Whitewashing the Thai Jihad

By Robert Spencer

* Thai Muslims, doing what they do best…

In a story Wednesday on a jihadist attack on a wedding party and other jihad activity in Thailand, Agence France Presse added a concluding paragraph that was typical of mainstream media coverage of the Thai jihad and of jihad activity in general. For while AP, Reuters, AFP and the rest never saw a piece of Palestinian propaganda they didn’t like, they also never saw a jihad they couldn’t whitewash.

AFP’s concluding paragraph blandly placed all the blame for the conflict on the non-Muslim Thai government:

More than 3,000 people have been killed since separatist unrest broke out in January 2004 in the south, which was an autonomous Malay Muslim sultanate until mainly Buddhist Thailand annexed it in 1902, provoking decades of tension.

* Land of smiles, Illustrated PIG (Warning/Graphic content!)

All was well, you see, until the Buddhists of Thailand, motivated apparently only by rapacious imperialism, annexed the poor autonomous Malay Muslim Sultanate. AFP does not mention, of course, that the Malay Sultanate at that time was making war against the Siamese during the war between Siam and Burma, and Thailand conquered it in that context — making it Thai by a right of conquest that has been universally recognized throughout human history (except, of course, when it comes to Israel and to any Muslim land that is conquered by non-Muslims).

Along with this come the media’s allergy to the word “jihad,” and its frequent recourse to the passive voice when discussing what the jihadists did. Sometimes inanimate objects act, apparently of their own accord. For example, in a March story on bombings in southern Thailand, Reuters’ lead paragraph stated: “Bombs killed three men and wounded 21 people in three separate attacks in Thailand’s troubled Muslim far south, police said on Sunday.” Reuters gives no hint as to who is doing the bombing and who are the victims – which in itself is a clear indication that the bombers are not the government or pro-government vigilantes, but jihadists.

Warning: Graphic pictures coming up!

The story continues in this vein. Its second paragraph tells us that a bomb was hidden in the car, but with no hint as to by whom. In paragraph 5 we learn that in the three southern provinces, “2,500 people have been killed in gun and bomb attacks since a separatist insurgency erupted in January 2004.” The separatist insurgency just erupted, you see, like a volcano. It was an act of God, a force of nature. Here again Reuters gives the reader no hint as to who the separatist insurgents are, or who killed the overwhelming majority of those 2,500 people. In paragraph 6, we learn how the “suspected militants” set off another bomb, but once again are given no hint as to who these militants are.

Same thing in paragraph 7: unidentified “insurgents” ambush the security forces. In paragraph 8, it’s simply a “bomb,” a random, accidental object, that unaccountably wounded four people. But also in that paragraph we learn that this is all taking place in “the three far south provinces which formed an independent sultanate until annexed by Thailand a century ago.” Reuters and AFP are in step on this: the only background they give suggests that Thailand is entirely responsible for provoking the conflict, and should simply have left the Malay Muslims alone.

Only in paragraph 10 of the Reuters story are we finally told that “Buddhist monks” are among the chief targets of the still-unidentified “militants” — which should lead the informed reader to identify them as Islamic jihadists and Sharia supremacists. But they come to that identification with no help from Reuters.

In reality, the Thai jihadists are uniquely brutal even by the standards of their jihadist brethren, and are fighting to correct the outrage, as they see it, of non-Muslim rule over a Muslim population in southern Thailand. But the AFP and Reuters stories exemplify the kind of coverage that jihad activity receives from the mainstream media as a matter of course. The perpetrators of jihad violence are not identified, their ideology is never discussed, and the conflicts they provoke are blamed on their victims. This kind of coverage is of a piece with the U.S. government’s new see-no-jihad, speak-no-jihad, hear-no-jihad policy: both appear to be based on wishful thinking. Both seem to emanate from the idea that if we simply do not allow ourselves to notice jihad activity, it will somehow fade away from neglect. If we pretend that Islam is peaceful, violent Muslims will lay down their arms.

The price we will have to pay for these fantasies could be very high.

36 thoughts on “Whitewashing the Thai Jihad”

  1. Will we here in the United States, first have to witness, these type of vicious killings or suicide bombers before the people will wake-up. Just hope it will not be to late. May be that people are frustrated and don’t know how to help.
    Has anybody a suggestion in what way they can help, should it be done by all cities over the USA, having meetings were people can ask questions.

  2. * jihad can’t stopped!!! allohuakbar!!!

    Oh, but it can be stopped, and it will be stopped, Irfan. Nothing you
    or “allah” can do about it.

    Revelation 13 (in part)

    7 It was also given to him to make war with the saints and to
    overcome them, and authority over every tribe and people and
    tongue and nation was given to him. 8 All who dwell on the earth
    will worship him, everyone whose name has not been written from
    the foundation of the world in the book of life of the Lamb who has
    been slain. 9 If anyone has an ear, let him hear. 10 If anyone is
    destined for captivity, to captivity he goes; if anyone kills with the
    sword, with the sword he must be killed. Here is the perseverance
    and the faith of the saints.

    The Lamb is Jesus Christ (the one that muslims deny is the Son
    of God, and whose crucifixion they also deny); the saints are those
    who are redeemed by the precious shed blood of the Lamb of God
    (not muslims, though of course many of the saints were muslims,
    prior to their redemption).

    Islam is doomed, along with its many followers.

  3. Irfan. Your Holy Prophet was a paedophile, rapist, murderer, liar, asswipe. He married a little girl and raped her two years later. Your pathetic Jihad will be stopped even if all of you have to be sent to camps and killed like the animals you are. I would wipe my ass with the Kuran. But wiping my ass with bullshit is a bit redundent.

  4. It is very bad….. but is there any one who can find out the actual pictues behind the same…
    there is no militancy, no jehad. but there are some powers which definetly want to roul all the world….
    this is what as a plained GAME. Which only can paly if you have lot of mony…

    so think about who have extra ordinery mony.
    who can sale / purchase humanbeing
    this is not what we are seeing but it is a GAME.
    My Allah safe us and you and all of the world form this

    thanks all of you for thinking positive.

  5. Shezad,
    Muslim Malaysia is behind this – it is not a GAME – and Allah (not your understanding of the term) is the problem.

  6. “america is high level terrorist”

    If that was true the USA would have taken over the entire world in the
    1940’s/1950’s; no one could have stopped them, the world could have
    been entirely under”pax americana” with worldwide restrictions on politics, religion, culture, customs and languages. it didn’t happen.
    The world would have been very different if the Soviet Union or
    Nazi-Germany or Imperial Japan would have had this opportunity
    to rule the world with unmatched power.
    Probably billions in the third world would not have survived if these
    countries totally would have had their way.
    let’s see whether the Chinese will be so benevolent towards their asian
    neighbors. probably Taiwan will be traded off to China for economical
    reasons, just wait for Russia to take back her satelite states and if you
    still think US is bad; just watch what will happen after the revival of the roman empire in the E.U. you’ll think back to the good old “american” days.

  7. In reponse to Mahmood bin Razzak
    “I shall [b]terrorize[/b] the infidels. So wound their bodies and incapacitate them because they oppose Allah and His Apostle.”–Qur’an Surah 8:12

    “If you gain mastery over them in battle, inflict such a defeat as would [b]terrorize[/b] them, so that they would learn a lesson and be warned.”–Qur’an Surah 8:57

    “Allah’s Apostle said, ‘I have been made victorious with [b]terror[/b].'”–Sahih al- Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 220

    “Allah’s Apostle said, ‘War is deceit.'”–Sahih al-Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 268

    “Get out of his way, you infidel unbelievers. Every good thing goes with the Apostle. Lord, I believe in his word. We will fight you about its interpretations as we have fought you about its revelation with strokes that will remove heads from shoulders and make enemies of friends.”–Ishaq:530

    “In the Muslim community, the holy war is a religious duty, because of the universalism of the Muslim mission and (the obligation to) convert everybody to Islam either by persuasion or by force.”–Ibn Khaldun, al-Muqaddimah (p183)

    “[O]ne must go on jihad (i.e., warlike razzias or raids) at least once a year…one may use a catapult against them [non—Muslims] when they are in a fortress, even if among them are women and children. One may set fire to them and/or drown them…If a person of the Ahl al—Kitab [People of The Book — primarily Jews and Christians] is enslaved, his marriage is [automatically] revoked…One may cut down their trees…One must destroy their useless books. Jihadists may take as booty whatever they decide…they may steal as much food as they need.”–Al-Ghazali, “al-Wadjiz”

    Wow, sounds like a terroristic dogma to me…

    We beat your arses in the Barbary Wars of 1801-1805 and 1812-1816 [in reaction to the unprovoked massacre and enslavement of American merchants by maritime mujahideen in the Maghreb], and we’ll again be victorious against the scourge of the Khilafat, just wait and see…

    America hu Akbar!
    Lan astaslem!

    Oh, and by the way, Arabs are not brown, they are BRUNET-WHITE! Mohammed is described constantly and consistently as a white man in the Sahih Ahadith and Sirat Rasulullah, and Arabs had always historically considered themselves “white” until they realized that they could take advantage of the Western phenomenon of “white guilt” and therefore pose fallaciously as “colored”, and thus in need of “special treatment”. Islam is not, and cannot be, a race, as there are:

    *Fair-skinned blond-haired blue-eyed mujahideen from Crimea, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Albania, Kosovo, Macedonia, Bulgaria, Montenegro, Ingushetia, Dagestan, Chechnya, Cherkessia, North Ossetia, etc
    *Lighter-skinned Asiatic mujahideen from Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Tatarstan, Kazakhstan, Xinjiang, etc
    *Darker-skinned Asiatic mujahideen from China [Hui Chinese], Malaysia, Brunei, Singapore, Indonesia, Thailand, etc
    *Olive-skinned [that’s “brunet-white”] mujahideen from the Middle East, North Africa, Turkey, parts of the Balkans and Caucasus, parts of Central Asia etc
    *Brown-skinned mujahideen from Pakistan, Afghanistan, India, Banglandesh, etc
    *Black Mujahideen from all throughout sub-Saharan Africa
    *”Latino” mujahideen from Suriname

    Islam is not a race, so opposing its genocidal, imperialist designs cannot rationally be construed as racism, but is actually as anti-racist as one can get, as it is merely opposition to a dangerously totalitarian global-domination-obsessed ideology not wedded to any biologically-distinctive subgroup of the human species; furthermore, you see, if one is to accept the mendacious and fallacious Islamic definition of race used to slander and marginalize critics of Jihad and Shari’a, then Islam is at its core actually horrendously RACIST AGAINST KUFFAR/MUSHRIKUN/MUNAFIQUN/ZANADIQA/MURTADDUN! Actually, Mohammad [yemach shmo vezichro–meaning “may his memory and name be obliterated”] endorsed racist attitudes against blacks in the Sunna & even the Qur’an, ideas which would form the basis of 14 centuries of slavery and dehumanization of blacks by Arabs which persist to this very day:

    “And on the Day of Resurrection you will see those who lied against Allah–their faces will be black. Is not in hell an abode for the arrogant? “–Qur’an 39:60

    ”I saw the Prophet…He was white and his beard was black with some white hair”–Sahih al-Bukhari Volume 4, Book 56, Number 744

    “The Prophet passed through the lane of Khaybar quickly and my knee was touching the thigh of the Prophet. He uncovered his thigh and I saw the whiteness of the thigh of the Prophet.”–Sahih al-Bukhari Volume 1, Book 8, Number 367

    “The Prophet never raised his hands for any invocation except for that of Istisqa’ and he used to raise them so much that the whiteness of his armpits became visible.”–Sahih al-Bukhari Volume 2, Book 17, Number 141

    “Allah’s Messenger (peace be upon him) said: Allah created Adam when He had to create him and He struck his right shoulder and there emitted from it white offspring as if they were white ants. He struck his left shoulder and there emitted from it the black offspring as if they were charcoal. He then said (to those who had been emitted) from the right (shoulder): For Paradise and I do not mind. Then He said to those (who had been emitted) from his left shoulder: They are for hell and I do not mind. Transmitted by Ahmad.”–Tirmidhi 38

    “I have heard that it was of him that the apostle said, “Whoever wants to see Satan let him take a look at Nabtal b. al-Harith!” He was a sturdy black man with long flowing hair, inflamed eyes, and dark ruddy cheeks. He used to come and talk to the apostle and listen to him and then carry what he had said to the hypocrites.”–Ishaq:243

    “He says: “The apostle of God and his companions went on a trip. (When) their belongings became too heavy for them to carry, Muhammad told me, `Spread your garment.’ They filled it with their belongings, then they put it on me. The apostle of God told me, ‘Carry (it), for you are a ship.’ Even if I was carrying the load of six or seven donkeys while we were on a journey, anyone who felt weak would throw his clothes or his shield or his sword on me so I would carry that, a heavy load. The prophet told me, ‘You are a ship”‘–Ahmad 5:222

    “The Prophet said, “I saw (in a dream) a black woman with unkempt hair going out of Medina and settling in Mahai’a. I interpreted that as (a symbol of) epidemic of Medina being transferred to Mahai’a, namely, Al-Juhfa.”–Sahih al-Bukhari Volume 9, Book 87, Number 163

    “A rock was put on a slave’s chest. When Abu Bakr complained, they said, ‘You are the one who corrupted him, so save him from his plight.’ I will do so,’ said Bakr. ‘I have a black slave, tougher and stronger than Bilal, who is a heathen. I will exchange him. The transaction was carried out.”–Ishaq:144

    “Ahmad ibn Abi Sulayman, the companion of Sahnun, said, “Anyone who says that the Prophet was black should be killed.””–Qadi ‘Iyad Musa al-Yahsubi, “Muhammad Messenger of Allah” (Ash-Shifa of Qadi ‘Iyad)

    “Ahmad ibn Abi Sulayman, Sahnun’s companion, said that whoever says that the Prophet was black is killed. The Prophet was not black.”–Qadi ‘Iyad Musa al-Yahsubi, “Muhammad Messenger of Allah” (Ash-Shifa of Qadi ‘Iyad)

    “Shem, the son of Noah was the father of the Arabs, the Persians, and the Greeks; Ham was the father of the Black Africans; and Japheth was the father of the Turks and of Gog and Magog who were cousins of the Turks. Noah prayed that the prophets and apostles would be descended from Shem and kings would be from Japheth. He prayed that the African’s color would change so that their descendants would be slaves to the Arabs and Turks.”–Tabari II:11

    “Ham [Africans] begat all those who are black and curly-haired, while Japheth [Turks] begat all those who are full-faced with small eyes, and Shem [Arabs] begat everyone who is handsome of face with beautiful hair. Noah prayed that the hair of Ham’s descendants would not grow beyond their ears, and that whenever his descendants met Shem’s, the latter would enslave them.”–Tabari II:21

    “Allah’s Apostle said, ‘You should listen to and obey your [Muslim] ruler even if he is a black African slave whose head looks like a raisin.’”–Sahih al-Bukhari Volume 9, Book 89, Number 256

    “It is your folly to fight the Apostle, for Allah’s army is bound to disgrace you. We brought them to the pit. Hell was their meeting place. We collected them there, black slaves, men of no descent.”–Ishaq:450

    “The black troops and slaves of the Meccans cried out and the Muslims replied, ‘Allah destroy your sight, you impious rascals.’”–Ishaq:374

    “The Prophet said, ‘Let the negro slave of Dinar perish. And if he is pierced with a thorn, let him not find anyone to take it out for him…. If he [the black slave] asks for anything it shall not be granted, and if he needs intercession [to get into paradise], his intercession will be denied.’”–Sahih al-Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 137

    “The Negro nations are as a rule submissive to slavey because they have attributes that are quite similar to dumb animals.”–Ibn Khaldun, “Muqaddimah”

    “When next you meet an Arab, you should ask what is the Arabic word for slave, you’ll discover that the words are the same “abeed.” Which is why, when an Arab looks at a black African, what he sees is a slave.”–Osama bin Laden

  8. Repent with Jesus Christ and “acknowledge” that he is the saviour

    Submitting to Allah is infallible

    There shall be a new crusade if Muslim extremity continues

  9. The way I understand it – Muslims are like a “sleeping giant” especially in the US. The moment these people flip, the US could face drastic consequences.

  10. I don’t think so UIS. It will be incomfortable but entirely resolvable. All that is missing at present is the resolve to solve this issue at the minimum cost to American citizens. And Obama is not helping – in fact he and the Democrats may well be a hinderance but we shall see. What happens depends on the real sleeping giant – the people of the USA – and it is up to them to put a brake on the assault of their culture by worthless islamic thugs. It is their country.

  11. I am guessing that the majority of people making hateful comments here are American and not forgetting a particular bible basher. I suppose these people have forgotton that America was born out of terrorism (the death and destruction of it’s native population and not forgetting the African slaves) A country which is born out of terrorism will continue to terrorise under the name of so called “freedom”.

    ”In 1492, Columbus sailed the ocean blue” . . . and made the first contact with the “Indians.” For Native Americans, the world after 1492 would never be the same. This date marked the beginning of the long road of persecution and genocide of Native Americans, our indigenous people. Genocide was an important cause of the decline for many tribes.

    In 1493, when Columbus returned to the Hispaniola, he quickly implemented policies of slavery and mass extermination of the Taino population of the Caribbean. Within three years, five million were dead. Las Casas, the primary historian of the Columbian era, writes of many accounts of the horrors that the Spanish colonists inflicted upon the indigenous population: hanging them en mass, hacking their children into pieces to be used as dog feed, and other horrid cruelties.

    …and for the so called Christian
    “When the Lord your God brings you into the land you are entering to possess and drives out before you may nations…then you must destroy them totally. Make no treaty with them and show them no mercy.” Deuteronomy 7:1-2, NIV. 1

    “…do not leave alive anything that breaths. Completely destroy them…as the Lord your God has commanded you…” Deuteronomy 20:16, NIV. 1
    These are but a few but there are many more.

    “Those who live in glass houses should not cast stones”

  12. Oh and I almost forgot, about the Iraq and Afghanistan genocidal invasion. Iraq death toll over 1.2 million people dead. Afghanistan death toll unkonwn.

    There are certain people here picking and choosing snipets of verses form the Qu’ran and hadiths, most likely to have been found on the internet therefore may have been manipulated and “lo and behold!” they cover the topic of killing. It wasn’t the muslims who dropped the atomic bombs wipping out entire villages and casing massive death and desrtuction and not forgetting horrible diseases and disfigurement and it’s not the muslims using biological and chemical warfare. Name any recent invasion/war on the west caused by the muslims. 9/11 is debateable, oil/gas?

    …and to crusader, after 200 years of fighting and with a much larger army the Christains lost the crusades.

  13. AIAN,
    Firstly it is clear that you are probably a muslim. Your logic is highly flawed and it is incorrect in a way that shares significant commonality with the vast majority of islamic twits that pollute our planet. I suggest that you think a little more deeply about what you might have read. And then try to understand it. The colonization of the Americas is a consequence of the meeting between two civilizations – one less advanced than the other. It has happened time and again in our history so pointing the finger at America is rather idiotic and shows little willingness on your part to understand. In fact, muslims conquests have been surpassed all norms of brutality – for example muslims are responsible for the destruction of several tribal cultures in west/central africa through 1000+ years of the slave trade (which they still practice today), but I digress.

    The Spanish, in reality the illnesses they carried to which the native populations had no natural immunity, decimated the native populations of the Carribean. The Spanish invasion of the Carribean and South America was carried out behalf of the Spanish court (not the Church in Rome), and the decisions made by the Spanish court – not the Church – were primarily responsible for the destruction of the Carribean indigenous populations as well as the Aztec civilizations and, to boot, the destruction of what now appears to be have been highly relevant material documenting the prehistory of the region. However, the Carib peoples were not completely destroyed in that a significant number of people in the region carry mitochondrial DNA from the original Taino. It is still an open question if any full blooded Taino still exist – of order 61% of the local populations carry the mDNA indicating significant cross fertilization between Taino and non-Taino peoples. Despite the abysmal behavior of the Spanish at that time to these people it was disease that did the significant part of the damage. Note that the conquest of these areas occurred at the same time that the Spanish inquest was in full swing – and this was not driven by the Church – it was driven by the Spanish court. What you describe was also done to many Europeans. However this is NOT the situation now, and the Church cannot behave in this way again. We have separated church and state and the church is now answerable to criminal law. This is what the muslims have NOT done, are UNLIKELY to do because they do not appear to be capable of creating the necessary mechanisms to facilitate change. So yes – we can comment and your comment that people who live in glass houses cannot throw stones is entirely and utterly invalid, out of context, and irrelevant!! We have every right to comment on and put down a violent political movement -islam- that threatens all with the same fate as the Taino. We have learned – it appears you have not! If you wish to comment then put some thought into what you wish to say – do not regurgitate what your fat, unwashed and pedophilic imman has forced into your brain. There is more than enough literature on the history of the region that is accurate, and to have fools misquoting or simply not making the effort to understand before commenting is becoming more than a little annoying. Have a nice day.

  14. AIAN,
    The majority of casualties (the vast majoritiy) in the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan have been caused by MUSLIMS killing MUSLIMS. Iraq is now close to some form of representative government, which has been achieved mostly through the cost of western lives. Afghanistan still has some way to go, and it is made more complex because Pakistan is unwilling or unable to clean up its own house. Again – understand before you comment. Actually, the coalition policies actually put their own soldiers lives at risk in order to protect civilians. Why is 9/11 debatable? It is not and sufficient material exists that correlates independently the fact that muslims planned and executed the murder of 3000+. You want examples of wars caused by muslims because of religous extremism? Chechyna, Kashmir, Darfur, Northern Nigeria, Lebanon just to name a few current ones . You want examples of regional conflicts caused by muslims? Southern Thailand, Southern Phillipines, Dagestan, NW Frontier Pakiland, Gaza, again to name a few others – and there are more. In all of these the West has not become involved. However, as muslim scum conveniently forget, the West has assisted muslim populations who claim to be under attack ie Bosnia ( a mistake by the west), or in times of natural disaster (Indonesia, Iran etc etc). Afghanistan is a direct consequence of a muslim attack on the USA. Iraq is more complex, and the full reason for western involvement is still not known. Of course, an idiot like you will bleat the magic word “oil” – but that is only a very small part of the whole equation.

  15. * There are certain people here picking and choosing snipets of verses …

    What, like this?

    [“…do not leave alive anything that breaths. Completely destroy them…as the Lord your God has commanded you…” Deuteronomy 20:16, NIV. 1]

    You could heed your own advice, and read Deuteronomy 20:16 in context.

    Out of context, the blasphemous Sura 4:157 claims that Jesus Christ was not killed or crucified. In context, it claims the same thing, and causes muslims to reject Jesus’ death on the cross for their sins, and His subsequent resurrection, damning muslims to death and hell, unless they change their minds about the crucifixion, and about Jesus Christ as saviour and Lord, being the Son of God.

  16. * Warning: Graphic pictures coming up!

    I had forgotten how gruesome allah’s handiwork is. “Strike off their heads, maim them in every limb”, whether in or out of context is still a mandate for muslim murder – allah uses muslims to do its wet work, and then has them whine about “islamophobia”.

  17. wow.! this is amazing if you think about it.. i have read all of these comments and we ass America can say that people that fight against us are terrorists Iraq,Islam,Russia,japan etc. we call them terrorists butt wee are just thee same…too thee other countries we terrorize them we are the terrorists..we leave them in fear as they leave us… we say its wrong that people bombed our twin towers but what about when we {America} bombed japan and killed over 500,000 innocent people….watt thee!!

  18. Jihadee..what about what happened before US bombed Japan? There is big gap in your history…What did japan do? Do you know?
    and Aian..we are not all Americans…Everyday, more and more non muslims become anti islam…get used to it…We don’t want or need your belief system….We do not see any value in it.

  19. jihad…. America was involved in a war which had been started by Japan – read the history – are you so stupid that you don’t even know your own history – which suggests to me that you are just another poisonous muslim moron pretending to be an American whilst insulting her on a daily basis.

  20. look at the muslim society.. fail. they are 1000yrs behind and without oil they would be a pothole in earth. -oh wait a minute.. they are!

  21. lets we wake up and show to the world the strength of ISLAM….
    jihad cannot be stopped,hence many chalenge must we walk in…

  22. * lets we wake up and show to the world the strength of ISLAM….

    Note to Israel – fuel up your excavators in preparation for mass burial of dead and smelly jihadis and their assorted bits and pieces.

    Note to hairoil – islam is about to be deleted from planet Earth.

  23. The most they can do is kill us, but what will Allah (SWT) do to them in the hereafter?!

    “How can you disbelieve in Allah? Seeing that you were dead and He gave you life. Then He will give you death, then again will bring you to life (on the Day of Resurrection) and then unto Him you will return.” [Qur’an 2:28]

    “Therein they will cry: “Our Lord! Bring us out, we shall do righteous good deeds, not (the evil deeds) that we used to do.” (Allah will reply): “Did We not give you lives long enough, so that whosoever would receive admonition, – could receive it? And the warner came to you. So taste you (the evil of your deeds). For the Zalimoon (polytheists and wrongdoers, etc.) there is no helper.” [Qur’an 35:37]

  24. get 10 terrorrists and nine bullets cut open a dead pig bleep it put bullets in the blood shoot nine let the other one go tell his frend how if they get court the will happen no virgins for them lol

Comments are closed.