Torture v/s Torture

Media Totally Ignore Al Qaeda Torture Manual

Real torture vs the perceived ‘torture’ of US prisoners in Abu Ghraib and Gitmo:


Eye Removal:


Here’s more evidence that US media are failing to convey information to the public that doesn’t fit their script; the sickening Al Qaeda torture manual we noted yesterday was totally ignored by every mainstream media outlet except Fox News.

MAY 24—In a recent raid on an al-Qaeda safe house in Iraq, U.S. military officials recovered an assortment of crude drawings depicting torture methods like “blowtorch to the skin” and “eye removal.” Along with the images, which you’ll find on the following pages, soldiers seized various torture implements, like meat cleavers, whips, and wire cutters. Photos of those items can be seen here. The images, which were just declassified by the Department of Defense, also include a picture of a ramshackle Baghdad safe house described as an “al-Qaeda torture chamber.” It was there, during an April 24 raid, that soldiers found a man suspended from the ceiling by a chain. According to the military, he had been abducted from his job and was being beaten daily by his captors. In a raid earlier this week, Coalition Forces freed five Iraqis who were found in a padlocked room in Karmah. The group, which included a boy, were reportedly beaten with chains, cables, and hoses. Photos showing injuries sustained by those captives can be found here.

The Smoking Gun has more

Don Surber and Wretchard at The Belmont Club note the silence of the human rights crowd and the MSM in regard to the al Qaeda torture manual published at The Smoking Gun. Writes Wretchard:

The problem with the word “torture” is that it has been so artfully corrupted by some commentators that we now find ourselves at a loss to describe the kinds of activities that the al-Qaeda interrogation manual graphically recommends. Now that the term “torture” has been put in one-to-one correspondence with such admittedly unpleasant activities as punching, sleep deprivation, a handkerchief pulled over one’s face and loaded with water, searches by women upon sensitive Islamic men or the disrespectful handling of Korans — what on earth do we call gouging people’s eyes out?

Answer: we call it nothing. My fearless prediction is that not a single human rights organization will seriously take the matter up. There will be no demonstrations against these barbaric practices, often inflicted upon Muslims by other Muslims, in any of the capitals of the world. Not a single committee in the United Nations will be convened nor will any functionary in the European Union lose so much as a night’s sleep over it. The word for these activities — whatever we choose to call it — will not be spoken.

Indeed, the news that Pfc. Joseph Anzack Jr.’s body showed signs of possible torture has been met by the human rights brigade with…


The continued search for our two other missing soldiers has been met by the human rights brigade with…


* You could fill 10 books with the treason and distortion of reality by the fearful wankers of the MSM and you would hardly scratch the surface. 

2 thoughts on “Torture v/s Torture”

  1. Abu Graihb was blown out of all proportion. Humiliation – yes. Torture – no.

    Water-boarding doesn’t even spill a drop of blood. The “creativity” of these brutes constantly amazes!

Comments are closed.