On Friday’s the peacenix come out in force to visit the mosques, where they listen to the kuthba, the usual hate sermon and pray for victory against the kuffar and the Jooozzz. This time the peacenix actually have a real infidel in captivity, and they are screaming for her blood: in actual fact that means that thousands of Muslims in Sudan are screaming for the death of Gillian Gibbons and her heinous teddy bear of blasphemy:
Sudanese Muslims burn a photo of the Muhammad teddy bear teacher
Thousands in Sudan Call for British Teddy Bear Teacher’s Execution.
KHARTOUM, Sudan —
Thousands of Sudanese, many armed with clubs and knives, rallied Friday in a central square and demanded the execution of a British teacher convicted of insulting Islam for allowing her students to name a teddy bear “Muhammad.”
In response to the demonstration, teacher Gillian Gibbons was moved from the women’s prison near Khartoum to a secret location for her safety, her lawyer said.
The protesters streamed out of mosques after Friday sermons, as pickup trucks with loudspeakers blared messages against Gibbons, who was sentenced Thursday to 15 days in prison and deportation. She avoided the more serious punishment of 40 lashes.
They massed in central Martyrs Square outside the presidential palace, where hundreds of riot police were deployed. They did not try to stop the rally, which lasted about an hour.
“Shame, shame on the U.K.,” protesters chanted.
The protesters called for Gibbons’ execution, saying, “No tolerance: Execution,” and “Kill her, kill her by firing squad.”
A Muslim cleric at Khartoum’s main Martyrs Mosque denounced Gibbons during one sermon, saying she intentionally insulted Islam. He did not call for protests, however.
“Imprisoning this lady does not satisfy the thirst of Muslims in Sudan. But we welcome imprisonment and expulsion,” the cleric, Abdul-Jalil Nazeer al-Karouri, a well-known hard-liner, told worshippers.
“This an arrogant woman who came to our country, cashing her salary in dollars, teaching our children hatred of our Prophet Muhammad,” he said.
* Churchill had it down to a T:
“How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy…
The effects are apparent in many countries, improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live. A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement, the next of its dignity and sanctity. The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property, either as a child, a wife, or a concubine, must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men.
Individual Moslems may show splendid qualities, but the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step, and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science, the science against which it (Islam) has vainly struggled, the civilization of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilization of ancient Rome.”
* Sir Winston Churchill; “The River War”
*
*More Lunacy from the Land of the Midnight Sun
Sharia alert:Â
Norway: ‘honor’ murderers should get reduced sentence
In the public debate the most strict punishments are called for so-called honor murder. Tor Erling Staff (lawyer at the supreme court) is, on the contrary, quite clear that honor must be an extenuating circumstance when giving out sentences.
Staff thinks that Norwegian society has betrayed men from other cultures who had come to Norway.
In a book published this week, Staff says that those who commit honor murder in Norway should get a reduction in sentence. If two people are sentenced for murder that according to the law should be punished in the same manner, Tor Erling Staff thinks that the person who can show that he killed his wife on ground of honor, should get a lighter sentence.
Staff says that if a murderer should get 17 years in prison, a man who murdered his wife on the grounds of his family’s honor should get two years reduction.
* Where do they breed these degenerates?
*
No infidel should go to the ummah for any reason anymore. These people are crazy and want nothing but Islamania anyway. Let Illah continue to keep his minions in filth, ignorance, poverty and stupidity-who are infidels to thwart the will of Illah? He knows what’s best for his people-that’s why they remain unchanged for all these centuries. Leave them be.
That quote from Churchill is a keeper. Thanks.
As for reducing sentences for those who do ‘honor killings’ is just cowtowing to islam – once again. A killing is a killing and accepting that what a woman, or anyone, does to ‘deface’ a moron – is beyond the pale. I cannot even believe they would think of appeasing such a murderer(s).
Sheik, you might be interested to know-
“Jan of Daryl’s Lamb” posted this comment (with 2 links) on Bolta’s blog (Forum Nov 30):
“How dare that teacher in Sudan name a teddy bear after a child-molestor? An insult to children everywhere! ”
..and was immediately accused of being (banned blogger) Sushi of Pork Alley, by Sammer, Bolta himself & others. Her comment under ‘Culture of Hate’ (Dec 1) was totally snipped, with the explanation “You were banned under your old name, and are banned under this.”
Stinking muslims. I wish that they would all eat shit and die.
From now on, my willie is named ‘Muhammad’………
eyespit
I could make a remark with lots of innuendo,,but I won’t!
Can you blame Kevin Andrews for not wanting those people in Australia?
Please eyespit, have some respect for your willie.
Mr. Tor Erling Staff has offended MY sense of honor. Am I now free to kill him?
In a nutshell, he has betrayed civilization with his questionable understanding of the application of law in society. Cultural Relativism (the belief that all cultures have equal value; that a given society’s practices are morally equivalent to any other society’s practices when viewed from a supra-cultural, morally-neutral stance) is NOT appropriate for the practice of law. Suppose these immigrants came from a “we sacrifice 7-year-old virgins to the Great Sea Monster” culture? Is Mr. Tor Erling Staff going to tell us that since “it’s part of their native culture” this practice should be permitted to continue when the immigrants reach Norway? This loss of moral moorings on the part of this fool (and the culture that created him!) is simply, totally, absolutely, APPALLING.
In a civilized society, each human being is considered to have value. The murder of any person is abhorrent and must be punished. Here we have an idiot lawyer deciding that “because an immigrant’s backward culture considers a woman only half-human, therefore we must accommodate his belief and charge him with only half-a-crime when he murders his wife/daughter/sister. This shows how tolerant and inclusive we are.” No, Mr. Tor Erling Staff, it shows how willing you are to betray your civilization.
The laws we have established over the millennia as the concept of civilization has advanced MUST NOT be diminished. Laws exist to enforce appropriate actions in our societies; to maintain public order and stability; to set up the mutual expectations between people, or people and institutions, on which commerce and personal interactions are based. Law makes civilization possible.
Mr. Tor Erling Staff has demonstrated that he is totally unfit for his office, totally unfit to defend the interests of civilization against the eternal and continuing attacks of anarchy and self-interest upon order and the public good.