Eurabia’s Socialists Are Importing Their Voters From The Muhammedan Proletariat

By Leo McKinstry

England is in the middle of a profoundly disturbing social experiment. For the first time in a mature democracy, a Government is waging a campaign of aggressive discrimination against its indigenous population.   
In the name of cultural diversity, Labour attacks anything that smacks of Englishness. The mainstream public are treated with contempt, their rights ignored, their history trashed. In their own land, the English are being turned into second-class citizens.

This trend was highlighted this week by the case of Abigail Howarth, a bright teenager who applied for a training position with the Environment Agency in East Anglia but was turned down because she was too white and English. The post, which carries a £13,000 grant, was open only to ethnic minorities, including the Scots, Welsh and Irish.

Such social engineering was justified by the Agency on the grounds that minorities were under-represented in its workforce, the parrot cry used by bureaucrats throughout the public sector to justify bias against the English. 


George Orwell sends his regards


Though Abigail’s case rightly caused outrage, it was not unique. This kind of reverse discrimination is now rife across the state machine, underwritten by the very English tax payers who are the targets of institutional prejudice.

Although it is technically illegal to restrict jobs to certain ethnic groups, the racially fixated commissars have found a way round that problem by developing training schemes open only to minorities. Under the 1976 Race Relations Act it is permissible to use racial considerations in recruitment to trainee positions such as the one to which Abigail applied. 

Such practices are dressed up as “positive action” to widen diversity and, in the words of one Labour council, “to overcome past discrimination”. So HM Revenue and Customs offers work experience jobs, worth up to £15,900 a year pro-rata, to ethnic minority graduates, while the Museums Association has two-year ethnic minority apprenticeships.

Similarly, Birmingham City Council gives £16,000 a year to “black and minority ethnic individuals” in its “Positive Action Traineeship Scheme”, and a £10,000 allowance to clerical trainees from “the Bangladeshi and Pakistani communities”.

* ‘Clerical Trainees translated: Jiziyah for hatepreachers

Discriminatory training schemes can also be found in ITV, the civil service and the NHS, which boasts “a management development programme specifically designed and tail ored to the needs of black and minority ethnic midwives”.

It was revealed last year that Avon and Somerset Constab-ulary rejected 186 applications from white men on the grounds that they were already “over-represented” in the force. In the same way, London Mayor Ken Livingstone last month refused to endorse a series of nominations for the London Fire Authority because they were dominated by whites.

* Livingstone? The usual suspects …

Read it all…

UK, the Brain-Police, Blackmail & Intimidation

* British Police investigated the producers of ‘Undercover Mosque’ in order to prevent further critical reports about their Muhammedan Masters:

On Wednesday, without any warning to Channel 4, the CPS and the West Midlands police issued their fatwa. Not only had they investigated, and decided, as they were entitled to do, that there were no charges to bring against people featured in the programme: they also announced that they had investigated the programme itself for stirring up racial hatred.

Again, they had decided not to press charges. But, said West Midlands police smugly, they had pursued the making of the programme “with as much rigour as the extremism portrayed within the documentary itself”. They had concluded that comments had been “broadcast out of context” and so they and the CPS had complained to Ofcom.

They did not acknowledge, by the way, that at several points in the programme, the organisations and individuals concerned are given a right of reply, or that several moderate Muslim experts explain on air why they think the remarks shown are extreme. Do the West Midlands police side with Islamists against moderates?

These new, self-appointed guardians of televisual editing techniques have not detailed their accusations, so C4 cannot respond. None of us can yet judge fully. But the preachers shown in the programme have not claimed that they did not say the words attributed to them. That would be difficult, since you can see and hear them speaking them. They complain about the “context”.

Read it all


The commies failed to take Europe by force. Now they are trying it again by importing their voters from the Muhammedan migrant proletariat. It is incredible that indigenous Europeans are too dumb to understand that. But such is the result of decades of indoctrination, a treasonous MSM and the far left schoolteachers and uni-professors who have poisoned the minds of generations.

The next revolution will make Robbespierre look like a harmless clown.


 Ex-Al Bebeeceera Group-Thinker Spills The Beans:

W)e were antiindustry, anti-capital-ism, antiadvertising, antiselling, antiprofit, antipatriotism, antimonarchy, antiempire, antipolice, antiarmed forces, antibomb, antiauthority. Almost anything that made the world a freer, safer and more prosperous place – you name it, we were anti it… 

Confessions of a BBC Liberal….


  1. Sometimes I think the wrong side won WW2. Would Britain be that much worse off today had Germany won the war given what its government keeps on doing regarding Islamania?

  2. Who needs Keysar Trad when the West Midlands police are acting for the “taken out of context ones”?

  3. The cartel nature of political parties in the West

    I have said previously – multiculturalism and the nation state are incompatible in the most fundamental way possible. To achieve its goal of hegemony, the EU first has to destroy a nation’s political and cultural identity, and multiculturalism becomes a very important tool in this objective. It is for this reason that Islam and Muslims are so vital to the EU project, and are well protected at all levels by the notionally ‘national’ governments and EU laws. Islam and Muslims are used as the solvents to dissolve the glue of common identity, that holds a nation state together. There is no other possibility. It is unlikely that the EU elite do not know the imperialist nature of Islam. They do, but are convinced that they can, this time round, tame the Islamic beast. Socialism of the Nasser type failed in the Middle East, but EU socialism is different a different beast.

    We protest about the Islamisation of Europe, but the real power behind it is the EU, with its own objective of hegemony and empire.

    As anyone can notice, all major political parties in the West have a similar political and social agenda. This leaves the electorate little or no choice in changing the direction or political climate of the nation. In the market place, laws emanating from the government restrain a cartel. In the political world, legislation to ‘break up’ the political cartel of the government and the ‘opposition’, is unlikely to say the least. The only recourse the electorate has to break the cartel, and restore the democratic process, is to buy a product from a non-cartel political party. The cartel will of course respond in several ways

    1. Use the MSM (BBC etc) to besmirch the non-cartel party, while leaving no major outlet for the non-cartel party to respond.

    2. If this fails, and the non-cartel party wins, but does not achieve a majority in parliament, the cartel will form a coalition government.

    3. If polls indicate that the non-cartel party is likely to achieve an outright majority, then the cartel will ban the non-cartel party outright from the election. This it will do amid loud proclamations of high moral principles, while continuing with #1.

    Sounds far fetched. #1 is happening here in the UK. Items #2 and #3 are likely in Belgium and the Netherlands.

    What do people do when the government does not reflect the will of the people, and worse, does not allow the democratic process to change the rulers, or allow the democratic process to operate?

Comments are closed.