Sven Lau, right hand Banana of the Islamic hate-preacher Pierre Vogel, was arrested in Moenchengladbach after arson in a multi-family house. Lau and other Muslims  committed  arson last weekend to  present themselves as  victims of an Islam-hostile attack. (more from PI)
Full article here in German from PI:
Here we go again: Muslims tell us every day what their intentions are, and loudly so. If we repeat what they say, the leftist bacteria calls us racist bigot Islamophobes. WTF is wrong with our society?
Wake up, and listen to Islam’s plan for America and for the world at large. Here is a video clip of them telling you what they are going to do, how they are going to do it, and when it’s going to happen. If you can watch this video and still think that Islam is a ‘religion of peace’, then you will deserve what you get when it happens. And remember, what you are about to see is an unedited video of Islam telling you what’s coming, just like Hitler did in 1928 when he wrote Mein Kampf.
Following are excerpts from a public address delivered by British Islamist Abu Waleed at a London demonstration. The address was posted on the Internet on May 25, 2011. From MEMRI
Abu Waleed: These infidels – they fear the most when you come out and say: Allah Akbar. By Allah, our words are like arrows on the chests of the enemies of Allah. This is why these infidels fear us so much – not because we come out and incite any violence. We are not the terrorists, my dear brothers. We know very well who is a terrorist. The Americans have massacred Muslims as well as non-Muslims, for far too many years. Go and ask the Indians inside America. Go and as the Filipinos. Go and ask the Vietnamese people. How many people have been massacred under the guise of democracy and freedom?
Spencer interview: Abedin/Weiner: A Marriage Made by Hillary Clinton and the Muslim Brotherhood?
Rep. Anthony Weiner (D-N.Y.) has now officially resigned from the House of Representatives —
In “A Marriage Made by Hillary Clinton and the Muslim Brotherhood?” in FrontPage tonight Jamie Glazov interviews Robert Spencer about the strange case of Huma Abedin, Anthony Weiner and Hillary Clinton:
Shrillary with Lesbian Lover Huma
Frontpage Interview’s guest today is Robert Spencer, the director of Jihad Watch and the author of the New York Times bestsellers The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam (and the Crusades) and The Truth About Muhammad.Frontpage: Robert Spencer, welcome to Frontpage Interview.
I would like to talk to you today about Anthony Weiner’s marriage to his Muslim Brotherhood wife, Huma Abedin.
How is it exactly that a Muslim woman who is connected to the Muslim Brotherhood is married to a Jewish man? Something is not fitting here is it?
Spencer: Jamie, Islamic law prohibits a Muslim woman from marrying a non-Muslim man. A Muslim man may marry a non-Muslim woman, but not the other way around. This is yet another manifestation of Islamic supremacism: the idea is that a wife will become a member of her husband’s household, and the children will follow the religion of the father. Thus, Muslim men marrying non-Muslim women ultimately enriches the Islamic community, while the non-Muslim community must forever be made to diminish.
Continue reading Weiner's Marriage Blanc to the Muslim Brotherhood
Scandalous: An ‘Allahu akbar’ screaming mob of  Koranimals gets Carnita Matthews to walk out of court.
Judge caves in to blackmail and intimidation
“Culturally appropriate Allahu akbar….”
Well, plenty of people will kindly explain you just need to become more tolerant, while other people will demonstrate you should also become deaf and blind:
A MUSLIM woman sentenced to six months’ jail for making a deliberately false statement that a racist policeman tried to forcibly remove her burka has been freed on appeal.
Judge Clive Jeffreys said he was not satisfied beyond reasonable doubt it was Carnita Matthews, a 47-year-old Muslim woman from Woodbine, NSW, who accused the police of racism because the person who handed in the complaint to police was wearing a burka at the time.
To reach the level of proof of identity to prove the case, it appears Mrs Matthews would have been required to identify herself by lifting her burka at the police station to prove her identity – which is what started the uproar in the first case.
More than a dozen Muslim supporters linked arms and began chanting “Allah Uh Ahkbar” as they stormed out of Downing Centre, Sydney, with Mrs Matthews concealed behind them.
Tempers soon rose and they began jostling with police after several members of the group began attacking TV cameramen.
Mrs Matthew’s lawyer Stephen Hopper defended them, saying: “They are obviously happy with the result and are expressing it in a way that is culturally appropriate to them”.
I did not know that taking in immigrants, including refugees, required us to accept “culturally appropriate” ways of expressing pleasure that involved fighting police and attacking journalists. If this deal had been explained front-up, I rather suspect Australians would have voted to slam shut the door. (Andrew Bolt)
Beating the law by virtue of a burqa
Paul Kent From
The Daily Telegraph via Aussie News & Views
Aussie News & Views: Muslim Savages seen here, in various forms of Middle Eastern garb, salivating and invoking their Paedophile Prophets and Head Hunter’s Death Chant of “allah ackbar”, rampage out of Sydney Court building onto street, following the appeal of Lying Carnita Matthews been upheld.
Muslims have rejected civilization in their own lands and have shown a manic obsession to reject it in any Judeo Christian Nation they have colonized, quickly “uncivilizing” their host nation by their insistence of carrying out their Religious obligation of implementing TERROR in all the lands of the “Infidels”….
Wear the freedom sack and instantly turn into another ‘race’:
Burqa wearing revert Carnita Matthews was charged with making a false complaint that used the Muslim victimhood card in her defense — “All cops are racist” — what race? Covered from head to toe in a burqa, with just a slit through which to see, the Muslima charged with makinga false complaint to police then claimed that she had been a victim of mistaken identity.
Wearing a full face veil is a political statement, and it should be illegal.
We have seen the weaponizing of the veil and the use of the veil to commit crimes, escape detection, kidnap and rape young girls and keep them hidden; the Elizabeth Smart case should be the catalyst for such legislation.
The judge saw through the claim of Carnita Matthews, a 46-year-old mother of seven. Magistrate Robert Rabbidge described her crime as “deliberate, malicious and ruthless. There is not a shadow of doubt in my mind, beyond a reasonable doubt, that she knew that the complaint she was making was false,” he told Campbelltown Local Court back in November.
“You look at me and see me wearing this and you couldn’t handle it. All cops are racist,” she says.The magistrate rejected her lawyer’s argument that the prosecution could not prove it was Matthews herself who made the complaint and signed the declaration.But police prosecutor sergeant Lisa McEvoy said there was no doubt.”Her signature on that affidavit coupled with the signature on her driver’s licence is exactly the same,” she told the court.
The burqa’ed civilizational jihadist appealed — and won, remaining inside her cloth coffin.
Race row woman avoids jail by remaining behind her burqa News.au.com
Muslim woman Carnita Matthews escapes jail by remaining behind her burqa (Telegraph)
Supporters fighting police and attacking journo’s outside the court….
Obviously, the French have the same problem:
France’s burka ban descended into farce when the first women to be summoned before a European court for illegally wearing the garments were refused entry, because they would not remove their face coverings.
French burka ban descends into farce
French authorities wouldn’t let the burqa-clad Muslima into court unless she removed her face covering. But that’s why she was under arrest in the first place: for refusing to remove her face covering. The French desire to preserve and defend their own culture is laudable, but they are going to have to go back to the drawing board on this one. “French burka ban descends into farce,” By Peter Allen in the Telegraph, June 17
