Month: March 2009

Failed asylum seeker jailed for 18 months for benefits con

Mirror UK

* Newsflash: Saddam’s Tariq Aziz Applies for British Asylum…

                 

* Asylum from what? Was he persecuted by his fellow Muslims? Unlikely.  Is seeking fertility treatment for your wife an entitlement to seek asylum in an infidel country? Something doesn’t add up here:

A failed asylum seeker was jailed for 18 months yesterday after admitting dishonestly receiving more than £100,000 in state handouts.

BMW-driving Huseyin Akbulut, 48, came to the UK from Turkey in 1993 to get fertility treatment for his wife.

He unsuccessfully claimed asylum in 2001 and, when appeal rights were exhausted, began fiddling benefits.

The UK Border Agency, who plan to recoup the cash from his assets, said: “He abused the country’s hospitality for his own greed.”

Doncaster crown court heard the local dad-of-one made false claims for six years despite holding key positions in four businesses.

Akbulut was given £66,957 in accommodation payments and £33,225 in cash.

Jacqui Eats That Yellow Snow…

Should Ibrahim Moussawi be allowed into Britain?

 

 

Ibrahim Moussawi

From the Monkey Tennis Centre

Will Jacqui Smith ban this Islamic hate-monger? Or is she a cowardly hypocrite?

After Wilders, will Smith ban Hezbollah extremist?

Earlier this month, Jacqui Smith, the middle-management chav who passes for Britain’s Home Secretary, banned Geert Wilders from the UK, ostensibly because he engaged in ‘hate speech’, but in reality because she feared violence from British Muslims angry at Wilders’ portrayal of Islam as a religion that preaches violence.

Now she’s under pressure to ban Ibrahim Moussawi, an Islamic extremist who’s a key figure in the propaganda machinery of the terrorist groupl Hezbollah, and James Slack at the Daily Mail isn’t optimistic that she’ll do so.

Coming so soon after the Wilders row Smith may feel she has no option but to ban Moussawi, who’s been allowed into the UK twice before. But if the usual suspects in the ‘moderate’ muslim community start making a noise it won’t be a surprise to see her back down – after all, it’s not as if British Jews are going to threaten to lay siege to Parliament, as Lord Ahmed (who will have plenty of time on his hands for campaigning from his prison cell) promised British Muslims would if Wilders was allowed in.

By James Slack, Home Affairs Editor/Mail Online

So here comes the acid test: is Jacqui Smith, as she proclaims, an enemy of extremism in all its forms, or a cowardly hypocrite?

Continue reading Jacqui Eats That Yellow Snow…

Watch out where the money goes (and don't you blow it up your nose…)

* Met a “moderate Muslim” lately?

UK funds meant to counter Muslim “radicalization” being used to…radicalize Muslims

One of the UK’s most influential Islamic leaders, who has helped counter extremism in the country’s mosques, is accused of advocating attacks on the Royal Navy if it tries to stop arms for Hamas being smuggled into Gaza.

High Treason

Oops. “£90m anti-terrorism project is fanning the flames of extremism,” by Duncan Gardham in the Telegraph, March 9 (thanks to JW):

A new generation of Muslims is being radicalised using the very Government funds that are supposed to be fighting the problem, a new report by the Policy Exchange think-tank says.An obsession with talking to extremists means that moderates are being ignored, leaving the stage clear for radicalisation, according to the report.

Did they say which moderates were being ignored? This is an important question, because obviously the UK government didn’t set out to fund “extremists.” The people they were giving money to presented themselves as “moderates,” and were taken as such. But when “moderate” leaders call for jihad warfare against the British Navy, the situation can become a bit confused.

Continue reading Watch out where the money goes (and don't you blow it up your nose…)

Hitchens and the Push to Criminalize Criticism of Islam

Christopher Hitchens

In case you missed it: 

“U.N. to make ban on criticizing Islam mandatory? Expected proposal would criminalize such comments in U.S.,” from WorldNetDaily,

The Dobbs segment to which this story refers is above. It is a bit careless — the Islamic organization in question is the “Organization of the Islamic Conference,” not the “Organization of Islamic Countries” — but the information about the imminent threat to free speech is generally accurate.

And yes, it could happen here.

Andrew Bolt:

“We’re coming to muzzle you…!”

Christopher Hitchens on the latest move in the United Nations to criminalise free speech – when applied in criticism of certain beliefs:

Islam affirms itself as the last and final revelation of God’s word, the consummation of all the mere glimpses of the truth vouchsafed to all the foregoing faiths… And it is the so-called mainstream Muslims, grouped in the Organisation of the Islamic Conference, who are now demanding through the UN that Islam not only be allowed to make such absolutist claims, but that it be officially shielded from any criticism as a result…

(T)he non-binding UN Resolution 62/154, on “combating defamation of religions”, seeks to extend protection not to humans but to opinions and to ideas, granting only the latter immunity from being “offended”…

For example, paragraph five “expresses its deep concern that Islam is frequently and wrongly associated with human rights violations and terrorism”…

You see how the trick is pulled? In the same weeks this resolution comes up for its annual renewal at the UN, its chief sponsor-government (Pakistan) makes an agreement with the local Taliban forces to close girls’ schools in the Swat Valley region (a mere 150km or so from the capital in Islamabad) and subject the inhabitants to sharia law. And this capitulation comes in direct response to a campaign of horrific violence and intimidation, including public beheadings.

Yet the religion of those who carry out the campaign is not to be mentioned, lest it “associate” that faith with human rights violations or terrorism.

                            

THE Muslim religion makes unusually large claims for itself. All religions do this, of course, in that they claim to know and to be able to interpret the wishes of a supreme being.

But Islam affirms itself as the last and final revelation of God’s word, the consummation of all the mere glimpses of the truth vouchsafed to all the foregoing faiths, available by way of the unimprovable, immaculate text of “the recitation”, or Koran.

If there sometimes seems to be something implicitly absolutist or even totalitarian in such claims, it may result not from a fundamentalist reading of the holy book but from the religion itself.

Continue reading Hitchens and the Push to Criminalize Criticism of Islam

UK jihadist Anjem Choudary explains how Islam will take over the UK

Anjem Choudary has been featured here many times. This good Muslim, who is also a lawyer, cannot be accused of misunderstanding his religion. In a country where Geert Wilders is banned, this animal openly  preaches the overthrow of the government and incites hatred and mass-murder. Chaudary is a free man, politicians like Gordon Brown, Jacqui Smith and Jack Straw try to ignore his existence.

                                     *****

The unholy past of the Muslim cleric demanding the Pope’s execution

 
                                  

Choudary: Refuses to discuss his dissolute youth

Continue reading UK jihadist Anjem Choudary explains how Islam will take over the UK

Geert Wilders interviewed: Islam and freedom of speech

Jeff Jacoby interviews Geert Wilders: “Islam and freedom of speech” in the Boston Globe, March 8 (thanks to Andy Bostom, via JW):

                                        

Q: You’ve said that England today is more Chamberlain than Churchill. Explain what you mean.A: Well, Chamberlain was the biggest appeaser to a totalitarian ideology called fascism. Now we face the threat of another totalitarian ideology called Islam, at least according to me. And instead of defending our freedom, defending our values, when I was invited a few weeks ago to show “Fitna” in the House of Lords, they denied me entry to the United Kingdom.

Continue reading Geert Wilders interviewed: Islam and freedom of speech

About Time: German MP calls for Durban II boycott

benjamin weinthal, jpost correspondent in berlin , THE JERUSALEM POST

Pressure is rising on Germany’s Social Democrat-controlled Foreign Ministry to walk away from the so-called Durban II meeting – the UN’s World Conference Against Racism – which opens in Geneva on April 20.

When asked about Rome’s decision to pull out of Durban II because, as Italian Foreign Minister Franco Frattini said, the preparatory document and negotiations are filled with “aggressive and anti-Semitic statements,” a German Foreign Ministry spokeswoman told The Jerusalem Poston Friday that Germany had not changed its position and would participate in “the text negotiations.”

Germany remained undecided on whether it would take part in Durban II itself, the spokeswoman said.

“Germany must boycott this anti-Semitic and anti-Western spectacle. Either together with its EU partners, or if necessary alone. We are not the fig leaf for Iran’s Islamist and anti-Semitic activities,” Christian Democratic Union MP Kristina Köhler said in a statement on Wednesday.

Continue reading About Time: German MP calls for Durban II boycott

Tundra Tabloids Photoshop of the Week

Whining Arab Alert: Qatar is Dissapointed With ICC’s Warrant For Sudan’s Mass Murdering President……!

But President Hassan al-Bashir is a Muslim!
Whaaaaaaaaa

Photoshop of the week          

            

I first got wind of the Muslim world being insulted by the ICC decision at Jihad Watch, and then after looking around, I find out that Qataris are as disappointed with the ICC’s decision as the Iranians are!

Qatar disappointed at ICC ruling against Sudanese President

DOHA, March 5 (KUNA) — The State of Qatar voiced on Thursday “deep regret” over the arrest warrant issued by the International Criminal Court (ICC) for Sudanese President Omar Hassan al-Bashir on Wednesday.”The ICC arrest warrant is by no means conducive to security and stability in Darfur region, west Sudan,” Qatar News Agency (QNA) quoted a Foreign Ministry official as saying.”The move could only hamper the Qatari efforts aiming to stabilize the troubled region in cooperation with the Arab League, the United Nations and the African Union.

Switzerland Federal Council Decides in Favor of Minarets

                            

The trouble with this decision is that once again politicians ride roughshod over the concerns of  115 000  citizens who signed this petition against minarets. What is more disturbing is that once again  “Human Rights” are invoked and used to further the Islamization of the the Dar al Harb. There is no reciprocity in Islamic countries, where our concept of human rights is derided and replaced by the sharia, which doesn’t respect human rights at all. Some Islamic countries are signatories to  human rights agreements, but don’t plan to abide by them anytime soon.

The popular initiative against the construction of minarets has been submitted in accordance with the applicable regulations, but infringes guaranteed international human rights and contradicts the core values of the Swiss Federal Constitution. On 27 August 2008, the Swiss Federal Council recommended that the Swiss parliament reject the initiative without making a counter-proposal. If the initiative does not “infringe upon the core human rights that are recognised by all states and must be upheld by all”, in the view of the Federal Council, it is nonetheless irreconcilable with the various human rights that are guaranteed by the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) and by the UN Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (UN Covenant II). It a press release, the Federal Office of Justice explains how the initiative

  • violates religious freedom and the discrimination ban
  • contradicts the core values of the Federal Constitution
  • ineffective in the fight against extremism, and
  • endangers peace between religions; hinders integration

The inititive has been a source of concern and indignation in Switzerland and abroad. The Federal Council acknowledged the initiative on 8 July, 2008, when it was submitted with almost 115’000 signatures, but, in a unusual move, had immediatekly voiced its opposition:  the “Federal Council will naturally be recommending that parliament and the electorate vote against the initiative”.

Continue reading Switzerland Federal Council Decides in Favor of Minarets