the Burkini makes high waves, in Germany it hardly caused a ripple. The arguments against this Muslim costume are numerous, most are inaccurate.
This piece of cloth is not contrary to secularism, the hygiene does not interfere, but it is opposed to peaceful coexistence in the (still) not Islamic states, where it is placed on women’s bodies on the beach and showcased in bathhouses.
Besides headscarf, hijab, niqab, burka, besides the wild beards, kaftans and coffee-filters the Burkini is another uniform of religious fighters. These costumes show the worried and increasingly helpless infidel society the status of their Islamization. For Muslims, they show how far they can go without encountering resistance.
Leftist and other Islamophilic media regularly side with Islamic ideology because of their business interests in the Islamic states. They openly come out against the critics of Burkini ban: ” hysteria” (WORLD), police is moving in (TIME), not the Burkini but Justice is dividing society (TIME), police heats Burkini debate on (FAZ). Italy prohibits the Burkini fearing terrorist attacks by Muslims…. Le Figaro reported neutral on the debate. Refreshing!
Shares of Arab investors in German and French companies, the media and / or advertising revenue from United Arab Emirates, among others must not be jeopardised. Our Western values are cheap and on sale, lets take out the roots of our commonality, our common standards and bring it to an end! Thats only a hindrance in the manipulation and control of our citizens. Down with the Ten Commandments! Lets bow down to the rules of Islam!
Daimler Kuwait holds 6.8 percent shares for decades. One begins to understand why Daimler CEO Dieter Zetsche, the guy with the funny white moustache, is so excited about Muslim immigrants. And we don’t know how many institutional and private investors are Muslims, it was never explained. Don’t be surprised when Daimler Benz adds the Islamic half-moon to its star. Allahu Akhbar!
Such shares are insignificant? Stop making me laugh, it hurts! In Manhattan the Qatar Investment Authority (QIA) has acquired ten percent of the Empire State Building. Islam buys into symbols and pillars of Western culture and civilisation. See the “Open Mosque Day” at our national holiday. One calls the French l’Entrisme, “tactics used by some organisations (unions, political parties) with the intent to infiltrate another organisation to get its members to change their business practices and objectives.”
Hello, Sharia Party of Germany!
ALSO WE ARE THE NATION
How could it be otherwise, George Soros has directly or indirectly had a hand in it. In France there is an Islamic association that complains in all places and in all instances about the Burkini ban: the project funded by philanthropist George Soros Comité contre l’islamophobia en France (CCIF). The logo of the CCIF can be seen in the image, below right. This Association is since 2003 working on the Islamisation of France. its representative Marwan Muhammad, who coordinates the actions, explained during a conference, in 2002, in a mosque from Orly:
The CCIF spokesman is, since March 1, 2016 Executive Director
Qui a le droit de dire que la France dans ou trente quarante ans ne sera pas un pays Muslim? Personne n’a le droit de nous nier cet espoir là.
Who has the right to say that France will not be a muslim country in thirty or forty years? Nobody has the right to deny this hope us.