"My Allah is better than yours" bomb-blast injures 60 at Fatah member’s Gaza wedding

Gaza – Ma’an – At least 60 Palestinians were injured on Tuesday night in an apparent bomb blast at a wedding party for a relative of Fatah leader Muhammad Dahlan in Khan Younis in the southern Gaza Strip.

Rewriting history (Pali-Media Watch)

Rewriting the history of the Land of Israel in order to deny Israel’s right to exist is central to Palestinian Authority (PA) policy. Long before it started the Terror War in 2000, the PA was fighting a history war – erasing Jewish history and replacing it with a fabricated Palestinian history. This rewriting has two central goals:

  1.  Erase the Jewish nation’s 3,000 year history in the Land of Israel;
  2.  Invent ancient Palestinian, Muslim and Arab histories in the land.

Headbanger Watch: The Druze Are Infidels!

Death to the infidels!
infidel_obama_

MEMRI:

Following are excerpts from an address by Egyptian psychiatrist Dr. Salah Haroun, which aired on Al-Nas TV on February 17, 2009.

Continue reading "My Allah is better than yours" bomb-blast injures 60 at Fatah member’s Gaza wedding

WTF are we fighting for? To establish the shari'a?

“Our man in Kabool” Karzai Signs New Law Allowing Men to “Rape” Their Wives

hamid-karzai

Afganistan’s ‘moderate’ Prez Karzai a Misunderstander of Islam? Signs law “legalizing rape in marriage”

Canada takes women’s rights protest direct to Karzai government

It will be forever ignored or denied by those who insist that Islam is a Religion of Peace, but in reality there is no Misunderstanding of Islam going on here. Every provision of this law as stated in this article, including the rule that women cannot refuse sex to their husbands at any time or for any reason, is part of traditional Islamic law. And so this new law is yet another indication of how the overtures to the Taliban from official Washington are out of focus. Will the U.S. stand up for these women and defend them? Absolutely not, because they are being victimized by Sharia, to which Washington has no apparent objection, and because they are not being blown up in terrorist attacks. The passing of a law in a non-violent manner — what’s the problem? It’s democracy at work!

“Hamid Karzai signs law ‘legalising rape in marriage,'” by Ben Farmer in the Telegraph, 

*  Afghan women’s activists protest idea of reconciliation with “moderate” Taliban

Swat: New video reveals Taliban beating 17 year-old girl

Continue reading WTF are we fighting for? To establish the shari'a?

Imam BLiar and the battle about Islam

tony_blair_narrowweb__300x4100
“There is essentially one battle going on, and it is a battle about Islam”
So says former British Prime Minister Tony Blair. And he makes it all very simple and Manichaean: there are “two elements in Islam: one wanted to work with the West; the other did not.” We just have to work with the one that wants to work with the West.

Of course! Why didn’t anyone think of that before?

Anything in his talk about why the “extremists” are so popular, or is that assumed to be a simple matter of policy and reaction to Western foreign policy? Did Blair even get close to mentioning the fact that there is a traditional, deeply rooted idea in Islamic texts and teachings, that Muslims must wage war against and subjugate unbelievers — regardless of what those unbelievers have done or not done? I am sure that he didn’t, despite its relevance to his point.

But until analysts grapple with that fact, nothing is more certain than that the global jihad will continue, no matter which smiling moderate is feted in Western capitals today.

“Battle on Islam heart of Mideast crisis—Blair,” by John Nery for the Philippine Daily Inquirer, March 23 (thanks to Wilkie):

MANILA, Philippines – Former British Prime Minister Tony Blair, in Manila for a series of leadership conferences, used an open forum at the Ateneo de Manila University to make what he called “a larger point” about the turmoil in the Middle East.
“There is essentially one battle going on, and it is a battle about Islam.”…

He told a sympathetic audience that the “larger point” was the right framework with which to understand the pivotal, conflict-ridden region.

Blair said there were two elements in Islam: one wanted to work with the West; the other did not.

The right approach to peace and development in the Middle East, then, would be to “partner with the modernizing and moderate element,” he said.

He made his remarks in answer to a question about how he made major decisions, such as joining the US-led Coalition of the Willing in invading Iraq.

He answered the Iraq question first, and then broadened his view to include the titanic struggle for the future of Islam.

Referring to the moderates doing battle with extremists, he said: “We gotta make sure those guys win.”
Comment:
Blair is definitely confused. Sure, lots of Muslims would like to “work with” the West. The issue is what they want, and it is clear from polls that most Muslims want the economic and technological advantages that may come from dealing with the West, but most of them don’t want to be influenced by Western values, and most of them want strict sharia.

Note, from the figures cited below, that across those four major Muslim countries, an overall simple average of only 9% of people “disagree strongly” with the goal to require a strict application of sharia law. Some of this 9% is probably composed of non-Muslims (especially in the Indonesian sample; see D4). If we take a moderate Muslim to be someone who disagrees strongly with sharia law, then, overall, less than about 9% of Muslims fit that category. The figures below regarding attitudes toward Western values also put into perspective Blair’s statements about “two elements” in Islam. Obviously, the “element” or subset of Muslims that is positive in its attitudes toward Western values is very small (see section “f” below).

Excerpts from World Public Opinion Poll 2007

Q27-F28: What do you personally feel about these goals? For each goal, please say whether you agree with it strongly, agree somewhat, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly.

a. To require a strict application of Shari’a law in every Islamic country.
………………………………………… Egypt, Indonesia, Morocco, Pakistan
Agree strongly…………………….. 50%, 17%, 35%, 52%
Agree somewhat……………………24, 36, 41, 21
Disagree somewhat………………..11, 25, 10, 6
Disagree strongly………………….. 11, 15, 9, 1
Refused/Don’t Know…………….. 4, 7, 6, 19

f. To keep Western values out of Islamic countries.
………………………………………..Egypt, Indonesia, Morocco, Pakistan
Agree strongly…………………….80%, 40%, 33%, 42%
Agree somewhat………………….11, 38, 31, 23
Disagree somewhat……………… 3, 9, 13, 7
Disagree strongly………………… 1, 4, 8, 2
Refused/Don’t Know……………. 5, 10, 16, 25

D4. What religion do you follow?
………………………………………….Egypt, Indonesia, Morocco, Pakistan
Muslim………………………………….93%, 87%, 100%, 98%
Christian…………………………………7, 7, *, *
Jewish…………………………………..na, 0, *, 0
Other…………………………………….na, 5, na, 2
Refused/Don’t Know………………na, 1, na, *

Source:
http://www.worldpublicopinion.org/pipa/pdf/apr07/…