Imam Soharwardy Meltdown: Honor Killings are done by tiny minority of excremists, nothing to do with Islam….

Thanks to BCF:

Shafia Honour Killings: Syed Soharwardy & The Social Worker Shill For Islam

Soharwardi gets caught in a lie, he states he has never called for the implementation of Sharia Law in Canada. This Calgary Herald article says otherwise:

Imam undercuts himself by twisting his own words

“While preparing for the meeting, a quick search on Canwest’s library system showed a Jan. 17, 2004, column written by the cleric.  In it, he wrote:

“Sharia cannot be customized for specific countries. These universal, divine laws are for all people of all countries for all times.” In the same column he also boasts: “I am one of the founding members of the Islamic Institute of Civil Justice. The mandate of the institute is to resolve disputes within existing Canadian laws by using the principles of conflict resolution from Islamic Law, or sharia.”

His column is clear. He wanted to bring sharia to Canada and even helped found the organization that spearheaded the drive to do so.”


Syed Soharwardy: “I am from Pakistan”

Raj Sharma: “I’m sorry to hear that”

The Social Worker, Shenny Karmali,  is dead loss.

Shenny “thinks” this and that, she thinks, but she doesn’t know. She declares that the Shafia murders aren’t Honour Killings because Daddy “killed all three daughters”. Hogwash.

If you  can’t speak from knowledge, you should keep your trap shut, Shenny. Leave some for Woopi, she can blow it out of both ends.

Moonbats who  imagine they can replace knowledge with “I think”  have caused the mess we are in. Soharwardy is a nasty piece of work, of course. He would rather swallow his tongue than tell the truth. But here it is, for all to see:

A manual of Islamic law certified as a reliable guide to Sunni orthodoxy by Al-Azhar University, the most respected authority in Sunni Islam, says that “retaliation is obligatory against anyone who kills a human being purely intentionally and without right.” However, “not subject to retaliation” is “a father or mother (or their fathers or mothers) for killing their offspring, or offspring’s offspring.” (‘Umdat al-Salik o1.1-2). In other words, someone who kills his child incurs no legal penalty under Islamic law.

Here’s more:

Honor killing is as Islamic as FGM, death for apostasy and jihad.

That’s why  Muslims do it, and that’s why we must act against it.

6 thoughts on “Imam Soharwardy Meltdown: Honor Killings are done by tiny minority of excremists, nothing to do with Islam….”

  1. Shenny Karmali

    (Shari’ah law) “The following are not subject to retaliation” and then lists — after the lovely, egalitarian “Muslim for killing a non-Muslim” (9:5) and “Jewish or Christian subject (9:29)
    … for killing an apostate” (4:89)
    — “(4) a father or mother (or their fathers or mothers)
    for killing their offspring, or offspring’s offspring”

  2. Why didn’t any of the speakers challenge Imam Soharwardy’s statement that he informed muslims that since Canada was not a shariah run country honour violence was against the law?

    Surely he should have been asked why he didn’t just tell them that domestic violence was wrong altogether? Ok, so we all know why he didn’t, but it would have made the statement that people watching the show maybe did not know.

  3. Lies, lies and more lies.
    Defenders and apologists for Islam…the push for sharia in all western countries will continue non-stop.
    We must ban sharia law and all foreign laws in our country. When in Rome do as the Romans do…
    When in Canada, abide by our laws or will kick your f*cking ass back to the medievel country where you can practise your sharia to your heart’s content.

  4. A Mohammad case for honor killing…apostasy: “If anyone contradicts or opposes the Messenger after guidance has been conveyed to him, and follows a path other than the way, We shall burn him in Hell!” Qur’an 4:115

Comments are closed.