Saudi Foreign Minister: “ISIS Is As Much Islamic As The KKK Is Christian”
Saudi Foreign Affairs Minister Answers question about ISIS, DAESH
Listen to Soddy Barbaria’s al Jubeir, grand master of taqiyya and Islam-apologies:
In response to a question generalizing Islam’s role in the Islamic State (ISIS), Saudi Foreign Minster Abdel al-Jubeir claims that every religion has extremist “perverts and psychopaths” that seek to hi-jack them, and that categorizing extremists and moderates in any religion is dangerous.
No one tried to set al-Jubair straight. No one bothered to tell al Jubair that Islam is the religion of hijackers, that we are not concerned about other extremist “perverts and psychopaths”, and that the world is in fear of Islam.
Al Jubair invokes the KKK. But the KKK doesn’t claim to be Christian and its members don’t quote from the bible. Besides, they are nothing but a marginal group. If they had a billion members, things might be different.
Yes the Qu’ran says “you have your faith and I have mine”, which is a Meccan verse from the days when Muhammad had no power. Later, in Medina, where Muhammad became a powerful warlord, it became “kill the unbelievers wherever you find them”. The previous verse is abrogated and serves only to confuse gullible kafirs. The later verse is the one that matters.
No, in Saudi Arabia no one is free to practice their faith unless they are sunni Muslims; non Muslims are not allowed to visit Mecca. That is not “a sign of great tolerance”, that is barbarian intolerance.
Then he cites the “innocent soul” verse, 5:32, which is a warning to Jews not to kill Muslims, because only Muslims are innocent. Al Jubeir conveniently ignores the the next verse Quran 5:33.
There is no compassion or mercy in this. The OT says indeed ‘an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth’, but no one in the west lives by the OT and again, nobody bothered to tell al Jubair.
But no, they let him go on, with his “I caution people…” which is a threat, and with his gibberish about “the Islamic civilisation that preserved… whatever Muslims say it preserved… blah blah…
No. Islam preserved nothing. Islam destroyed all the remnants of the Jahiliyya, and then it destroyed the evidence that remained. That is a constant throughout 1400 years of Islamic history, and the Islamic state, “Dash”, did exactly that in Palmyra. The history of the Greeks and Rome was not “passed on” by Muslims, and the “Islamic Arab civilisation” did not connect China with Europe. Islam did not “preserve Aristotle and Sokrates” and it did not “pass it on to the west. These are fantastic Arab fairytales, and we should not give Arab savages the light of day for peddling these lies.
“The Qur’an says whoever kills an innocent, it is as if he has killed all mankind.”
This is what the Qur’an really says:
Because of that, We decreed upon the Children of Israel that whoever kills a soul unless for a soul or for corruption in the land — it is as if he had slain mankind entirely. And whoever saves one — it is as if he had saved mankind entirely. And our messengers had certainly come to them with clear proofs. Then indeed many of them, after that, throughout the land, were transgressors. (5:32)
First, note that this is not a general moral principle applying to everyone, as Obama implied, but one only for the Children of Israel. Nor is it is not a general prohibition of killing: there are big exceptions for those who kill “for a soul or for corruption in the land.” And it concludes that even after this command was given, “many of them, after that … were transgressors” — so all it is really saying is that Allah gave a command to the Children of Israel and they transgressed against it. It isn’t anything more than yet another Qur’anic castigation of the Jews.
Also, it is followed in the Qur’an by 5:33, which specifies the punishment for the corruption and transgressions of the Children of Israel:
“Indeed, the penalty for those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger and strive upon earth corruption is none but that they be killed or crucified or that their hands and feet be cut off from opposite sides or that they be exiled from the land. That is for them a disgrace in this world; and for them in the Hereafter is a great punishment.”
Thus this passage is explaining what must be done with Jews who reject Muhammad, not dictating lofty moral principles. Ibn Warraq sums it up: “The supposedly noble sentiments are in fact a warning to Jews. ‘Behave, or else’ is the message. Far from abjuring violence, these verses aggressively point out that anyone opposing the Prophet will be killed, crucified, mutilated, and banished!”