General

Sherifa Zuhur complains (again)

7 Comments

Sherifa keeps complaining:

Here an earlier complaint: We got mail from… Sherifa Zuhur!

Sherifa Zuhur Profile

Sherifa, it seems, has been decommissioned from pulling the Islamic wool over the eyes and ears of unsuspecting recruits at the US Army War College.

Sample:   “Hostage Taking is Un-Islamic”

Ironically, in the news today we have another case of un-Islamic behavior:

Muslim militants abduct Swiss national in S. Philippines

A case for Sharifa! Why not go and straighten these misunderstanders  of Islam out,  Sharifa?

This could have been an opportunity to come clean, Sherifa. Why don’t you state clearly that kidnapping and hostage taking is an essential part of Mohammedan warfare, dating back to Muhammad and the 7th century?  Try the truth for once! Wouldn’t that be a better way to get  a job?

Any chance Hezbollah Spy Nada Nadim Prouty (a convicted felon) and her new lawyer, Mark Zaid, are friends of yours Sherifa?

Other links:

Sherifa has been exposed as an enemy agent, a Hizbollah & Hamas supporter. She now claims that  “I had input into curriculum, and my sophisticated students were not damaged by my religious views”– which is doubtful, to say the least.

She also claims victimhood and blames da Jooozzz: “Thanks to his perennial persecution, a sexual harassment complaint which the College refused to acknowledge, pro-Zionist slander like yours and Haaretz’ and the College’s discrimination, I am no longer on the faculty. (Sexual harassment? Really? You crack me up, Sherifa.  I think we can safely wrap that one up….)

Too bad we can’t sympathize with you, Sherifa. Pack up, saddle your camel and ride back to the ME. Hamas needs suicide bombers!

Here, her latest complaint posted on   “Hostage Taking is Un-Islamic”

Submitted on 2010/04/04 at 6:02pm

Sherifa Zuhur
zuhur@earthlink.net

Shaykhyermami. Cease and desist your slander! I don’t condone kidnapping, or violence. I have explained why Muslims are not allowed (religiously) to engage in violence against prisoners in the context of historical examples, see the monograph, Islamic Rulings on War co-authored with Youssef Aboul Enein. There are NO “Muhammadans” as we do not worship Muhammad! Dr. Metz’ is correct that we do not teach “gullible recruits” but he is wrong in suggesting that I did not teach Thanks to his perennial persecution, a sexual harassment complaint which the College refused to acknowledge, pro-Zionist slander like yours and Haaretz’ and the College’s discrimination, I am no longer on the faculty. My duties included research, writing, and teaching “when requested.” It is true that I was not a “course director” – but I did teach for several years in the Middle East Regional Course. I had input into curriculum, and my sophisticated students were not damaged by my religious views. I would have continued teaching but the course director admitted under oath that he was directed to not to allow me to teach, although he thereafter invited me to “guest-teach” twice. On one such occasion, SSI prevented me from lecturing 5 minutes before the lecture; on the second occasion, I gave the lecture w/o incident.

In typical Mohammedan fashion, Sherifa also tries to post under different monikers, like “Steve Metz”, but its not working:

Steve Metz
dr.steve.metz@gmail.com
98.237.42.4

144.99.8.10

Sherifa, when using a  fake name, remember to change the IP address:

Sherifa Zuhur
samrah_eg@yahoo.com
144.99.8.10

7 thoughts on “Sherifa Zuhur complains (again)”

  1. IP Address (click for more detail): 144.99.8.10
    Hostname: webby.carlisle.army.mil
    Country: US
    AS: 1476
    AS Name: ASNBLK1474-1477 – Headquarters, USAISC
    Network: 144.99.0.0/16
    Reports: – none –
    Targets: – none –
    First Reported: N/A
    Most Recent Report: N/A
    Comment: – none –

  3. Mullah does that mean she is still in a military institution?

    Or…is it a he?

  6. The PDF of “ISLAMIC RULINGS ON WARFARE” is available here:

    http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/ssi/islam_warfare.pdf

    A bit on jihad (Page 5)

    Types of Jihad.
    Islamic jurists considered different types of jihad. Certain
    categories might be waged against Muslims as well as non-Muslims.
    • The most permissable form of jihad was that pursued against
    unbelievers or polytheists.
    • Jihad against apostasy. Apostasy is a capital crime in Islam;
    here it could mean that an individual renounced his belief in
    Islam or, as with the tribes who seceded from their alliance
    with the Muslims after the Prophet’s death, it could refer to a
    group of Muslims who denied their faith.
    • Jihad against dissension or sedition. Since Muslims gave an
    oath of allegiance to their leader, none should revolt against
    him.10
    • Jihad against brigands and deserters.
    • Jihad against the Peoples of the Book (ahl al-kitab), Jews,
    Christians, and by some defi nitions, Magians and Sabeans.11
    • Some jurists considered defense of the frontiers (ribat) to be a
    requirement of Muslims comparable to jihad.12

    Their days of waging jihad against Jews and Christians will come to an end. islam is doomed.

  7. More from “ISLAMIC RULINGS ON WARFARE” (page 7)

    [Authorities explain that
    conversion by the sword is not a reasonable expectation; instead the
    acceptance of Islam should be the result of free will.15]

    allah and the false prophet seem to favour the sword, going by megalomaniac verses such as 8:39.

Comments are closed.