Breeding For Jihad

Al BeBeeCeera

The UK’s first female Asian peer has used a debate in the Lords to criticise Pakistani and Bangladeshi families for having too many children.

 The dishonesty and deliberate obfuscation by the beep is remarkable.  ‘Asian’ normally stands for Muslims, but here they conflate the two in order to deflect from the fact that the problem lies with overbreeding Muslims.

Baroness Flather suggested people in some minority communities had a large number of children in order to be able to claim more benefits. (Flather herself calls herself a secularist from an accomplished Hindu family.)

The peer, born in Lahore before the partition of India, said the issue did not apply to families of Indian origin.

The cross-bencher said benefit cuts could help to discourage extra births.

Baroness Flather, speaking during a debate on the government’s welfare changes, said: “The minority communities in this country, particularly the Pakistanis and the Bangladeshis have a very large number of children and the attraction is the large number of benefits that follow the child.

“Nobody likes to accept that, nobody likes to talk about it because it is supposed to be very politically incorrect.”

“Indians have fallen into the pattern here. They do not have large families because they are like the Jews of old”

Baroness Flather

The 67-year-old said that immigrant families must stop having lots of children “as a means of improving the amount of money they receive or getting a bigger house.”

Indians ‘different’

The former Tory peer also claimed Indian families had a different mentality to Pakistani and Bangladeshi communities in the UK.

“Indians have fallen into the pattern here,” she told peers. “They do not have large families because they are like the Jews of old. They want their children to be educated.

Obviously she means  Hindus & Christians, the problem lies with Muslims who breed for jihad and domination.

“This is the other problem – there is no emphasis on education in the Pakistani and Bangladeshi families.”

Baroness Flather called for a gradual reduction in benefits in order to discourage large families and suggested payments should be reduced after a couple’s first two children.

She said: “I really feel that for the first two children there should be a full raft of benefits, for the third child three-quarters and for the fourth child a half.”

Baroness Flather’s comments were not well-received by Labour work and pensions spokesman Lord McKenzie.

Concluding the argument for the opposition, he told the Lords: “I had not expected the treatise on the family sizes of the Pakistani and Bangladeshi communities and hope I don’t again.”

The UK has a “Welfare Reform Minister” who doesn’t like reform:

Welfare reform minister Lord Freud, replying to the debate, did not refer to Lady Flather’s comments.

The Welfare Reform Bill is the biggest shake-up of the benefits system for 60 years.

A universal payment to replace income-related work-based benefits, such as child tax credit, is planned, as are stricter rules for people losing their benefits if they refuse a job. (Continue reading the main story)

5 thoughts on “Breeding For Jihad”

  1. She called for a “gradual reduction in benefits” I’d call for an immediate end to benefits for all immigrants. Let a 10 year period pass,if they can speak the language, obey the laws, and have paid into the system, then,and only then, can they access the welfare state. In the meantime they must pay for any medical services, educational needs, and make a contribution towards the infrastructure i.e. law and order etc. 3rd world immigration would slow to a trickle overnight, only self sufficient ones would arrive.

  2. – We’re moving to Sweden to avoid the language test in Denmark

    The stricter immigration politics in Denmark makes couple go for Sweden. But he’s Danish, returning to Denmark with his Cuban loved one.

    In Norway, a Norwegian maths professor returning to Norway after several years in Singapore, has respectively problems entering his native country with his Chinese wife and two children.

    What is going on here?

    Denmark and Norway prefer illiterate “asylum seekers” to natives?

    Will Denmark, after all, turn to a less strict immigration politics after tonight’s election? The red block is likely to win.

  3. Baroness Blather got herself into a lather over shit. I know loads of white people who have nevered paid in more than they get out of the system but she makes no mention of them. Yes cap Benefits and screw it down tight and then see how much it costs to take these children into care for surely that is where the whole thing will end up. And one day when you need help it will not be there and it will be your turn to sleep under the stars

Comments are closed.