Enemy identified. Let the witch-hunt begin!

5 minutes of al Jizz and you know which way the wind blows:

The enemy is of course ….us.

Aftenposten is now reporting him as a counter-jihadist endorsing the views of Fjordman, Robert Spencer, and Bat Yeor.   (This Aftenposten article could not be more Orwellian.)

The Guardian (UK) has become a parody of the so-called liberal left view of Islam as victim by trying to associate the perpetrator of this crime with the EDL and SIOE.

The enemy is the ‘far-right, extremist, anti-multiculturalist, anti-Muslim, anti-immigrant lobby’,   etc, etc. The enemy are the newly emerging ‘powerful far right’ parties, in Holland, Denmark, Finland and Sweden. Oh those dreadful new border-controls in Denmark!   Lets have total Gun control by UN treaty!  Those dreadful guns. Lets disarm the people totally and indoctrinate  all the children in multicultural socialist summer camps, just like the kidz from Utoya island.

Is the Oslo Gunman Really Right-Wing?

The enemy are “Christians” and “Conservatives” – but who added “Christian” and “Conservative” to Norway shooter’s Facebook page yesterday?

 Authorities say he posted comments on Christian fundamentalist websites and held anti-Muslim views. He was also once a member of the youth wing of a rightist party.

Right. “Rightist” and ‘right wing’. 

But wait, there’s more:

 “Europe has seen an overall increase in xenophobia, boosting the ranks of ultranationalists and fueling their activity.”

Bring on the brain-police!

LONDON (AP) — In the wake of Norway’s terrorist attack, the European police agency is setting up a task force of more than 50 experts to help investigate non-Islamist threats in Scandinavian countries,

Who added “Christian” and “Conservative” to Norway shooter’s Facebook page yesterday?

Pamela Geller has noticed an interesting anomaly:

While the leftist and Islamic supremacist ghouls rush to portray Norway mass murderer Anders Behring Breivik as a Christian and even as an anti-jihadist, the unanswered questions multiply. Why did a jihad group take credit for the atrocities, and then retract? And who altered the murderer’s Facebook page? Yesterday, at the time that his name was released, his Facebook page looked like this:

But shortly thereafter, this screenshot started circulating, of an altered Facebook page on which Breivik identified himself as a Christian and a conservative:

Did he have two different Facebook pages, one in Norwegian and one in English, and he only identified himself as a Christian and a conservative on the English one? Or did he pause from his murder spree to add “Christian” and “conservative” to his Facebook profile? Or maybe the whole page is a fake, as has been reportedhere.

But in the case, who faked it, and why? Who is so anxious to portray Breivik as a Christian and conservative? And if this was faked, can we trust any of the material that is now being released about Breivik being anti-jihad?


10 thoughts on “Enemy identified. Let the witch-hunt begin!”

  1. It doesn’t really matter how the crazy, murdering S.O. B. is labelled, either by himself or other people. It has no effect on how dangerous Islam is to countries that value free speech, and democracy. Also, there is no way that the EDL, and SIOE can be blamed for his indiscriminate acts of violence, which appear to have been aimed towards his fellow countrymen, in general, rather than Muslims. After all, he could easily have targetted a mosque, or an area with a high percentage og Muslim residents.

    1. “It doesn’t really matter how the crazy, murdering S.O. B. is labelled,”

      of course it matters. The left and their Islamic herders are trying to use this guy to smear the whole counter-jihad movement.

  2. I had the English one – I thought it strange that a Norwegian would post in English unless Facebook was English-only. The Norwegian version looks more plausible.

  3. In allegedly his, 1 500 pages manifesto under the name Andrew Berwick, which he updated as late as two and a half hours before the blast, he explains, that as a hip-hop graffiti teenager he was one of those Norwegians protected by the local muslim gangs in Oslo, which he describes as “jihadist racist” gangs.

    He also explains how, becoming aggressive and with increased testosterone levels, taking drugs helps him stay cold, and in control.


  4. I realize that the initial response from Christians as well as right groups is to completely divorce themselves from this individual…and they may be totally right in doing so.

    Yet, if his claim to be a Christian and a conservative is true… as anyone can objectively determine, then how do we make sense of this sad tragedy?

    Certainly the act was not a Christian one, nor one of a conservative bent…but of a person whose moral compass was compromised by the pressures and the polarization of a society.

    A society led by politicians who are bent on pursuing an agenda that alienates their own population, continuing their political dynasties in order to foster their cynical views that are indifferent to the undermining of the rule of law, respecting “cultural” and foreign ideologies and as a consequence directly responsible for creating vigilantism of all kinds and interpretations(not just of indigenous bent, but especially of that kind from foreigners imposing their own rule of law in no go zones…etc.).

    This ought to be addressed as an issue that is complement to the types of politics that have completely changed the demographic landscape of many major cities in Europe….

    The consequence is that more tragedies like these will occur as more twisted and warped people begin to come out of the “woodwork” …of a society that has had its moral compass compromised. Yet, these very people are still responsible for their own actions, and must be held accountable for the tragedies that they perpetrate in our midst.

  5. I agree with Steiner’s lest email, particularly the fourth and fifth paragraphs. This is what initiated the whole tragedy, and it is likely more will follow. It was amazing to listen to at least one of survivors who keep on repeating the left wing mantras – the fool did not understand that he was partly responsible for what happened. While the perpetrator is the guilty party, others are not blameless and it will be interesting to see if Norwegians have the intellects and courage to ask the right questions.

Comments are closed.