Shame on you, Judge Jeffreys !

Scandalous: An ‘Allahu akbar’ screaming mob of  Koranimals gets Carnita Matthews to walk out of court.

Judge caves in to blackmail and intimidation

“Culturally appropriate Allahu akbar….”

Well, plenty of people will kindly explain you just need to become more tolerant, while other people will demonstrate you should also become deaf and blind:

A MUSLIM woman sentenced to six months’ jail for making a deliberately false statement that a racist policeman tried to forcibly remove her burka has been freed on appeal.

Judge Clive Jeffreys said he was not satisfied beyond reasonable doubt it was Carnita Matthews, a 47-year-old Muslim woman from Woodbine, NSW, who accused the police of racism because the person who handed in the complaint to police was wearing a burka at the time.

To reach the level of proof of identity to prove the case, it appears Mrs Matthews would have been required to identify herself by lifting her burka at the police station to prove her identity – which is what started the uproar in the first case.

More than a dozen Muslim supporters linked arms and began chanting “Allah Uh Ahkbar” as they stormed out of Downing Centre, Sydney, with Mrs Matthews concealed behind them.

Tempers soon rose and they began jostling with police after several members of the group began attacking TV cameramen.

Mrs Matthew’s lawyer Stephen Hopper defended them, saying: “They are obviously happy with the result and are expressing it in a way that is culturally appropriate to them”.

I did not know that taking in immigrants, including refugees, required us to accept “culturally appropriate” ways of expressing pleasure that involved fighting police and attacking journalists. If this deal had been explained front-up, I rather suspect Australians would have voted to slam shut the door. (Andrew Bolt)

Beating the law by virtue of a burqa

Paul Kent From
The Daily Telegraph via Aussie News & Views

Aussie News & Views: Muslim Savages seen here, in various forms of Middle Eastern garb, salivating and  invoking their Paedophile Prophets and Head Hunter’s Death Chant of “allah ackbar”, rampage out of Sydney Court building onto street, following the appeal of Lying Carnita Matthews been upheld.

Muslims have rejected civilization in their own lands and have shown a manic obsession to reject it in any Judeo Christian Nation they have colonized, quickly “uncivilizing” their host nation by their insistence of carrying out their Religious obligation of implementing TERROR in all the lands of the “Infidels”….

Burqa’ed Muslima Accused of Lying about Police Trying to Tear her Burqa off Avoids Jail — Because Her Identity Could Not Be Proven (Atlas)

Wear the freedom sack and instantly turn into another ‘race’:

Burqa wearing revert Carnita Matthews was charged with making a false complaint that used the Muslim victimhood card in her defense — “All cops are racist” — what race? Covered from head to toe in a burqa, with just a slit through which to see, the Muslima charged with makinga false complaint to police then claimed that she had been a victim of mistaken identity.

Wearing a full face veil is a political statement, and it should be illegal.

We have seen the weaponizing of the veil and the use of the veil to commit crimes, escape detection, kidnap and rape young girls and keep them hidden; the Elizabeth Smart case should be the catalyst for such legislation.

The judge saw through the claim of Carnita Matthews, a 46-year-old mother of seven. Magistrate Robert Rabbidge described her crime as “deliberate, malicious and ruthless. There is not a shadow of doubt in my mind, beyond a reasonable doubt, that she knew that the complaint she was making was false,” he told Campbelltown Local Court back in November.

“You look at me and see me wearing this and you couldn’t handle it. All cops are racist,” she says.The magistrate rejected her lawyer’s argument that the prosecution could not prove it was Matthews herself who made the complaint and signed the declaration.But police prosecutor sergeant Lisa McEvoy said there was no doubt.”Her signature on that affidavit coupled with the signature on her driver’s licence is exactly the same,” she told the court.

The burqa’ed civilizational jihadist appealed — and won, remaining inside her cloth coffin.

Race row woman avoids jail by remaining behind her burqa

Muslim woman Carnita Matthews escapes jail by remaining behind her burqa (Telegraph)

Supporters fighting police and attacking journo’s outside the court….

Obviously, the French have the same problem:

France’s burka ban descended into farce when the first women to be summoned before a European court for illegally wearing the garments were refused entry, because they would not remove their face coverings.

French burka ban descends into farce

French authorities wouldn’t let the burqa-clad Muslima into court unless she removed her face covering. But that’s why she was under arrest in the first place: for refusing to remove her face covering. The French desire to preserve and defend their own culture is laudable, but they are going to have to go back to the drawing board on this one. “French burka ban descends into farce,” By Peter Allen in the Telegraph, June 17

The Liberating Shrouds of Tunisia

Religious coercion threatens Tunisian women

A number of Tunisian women feel forced to adopt religious practices in attire and behaviour. Experts, however, question the legality and Islamic authenticity of the phenomena.

By Jamel Arfaoui for Magharebia in Tunis – 07/01/11 (thanks to the RoP)

  • Fitzgerald: Tunisia and the Monitoring of Islam: Tunisian police are stopping women on the streets and asking them to take off their headscarves and to sign a pledge that they will not wear a scarf again. A 1981 Tunisian law prohibits Islamic attire in schools or government offices.

[Jamel Arfaoui] “The case with the veil in Tunisia is a matter of fashion and is the result of influence from certain groups; it’s the herd mentality,” writer Rach Tounsi says.

Rima, a student, breathed a sigh of relief when her mother allowed her to remove the hijab.

“I’ve been waiting for this day for six months,” she says, adding that the experience felt like “long decades”. “My mother forced me to abandon what she considered to be indecent clothes when I returned home at a late hour after attending a friend’s birthday party.”

Like many other Tunisian girls and married women, she was made to obey her family, while facing alienation at school.

“I’ve lived through difficult times at my college. I may be wrong about it, but I felt that my male and female colleagues’ looks were tearing me apart. This made me avoid going to the college for several days, and I could have failed that year if it hadn’t been for the assistance of a female colleague,” she adds.

Even though freedom of conscience is enshrined in Article 5 of the Tunisian constitution, which “protects the free exercise of beliefs with reservation that they do not disturb the public order”, a growing number of women experience coercion in religious practices.

Rabiaa, in her 30s, is one of them. She admits to wearing Islamic garments out of fear of her husband’s violence.

“He threatened to divorce me and to prevent me from seeing my kids if I insisted on my rejection of the veil and cloak,” she tells Magharebia.

Continue reading The Liberating Shrouds of Tunisia

Time to Ban the Veil: The Chilling Lesson from the Elizabeth Smart Case

Hidden in plain sight/Phyllis Chesler

He hid her in plain sight.

Her face was on posters plastered all over Utah, her kidnapping had launched one of the greatest manhunts in American history. Nevertheless, Brian Mitchell, the man who kidnapped 14 year-old Elizabeth Smart at knife-point in her bedroom actually got away with it for nine months. He kept Elizabeth as his sex slave and “second wife” for that long.

Continue reading Time to Ban the Veil: The Chilling Lesson from the Elizabeth Smart Case

Islamic UK: Freedom Sack is "British way of life"

Alveena Malik advocates British cultural surrender. “Islamic face-veil part of ‘British way of life,'” by Tim Ross in the Telegraph, October 16 (thanks to JW):

The full Islamic face-veil is a part of the “British way of life” and should be celebrated along with religious symbols such as the crucifix, according to a report published today. (Freedom Sack part of “British way of life” JW)

Islamic students at top university ‘are preaching hard-line extremism,’ terror experts warn

Wait a minute. I thought poverty was supposed to cause terrorism. So how is it that university students, who are well off enough to be there in the first place, are drawn to “Islamic extremism”? Could it be because there is so much in the texts of teachings of Islam that incites to violence and hatred? Naaaah — to think that would be “Islamophobic”!  (UK: Muslim “radicals” -JW)

Think tank finds evidence of moderate Muslims being radicalised and Jewish students intimidated

The counter-extremism think tank said they had evidence of the president of City University’s Islamic Society, (ISoc) openly preaching extremism during prayers held on the campus during the 2009/10 academic year.
They said the president – Saleh Patel, was recorded saying: ‘When they say to us ‘the Islamic state teaches to cut the hand of the thief’, yes it does!
‘And it also teaches us to stone the adulterer.

Radical Islamic extremism is being openly practised at a leading university campus, a report today claimed.
Think tank Quilliam said they had evidence of hard-line Islamist ideology being promoted through the leadership of the university’s student Islamic Society at City University in central London.
The group had intimidated and harassed staff, students and members of minority groups, (Jews)  it was claimed.
(Daily Mail has more/Continued below the fold)

UK: Massive Voter Fraud to Elect Islamic Extremist with Supremacist, Racist Ties Next Executive Mayor in Control of Billion Dollar Budget

Atlas Shrugs:

In my New York Times interview here, I repeated what I have said and thought for some time, that the first country that will be Islamic in Europe will be the U.K.

This terrible story just validates my prediction. An Islamic supremacist with fundamentalist links will most likely be elected Executive Mayor of Tower Hamlet council, with control of over a billion dollar budget.

Mind you, he was previously fired for extremist ties. But the Islamic machine went into overdrive and fraudulently gamed the system (shocka!).

Tower Hamlets moved from a conventional leader system to a mayoralty this year as a result of a campaign spearheaded by the Muslim extremist group the IFE. IFE’s Abu Talha told an undercover reporter for The Sunday Telegraph and Channel 4’s Dispatches: “The mayor is going to have a lot more control. That’s why we need to get someone, one of our brothers, in there. Which we will do.”

The law says that if 5 per cent of the electorate petition a council, it must hold a referendum on changing to a mayoral system.

Earlier this year another prominent IFE activist, Abjol Miah, organised such a petition.

A total of 99.3 per cent of the signatures were Muslim names, in a borough which is only a third Muslim

Next time they will be smarter. They simply won’t use Muslim names…..

Council officers found that almost half were “invalid”, with entire pages of names and addresses written in the same handwriting and around 5,000 not even appearing on the electoral register.

But the dhimmi court allowed it just the same. Ameroca, pay attention.

Read on. And bear in mind that according to the media and the political elites, the EDL is the problem. The campaign of destruction against the EDL (made up of Jews, Christians, Blacks, Hindus, Sikhs, et al) fighting Islamic supremacism and imperialism would be laughable if it weren’t so tragic.

Tower Hamlets extremist vote poses Ed Miliband’s first big election test (Telegraph/Atlas)

Continue reading Islamic UK: Freedom Sack is "British way of life"

So what does the Koran say?

Lets revisit Banning the Burqa”, screened on SBS, Tuesday  the 21st of September

How can banning the burqa be such an affront to Islam if it isn’t required by the religion? How long can Muslims have it both ways?

No Straight Answers on the Burqa? (Andrew Bolt)

Earlier, Tim Blair posted on BAGFEST: Wearing their finest freedom sacks, the babes of Hizb ut-Tahrir are loud, proud and under a shroud:

Sheikh Shady al-Suleiman said Muslims loved Australia but rejected interference in the practice of their religion. ‘’Keep away from our affairs,’’ he said.

When your religion is in the main street, strolling about in Mohammed’s Snuggie and viewing the world through a mail slot, it’s not just your affair, mate. More from Ardati:

‘’We dress like this because it is the command of Allah, not any man.’’

There you go:  Allah commands, the believers have no choice. But at the same time they tell us ‘its their choice’ and we cannot tell people what to wear. Confusing indeed, especially for Australians who are unfamiliar with Allah’s duplicitous ways, because Allah is the best of schemers, (Koran 3:54)

To clear things up, I did check my Koran (King Fahd Academie translation) which is the most precise. Here’s what it says:

Sura 33, Al-azab, 59:

O prophet! Tell your wives (sic) and your daughters and the women of the believers to draw their cloaks (veils)all over their bodies (i.e. screen themselves completely except the eyes or one eye to see the way) that will be better……

Islamically correct one eye burqa

So then: the only question that remains is why the lies and why the denials?

The answer should be easy: Western useful idiots are demanding that we respect ‘their right’  to wear what they want. Indeed, what could be worse than Westerners telling Muslim women what to wear?

However, where the soldiers of Allah  have the upper hand, Muslim women have to chose between the freedom sack or else:

Chechnya forcing women to wear Islamic dress

It’s bitterly ironic how often we’re told that Muslim women in the West wear Islamic dress freely and proudly. Yet Islamic spokesmen in the West never seem to get around to addressing this kind of coercion.

An update on this story. “Chechnya Coerces Women on Dress, Activists Say,” by Sophia Kishkovsky in the New York Times, September 27 (JW)

Continue reading So what does the Koran say?

Burqa Debate Downunder

Insight: Banning the Burqa or Freedom Sack for All?

The French Senate has voted to ban the burqa in public places.

Similar laws are being considered in Belgium, Spain and Italy.

President Sarkozy said in Parliament “We cannot accept that in our country some women will be imprisoned behind a fence cut off from all social life, deprived of identity. This is not a principle that the French republic has about women’s dignity.”

In Australia, a recent decision by a judge to have a witness remove her face veil has sparked controversy and recent polls show that the majority of Australians support a ban.

Part 1/4

The participants are: Tariq Ramadan, Cory Bernardi, Amina Ghafoor, Jacques Myard

Part 2/4

Part 3/4

Part 4/4

Here’s Pat Condell, as good as a cold shower:

Related links:

Are Americans more ignorant than Europeans when it comes to the freedom sack?

Because the lame stream media insists its all about ‘choice’, rather than opposing the misogynist  lunatics that  whack the crap out of their women when they refuse:

WASHINGTON /AFP— Days before French lawmakers are due to vote on a bill that would make it illegal for Muslim women to wear full veils in public, a US poll has found that a majority of Europeans back such a ban while Americans reject it.

Continue reading Are Americans more ignorant than Europeans when it comes to the freedom sack?

“Out of touch”


EUROPE backed the burkha yesterday by ruling that the controversial Muslim veils should not be banned.

The Council of Europe also branded the Swiss “bigots” for their ban on the construction of Islamic minarets. Last year Switzerland banned the building of the minarets – towers used to call Muslims to prayer – after a nationwide referendum.

Please note that Switzerland is not a member of the EU.  That the unelected polit-commissars in Brussels have the cheek to condemn a country that is not even part of their assumed jurisdiction is beyond parody……

MPs from 47 countries voted unanimously that outlawing the full-face veils would deny women “who genuinely and freely desire to do so” the right to cover their faces.
The Council of Europe’s resolution is not binding on members of the group, which includes all European countries except Belarus, as well as Turkey.
But the vote by the human rights group threatens to torpedo bans planned in France, Belgium, the Netherlands and Spain as it could open governments up to costly legal battles.
Last night the ruling was condemned as “out of touch”.
UKIP leader Lord Pearson said: “This vote just highlights the disconnection between the appointed politicians of the Council of Europe and the peoples of Europe. Express UK

While the politically correct multiculturalists keep their heads firmly up their subsidized asses, reality strikes, once again, in Afghanistan:

Female suicide bomber murders two U.S. soldiers in Afghanistan with bomb hidden beneath her burqa

As Spain moves to outlaw the face veil, and the cries of “Islamophobia” inevitably rain down, remember this story and others like it.

“Two U.S. Soldiers Killed in Afghan Suicide Bombing,” by Maria Abi-Habib and Habib Zahori in the Wall Street Journal, June 22 (thanks to Weasel Zippers & JW):

Continue reading “Out of touch”

Nile unveils bill to ban people hiding their faces

That, of course, makes him a “right-wing bigot” and an “Islamophobe” for the Muzz and their enlightened fellow travelers, the Red-Green subversives…..


THE Reverend Fred Nile has again called for a ban on the burqa, the head and body veil worn by some Muslim women, saying it oppresses women and could be used as a disguise by terrorists.

The Christian Democrats MP wants NSW to follow a growing number of European countries trying to ban women from wearing in public the burqa and the niqab, a veil with a narrow opening for the eyes.

Continue reading Nile unveils bill to ban people hiding their faces