Tag Archives: charlie hebdo

A Motoon a Day

(Reuters) - France confirmed on Friday it would allow no street protests against cartoons denigrating Islam’s Prophet Mohammad that were published by a French magazine this week.

A Muhammad Cartoon a Day  (Daniel Pipes)

When Salman Rushdie mocked Islamic sanctities in 1989 in his magical realist novel The Satanic Verses, Ayatollah Khomeini did something shockingly original: He pronounced a death edict on Rushdie and all those connected to the production of his book. By doing this, Khomeini sought to impose Islamic mores and laws on the West; we don’t insult the prophet, he effectively said, and neither can you.

That started a trend of condemning those in the West deemed anti-Islamic that persists to this day. again and again, when Westerners are perceived as denigrating Muhammad, the Koran, or Islam, Islamists demonstrate, riot and kill.

See them all, here!

What’s good for the goose is good for the gander:

Double standards and dhimmi pandering exposed.

Shrillary  continues to kowtow before violent intimidation:

Continue reading A Motoon a Day

Geert Wilders vs OIC: Dutch state taken to UN court of human rights over Wilders

Because they can.

Because they are enabled by Hillary Clinton & Hussein Obama who sold out to the OIC:

July 15, 2011: Shown here are Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and OIC Secretary General Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu signing away free speech in Istanbul. Such prominence is given to this totalitarian organization. 


Global Sharia Enforcement: Dutch state taken to UN court of human rights over Wilders

Where are the “good”, “moderate” Muslims protesting the actions of the OIC?

Stealth jihad.

The UN, largely driven by the largest bloc of countries (Muslim countries), continues to vigorously pursue the impostion of sharia law across the world.

Speaking candidly about Islam is blasphemy under Islamic law. Restriction of free speech is a basic tenet of sharia law and what was behind the cancellation of my event in Sugar Land, Texas and Nashville, Tennessee. The war on the truth.

Expect the OIC (Organization of Islamic Cooperation) to pursue this non-binding resolution vigorously. Stealth jihad.

Dutch state taken to UN court of human rights over Wilders

‘Fearful’ Muslim Immigrants Terrorists Take Dutch Host to UN Court…

The OIC is the new Comintern, dedicated to subversion, infiltration, sabotage and destruction of the Western way of life. OIC agents within the West (which includes many politicians, academics and media hacks) are guilty of treason.

Dutch state taken to UN court of human rights over Wilders

Thursday 17 November 2011

Three Dutch Moroccans have made a complaint against the Netherlands to the UN court of human rights, claiming the Dutch state has not protected them from incitement to hatred instigated by Geert Wilders, Nos television reports.

The three, who are not named in the court filing, say the ‘systematic incitement to hatred and discrimination against Muslims and other migrants’ committed by Wilders has left them feeling ‘discriminated against, humiliated and threatened’.

‘They are of the opinion that Wilders by his continued hate speech has poisoned the social climate in the Netherlands that has become more and more anti-migrant and anti-Muslim,’ the statement says.

Continue reading Geert Wilders vs OIC: Dutch state taken to UN court of human rights over Wilders

Is it justified to burn TIME to the ground….?

Defending Arson in the Name of Profit Moe:

Mohammad Andry
Submitted on 2011/11/07 at 7:59 pm

incident such as Charlie Hebdo will continue happen until the end of time, is destiny. this is what makes history goes on.
Islam is a mercy for the whole of nature, but if them suppressed, Muslims will react violently.
if you slapped for no reason, I am sure you will be slapped back.

 I guess we haven’t played cowboys and Iranians yet, Mohammad! (Mohammad Andry writes from Jakarta, Indonesia……)

 ”If  TIME  offices get firebombed, did they deserve it?!”

 TIME is the magazine which chose Hitler as Man of the Year…

Yesterday a Guardian contributing writer tweeted about the Nazism of Zionism.”

If The Guardian offices get bombed, did they deserve it?!

If a reader, so offended by Crumley’s excuse-making for theocratic nutcases, bombs TIME’s Paris Bureau, would that make Crumley a “victim” of his own obnoxious cowardice?

 “No one has the right not to be offended. No one has the right to firebomb a newspaper that offends them.”

Over the past decade, that civil war jihad has intensified on the streets of Western cities; Amsterdam, (where the artist Theo van Gogh was murdered in broad daylight for a film which criticized misogynistic Koran verses), Nyhamnsläge, (the Swedish village where the home of cartoonist Lars Vilks, who drew images of Mohammed, has been repeatedly attacked), Aarhus (the Danish town where fellow prophet-image-maker Kurt Westergaard had to hide in a “panic room” after an axe-wielding Muslim broke into his home). It has thus been heartening to see this fundamental understanding among writers — that, no matter our political disagreements, we are all colleagues in a vitally important element of the free society — flower in response to a truly vile little excrescence by Bruce Crumley, the Paris correspondent for TIME magazine.

On Tuesday morning, the offices of the French satirical newspaper Charlie Hebdo were firebombed after it named the Prophet Muhammed its “editor-in-chief” for an upcoming issue. In an article entitled, “Firebombed French Paper Is No Free Speech Martyr,” Crumley taunted the paper’s editors. “Do you still think the price you paid for printing an offensive, shameful, and singularly humor-deficient parody on the logic of ‘because we can’ was so worthwhile?” he asked. Crumley, who would make an excellent propaganda commissar in Uzbekistan or Iran, chided French politicians for “denouncing the arson as an attack on freedom of speech, liberty of expression, and other rights central to French and other Western societies,” which is exactly what it was.  (More)

Charlie Hebdo’s Next Frontpage:

“Love is stronger than hatred”- knowing what we know about Mohammedanism I’m not too sure about that….

Even a Guardian Leftard smells the coffee: 

No Moe Toons in Yale

Yale University Press is a well-regarded academic press; it is shocking to many observers to find such a university and such a press surrendering to a kind of ghostly coercion exercised not by violence but by predictions of violence. (More)

Continue reading Is it justified to burn TIME to the ground….?

Sharia Compliant: Bruce Crumley, Paris Bureau Chief For TIME Magazine

Dhimmie of the Month or Asshole of the Month?

That choice is all yours, dear readers. Bruce Crumley  seems to believe that the suit he wears makes him an adult who is “sensitive” enough to understand Islamic terrorism, and  if it wasn’t for our  ” childish, Islamophobic, idiotic, divisive, and destructive efforts”  which force Muslims to firebomb newspapers they don’t like,  we could all sing kumbaya and pretend we like each other.

Next he’ll be blaming Parisian women for their rapes for not  “voluntarily” covering up with a burqa.  Yes folks, that’s where we are headed with dim bulbs like this…… ( thanks to KGS for the reminder….)

Diana West:

What journalist wouldn’t want to be Paris Bureau Chief for Time magazine, or anything else? Sounds so glamorous. But look closer and the job qualifications — sharia-compliance — are more than a little off-putting, certainly as exemplified by the man with the job, Bruce Crumley, on weighing in on the bombing of Charlie Hebdo. Poor man. Full-blown, late-stage and terminal Dhimmitude.

Excerpts from his Time piece:

1) “Not only are such Islamophobic antics futile and childish, but they also openly beg for the very violent responses from extremists their authors claim to proudly defy …”

2) It’s “hard to have much synpathy for [Charlie Hebdo] after it published another stupid and totally unnecessary edition mocking Islam.”

3) The “issue was certain to enrage hard-core Islamists (and offend average Muslims) with articles and “funny” cartoons featuring the Prophet Mohammed—depictions forbidden in Islam to boot.”

4) “…do you still think the price you paid for printing an offensive, shameful, and singularly humor-deficient parody on the logic of “because we can” was so worthwhile? If so, good luck with those charcoal drawings your pages will now be featuring.”

5) “If that weren’t enough to offend Muslims sensitive to jokes about their faith, history helped raised hackles further. In 2007, Charlie Hebdo re-published the infamous (and, let’ face it, just plain lame) Mohamed caricatures initially printed in 2005 by Danish paper Jyllands-Posten.:

6)”Apart from unconvincing claims of exercising free speech in Western nations where that right no longer needs to be proved, it’s unclear what the objectives of the caricatures were other than to offend Muslims—and provoke hysteria among extremists.”

7)” It’s yet to be seen whether Islamist extremists were behind today’s arson, but both the paper’s current edition, and the rush of politicians to embrace it as the icon of French democracy, raises the possibility of even moderate Muslims thinking “good on you” if and when militants are eventually fingered for the strike.”

8)”So, yeah, the violence inflicted upon Charlie Hebdo was outrageous, unacceptable, condemnable, and illegal. But apart from the “illegal” bit,Charlie Hebdo‘s current edition is all of the above, too.”

A hopeless case.

Four years ago, Charlie Hebdo was one of the few European publications willing to reprint a Danish newspaper’s controversial Muhammad cartoons.

The New York Slimes, Washington Compost, La-La Land Times, and every other gutless publication that didn’t have the belly to run the innocuous Danish cartoons should be hanging their heads in shame.

Michael Coren:

Sometimes islam makes me want to scream!

 But there’s some good news also:

Firebombed French paper reprints Muhammad cartoon that got it bombed

 Defiance in the face of Islamic supremacist intimidation and thuggery. Bravo. “French paper reprints Mohammad cartoon after fire-bomb,” by Brian Love for Reuters, November 3:

Time Magazine calls for censorship, blames victims of Islamic attack on French magazine that lampooned Muhammad

Robert Spencer:

In my article at Front Page today I wrote this: “The worst aspect of this firebombing is that there are certain to be voices in the West over the next few days – some of them no doubt quite prominent and respected – who will call on Westerners to be more ‘sensitive’ toward Muslims, and to end this unacceptable hurting of Muslim feelings by drawing cartoons of him and making him the honorary editor-in-chief of a comedy magazine.”

Continue reading Sharia Compliant: Bruce Crumley, Paris Bureau Chief For TIME Magazine