A Muslim killed by another Muslim in a Muslim country,
And this is Trump’s fault?
“…. if Donald Trump or anyone else looks upon Muslims in the U.S. military with suspicion, it is with good reason: does any other demographic have as high a rate of treason as Muslims in the U.S. military? In 2003, a convert to Islam, Sgt. Hasan Akbar, murdered two of his commanding officers in Kuwait. In 2009, Major Nidal Malik Hasan murdered 13 Americans at Fort Hood.”
And that’s just for starters.
His son died in service of the U.S. military; now his father is using his memory to advance a different cause.

Keeping Up With the Khandashians: Khizr Khan’s 15 Minutes Are Up
Of all the various stunt casting gimmicks in Hillary’s DNC coronation, celebrities getting out the vote, Republicans for Hillary,.. Khizr Khan’s stunt casting was the only one that worked.
The gimmick was blatantly obvious. The Democrats were trying to be both treasonous and patriotic at the same time. They wanted to dismiss the threat of Islamic terrorism while wrapping themselves in the flag. How better to do it than with the parents of a Muslim soldier.
The stunt, like all the others should have been ignored. Once it wasn’t, Khizr Khan and his wife gleefully latched onto all the attention and did interview after interview.
But the 15 minutes are almost up. And now they’re whining about being private people who want to end the controversy. Private people tend to remain private. Countless American families have been robbed of their loved ones, on and off the battlefield, by Khan’s co-religionists who follow the teachings of their religion, and they have remained private.
Nor were they given the kind of high profile forum that the Democrats and the media gave to the Khandashians. But there’s no actual material there. The 15 minutes have come and go. And even the media is contemplating how to move on from their fake non-story.

Khizr Khan Drew Inspiration from Muslim Brotherhood Islamist ‘Fascist’
Theodore and Walid Shoebat have uncovered some very interesting information about media darling Khizr Khan. They document his interest in Sharia law and one of the figures he credits for inspiring his work.
Khan’s fascination with Islamic Sharia stems from his life in Saudi Arabia. During the eighties Khan wrote a paper titled Juristic Classification of Islamic [Sharia] Law. In it he elucidated on the system of Sharia law expressing his reverence for “The Sunnah [the works of Muhammad] — authentic tradition of the Prophet Muhammad…
At the bottom of the page, Khan shows his appreciation for an icon of the Muslim Brotherhood: “The contribution to this article of S. Ramadan’s writing is greatly acknowledged.”
If this is the major figure who used that name, then we are talking about the son-in-law of Hassan al-Banna and the father of Tariq Ramadan, a key Brotherhood transitional figure from overt Jihadist anti-Americanism to more subtle and deceitful rhetoric.
Said Ramadan was clever enough to court American support and to some degree he got it for his Islamist agenda. One might argue that Khizr Khan is following in his footsteps.
Yet the media has no interest in when their Muslim heroes and heroines cite highly disturbing figures. But they are ever alert to even a whiff of anything of the sort from Republicans.
Period US analysis described Ramadan as a fascist, but the left has no hesitation in making common cause with Islamofascists.










Father Jacques Hamel was murdered this week, in the church of Saint-Étienne-du-Rouvray, by Islamic jihadists.








