A Cairns Post Editor describes the Sheik Yer’mami website as ‘vulgar’- and claims the moral high-ground: ‘Objections’- (against a mosque) he says, are ‘patently ludicrous and absurdly racist’- whereby he absurdly plays the race-card on behalf of the most intolerant ideology without being able to differentiate between ideology and race.
Once again, nutroots, moonbats & pink brigades hard at work to bring us multiculti diversity. Winds of Jihad a ‘hate site?’ Ridiculous.
This here is a hate site, Mr. Editor, from your Islamic friends, calling for the murder of all who insult the prophet Muhammad: Click here
Obviously you don’t object to that. We shall be waiting for your comment!
You won’t find sheik yer’mami calling for first degree murder. Mr Editor. And when I see such comments they are deleted.
It worked with Cronulla, right Mr. Editor? After years of harassment, revolting rape-epidemics and assault and battery by Muslim thugs the Aussies decided to do something about it. It went horribly wrong, because the liberal media betrayed them: ‘Racism’ killed the ugly reality. Shooting the messenger will make sure nobody points the finger at the unpleasant fact. If we don’t talk about it it will just go away, right? Right. Its a formula that always works. Almost.
Misguided tolerance towards those who would never tolerate a church, or a synagogue, or a temple in Saudi Arabia or other Muslim countries. Ask the Imam, Mr. Editor. Ask him what happens if you bring a bible with you to Saudi Arabia. Ask the imam what happens to Christians or Hindu’s who are caught praying in the privacy of their own homes in Riadh or Jeddah.
One of our readers was deeply offended by your comments, Mr. Editor. He has a completely different concept of ‘vulgar’: He finds chopping off heads (of unfortunate infidels) in front of video-camera’s much more vulgar. And he pointed out that blowing up 200 young Aussies in Bali restaurants and pubs in the name of Islam is simply revolting. He sent this in just to show you the difference:
Video: UK Imam Justifies Beheading of Ken Bigley
*
In this clip, a British Muslim cleric praises the videotaped beheading murder of British hostage Ken Bigley as an act of war, says Bigley embraced Islam before he was slaughtered—then jokes about it. You may need to double up on your blood pressure meds before watching this, and remove throwable objects from the vicinity of your computer display.
The face of evil: imperviously stupid and violent.
Rusty points out that another video shot at the same time shows recently-arrested terror supporter Omar Brooks, aka Abu Izzadeen, sitting next to this cleric (off-camera here), which means these Muslims are probably followers of Omar Bakri.
And Rusty’s right on target with these comments:
In the video, the speaker justifies Kenneth Bigley’s murder on the grounds that Bigley was in Iraq to help fix military hardware which would then be used to “kill Muslims”. This is not true. Kenneth Bigley, Jack Hensley, and Eugene Armstrong were in Iraq to work on civilian reconstruction efforts. They were there helping Muslims. It is al Qaeda in Iraq that continues to murder Muslims to this day.
The speaker then says Bigley was in Iraq to “steal the money of the Muslims”. Which, of course, is also patently untrue. Ken Bigley was being paid by the U.S. government to help the Iraqis rebuild their country so that Muslims in Iraq would have a functioning economy so that they could earn money for themselves. It is those that murdered Ken Bigley that steal money from Muslims by blowing up Iraq’s infrastructure.
The speaker, in what seems to be a bit of “humor”, warns that people involved in the reconstruction effort—or, as he deems it, “stealing from Muslims”—-should “mind your head”. No doubt, a reference to the dozens of civilians beheaded by al Qaeda and other jihadi groups in Iraq.
Last, even though Bigley “converted” to Islam at the point of a knife, the speaker reiterates that since Islam forbids forced conversions, then Bigley must have become a Muslim of his own free will. See if you follow that sick and twisted logic? And if that is the case, even though the speaker does not say it in this video, those listening would undoubtedly understand another reason why his murder was “justified”. To the Salafi jihadi mind, Muslims helping the U.S. and U.K. in Iraq are “traitors”.
*
Update:
Some papers, radio & TV stations have requested interviews with regards to the Winds of Jihad website and about my motivation. I am not interested to be the sacrificial lamb on the altar of political correctness. Critics should concern themselves with the subject matter and educate themselves before they rush to uninformed judgment about ‘racism’- The subject is militant Islam and the global jihad, and every mosque in the land of the infidels, deep in the Dar al Harb, behind enemy lines, advances that cause. This is about our future and the future of our kids, not about my person. If you have any questions, please direct them to this site and I will answer them right here in undisclosed Locationville…
We have a lot of morons in Australia. What else can I say?
Try to save the place and they think you are mad.
I think I would rather watch a Marx brothers movie – but that is too easy!
Hi Sheik
Just heard about your run in withh the authorities over at Jihad watch, just popped by to find out whats going on and give my support. Keep up the good fight my man.
Hey Shake
Give those SOBS shit – they are all cowards – they KNOW what Islam is – they are just a bunch of f*** cowards – when history is written I hope there is an aknowledgement of the guys like yourself who took a stand against the evil ideology ISLAM before its true character was know to the masses.
Hi Sheik, it shows your have been successful in raising awareness, perhaps they have not worked out that the racist card has lost its potency, repeat slowly so even th most indoctrinated Muslim can get it,
I S L A M I S A N I D E O L O G Y
Keep at it, I expect at some point I will find myself in the same situation.
All the best
DD
For those who think this is a racist site read this
Suppose you stumbled upon the Constitution of an organization that was terrorizing the world. Would you ignore such a document, or would you read it? Suppose you discovered that this Constitution’s most prominent themes were pain and punishment, thievery and violence, intolerance and war. If the regime’s charter ordered its devotees to kill, plunder, and terrorize, would you sound an alarm?
What if this Constitution was supported by a manifesto that contained the only authorized biography of the regime’s founder, and the first devotees of this doctrine, its co-founders, said that their leader was a sexual predator, a pirate, and a terrorist? If you found such evidence, what would you do with it? What if this leader motivated his mercenaries to murder and mayhem by allowing them to keep what they had stolen in the name of the cause – their victim’s homes, businesses, money – even their women and children?
All right, no more hypotheticals. I’m going to share some passages from this Constitution – from the covenant of the world’s largest and most violent organization. I have changed the names to disguise the source without altering the message. “Your leader has sent you from your homes to fight for the cause. Your leader wished to confirm the truth by his words: wipe those who disagree with us out to the last. We shall terrorize everyone who is unlike us! So smite them on their necks and every joint, and incapacitate them, for they are opposed to our doctrine and our leader. Whosoever opposes our doctrine and our leader should know that we are severe in retribution. And know that one-fifth of what you acquire as booty in war is for our great leader (the rest is for you). The use of such spoils is lawful and good.”
This popular and misunderstood Constitution says: “Fight them till all opposition ends and only our doctrine rules. If you meet anyone who disagrees with us in battle, inflict on them such a defeat as would be a lesson for those who come after them, that they may be warned. Slaughter those who disagree with us wherever you find them. Lie in wait for them. They are specimens of foolishness. Punish them so that our superior dogma and leader can put them to shame. If you apprehend treachery from a people with whom we have a treaty, retaliate by breaking it off. Those who do not think like us should know that they cannot bypass our doctrine. Surely they cannot get away. Fight them until they pay a heavy tax in submission to us; how perverse are they. Our leader and his doctrine will damn them. For anyone who offends our leader or opposes our doctrine will receive a painful punishment. We will burn them alive. So prepare against them whatever arms and weaponry you can muster, that you may strike terror in the enemies of our cause!”
This Constitution is genuine, and millions follow its message. Exposing it – understanding it – might actually save you from the wrath it inspires. The covenant goes on to say: “Our great leader urged all who agree with us to fight. If there are twenty among you with determination, you will vanquish two hundred; and if there are a hundred, then you will vanquish a thousand of our enemy, for they are a people devoid of understanding. Our great leader drove your enemy back in fury. He motivated our side in battle. He made their citizens flee from their homes and he terrorized them so that you killed some and made many captive. Our great leader made you inherit their lands, homes, and wealth, and gave you a country you had not traversed before.”
This sounds like a terrorist manifesto – a covenant for war and genocide. Does anything this immoral, this out-of-touch with human decency, actually exist? If it did, and if it were this blatant, you’d expect to see its followers amassing their weaponry. You’d expect them to rise up and terrorize the world. Not only would they feel it was their duty to kill, you’d expect their fallen assassins to be immortalized – hailed as martyrs and paraded down crowded streets, banners waving, tears flowing, guns blazing, with angry diatribes spewing from hate-filled faces. You’d expect them to wage war under the guise of doctrinal supremacy, wouldn’t you? And if there were such people, our journalists and politicians would have ferreted them out, exposed them, and protected us. Right?
Wrong! With the exception of changing the names of the perpetrators and their victims, what you read is from the actual Constitution of an enormous, rapidly growing, extremely well funded, and horrendously violent worldwide cult. And as bad as that sounds, it gets worse in context. The manifesto proudly proclaims that unarmed civilians were annihilated by armed gangs. Men were decapitated on the orders of the dogma’s founder. Thousands of children were sold into slavery. Women were raped – the leader himself participating. Townships were plundered, businesses were looted, and productive assets were destroyed. The villains slept in their victims’ beds, abusing their wives and daughters. And each bloody affair was meticulously recorded by the founder’s companions and later chronicled by the regime’s most-esteemed clerics.
It’s time to turn the page. Let’s look at what the founder’s companions had to say about their leader in his manifesto. Once again, I will change the names but nothing else. “Kill them, for he who kills them will get a great reward. Our great leader said, ‘Our doctrine assigns for a person who participates in battles in our cause to be rewarded with booty if he survives, or he will be admitted into the Hall of Heroes if he is killed in the battle as a martyr. Had I not found it difficult for my followers to do without me I would have remained in army units fighting great battles and would have loved to have been martyred for the cause.'”
The regime’s founder is quoted in the doctrine’s anti-Semitic manifesto saying, “Issue orders to kill every Jew in the country.” He was asked, “What is the best deed?” by one of his devotees. The dictator replied, “To believe in me and our doctrine.” “What is the next best deed?” the devotee queried. “To fight on behalf of our cause,” he answered. At the end of one such conflict, one of the regime’s lieutenants told his commander, “We have conquered another nation. The captives and the booty have all been collected. Now, my leader, may I take a slave girl from among the prisoners?” “Take any one you like,” the warlord replied, raping one himself. Ever mindful of his duty, this regime’s leader proclaimed, “Embrace our doctrine first and then fight.” Followed by, “I have been made victorious with terror!”
You have stumbled upon the Constitution of the world’s largest nation – and it’s not China or Russia. You’ve just heard the words of its founding father, and he’s not Lenin, Mao, or Hitler. And today, this doctrine’s adherents are doing what their founder and Constitution ordered: fighting, ravaging civilians, stealing the world’s possessions, and using them to terrorize.
Since it’s happening according to plan, shouldn’t we muster the courage to expose it – to speak out against it? Or should we remain silent for fear of offending them? The answer is obvious. Or is it? What if the names I substituted were Allah, Muhammad, and Islam? What if it’s a “religion?”
This “Constitution” is the Qur’an. The “manifesto” is the Islamic Hadith. The citizens of this nation are Muslims. They’re doing what they were ordered to do. They left their homes to fight infidels; they stole our planes, ravaged our economy, and slaughtered innocents in the name of Allah. They even confessed to the crime. Yet not a single national spokesperson or politician has had the courage to hold Islam accountable.
http://www.prophetofdoom.net/Prophet_of_Doom_Prologue.Islam
Shiek
my posts are not getting through
Suppose you discovered that this Constitution’s most prominent themes were pain and punishment, thievery and violence, intolerance and war. If the regime’s charter ordered its devotees to kill, plunder, and terrorize, would you sound an alarm?
What if this Constitution was supported by a manifesto that contained the only authorized biography of the regime’s founder, and the first devotees of this doctrine, its co-founders, said that their leader was a sexual predator, a pirate, and a terrorist? If you found such evidence, what would you do with it? What if this leader motivated his mercenaries to murder and mayhem by allowing them to keep what they had stolen in the name of the cause – their victim’s homes, businesses, money – even their women and children?
All right, no more hypotheticals. I’m going to share some passages from this Constitution – from the covenant of the world’s largest and most violent organization. I have changed the names to disguise the source without altering the message. “Your leader has sent you from your homes to fight for the cause. Your leader wished to confirm the truth by his words: wipe those who disagree with us out to the last. We shall terrorize everyone who is unlike us! So smite them on their necks and every joint, and incapacitate them, for they are opposed to our doctrine and our leader. Whosoever opposes our doctrine and our leader should know that we are severe in retribution. And know that one-fifth of what you acquire as booty in war is for our great leader (the rest is for you). The use of such spoils is lawful and good.”
This popular and misunderstood Constitution says: “Fight them till all opposition ends and only our doctrine rules. If you meet anyone who disagrees with us in battle, inflict on them such a defeat as would be a lesson for those who come after them, that they may be warned. Slaughter those who disagree with us wherever you find them. Lie in wait for them. They are specimens of foolishness. Punish them so that our superior dogma and leader can put them to shame. If you apprehend treachery from a people with whom we have a treaty, retaliate by breaking it off. Those who do not think like us should know that they cannot bypass our doctrine. Surely they cannot get away. Fight them until they pay a heavy tax in submission to us; how perverse are they. Our leader and his doctrine will damn them. For anyone who offends our leader or opposes our doctrine will receive a painful punishment. We will burn them alive. So prepare against them whatever arms and weaponry you can muster, that you may strike terror in the enemies of our cause!”
This Constitution is genuine, and millions follow its message. Exposing it – understanding it – might actually save you from the wrath it inspires. The covenant goes on to say: “Our great leader urged all who agree with us to fight. If there are twenty among you with determination, you will vanquish two hundred; and if there are a hundred, then you will vanquish a thousand of our enemy, for they are a people devoid of understanding. Our great leader drove your enemy back in fury. He motivated our side in battle. He made their citizens flee from their homes and he terrorized them so that you killed some and made many captive. Our great leader made you inherit their lands, homes, and wealth, and gave you a country you had not traversed before.”
This sounds like a terrorist manifesto – a covenant for war and genocide. Does anything this immoral, this out-of-touch with human decency, actually exist? If it did, and if it were this blatant, you’d expect to see its followers amassing their weaponry. You’d expect them to rise up and terrorize the world. Not only would they feel it was their duty to kill, you’d expect their fallen assassins to be immortalized – hailed as martyrs and paraded down crowded streets, banners waving, tears flowing, guns blazing, with angry diatribes spewing from hate-filled faces. You’d expect them to wage war under the guise of doctrinal supremacy, wouldn’t you? And if there were such people, our journalists and politicians would have ferreted them out, exposed them, and protected us. Right?
Wrong! With the exception of changing the names of the perpetrators and their victims, what you read is from the actual Constitution of an enormous, rapidly growing, extremely well funded, and horrendously violent worldwide cult. And as bad as that sounds, it gets worse in context. The manifesto proudly proclaims that unarmed civilians were annihilated by armed gangs. Men were decapitated on the orders of the dogma’s founder. Thousands of children were sold into slavery. Women were raped – the leader himself participating. Townships were plundered, businesses were looted, and productive assets were destroyed. The villains slept in their victims’ beds, abusing their wives and daughters. And each bloody affair was meticulously recorded by the founder’s companions and later chronicled by the regime’s most-esteemed clerics.
It’s time to turn the page. Let’s look at what the founder’s companions had to say about their leader in his manifesto. Once again, I will change the names but nothing else. “Kill them, for he who kills them will get a great reward. Our great leader said, ‘Our doctrine assigns for a person who participates in battles in our cause to be rewarded with booty if he survives, or he will be admitted into the Hall of Heroes if he is killed in the battle as a martyr. Had I not found it difficult for my followers to do without me I would have remained in army units fighting great battles and would have loved to have been martyred for the cause.'”
The regime’s founder is quoted in the doctrine’s anti-Semitic manifesto saying, “Issue orders to kill every Jew in the country.” He was asked, “What is the best deed?” by one of his devotees. The dictator replied, “To believe in me and our doctrine.” “What is the next best deed?” the devotee queried. “To fight on behalf of our cause,” he answered. At the end of one such conflict, one of the regime’s lieutenants told his commander, “We have conquered another nation. The captives and the booty have all been collected. Now, my leader, may I take a slave girl from among the prisoners?” “Take any one you like,” the warlord replied, raping one himself. Ever mindful of his duty, this regime’s leader proclaimed, “Embrace our doctrine first and then fight.” Followed by, “I have been made victorious with terror!”
You have stumbled upon the Constitution of the world’s largest nation – and it’s not China or Russia. You’ve just heard the words of its founding father, and he’s not Lenin, Mao, or Hitler. And today, this doctrine’s adherents are doing what their founder and Constitution ordered: fighting, ravaging civilians, stealing the world’s possessions, and using them to terrorize.
Since it’s happening according to plan, shouldn’t we muster the courage to expose it – to speak out against it? Or should we remain silent for fear of offending them? The answer is obvious. Or is it? What if the names I substituted were Allah, Muhammad, and Islam? What if it’s a “religion?”
This “Constitution” is the Qur’an. The “manifesto” is the Islamic Hadith. The citizens of this nation are Muslims. They’re doing what they were ordered to do. They left their homes to fight infidels; they stole our planes, ravaged our economy, and slaughtered innocents in the name of Allah. They even confessed to the crime. Yet not a single national spokesperson or politician has had the courage to hold Islam accountable.
This is vulgar
http://illustratedpig.blogspot.com/2007/03/citadel-of-terror.html
To a liar the truth is always vulgar!
It seems that the Editor is hoping for a position of an ueber-dhimmi in a Islamic Republic of Australia, so he is busy collecting recommendations he wants to submit to the future mullah rulers of Cairns. The vomit he has just come up will most certainly help if Australia goes moslem one day. It may also earn him a place on the gallows if it doesn’t. It is a risk every Quisling must take.
Infidels confine themselves to ranting on sites like these,causing no deaths.
What do our Infidelophobic pals do to let off THEIR steam? Kill and kill some more. I’m glad to be a vulgarian instead of a murderer. Keep on sticking it to these losers!
Wake up Australia.
Look what’s happening in the UK and Europe. Stop it while you can.
Keep the West Christian
Lest someone misunderstands my previous comment:
“Keeping the West Christian” means continuous Western adherence to the Golden Rule whereby a Christian, Jew, Indian, Buddhist, Zoroastrian, Bahai… – in short everyone who respects the Golden Rule is welcome to worship in his faith. Which, unfortunately for the mohammedans, who despise the golden rule, translates to “keep out, you enemies of civilization! Crawl back to the sewer of history where your monster of the prophet is confined for ever! Stay there until you loud and clearly renounce his monstrous teaching. You will then be most welcome to join the rest of the human race.
I would recommend everyone go to http://www.faithfreedom.org and http://www.prophetofdoom.net and gain some genuine and open knowledge on the subject of Islam. faithfreedom openly declares “if anyone can show one inaccuracy on their site, they will close the whole site”. Hopefully these sites will give people a more balanced understanding.
I don’t believe they (Muslims) should have to to change there culture.
I do however believe that if they want to live in our wonderful free country
they should at least allow us our way of life.
We can not go to there lands and freely practice and teach our beliefs.
If they don’t like us or our way of life : I say go home
I don’t want moslem cavemen to “change their culture”. But I do insist they do it in their lands.
Iraq is a perfect place a moslem may practice his faith: if he is a sunni he can express himself culturally by slaughtering the shia and if he is shia he too will demonsrate his cultural sophistication by butchering the sunni.
Well, a cult started by a thief, murderer, rapist and child molester is bound to produce such a festival of internal cultural creativity when infidel is unavailable!
Christian West
I totally concur!
And still our sleepy democratic governments can’t even get the simple message of the dirty cult and what it stands for even form the horse’s mouth! a lot of insane talk goes on in them mosques because they are insane people that follow an insane religion or blood thirsty death cult I call it.
Keep up the good work Sheik!
The mass media is full of liars, traitors and ignorant careerists, plain and simple.
For there to be such a big song and dance about your blog is a good thing, the more the stooges on the media and government bang on about sites such as your one, the more everfy day, peace loving australoians find out about the rabid, 6th century death cult that is ISLAM!
Keep
Keep up the good work Sheik!
The mass media is full of liars, traitors and ignorant careerists, plain and simple.
For there to be such a big song and dance about your blog is a good thing, the more the stooges on the media and government bang on about sites such as your one, the more everfy day, peace loving australoians find out about the rabid, 6th century death cult that is ISLAM!
Keep it up!
Ben
PS
Mr editor of the Post – you are an ignorant buffoon!
IN RESPONSE TO TODAYS LATEST CAIRNS POST ARTICLE EXPOSING CAIRNS BUSINESS MAN… What a fucking looser moonbat Cairns Post editor Gavin King is… Tall poppy syndrome strikes again from one who cant even spell the word “expensive”. Do you feel like a hero now you have exposed a cairns business man? What if he should now become subject to a HATE ATTACK? You should be ashamed of your irresponsible reporting. Why not ask some real questions from both sides of this instead of seeking to just expose someone in your small town, small minded muslim post publication.
Anon writes above
“I would recommend everyone go to http://www.faithfreedom.org ….”
Yes, Anon, one article at least from that website is particularly insightful.
http://www.news.faithfreedom.org/index.php?name=News&file=article&sid=1146
C’mon guys let’s face the long war for what it is. Despite my moniker I am neither a kangaroo nor grey-haired but sometimes I despair. Are there any blokes with balls left in Australia?
We girls can stand up to a lot of mediaeval hate, discrimination and ignorance but in the end we cannot do it alone. Radical Islam is orchestrated violence and offers me only a backwards system of social order and a sort of ‘return to the past’ that I will not abide either physically or intellectually.
The kind of alien, rule-bound, obsessive and bigoted system that these radicals propose is a sick, sad, separated one. But any guys staying silent out there is helping these scumbags spread their offensive desires and it is hurting us.
Keep up the work Sheik yer’mami, please keep up the good work.
Oh, You silly bugger!
And what a menace, too!
Now, thanks to your need for 15 minutes of fame, all your ‘posters’ and ‘readers’ have the Australian Federal Police checking out their IDENTITIES…
I most definitely find that YOU HAVE BROUGHT DISCREDIT TO ME!!!
Away with you, Frankfurter! Away!