Scandalous: An ‘Allahu akbar’Â screaming mob of Â Koranimals gets Carnita Matthews to walk out of court.
Judge caves in to blackmail and intimidation
Well, plenty of people will kindly explain you just need to become more tolerant, while other people will demonstrate you should also become deaf and blind:
A MUSLIM woman sentenced to six months’ jail for making a deliberately false statement that a racist policeman tried to forcibly remove her burka has been freed on appeal.
Judge Clive Jeffreys said he was not satisfied beyond reasonable doubt it was Carnita Matthews, a 47-year-old Muslim woman from Woodbine, NSW, who accused the police of racism because the person who handed in the complaint to police was wearing a burka at the time.
To reach the level of proof of identity to prove the case, it appears Mrs Matthews would have been required to identify herself by lifting her burka at the police station to prove her identity – which is what started the uproar in the first case.
More than a dozen Muslim supporters linked arms and began chanting “Allah Uh Ahkbar” as they stormed out of Downing Centre, Sydney, with Mrs Matthews concealed behind them.
Tempers soon rose and they began jostling with police after several members of the group began attacking TV cameramen.
Mrs Matthew’s lawyer Stephen Hopper defended them, saying: “They are obviously happy with the result and are expressing it in a way that is culturally appropriate to them”.
I did not know that taking in immigrants, including refugees, required us to accept “culturally appropriate” ways of expressing pleasure that involved fighting police and attacking journalists. If this deal had been explained front-up, I rather suspect Australians would have voted to slam shut the door. (Andrew Bolt)
Beating the law by virtue of a burqa
Paul Kent From
The Daily Telegraph via Aussie News & Views
Aussie News & Views:Â Muslim Savages seen here, in various forms of Middle Eastern garb, salivating andÂ invoking their Paedophile Prophets and Head Hunter’s Death Chant of “allah ackbar”, rampage out of Sydney Court building onto street, following the appeal of Lying Carnita Matthews been upheld.
Muslims have rejected civilization in their own lands and have shown a manic obsession to reject it in any Judeo Christian Nation they have colonized, quickly “uncivilizing” their host nation by their insistence of carrying out their Religious obligation of implementing TERROR in all the lands of the “Infidels”….
Wear the freedom sack and instantly turn into another ‘race’:
Burqa wearing revert Carnita Matthews was charged with making a false complaint that usedÂ the MuslimÂ victimhood card in her defense — “All cops are racist” — what race? Covered from head to toe in a burqa, with just a slit through which to see, the Muslima charged with makinga false complaint to police then claimed that she had been a victim of mistakenÂ identity.
Wearing a full face veil is a political statement, and it should be illegal.
We have seen theÂ weaponizing of the veil and the use of the veil to commit crimes, escape detection, kidnap and rape young girls and keep them hidden; theÂ Elizabeth Smart case should be the catalyst for such legislation.
The judge saw through the claim of Carnita Matthews, a 46-year-old mother of seven. Magistrate Robert Rabbidge described her crime as “deliberate, malicious and ruthless.Â There is not a shadow of doubt in my mind, beyond a reasonable doubt, that she knew that the complaint she was making was false,” he told Campbelltown Local CourtÂ back in November.
“You look at me and see me wearing this and you couldn’t handle it. All cops are racist,” she says.The magistrate rejected her lawyer’s argument that the prosecution could not prove it was Matthews herself who made the complaint and signed theÂ declaration.But police prosecutor sergeant Lisa McEvoy said there was no doubt.”Her signature on that affidavit coupled with the signature on herÂ driver’s licenceÂ is exactly the same,” she told the court.
The burqa’edÂ civilizational jihadist appealed — and won, remaining inside her cloth coffin.
Obviously, the French have the same problem:
France’s burka ban descended into farce when the first women to be summoned before a European court for illegally wearing the garments were refused entry, because they would not remove their face coverings.
French authorities wouldn’t let the burqa-clad Muslima into court unless she removed her face covering. But that’s why she was under arrest in the first place: for refusing to remove her face covering. The French desire to preserve and defend their own culture is laudable, but they are going to have to go back to the drawing board on this one. “French burka ban descends into farce,” By Peter Allen in theÂ Telegraph, June 17